return to table of content

East Germany invented 'unbreakable' drinking glasses

veltas
69 replies
1d6h

In the UK, and I suspect elsewhere, pub glasses are manufactured to indicate their age as they're meant to be replaced regularly. Often in pubs you can see they've far outlived their proper life, if you know what to look for, and are covered in etches from repeated washes. Clearly glasses last a long time, I don't think smashing is the kind of issue they're making it out to be.

These hardened glasses are sharper when they smash. They tend to smash after a few drops, but more drops than normal glasses.

They solve a historical problem from East Germany: lack of resources to make glass, which is no longer a problem. Normal glasses are recyclable. EDIT: No apparently they are not, so maybe that's useful?

Rinzler89
44 replies
1d6h

>pub glasses are manufactured to indicate their age

Why? This just sounds like planned obsolescence.

>as they're meant to be replaced regularly

Why? Is it a real hygrine problem or something?

jdietrich
19 replies
1d5h

It's a quality issue. Beer served in a new, spotlessly clean glass will have a distinct foamy head on top of clear liquid. If the glass is dirty or scuffed, bubbles will rapidly form on the sides of the glass, which seriously affects the quality of the beer. The head will be thin and uneven, the liquid will look murky and the beer will taste flat.

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/2971/0116/files/dirty_beer...

This isn't meant to be a nationalistic point, but America has a relatively undeveloped beer culture; beer is often kept and served very poorly and drinkers rarely notice. British, Belgian or German drinkers will notice, complain and tell all their friends if you aren't serving beer properly.

javaunsafe2019
5 replies
1d4h

German here: as if! No one except a few nerds would notice in real life.

lb1lf
3 replies
23h35m

Those nerds tend to be quite vocal about it, though!

(I count myself amongst them, despite only being 3/32 German...)

g15jv2dp
1 replies
13h50m

3/32 German

What is this even supposed to mean?

lb1lf
0 replies
12h4m

Nothing more complex than three great-great-grandparents being German. (Oh, and it was meant as a joke - I definitely don't think of myself as part German!)

Rinzler89
0 replies
10h29m

>Those nerds tend to be quite vocal about it, though!

Where are they loud? I never hear people in the pub/bar shout "My glass has micro-scratches, this is undrinkable!".

aardvarkr
0 replies
1d4h

And that’s why I love HN!

Rinzler89
5 replies
1d4h

>British, Belgian or German drinkers will notice, complain and tell all their friends if you aren't serving beer properly.

Yeah, no, that's an American PoV/meme to think all those nationalities somehow are fickle about the glass of the beer when in reality most of them wouldn't even notice in real life. Beer drinking is a causal activity there, not a sommelier activity where every detail is scrutinized.

You go to the park and it's full of Germans drinking beer out damn aluminum cans. Most bars are so dark and loud and people so drunk, the last thing they care about is if their beer glass is pitch perfect.

People do care about the quality of the beer, but the quality of the glass, not so much.

jdietrich
2 replies
1d3h

There are bad pubs and indifferent drinkers anywhere, but there's also a very large and long-standing market for quality beer and vast numbers of publicans who serve great beer without any fanfare. The Campaign for Real Ale has 150,000 dues-paying members. Sitting in an 18th century pub and drinking beer that was brewed within walking distance is a largely unremarkable experience in the UK.

It isn't a matter of being a connoisseur's fetish, but about the basic standards expected by a large bulk of drinkers. "Craft beer" is a fairly novel and niche product in the US, but even Wetherspoons - a huge chain known for selling very cheap beer - serves a wide range of (often local) real ale in most of their pubs. Many thousands of British pubs are members of Cask Marque, a voluntary accreditation scheme that requires regular inspections of their cellar-keeping and the quality of their beer. America has a burgeoning beer culture, but much of the country is still a beer desert where the only widely available beers are pasteurised lagers. The effects of prohibition are still being felt today, because it takes generations to develop a proper beer culture.

https://camra.org.uk/

https://cask-marque.co.uk/

tristor
0 replies
1d3h

America has a burgeoning beer culture, but much of the country is still a beer desert where the only widely available beers are pasteurised lagers.

This would have been true decades ago. It hasn't been true anytime recently, even more than a decade ago. At this point, craft beer is available bottled and canned in the typical supermarket and even gas station/convenience store in the US, even dive bars have at least one tap for craft beer or at least some bottles (although it is likely not going to serve it in high quality glassware), and craft beer makes up more than a quarter of the total dollars sold in the US beer market and nearly 15% of the volume.

You say this, but at the same time, the most popular beers drunk in every European country are pasteurised lagers as well. In fact, lagers are popular /all over the world/ for the same reason: They are light, easy to drink, cheap to produce and buy, and refreshing when served cold in hot weather.

I've been in plenty of historic pubs in the UK that were unfortunately acquired and ruined by Wetherspoons. A Wetherspoons is in no way any better than the average dive bar in the US, except that in the US it is commonplace for a bar to serve only alcohol and no food, where in the UK pubs are generally expected to have food.

account42
0 replies
1d3h

Maybe what you are saying is true in the UK, but gp is right for Germany - I don't know anyone here who would complain about the glass their beer was served in.

Also, most of what counts as craft beer in the US wouldn't even legally pass as beer here.

panick21_
1 replies
1d4h

Beer drinking being casual isn't a counter argument. Even if its a minority, there are a lots of beer 'nerds' who take drinking beer seriously. And those are usually the people who have some amount of influence threw various mechanisms.

As a Guinness fan I gladly go to a pub that does it correctly, compared to one that doesn't.

So the idea that there is a business impact to having lower quality experience even visiaul can not just be ignored by saying 'drinking is causal'.

As a pub you have to try to offer something that you can't get from aluminum cans in the park.

lo_zamoyski
0 replies
1d3h

I suspect the controversial proposition, whether intended or not, is that everyone in countries with a notable beer tradition is a snob who will refuse to drink anything but the best served according to the most exacting standards.

Clearly, this is false, and it is enough to visit such a country or look at beer sales to know that this is the case.

At the same time, I will agree that the average beer and what is considered "drinkable" in probably any European country is significantly better than the swill that passes as average in the US.

walthamstow
2 replies
1d4h

Correct. Beer is the one item in Britain that is acceptable to send back. My pet peeve is beer served in a glass that is still warm from the dishwasher.

Food, god no, wouldn't want to cause a fuss. Uncooked chicken? I'll just push it to the side and eat the rest.

gspencley
1 replies
1d3h

Uncooked chicken? I'll just push it to the side and eat the rest.

Really? You're not just being facetious?

I NEVER send food back if I just don't like it. If it's under-seasoned or not up to my standards, no big deal. I'll go elsewhere next time.

But if it's a food safety issue, or if I order something pricey and it's missing a key ingredient (they don't have to take it back in that case, just bring that ingredient to the table and we're good). I mean, if you paid for it and you can't eat it because it's unsafe or you didn't get what you paid for ... that should be totally understandable and expected that it gets sent back. I've worked in food service and while I would never spit on anyone's food no matter how much of a dick they are, I wouldn't even feel the temptation if it was a legit kitchen screw-up.

walthamstow
0 replies
1d2h

No my friend it was just a joke about British manners

ginko
2 replies
1d4h

It's a quality issue. Beer served in a new, spotlessly clean glass will have a distinct foamy head on top of clear liquid.

I thought Brits hate head on beer.

jdietrich
0 replies
1d3h

No, they just hate excessive head that is inappropriate to the beer. Some amount of head is essential to properly release the aroma of beer. A traditional cask ale is hand-pumped and served without additional gas, so it will tend to have a smaller head than a beer that has added gas. No more than 5% of the glass should be filled with head. Many pubs use glasses with a marked fill line, allowing for space for a head while still providing a full measure of liquid.

Northern drinkers traditionally prefer a thicker, creamier head and used beer pumps with a "sparkler" nozzle to provide this, while southern drinkers typically preferred very little head; this historic divide is starting to soften in recent years.

Some European beer styles are properly served with a bigger and frothier head, particularly wheat beers and pilsners.

tristor
0 replies
1d3h

This isn't meant to be a nationalistic point, but America has a relatively undeveloped beer culture; beer is often kept and served very poorly and drinkers rarely notice.

You are extremely incorrect on this point. I think this is true if you think of your typical dive bar in the US, but this is more a /cost/ point than a point of the beer culture. Dive bars are not expected to be good, just cheap. The best beers in the world of every style (except Belgian beers) are in made in the US. The US revived craft brewing and spread it around the world, and brought craft brewing to parts of the world that never had any serious beer culture. American beer is /far/ far more than light beers shotgunned out of a can in the parking lot during a college football game.

There are numerous craft bars in the US that take the quality of their pours, including the quality of the glassware very seriously. The US helped to pioneer the certification process for serving beer, modeled after that for wine. The BJCP was founded in 1985 in Colorado, as an offshoot of the American Homebrewer's Association, and the Cicerone Certification program was founded 25 years ago in the US as well. The US has done a significant amount, not just for itself, but for the world, to establish high standards of excellence for the making of beer and the serving of beer.

I say this as someone who is an expert on beer. I have traveled to more than 70 countries, in part specifically to drink beer. I have brewed beer for more than 20 years. I have judged beer competitions. I am a certified cicerone. I have drank more than ten thousand unique beers and been to more than 2500 breweries in my life. It is completely ignorant (and a nationalistic ignorance) to say that the US has a poor beer culture. This might have been true in the 1970s, it is not true today, and it hasn't been true for decades.

scott_w
16 replies
1d6h

It's likely the washing process still scratches the glass but it's less visible. It doesn't increase the "safe" life of the glass, as bacteria is still able to get into those scratches.

Making the scratches obvious makes clear to the pub landlord that they need to be replaced (and tips patrons off so they'll put pressure on the landlord by not coming back).

Rinzler89
9 replies
1d6h

>It's likely the washing process still scratches the glass but it's less visible. It doesn't increase the "safe" life of the glass, as bacteria is still able to get into those scratches.

Honestly, I've never heard of this before and I have friends working in the restaurant industry. Is it a real documented health hazard or a FUD spread by the glass manufacturers to create perpetual demand for their product (Glass As A Service)?

My grandma still uses the same glassware from like 30+ years ago and washes it by hand and it doesn't look tarnished at all. Is she and our family likely to die from drinking from those old glassware with micro scratches?

scott_w
8 replies
1d5h

and washes it by hand

That's the key part here. Pubs use commercial dishwashers which effectively shot blast your dishes and glasses. There's a reason you can see "Not dishwasher safe" on certain items: because it'll blast off the nice patterns. I know because I've done it by accident.

sfn42
3 replies
1d4h

Not sure what shot blast means, but as far as I know dishwashing machines just spray hot water and detergent on everything.

I guess that could cause abrasion if there's hard and sharp particles in the water, but I'm not sure what could cause those. Maybe if glass breaks during washing, but I'd assume the machine filters the water before reusing it.

scott_w
2 replies
1d4h

as far as I know dishwashing machines just spray hot water and detergent on everything

There's a couple of sources:

- The dishwasher tablets have a mildly abrasive substance

- The water itself (especially in the UK) can carry abrasive substances from the pipes

ThePowerOfFuet
1 replies
1d3h

If it was in the pipes, handwashing would do it too.

Dishwasher detergent does not contain abrasive substances; dissolve a teaspoon of it in a glass of hot water and see for yourself.

scott_w
0 replies
21h35m

I’m not convinced because I can run pellets over a surface by hand and not scratch it, yet a shot blast will strip paint off easily.

Same substances with different processes produce different results.

Rinzler89
3 replies
1d4h

> There's a reason you can see "Not dishwasher safe" on certain items:

I've nerve seen it on glassware though. That warning is usually for plastics since they melt at hot dishwasher water, and on certain metal cook-ware where the caustic dishwasher detergent will corrode the metal anodization, but glass is usually resistant to both temperature and caustic detergents, which is why it's used in bio labs for storing and mixing harsh chemicals, granted, different composition of glass, but it's still glass not adamantium.

So this point doesn't scan for me.

scott_w
2 replies
1d4h

I've nerve seen it on glassware though.

No but the process that strips the paint off delicate crockery is self-evidently abrasive, which stands to reason when you look at the scratch marks in glass that has been through too many cycles.

It's not on glass because an individual washing won't destroy it but repeated washing eventually scratches the glassware to hell. I've seen it with my own eyes.

seszett
1 replies
21h5m

self-evidently abrasive, which stands to reason when you look at the scratch marks in glass that has been through too many cycles.

Marks on glass are not due to abrasion, they appear because glass is slightly soluble in alkaline water, which is the case in dishwashers. Porcelain and stainless steel do not get scratched by dishwashers for example.

scott_w
0 replies
12h36m

Thanks for the explanation! I guess this means there’s no way to make even “unbreakable” glasses to not mark?

infecto
2 replies
1d5h

I will be honest that sounds doubtful with at least the contraptions and process used in America. I guess its possible if you are just hand washing the glass?

scott_w
1 replies
1d4h

I don't know what American bars use but the use of the term "pub" marks this out as a UK thing. I recall going to social clubs and other, cheaper, drinking establishments and seeing grotty glasses.

I know for a fact they use dishwashers (I've seen them) and that dishwashers scratch the hell out of your glasses (I've seen that too). Handwashing simply doesn't do this. Dishwashers work by, effectively, shot-blasting your dishes and glasses so I can see the mechanism by which your glassware will get scratched. I don't see how this happens when you're handwashing with Fairy liquid and a soft sponge.

infecto
0 replies
16h43m

My point being that the sani-wash that most all pubs/bars/clubs use would eliminate any bacteria hidden in scratches. Hence my caveat that I know America best and perhaps that is not the standard in other countries. A UK pub might not use these traditionally which may introduce sub-par cleaning.

Thank you for the explanation but already knew it, just going towards the part where commercial washers are less "soap" and more sani-solution.

eru
2 replies
1d5h

Why would a pub landlord buy these glasses?

scott_w
1 replies
1d5h

If a brewery is providing them, why would they let the glasses get into a state that their drinks look like shit in them?

eru
0 replies
15h34m

Oh, if they get the glasses for cheap or free from the brewery, that makes sense.

BoxOfRain
4 replies
1d6h

Some pint glasses designed for lager are made with nucleation sites for the bubbles at the bottom, over time these wear out and make your pint of lager look 'dead' compared to a fresh glass. This is less of an issue with ales and other less carbonated drinks though.

ch4s3
2 replies
1d5h

Some pint glasses designed for lager are made with nucleation sites

They really shouldn't be, forcing CO2 out of suspension is exactly what you don't want. It causes the beer to become flat more quickly. This is why good beer bars use a glass washer right before serving, to remove any small particles that may end up in the glass and cause nucleation.

walthamstow
1 replies
1d4h

More quickly, like how quickly? Most pints are drunk within about 45 mins of pouring

ch4s3
0 replies
1d3h

You'll notice a difference right away, because the escaping CO2 breaks the head on the beer, which is exactly the opposite of what you want on a pilsner. As for going flat, I'd have to root around on Brulosophy later I think they did a test on this.

consp
0 replies
1d5h

My experience is either the wrong soap or unclean water leaves a residue on the glass killing any beer. It likely also fills these nucleation sites.

mschuster91
0 replies
1d2h

Why? This just sounds like planned obsolescence.

It's a requirement of the volume calibration - beer glasses used for commercial purposes are classified as certified measurement devices under EU law, you have to print on the glass the year in which the required stamp got affixed [1]. This serves to provide the customer with a way to check if they're being sold the correct amount of beer.

Fun fact, this was a massive issue for stone mugs and led to a lot of confusion when the regulation became enforced [2].

[1] https://www.agme.de/?qs_servlet=downloadIxServlet&rq_RecId=3...

[2] https://germany.representation.ec.europa.eu/news/klarstellun...

Steve44
0 replies
10h15m

I've posted a fuller reply, but they year on the M stamp is about certification of the tooling used to make the glass. This can be updated annually and so does give a decent indication of year of manufacture, but it is there as part of the Weights & Measures legislation and not about obsolescence / "use by" etc

agurk
10 replies
1d6h

Normal glasses are recyclable

Is this the case in reality? Everywhere I've lived drinking glasses were not accepted as part of domestic glass recycling due to their composition [0]

Perhaps there is a commercial recycling route for pubs though? A quick google didn't turn anything up.

[0] https://www.friendsofglass.com/ecology/what-glass-can-you-re...

veltas
5 replies
1d5h

I take that back then. Would these hardened glasses be recyclable though?

defrost
4 replies
1d5h

"Yes"

From a glass making point of view you don't want them messing with expansion coefficients and bulk properties so they're off the table there - it's a waste of energy to reheat them up to ~ 1,000 C.

But you do end up with large volumes of glass .. a relatively consistant material, you might want to crush and tumble that (to take the sharp edges away) and use that sized grit | frit as driveway material, as additive to concrete where structurally sound, as fish tank "sand", etc.

toxik
3 replies
1d4h

IIRC concrete aggregate should be jagged so that it interlocks with itself. You actually can't just use any old sand, you need sharp sand, which is an increasingly scarce resource.

inglor_cz
1 replies
1d3h

"you need sharp sand"

Hmm, practical concerns about acquisition aside, would lunar dust work?

defrost
0 replies
1d4h

My bad .. mentally insert more commas and juggle the clauses :-)

The tumbling was only meant to be applied to application requiring rounded grit, you're correct that concrete and other uses might prefer jagged.

brewdad
1 replies
23h54m

I assumed my city wouldn't accept drinking glasses due to safety issues. The assumption being that the most likely case someone would recycle a drinking glass is after breaking it and they don't want their workers getting cut. Turns out it isn't really compatible with recycling beer and wine bottles.

Mashimo
0 replies
6h12m

The assumption being that the most likely case someone would recycle a drinking glass is after breaking it and they don't want their workers getting cut.

All the places I know (Denmark/Germany) the glass you want to recycles is getting dumped in containers where it breaks most of the time when you toss it in.

jnurmine
0 replies
1d1h

Interesting!

The recycling containers here have separate containers for clear glass and coloured glass and I've always thought glass is glass.

Now I checked in detail what is accepted, and sure enough, drinking glasses and mirrors are specifically disallowed.

consp
0 replies
1d5h

AFAIK (but may be massively wrong) is that most clear glasses have many composition types and don't mix well and the industrial brown/green is all the same.

yoavm
2 replies
1d6h

I don't think smashing is the kind of issue they're making it out to be.

I never ran a restaurant but Googling around it seems like bars replace around 100% of the glasses annually due to breaking. That sounds like a lot...

Normal glasses are recyclable

I've never seen anyone collecting broken glass and putting it in a special glass-bin. The glass bin we have in Amsterdam isn't one that you can even push broken glass into if you wanted - it's shaped specifically to receive bottles.

Most resources online hint that the reason this hard glass didn't become successful is because there's a lot of profit to be made by reselling glasses when your old glass breaks.

nerdbert
0 replies
19h46m

The glass bin we have in Amsterdam isn't one that you can even push broken glass into if you wanted - it's shaped specifically to receive bottles.

It wouldn't take large shards of a plate window but it definitely can accept anything with one dimension that doesn't exceed 10cm or so, which is almost all the broken glass we've wanted to put into it.

nemo44x
0 replies
1d3h

I remember reading once that the average Martini glass has a lifespan of 3 uses in a bar environment. Very thin and easy to chip.

grecy
2 replies
1d6h

Normal glasses are recyclable

That may be, but rem ember of the three things you should be doing - Reduce, Reuse, Recycle - Recycling is the worst and should be avoided anytime the other two are doable.

veltas
0 replies
1d5h

As another commenter mentioned, apparently they are not!

eru
0 replies
1d5h

Also recycling glasses might not make much sense.

The raw material for glass making is basically sand, and there's no problem dumping old glasses in a landfill.

So you should only recycle glass, if that's cheaper than making glass from scratch. There's no benefit otherwise.

(And you can still reduce and re-use, of course.)

puzzlingcaptcha
1 replies
1d5h

In any case, glass is chemically inert and eventually breaks down into sand so it's not a huge environmental issue, other than its bulk.

bell-cot
0 replies
1d5h

Most of the environmental issues with glass are on the other end - mining raw materials, refining those, manufacturing, etc.

infecto
1 replies
1d5h

With the small size of the UK it might make it easier to recycle. In larger countries glass might not always be recycled, it might cost more to recycle than to just produce new glass. The transportation cost/impact to lug around heavy glass to be recycled is not worth it.

infecto
0 replies
16h41m

I don't know why this was downvoted but this is absolutely a fact in places like America. You may want to feel all fuzy that you are recycling glass but unless you are geographically near a glass production plant, your glass most likely ends up in the landfill. It does not make economic sense to truck crushed glass around the country, there are not a large number of plants making glass.

wiether
0 replies
1d6h

pub glasses are manufactured to indicate their age

I was first confused by this because here in France we have this popular practice, mainly at the school cafeteria, to look at the bottom of our glass to know how old we are (actually it's the mold number obviously...) and depending of the people, the younger (or the older) gets to fetch water for everyone else during lunch.

https://eu.duralex.com/en/blogs/inspirations/et-toi-tu-as-qu...

prmoustache
0 replies
1d5h

Normal glasses are recyclable.

Recycling is not energy neutral. Far from it.

Clearly glasses last a long time, I don't think smashing is the kind of issue they're making it out to be.

Clearly not. Spend 2 hours in any crowded bar or restaurant and you will hear the sound of glass smashing into pieces.

Steve44
0 replies
10h19m

In the UK, and I suspect elsewhere, pub glasses are manufactured to indicate their age

I think that is a TikTok 'story' which sounds reasonable and is spreading despite it being not true. Yes perhaps the year can be an indication of older glass and perhaps they have more wear, but that is down to use and care rather than just age and not what the year means.

The M mark indicates the year the tooling for that specific glass was certified and marked. Years ago the glasses were manufactured, then tested for capacity, and finally stamped to show they passed.

More recently the manufacturer, this is a major factor for plastic glasses which are moulded, has their process and tooling regularly certified and random samples regularly tested. This means they can be marked during manufacturing rather than an additional process.

This has a good overview of the markings on a UK drinks glass https://advancedmixology.com/blogs/art-of-mixology/what-does...

A bit of legislation from Trading Standards who police it. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/2503/Alcoholic-dr...

A bit of Government legislation about applying the mark. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/applying-a-crown-symbol-to-pint-...

wiether
35 replies
1d6h

The company's history is interesting because in France almost the same thing happened with Duralex, which was near bankruptcy but was bought back by the employees a few weeks back.

And now it's popular again.

Until people forget about it and buy cheap stuff again.

https://www.glass-international.com/news/duralex-employees-t...

khaki54
17 replies
1d4h

Yes Duralex is pretty sweet. They are thicker than normal glasses too. At home went from breaking / chipping a glass a week to maybe 3-4 a year. I have seen Duralex bounce off the tile unscathed many times.

MaxikCZ
16 replies
1d1h

How are you guys living? I dont use any fancy glassware and I break/chip a glass like once in a decade..

nashashmi
4 replies
17h56m

Used to have rubber flooring. Didn’t break any for like 9 years. Moved to ceramic tile. Broke 3-4 glasses and plates a year.

AuryGlenz
3 replies
13h23m

I don’t think I’ve dropped a glass or plate on my slate floor the entire time I’ve lived at my house - 10 years now. I think my wife maybe has once or twice.

Ya’ll are clumsy.

thoroughburro
0 replies
6h20m

Ya’ll are clumsy.

So are you, in the future… if you’re lucky enough to stick around. ;)

nashashmi
0 replies
15m

Tight kitchens and lots of people working rapidly drops lots of stuff.

ido
0 replies
13h6m

How many kids do you have and old are they?

brewdad
3 replies
1d

Taking "Let me just toss these dishes in the dishwasher real quick" literally.

alwa
2 replies
23h57m

I was astonished when I witnessed an acquaintance cycle his dishwasher. He would throw the clean ones out of the dishwasher onto the stone counter, getting air and a loud crashing sound out of each plate and glass, before doing it again into the cabinets. The dirties would rebound off the flexible plastic of the dish rack and smash into one another as he’d throw them in.

This same acquaintance was surprised to learn that my household doesn’t consume an entire roll of toilet paper each and every day.

Amazing what we take for granted about others’ basic habits of living, in life as in tech…

mrexroad
1 replies
22h38m

I’d hate to see how their knives are washed

kmacdough
0 replies
19h15m

Cut a few fresh sponges across the blade, then give the blade a couple bounces off the stone counter to make sure it's got that clean ring to it.

EDIT: but he's skeptical of all the hype around sharp knives. He finds his butter knives work almost as well.

BadgerBloke
1 replies
19h7m

Lively cats and wooden floorboards are a terrible combination as far as glasswear is concerned

foobazgt
0 replies
15h15m

I've lost at least a dozen pieces of glassware exactly this way. :(

vondur
0 replies
1d

Maybe they have hearty toasting of drinks frequently?

tomcam
0 replies
21h0m

Tell me you don't have kids without telling me you don't have kids ;)

tomcam
0 replies
20h59m

P.S. I've been a klutz since before you were born. Apparently it's not something I'll grow out of :(

renewiltord
0 replies
23h57m

I'm just clumsy. Occasionally drop glasses when taking them out of the cupboard. All the ones I've broken are ceramic, though.

khaki54
0 replies
1h21m

I don't break them but I have 5 kids. Perhaps one of the downsides of trusting them with most of the kitchen chores at a young age. It's annoying they have chipped all my favorite coffee cups too.

duckmysick
3 replies
1d1h

Form what I've seen Duralex glasses are (and have been for some time) quite popular in restaurants/food joints.

GuB-42
1 replies
23h38m

They have been particularly popular in French school canteens, which make it a childhood memory for many. I am sure that this nostalgic aspect helped with its renewed popularity.

One notable feature of Duralex glasses is that there is a number on the bottom that can go from 1 to 50. A tradition among schoolchildren is to look at that number, which is said to represent your age. In reality, it is the mold number, used for quality control, but that "age" thing is what most people remember it for.

rx_tx
0 replies
23h52m

I tend to find large "Gigogne" Duralex mixing bowls often in Goodwill/second hand stores in the Bay Area, and I can't resist getting them. They're truly versatile and very sturdy, and they stack very well without getting jammed.

morsch
2 replies
1d6h

I wonder how Duralex compares to Superfest in terms of durability. Duralex is certainly more durable than regular glass, but I have stopped demoing it because it does break sometimes. Our Duralex glasses are also pretty thick, while the Superfest stuff is rather thin.

mdasen
1 replies
1d

They're kinda similar in that they're both tempered glasses - where you create residual compressive stress in the outer part of the glass which makes it stronger. However, there are different ways to temper glass. Superfest (and Gorilla Glass in smartphones) uses an ion-exchange technique where sodium ions on the surface are replaced with larger potassium ions.

I'm guessing that Duralex uses a thermal tempering process where the glass is heated very high and then rapidly cooled to temper it, but I don't know. Maybe Duralex also uses an ion-exchange and it just isn't as good as the Superfest process. Even with smartphone screens, newer techniques from Corning have created much stronger screens than we had 10-15 years ago even though they're all using the same basic ion-exchange technique.

Personally, I love tempered glass even if it might break. They're a lot less likely to break, they're less dangerous if they do break, and they don't really cost that much more. Maybe you'll pay $3/glass for regular soda-lime glasses and $5-6/glass for nice tempered ones, but I bought my tempered glasses a decade ago and still have all of them, despite having moved 3 times (and my packing technique doesn't involve bubble wrap or anything). Maybe Superfest is better, but for my non-restaurant use, tempered glasses like those from Duralex or Bormioli Rocco seem to be good enough.

freeqaz
1 replies
1d4h

Is there a link to buy any of their glass?

wiether
0 replies
1d3h

Their webshop is here : https://www.duralex.com/

There is regional versions depending on where you are located at, available at the top right!

namlem
0 replies
2h59m

Yeah was gonna come in to say French duralex glasses are extremely durable. Though they are thicker than these German ones I think.

gniv
0 replies
3h46m

I had no idea Duralex glasses are special. I bought some from Carrefour because I liked the shape and they were cheap (1€ per glass iirc).

garaetjjte
0 replies
20h50m

I have seen Arcoroc glassware, I guess it's similar? Normally they break into a million pieces, but one plate failed spontaneously with hole falling out the bottom... I think it must have been overheated earlier.

dyauspitr
0 replies
13h14m

Love my duralex picardies. Beautiful, solid glasses.

consp
0 replies
1d5h

Until people forget about it and buy cheap stuff again.

Until they cut themselves on the sharp edges when it breaks. Duralex is safety glass but some people only see "wow many peaces normal glass only breaks into a few".

Proper cuts from Duralex look like you had a hard fall, proper cuts from normal glass require a trip to the hospital for stitches.

Doxin
0 replies
11h36m

I can only heartily recommend duralex. They were the only brand of drinking glasses that'd survive any appreciable amount of time growing up. I've only seen one break once, but I've seen them bounce plenty of times.

Daub
0 replies
14h56m

A similar thing happened in ancient china. Oven proof ceramic was invented but suppressed in order to protect existing industry.

AceJohnny2
0 replies
19h13m

Anecdotally, years ago, it was easier for me to buy Duralex glasses in fancy West Coast US shops (Sur La Table) than anywhere in France.

That said, in France they had a connotation of being cafeteria glasses, so perhaps that affected their perceived worth.

willguest
20 replies
1d6h

The glasses are too good for pure market thinking.

A demonstration that the economy isn't economical at all, when it comes to resources.

vasco
16 replies
1d6h

It's the opposite, it makes no sense to build something forever. You have no clue what people will want or need in the future. If you make a bunch of forever glasses and in 50 years nobody wants to use glass containers anymore (or at least the ones you made), you just wasted a bunch of resources and energy making them last longer than they needed. Specially due to changing "taste" people want to change the items they use frequently.

You can imagine other reasons why we shouldn't make products last forever, it's a huge over-investment of limited resources that could be used in the future for better things. Specially in a planet with limited resources but continuously evolving technology, it is really not good to make forever stuff unless the technological innovation stops. Because you could use the same resources later to do better stuff at the same cost.

What we should do is wherever possible make things repairable and prosecute anyone that intentionally makes something harder to repair (not really applicable to glass, where recycling is the only option).

immibis
8 replies
1d6h

So let's make things that only last a day because you never know what tomorrow will bring.

eru
7 replies
1d5h

Are you familiar with the concept of trade-offs?

malermeister
6 replies
1d5h

Sure. Do you see glassware not being in use at any point in the next 100 years though?

echoangle
5 replies
1d5h

Maybe they current style of glassware. The Superfest glasses already look outdated and retro to me, I wouldn’t want to decide which glasses I use in 50 years now.

robertlagrant
4 replies
1d5h

Fashion is a huge driver of waste.

vasco
3 replies
1d4h

As pointed out in my original comment in the thread. The question is, do you want to moralize and tell people to not behave as they behave, or do you recognize that "fashion" is associated to inherent human traits and design the world to have a good middle ground between doing what people want and not messing up everything super fast. In the end the only way to protect everything is to kill all humans, so if we agree that is not a solution, we should understand that the concept of fashion or changing preferences is not going to go away and not design products forever.

t43562
2 replies
1d3h

We moralize about all sorts of important things like washing hands, putting rubbish in the bin etc.

Fashion benefits from morals - like the idea of showering daily benefits the cosmetics/body care industry. I have a relative in one of the big French companies who saw a huge drop-off in shampoo/bathing products during covid when people were working at home. If we all decided that fresh water was too precious to waste we might materially impact this person's business - so they are eager to convince everyone that it's morally right to wash umpteen times a day.

Similarly clothing is marketed and that marketing works on us.

Other than telling such people to f-off, how do we get out of the negative loop they are only too eager to drive us into?

vasco
1 replies
1d1h

I mean nobody is forcing you to buy anything. I wear shoes that are 5-10 years old often and clothes that are 15 or 20 years old. And for most normal people they look "disheveled", my mom would gasp if she saw it. Yet I've been to work offsites with holes in my 8 year old shoes meeting with C-levels. But whenever I feel like buying something that you think is superfluous I also don't want anyone telling me what to do.

t43562
0 replies
1d

We all accept some telling what to do - like the law, tax and so on. Ideally it's meant to be for the general good.

So if some activity were to be negative for everyone - e.g. if it generated a lot of waste that was hard to handle and caused large unnecessary carbon emissions .... then we could end up needing laws to limit that damage.

jesprenj
3 replies
1d5h

in 50 years nobody wants to use glass containers

yet here we are, 50 years later, still using glass containers and fluorescent tube lamps that break because they are designed to break every two years

echoangle
2 replies
1d5h

Im pretty happy I don’t have to use a fluorescent tube lamp that’s 50 years old, LEDs are much better. I don’t think this is a good counterexample.

t43562
1 replies
1d3h

Don't worry, they're probably working on 2-year LEDs right now.

tristor
0 replies
1d3h

They've already managed that, just buy any of the low-cost LED replacement bulbs in any major store made in bulk in China. They don't put proper heatsinks on the power circuitry driving the LEDs so it eventually fails, especially under conditions of being turned off and then back on again often, like the lights in most rooms in most houses.

silisili
0 replies
1d1h

I realized something similar after working in auto parts for a few years. Not sure about now as I don't really buy them anymore, but at the time there was a clear difference in quality between the cheapest of the cheap and the normal items (reman alternators, brake pads, etc.)

Even though I tried to steer people away from the known questionable quality stuff (for no benefit of my own, not on commission), 95% of people would get it anyways. For the same reason "oh, I'm thinking of selling it soon anyways." And they rarely actually seemed to, based on my memory, but they had that mindset.

Glasses are perhaps more 'timeless', but I could see them not selling well at a premium because of the 'ephemeral' mindset of potential life and style changes.

guappa
0 replies
1d6h

But you can't really repair a glass.

Unbefleckt
0 replies
1d5h

So why doesn't this apply to plastic?

ch4s3
2 replies
1d5h

This is such a weird argument by the guardian. You can simply charge more for more durable products as long as people want your product.

t43562
1 replies
1d3h

That could assume there was a linear realationship between price and demand.

Possibly if you need to charge x% more then your sales might drop off almost entirely as you raised your price to that level.

ch4s3
0 replies
1d3h

Obviously there are a lot of factors. The article points out that the plain East German style glasses were simply seen as uncool. I would also speculate that the company like many others from the GDR were heavily reliant on subsidies and ran rather inefficiently.

torginus
19 replies
1d7h

Here's a video of a guy dropping said unbreakable glass 3 times and breaking it:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/NIAbt_GxPsg

The problem with unbreakable glass is once it hits a really hard material, like a grain of quartz, or a ceramic fragment, it breaks just the same.

Tepix
16 replies
1d7h

It doesn't have to be perfect, as long as it lasts much longer it's already a big win.

ta1243
8 replies
1d6h

Is it? Based on what metric.

If a glass costs €1 and lasts 1 year, and an unbreakable glass costs €10 and lasts 5 years, that's not a big win.

dotancohen
3 replies
1d5h

Not if going out and buying the glasses takes time, or if storing additional spare glasses takes precious space, or cleaning the broken glass takes workers' time, or if the broken glass could be a hazard, or there may be supply issues with getting the same uniform glasses years later, or any other number of reasons.

signatoremo
2 replies
1d4h

Oh the new version of the glasses will be cheaper, more durable, lighter, more energy efficient to make.

The point remains, longer lasting glasses may or may not be superior.

pixelfarmer
0 replies
1d4h

It is all about metrics and how you bend them to whatever you prefer. However, the more this deviates from actual reality, the more likely reality will eventually show up and bust the show in the most horrible way possible.

dotancohen
0 replies
1d4h

You don't know that when making the initial purchase.

xnickb
1 replies
1d4h

The article talks about sustainability, so clearly Euro isn't the unit to measure that.

ta1243
0 replies
21h12m

Ideally the cost would include all externalities and thus allow people to judge the value and bare the full cost.

But kWh, or grammes of glass, or carbon credits, or whatever you want.

Normal glass is very recyclable and doesn't require a lot of energy or resource to recycle. "Long life" glass may well not be recycled at all.

t43562
0 replies
1d3h

The problem is really about who gets the benefit of the longevity - e.g. I feel that with LED lightbulbs etc it is mostly the producer who has soaked up the economic benefit. As a user you think it's going to last longer and then for one reason or another it doesn't - they've worked out how to introduce some unreliability.

Now you're paying 5x more for 1.5x life. etc etc.

Tepix
0 replies
1d4h

Creating glass requires a lot of energy, which should be reflected in its price. Chances are creating a much stronger glass will not be much more expensive than a normal glass.

mytailorisrich
4 replies
1d6h

I suspect that waste produced by broken glasses is so minuscule compared to the overall glass production/waste that this is largely irrelevant.

Edit: Apparently glass cookware and drinking glasses are often not recyclable. This seems like a more important aspect to improve than durability even if, again, still overall a small improvement compared to overall glass industry.

ecjhdnc2025
3 replies
1d5h

Broken glasses in bars, for example, have a lot more impacts than just waste.

Broken glass has to be cleaned up, causes injuries, even causes lost product in some situations.

I was in a cocktail bar once with three friends who ordered us the same chilled cocktail, served there day in, day out, and as the cocktails were poured into the glasses, three of the four glasses broke. Plink, plink, plink.

Glasses too hot, cocktail too cold, some other handling problem. Who knows. But tougher glass might not have done that.

mytailorisrich
2 replies
1d5h

That sounds like clutching at straws while not really showing how that'd make a significant difference to anything.

Make all glasses recyclable. Probably more important but less marketable for a new startup idea...

inglor_cz
0 replies
1d3h

A friend used to work in a student bar as a bartender. Broken glass was legitimately a safety issue. Drunken people can cut themselves quite creatively, including severed sinews.

Ironically, most of his patrons were medical students.

ecjhdnc2025
0 replies
1d5h

I don't think it is "clutching at straws" for a bar to want glasses that break less frequently, causing fewer safety concerns, and to be prepared to pay the extra, but whatever.

cess11
1 replies
1d6h

I have a few glasses with handles from the fifties (or as far back as the twenties, there's no stamp on them) that are quite brittle and will for sure break at the bottom if you pour hot water in them.

Seems to me like they last long enough when taken care of, and in situations where you don't the "unbreakable" glass splinters into a rather nasty dust like material.

actionfromafar
0 replies
1d6h

I like the drinking glasses from hardened glass. When they break, they shatter into a lot of almost cubic pieces, not into little syringe like splinter like regular glass.

forinti
1 replies
1d6h

Short tangential story:

My grandfather many decades ago came home with a pack of "unbreakable" glasses. My grandmother asked why he had bought them. He shrugged and replied "well, if you don't want them..." and threw them all on the floor.

They all broke, of course.

My grandmother was not amused. She was a very serious person. The rest of the family is still laughing on 60 years later.

sumtechguy
0 replies
1d3h

My aunt did that with a corningware plate. "This is unbreakable" then proceeded to yeet it on the concrete floor covered in linoleum. It was quiet an impressive splash of splinters everywhere.

Shatter resistant is a better term. :) Or as Jerryrigeverything says 'glass is glass'.

lukan
14 replies
1d6h

"In the case of the Superfest glass, the anonymity of the makers was also politically desired. The GDR’s regime preached solidarity and unity. The prevailing ideology regarded the collective more highly than the talents and abilities of the individual. Even though Superfest glasses were ubiquitous in every bar, canteen and household in the Soviet satellite state, few people had heard of Paul Bittner, Fritz Keuchel and Tilo Poitz, the design collective who gave them their shape."

Interesting how the article laments, that they did not name the designers, but then happily ignore the names of the actual inventors of the material:

"The groundbreaking technology they deployed was developed in the 1970s at the Department for Glass Structure Research at the Central Institute for Inorganic Chemistry near Dresden. The material scientists there knew that when glass breaks, it is typically due to microscopic cracks in the material’s surface which form during the production process. Dramatically increasing the toughness of the glass surface was possible, they found, by replacing the smaller sodium ions in the glass with electronically charged potassium ions. Potassium ions need more space, pressing harder against neighbouring atoms and building up more tension that needs to be overcome for the microscopic cracks to get bigger"

I believe the technology in itself, is a bit more admirable and rather the people involved mentioning, than those who were using it to shape a glass.

guappa
6 replies
1d6h

I've listened to a (bad) podcast about women scientist and the host went on a rant about how the evil men took away from the real inventor of the fridge, that was a woman, to give it to a man.

I challenge anyone to name the inventor of the fridge. At least in my country it is completely unknown who it was.

LeroyRaz
5 replies
1d5h

I mean, Wikipedia says "the history of artificial refrigeration began when Scottish professor William Cullen [made a fridge]"

But, again (merely sourcing from Wikipedia) the idea of evaporative cooling is ancient.

rvnx
3 replies
1d5h

Ideas and techs are consequences over previous discoveries so it is never a process with a single person.

Even Einstein, it’s the continuity of previous works, etc.

Failures that other did are also saving precious time.

This is why the idea of patents is just absurd.

Everybody should have the right to create anything they want, and the natural selection will do its work on keeping the best implementations alive.

marcosdumay
2 replies
1d4h

This is why the idea of patents is just absurd.

Well, not absurd. The last person on the chain contributed a lot to extending the chain.

But yeah, ridiculously overblown. Patents should be a much lighter thing.

rvnx
0 replies
1d4h

Maybe 5 years or so. Not like music where unrelated people are earning millions on royalties of Ravel’s pieces that they inherited because so far-away relatives were cleaning their living room.

adamc
0 replies
1d1h

What you see there are the workings of power, particularly of large corporations. Not that different from copyright and Disney.

coldtea
0 replies
1d5h

I mean, Wikipedia says

Yes, but the claim was that some kind of fame was stolen from the "real inventor of the fridge" (sic).

And the parent's point is that the one considered the inventor atm (deservingly or not), hardly has any fame to begin with. Sure, he might have a Wikipedia entry, along with OnlyFans creators and every minor character in Star Wars lore. Including non-movie characters.

Frieren
3 replies
1d6h

"Even though Superfest glasses were ubiquitous in every bar, canteen and household in the Soviet satellite state, few people had heard of Paul Bittner, Fritz Keuchel and Tilo Poitz, the design collective who gave them their shape."

I guess that it is in the same way you do not hear about the engineers and designers at Apple, Space X, etc.

I believe the technology in itself, is a bit more admirable and the people involved mentioning, than the mere shaping.

But we hear all the time about CEOs and their opinions, thou. And they are way less interesting that the tech and the engineers that work at their companies.

coldtea
2 replies
1d5h

Yeah, how many designers and inventors of industrial processes, or materials, or techniques or such we know widely in the west?

Never mind that even for those well known to us engineers, regular people couldn't name what they did either, except maybe Edisson, Tesla, Wright Brothers, and a few more. E.g. would even more modern PhD holders know what Watt contributed? Or Lord Kelvin?

People like Gates, Bezos, Musk, and Jobs on the other hand, everybody knows.

indoordin0saur
1 replies
1d4h

Yes, the engineer CEOs like Gates, Musk and Jensen Huang certainly become very well known. Not so much for their engineering prowess (though it is typically great) but for being the symbol of the products they create.

Frieren
0 replies
23h46m

Not so much for their engineering prowess (though it is typically great) but for being the symbol of the products they create.

They are mostly known for being rich. Very very rich. Way better engineers creating way better products are not well known.

"Great engineering" is not the word choice I will go for to describe their legacy.

lukan
0 replies
23h57m

So Siegfried Schelinski, Dieter Patzig, Klaus Heinrich and Bernd Grueger did the main work inventink the "unbreakable" drinking glass. Just for the record.

mannykannot
0 replies
1d5h

Potassium ions need more space, pressing harder against neighbouring atoms and building up more tension that needs to be overcome for the microscopic cracks to get bigger.

I just posted a comment in which I doubt the article's explanation of the physics behind the process: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41180590

numpad0
11 replies
1d6h

This is basically Cold War predecessor to Gorilla Glass. It's not a lost art at all, but just one of first generation products.

chasil
10 replies
1d4h

I wonder why Corning doesn't make these as a boutique or novelty product.

Edit: Could this also be used for window glass?

psunavy03
6 replies
1d3h

Corning already makes Corelle, which are tempered glass plates and bowls. They'll also take a bounce off a tile floor from counter-level and have a good shot at not breaking.

HarryHirsch
4 replies
1d3h

Hasn't Corelle been enshittified as well? It used to be tempered glass with milk glass in the middle, but now it's just milk glass?

seanw444
0 replies
3h21m

enshittified

This fad word can't die soon enough.

psunavy03
0 replies
1d2h

I just got new Corelle about 18 months ago when I redid my kitchen, and don't see any difference between that and the previous stuff I'd bought probably 15 years ago, other than the different pattern.

mohaine
0 replies
14h46m

Yes and no. Some I’ve bought recently is good and some is the name on normal ceramics or glass. It is now buyer beware for sure.

adamc
0 replies
1d1h

I bought a set of Corelle 7 years ago that seems very much like the Corelle I bought 30 years ago. Not convinced it's any worse.

I think dishwashing and/or age does eventually make it more fragile, but it seems fairly durable. I've lost one piece in 7 years.

nimish
0 replies
1d3h

They sold that off decades ago. The brand just hangs around

kragen
1 replies
1d3h

before they sold off the brand to a different company, corning started selling tempered glass as 'pyrex', resulting in a dozen or so hospital visits with disabling burn injuries every year in the usa alone

i'm not sure whether to blame this kind of line extension fraud on unethical management, on consumers who can't tell the difference and consequently buy such fraudulent products whenever they're cheaper, or on poorly-thought-out regulations (making real pyrex emits boria into the air, which is an insecticide and therefore does environmental damage, a consideration probably not relevant to gorilla glass)

rangerelf
0 replies
1d2h

i'm not sure whether to blame this kind of line extension fraud on unethical management, on consumers who can't tell the difference and consequently buy such fraudulent products whenever they're cheaper, or on poorly-thought-out regulations

Porqué no los tres? CEOs pursuing yet another vacation home, under-educated consumers that lose their minds over 'saving' 1c ("$5.00" too expensive "4.99!" OHH THIS ONE!!), and regulators either with a private-sector agenda or who have no teeth because Congress is politically compromised.

There's more than enough blame to spread around.

fuzzfactor
0 replies
4h7m

Probably would cost Corning even more than ordinary glass that they are prospering well enough from now.

At the same time the old European factories can make specialty glasses cheap enough for schools and pubs.

What if some person like Einstein invented glass to begin with, it would not take that much insight to conclude that the "weak point" was how easily it can be broken. If they really started working on that problem from the very beginning you would expect more progress the more centuries that it was continued.

OTOH what if inventing glass was not the result of very much of an intellectual exercise, anybody can still see the disadvantages when it come to breakage. But they might not start to do anything about it until centuries later. Who knows?

What if just barely making glass was (almost) like a lost art where it took a few centuries for someone like Einstein to come along and take an interest in a way that could add more scientific process, even if still illiterate.

Or maybe even more likely, an intermittent series of lesser Einsteins make their contributions to a geographical technical center of excellence which did originally arise from a gifted or fortunate individual at the beginning. Maintaining the status quo (as an art center producing recognized "masterpieces") over generations until the next amazing experimentalist gains a position influential enough to make a contribution so worthwhile it lasts more centuries into the future.

Pretty amazing when you think about it, they didn't even have half the chemical elements there are today ;)

fencepost
9 replies
1d3h

For people talking about glass recycling, it's not NEARLY as simple as you might think because of input issues. Along with CoE (Coefficient of Expansion) concerns that may arise depending on the exact input materials, recycling ends up with grit and contaminants in the material, and those end up as inclusions in final products. That might not be a concern for glass blocks, but for anything where you care about the end quality (food containers, large sheets of glass for windows, etc.) inclusions can result in a lot of production loss. It's also not like you can just melt it and let the inclusions float or sink out - molten glass doesn't flow like water, and particles don't just move through it.

meindnoch
2 replies
1d

And why would this contamination not happen with non-recycled glass, which is made from sand?

nick4981716
0 replies
17h48m

They use sand from deposits that are quite pure.

donatj
0 replies
7h40m

As another commenter said, they use very clean sources.

Even then, the sources are very at the very least consistent in their makeup. It's a lot easier to deal with a consistent type of contamination than a varying one.

tgtweak
1 replies
1d2h

This is why they have green and brown bottles in beverage industries, they're typically lower down the recycling chain so impurities and mixed silicates can be used without affecting the end use.

I don't think this glass is any less prone to recycling than standard sodium glass since it looks to be a post process with largely the same input materials.

082349872349872
0 replies
21h39m

Green, but especially brown, also protects photosensitive contents (eg beer).

trelane
0 replies
20h20m

And long, long before recycling glass, people just reused the bottle as a bottle. Which is IMHO the better approach.

morsch
0 replies
1d2h

Complicated, but routinely done? Glass recycling seems to be routine and widespread. Glass containers and jars, that is, not drinking glasses.

katzinsky
0 replies
6h36m

Maybe a better approach would be to purify it by chemically dissolving the old glass in eg sodium hydroxide and reprecipitating it out.

I'm sure people have tried that though and it doesn't work for some reason.

HarHarVeryFunny
0 replies
23h32m

One of the major products made out of recycled glass is Fiberglass (yes, it's literally glass) - sold in rolls for insulation.

mannykannot
6 replies
1d6h

This article's brief explanation of how the process works seems somewhat misleading, as it claims that the ion substitution creates tension in the glass, which makes it harder for cracks to spread - but cracks propagate under tension.

As I understand it, the substitution of larger potassium ions for smaller sodium ions in the surface layer creates a compressive stress in the surface, and while this results in a counterbalancing tension in the interior, it is the surface compression which inhibits crack propagation.

This is how tempered glass works, except the surface compression and interior tension is the result in the greater shrinkage of the slowly-cooling interior. The interior tension is also the reason why these glasses shatter into tiny pieces when they do break (see also Prince Rupert's drops: there are many videos on Youtube.)

I am wondering if the chemical process is slow, which might be another reason for it not being adopted for ordinary objects such as drinking glasses.

kergonath
2 replies
1d5h

This article's brief explanation of how the process works seems somewhat misleading, as it claims that the ion substitution creates tension in the glass, which makes it harder for cracks to spread - but cracks propagate under tension.

The article uses “tension” informally, meaning under mechanical stress. I would not read too much into that. But yes, you are right.

I am wondering if the chemical process is slow, which might be another reason for it not being adopted for ordinary objects such as drinking glasses.

The fact that such glasses tend to fail catastrophically and shatter in small shards is a problem, for something that is used in homes, often with children, and that is bound to break at some point. Not great from a safety perspective.

morsch
1 replies
1d2h

The cleanup after a broken tempered glass breaks isn't worse than after a regular glass in my experience. There are more shards, yes, but they are individually less dangerous. And in either case the annoying thing is having to be thorough. Regular glass shards seem to be better at hiding.

thoroughburro
0 replies
6h8m

A random tip for the thread: when looking for glass or other small objects, shine a bright flashlight parallel to the floor: all detritus is made visible by casting longer, harder shadows.

mannykannot
1 replies
1d5h

I see this article says that chemically strengthened glass can be cut, and while it becomes weakened in the vicinity of the cut, it does not shatter as a result. The Wikipedia article does not explain in any detail why this is so, but it suggests that there is less tensile stress than in tempered glass. Perhaps this is because the latter needs the internal tension to create the surface compression, while in chemically toughened glass, the compression is generated within the surface layer?

I have seen it said about Supafest drinking glasses that they do shatter into tiny pieces when they do break, though I do not know whether the source was reliable. If this is the case, then it suggests there is some difference between the Supafest and Corning / Gorilla Glass processes.

HPsquared
0 replies
1d3h

It's due to the thickness of the compressed layer at the surface. It's often thinner (but more intense therefore harder) in Gorilla glass, so I suppose there isn't enough tension in the interior to make it shatter.

There's always a corresponding tension in the interior, the sum of forces in each direction are balanced. But if the outer compressed region is thin, you won't need as much internal tension.

jakubmazanec
6 replies
1d5h

Not sure if it's the same material, but this article reminded me of a very funny scene from the Czech movie "Pelíšky" about "unbreakable" glasses. Here it is with English subtitles: https://youtu.be/6QTieSQeNvE?si=vmtCUAKXVhtg62aq&t=1930

timeon
5 replies
1d4h

My first though after seeing the title: A skláři nebudou mít co žrát.

But unlike plastic ones in the film, glasses in the article are from modified glass.

trizoza
4 replies
1d4h

Same here, even shared with my family with note: "Pelisky on top of hackernews today" :D

inglor_cz
3 replies
1d3h

Heh, a Czech club forming in real time :)

In order to fulfill all the memes, we can defenestrate those glasses.

lb1lf
2 replies
23h43m

Not Czech, I just wanted to chime in that 'defenestration' is one of my all-time favourite words - that the act occurred frequently enough to warrant its own word being coined...

082349872349872
0 replies
21h44m

Frequently enough to have been mentioned in the bible...

jdfedgon
5 replies
23h58m

There's this anecdote, somehow connected to this topic.

Some decades ago, a manufacturer from East Germany, former GDR, was participating at a fair for lights and light bulbs. This manufacturer invented a light bulb that never burns its glow wire.

At some point during the fair the companies from West Germany had a big laugh on that manufacturer, mocking him and his invention. Their argument: If you build a bulb like this, how are you going to make money?

Now, I cannot say why we don't have glasses like this already but my assumption is that the monetary incentive is seen as being contradictory to such an invention.

torginus
0 replies
22h35m

Actually Technology Connections made a great youtube video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb7Bs98KmnY

The gist is that by running bulbs at a lower power, you can greatly prolong its life, but the downside is that it doesn't heat up as much, and since emissions spectrum correllates with temperature, ends up being much worse at converting electricity to light, which ends up being not worth it.

lesuorac
0 replies
23h52m

I mean if you don't already have a large light bulb business this sounds like a great idea.

Make a million light bulbs and sell all of them and then do whatever it is that you want.

Similar to finding a cure for cancer. There's a huge market that you can just eliminate and then retire.

cleansy
0 replies
23h45m

That and producing these glasses with said technique is a lot more expensive. You need to heat up the glass and the potassium nitrate to 500C, mostly over hours because otherwise the glass breaks. Then you need to keep it for a couple of hours, then cool down slowly. What made the initial east german production work is, they did it on a large industrial scale, but even then the energy that you need makes the glasses quite expensive to produce. It's hard to justify buying 6-7€ for a regular drinking cup when a comparable form factor is 1€ or something in this region.

HarHarVeryFunny
0 replies
23h37m

Maybe depends on price and market.

In the US, consumers like stuff that is cheap, and don't seem to care much if it is poor quality and breaks - they'll just buy another.

In the UK, at least when I lived there 30 years ago, people seemed content to pay more for quality items that would last longer.

I noticed when I moved to the US and saw same brand, e.g. Black & Decker selling cheap plastic US-only versions of products compared to their heavy duty cast iron counterparts sold in the UK that would last forever.

isoprophlex
5 replies
1d4h

Dramatically increasing the toughness of the glass surface was possible, they found, by replacing the smaller sodium ions in the glass with electronically charged potassium ions.

This sentence angers the chemist in me. A potassium cation has exactly the same charge as a sodium cation, namely, +1.

bongodongobob
4 replies
1d2h

Well that bothers the logician in me, they didn't say the sodium ions weren't charged, you are just assuming that implication ;)

Log_out_
2 replies
1d

If they knew enough about it to write about it correctly they would pursuit other work then journalism.

1attice
1 replies
16h56m

If they knew enough about it to write about it correctly they would pursuit other work then journalism.

*pursue. *than.

Honestly, given the sentiment expressed, just too funny.

pxc
0 replies
16h12m

Specialization is wonderful and makes great things possible, but it also tends to inflict a certain kind of brain damage.

Specialists! Can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em.

kevincox
0 replies
6h31m

Well that bothers the linguist in me, typically only relevant information is included when contrasting two items. So while in general you can't assume the negation of the implication, in conversation it is generally expected that if I say "I switched from X to Y because it is my favourite colour" you should be able to assume that X is not my favourite colour.

bravura
5 replies
1d4h

Then can someone explain why the obscene and completely ludicrous "pfand" token system is so common still in Eastern Germany?

c-fe
3 replies
1d4h

Its common everywhere in germany and also other countries, and why is it obscene and ludicrous?

jonp888
1 replies
1d3h

Since he mentions a "token", I don't think he means the recycling system, but rather than whenver you visit a festival/sports events etc., you typically have to pay a deposit of €2 for the cup your drink is served in. Before you leave you have to return the cup for a refund.

Sometimes you also get issued a "token" and the refund is only possible with the token, so you can't return other cups you find lying around.

bravura
0 replies
23h45m

It's the concept of a pfand system that involves a token.

The token is ridiculous and makes no sense. I've actively interrogated GPT4 on it and it becomes increasingly nonsensical trying to explain it.

Possession of the cup itself is proof in itself that I possess the item of value worth the pfand. The token itself is pointless.

thecosmicfrog
0 replies
1d3h

It has just been introduced in Ireland under the name "Re-turn".

aeyes
4 replies
1d4h

To me the most surprising property to this day is how thin and light these glasses were. They are almost as thin as a modern wine glass but I don't remember ever breaking one accidentally.

Edit: The article is poorly researched. The design pictured wasn't the only design they sold, it was just the most common one used in restaurants and bars. I had these glasses with kids prints. I found a page which shows a few more designs: https://militariasammlermarkt.de/ddr/zum-thema-ddr-ostalgie/...

hn_throwaway_99
3 replies
1d4h

They specifically mentioned they had a range of glasses, so don't know why you say it's poorly researched:

For their range of glasses – which included variants for champagne, schnapps and cognac as well as three different sizes for beer – the designer trio were inspired by the equally beautiful so-called Wirteglas, which the East German designers Margarete Jahny and Erich Müller created in the early 1970s.
Retric
2 replies
1d3h

He’s referring to the patterns on the glass not the shape of the glass.

One factor that may have hindered Superfest’s competitiveness in a unified Germany was its functionalist, austere look. Especially in southern parts of the country, drinkers like to swig their beer from glasses decorated with gold edging or engraved coats of arms. “Baroque decoration on a Superfest glass wouldn’t work,” says Höhne. “It would violate the design itself.”

The 6th image in the carousel on that page shows gold rimmed glasses with a decorative design, hardly an austere look.

g15jv2dp
1 replies
14h0m

He’s referring to the patterns on the glass not the shape of the glass.

That's clearly not true... It's not the patterns on the glass that separate a champagne glass from a cognac one. Or different sizes of beer glasses...! Did we read the same sentence?

Retric
0 replies
13h42m

Again this isn’t about champagne glass vs cognac.

That's clearly not true... It's not the patterns on the glass

I was calling attention to where aeyes said “I had these glasses with kids prints.” clearly a reference to decoration not the types of glasses produced.

The company varied both the types of gasses and the decoration on those glasses, but the article is only giving them credit to the types of glass not the wide range of purely cosmetic designs.

JR1427
4 replies
1d6h

I remain to be convinced. We rarely smash glasses in my household. Normal glass is (presumably) cheaper and less resource intensive than this special glass. Sometimes making things less durable actually is better. Over engineering and special manufacturing has costs.

JR1427
2 replies
1d6h

Also, if 120m were made, but they are now fetching 30+ dollars, then there can't be that many around anymore, so are they really that long-lived?

It doesn't matter if they _theoretically_ last a long time, if people are still going to throw them away to freshen up their cupboard of glasses to keep up with the latest fashions.

pixelfarmer
0 replies
1d4h

East Germany ceased to exist in 1990. One of the glasses also shows the Mitropa label: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitropa but it was used on a broader scale.

I wouldn't assume that all these "assets" of bars, pubs, Mitropa etc. were for example sold off, i.e. you can expect quite a big number being dumped/destroyed, aside of the numbers that went into wear and tear until 1990 in the first place.

There is a lot of stuff that was ubiquitous during the time of East Germany and went poof pretty fast after the wall came down, usually into the dumpster in one way or another.

ljsprague
0 replies
23h23m

6 pieces going for $283 on eBay right now with 2 days of bidding left.

dabber21
0 replies
1d2h

household maybe, but bars and cafes?

also usually with time companies figure out ways to reduce costs of production/process

ianbicking
3 replies
23h40m

"The problem with the original Superfest glass is that its manufacturers worked with modified alumino or borosilicate glass, which is not as easy to recycle as the more common soda-lime glass. So Soulbottles’ challenge is to produce glass that is both durable and recyclable."

Why would they care about recycling it? It's not a disposable product. If it breaks you can't recycle it anyway (at least in the US recyclers don't want broken glass). Isn't durable good enough?

Or is this a result of Germany's obsessive recycling culture?

sofixa
2 replies
23h36m

If it breaks you can't recycle it anyway (at least in the US recyclers don't want broken glass)

In France glass is explicitly broken upon deposit at the recycle bin. I'd guess it's the same in Germany.

Or is this a result of Germany's obsessive recycling culture

God forbid anyone thinks a little bit ahead to avoid extra waste.

ianbicking
1 replies
1h28m

You can't recycle ceramics but I don't think it's wasteful to use ceramics. You should just use them as a durable good that is kept and used as long as possible.

sofixa
0 replies
1h4m

Ceramics are literally millennia old as a concept. It'd be a bit shortsighted to introduce new materials today and not think about its full lifecycle.

doener
3 replies
22h40m

This reminds me of a column in DIE ZEIT from 1999 on the subject of the planned obsolescence of light bulbs:

"Is it actually true that light bulb manufacturers could have produced light bulbs with an almost unlimited life a long time ago, but don't want to in order to stay in business? Rainer Mauersberger, Tucson (USA)

I don't want to speculate here about the motives of the light bulb manufacturers, but just want to list a few facts.

1. every light bulb (as it is correctly called) has a limited service life because tungsten atoms constantly evaporate from the filament and the wire breaks at some point.

2. how long the wire lasts can be "adjusted", for example by making it thicker or thinner. However, if you make it glow less brightly and thus increase its service life, the already poor efficiency drops even further - a standard light bulb only converts four percent of the electrical energy into light.

3) Since December 24, 1924, there has in fact been an international "light bulb cartel", which was essentially controlled by the companies General Electric (USA), Osram/Siemens (Germany) and Associated Electrical Industries (Great Britain). This cartel not only divided up the global markets among themselves, but also reached agreements on how long a light bulb should last - since the Second World War, this has been 1,000 hours. In the Soviet Union and Hungary, there have always been bulbs with a longer service life; the Chinese bulb still burns for 5000 hours today.

4) The inventor Dieter Binninger developed a light bulb with a considerably longer life expectancy, which he also patented. His three improvements: a new form of filament

filament, a glass bulb filled with noble gas and a diode as a "dimmer". The Binninger bulb lasted 150,000 hours and consumed only around 50 percent more energy than an ordinary bulb for the same light output. Binninger produced the light bulbs himself, but then negotiated with the Treuhand to take over the GDR company Narva. Shortly after submitting his offer, the light bulb revolutionary crashed in a private plane in 1991.

5 Today, light bulbs are no longer manufactured in the new federal states. Light bulbs in the western world still have a life span of 1000 hours. Christoph Drösser

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)"

https://www.zeit.de/stimmts/1999/199933_stimmts_gluehbir

thoroughburro
0 replies
6h3m

Spoiler alert: the common knowledge “cartel” actually made a rational choice which balanced longevity, light quality, efficiency, and cost.

The longer lasting lightbulbs were worse at everything except lasting longer. This was not malicious.

teractiveodular
0 replies
19h51m

The cartel mentioned here is not merely a figure of speech or conspiracy theory, but an actual agreement between manufacturers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoebus_cartel

complaintdept
3 replies
1d1h

Corning used to make these bowls (called "Grab and Go", I think) that were very difficult to break. You could cook in them, eat out of them with utensils that damage normal ceramic (like a Ti spork), and probably throw them out of your kitchen window onto cement and they'd be fine. They sold off the patent to some other company that couldn't afford the production and quality went way down -- I think prod required intense heat and/or pressure. Sad times.

tdeck
1 replies
1d

The new company is called Corelle and they make a pretty durable range dishes and bowls out of the same material. I don't think I've ever broken one by dropping it, however if you drop a ceramic knife blade onto one of them the Corelle will immediately fracture for some reason.

rpdillon
0 replies
23h41m

Corelle is legit, anecdotally. Have had a set of Corelle since 2004, have yet to break a single item. Mostly, dishwasher cycles are slowly eating away at the edges of the plates and bowls, but given its been 20 years, I'm OK with that. I'm not like the guy mentioned in another comment that throws his dishes onto the counter and into the cabinet, though.

voidey
0 replies
1d6h

Indeed, was going to share that but you already did.

mannykannot
0 replies
1d6h

This video makes the point that the technology was also developed by Corning (allegedly independently, though I am skeptical that it independently came up with the concept, given that the video claims that the Superfest process was patented), which was likewise unsuccessful in finding a market for it until Apple came looking for a tough screen for its iPhone.

panick21_
2 replies
1d4h

The glasses are too good for pure market thinking.

This argument never made sense to me.

Of course if you go to the big glass retailers. That just sounds like dumb marketing. It clearly would require a smaller retailer that could disrupt.

The people you have to convince to buy these are the direct consumers who carry the cost. Combine that maybe with some financial products to make it easy to acquire or directly cooperate with drinks companies, or distribution companies.

Or I mean there are lots of other potential markets for glass.

At the very least they are not telling the full story here. If this glass is really so amazingly superior, and such a no-brainer, then somebody could have saved a lot of money here. More likely the company was just not positioned or lead well enough to figure out a strategy.

At the vary least I need more then a one supporter with skin in the game saying 'we were just to good'. I have heard that often and its sometimes true, more often it isn't.

iSnow
0 replies
1d4h

The first years of post-reunification were not good years for innovative companies from the former GDR.

There was lack of money for investments unless you got sold to Western investors who might or might not have understood the value of your product. Eastern companies notoriously had old machines and low productivity and no experience in sales & marketing. Wages had to be paid in hard currency all of a sudden while traditional markets in the East did not have this hard currency. Western markets usually were already very competitive (as mentioned in the article where they tried to sell to Western Germany a couple of years before).

Additionally, there was no internet back then, so crowdfunding wasn't available, direct selling to consumers was very hard, and sophisticated market places did not exist.

I know those glasses, they were indeed very good, but kind of out of fashion in the early 90's.

6510
0 replies
1d4h

I'm a big fan of Duralex, I've inherited a lot of their glasses. They look nice, feel good, I've always used them. They remind me of my mum, my aunt and my grandma. I've also never purchased any. There is no reason to think they won't last another 100 years? Is there?

knowaveragejoe
0 replies
1d1h

It was discussed here even more recently than that.

TheRealPomax
0 replies
1d2h

That's a completely different article.

echoangle
2 replies
1d5h

I wonder how often people really break glasses, for me it’s maybe once per year or less. Unless the glasses last a lifetime and you never replace them due to style/design preferences, I don’t think it would be economical to go with those glasses. Ecologically it’s different of course.

hencoappel
0 replies
1d5h

Now think on the scale of a restaurant/bar. Could save them a lot if none of the glasses broke!

black6
0 replies
1d5h

For each individual drinking glass it depends on how frequently it's handled. In a household a drinking glass may get handled once a week. In a restaurant or pub it can be multiple times a day. More frequent handling means more opportunity to break.

r3trohack3r
1 replies
22h20m

But the main reason for its decline, paradoxically, was its strength. Glass retailers who play by the rules of the market live off the fact that their products break, so they can sell more. A glass that didn’t break was a threat to profits.

I've heard this story repeated multiple times but I've never bought it. Unless there is a glass cartel, i.e. crony capitalism, I have a hard time believing that consumers wouldn't storm the gates for unbreakable glassware.

If I were a bar owner, and I had near 100% restocking of my glassware annually (which I believe is in the ballpark of the actual number), I would be willing to bypass my supply chain and order these glasses directly from the manufacturer.

I can't see how someone couldn't make a decent living off the addressable market of one time sales of this glassware.

This doesn't seem like it is a true market dynamic - but I might be missing something.

rajnathani
0 replies
12h12m

The thought process which I have here is that decades ago when the supply chains were more dis-intermediated than they are today (due to higher information asymmetry due to lower speed communication than we have today), that it could've naturally resulted in distributors to gravitate towards less durable glass without necessarily forming any cartels as such. It is technically still possible in today's age too, but very likely to a much lesser extent.

laborcontract
1 replies
1d5h

Article fails to mention that these glasses explode when they do crack. Not fun cleaning it up.

consp
0 replies
1d5h

I've had many Duralex glasses break (it has the same "issue") and exploding is a massive exaggeration. They break into many peaces yes, but they are less dangerous than normal glass. I also do not like cleaning up normal glass since you need to handle it with care. Especially around drunk people.

colonwqbang
1 replies
11h33m

But the main reason for its decline, paradoxically, was its strength. Glass retailers who play by the rules of the market live off the fact that their products break, so they can sell more. A glass that didn’t break was a threat to profits.

It would be interesting to have some supporting evidence for this conspiracy theory. Perhaps the Guardian expects us to buy it because it plays into our preconceptions about evil capitalists vs. morally pure socialists.

Waterluvian
1 replies
1d6h

Maybe there’s a way to double layer the part you hold with a pocket of air for insulation.

Anecdotally, many people hold glasses poorly for fear of warming their drink with their hand.

bux93
0 replies
1d6h

Double walled glasses exist, they are used for tea or frothy coffee.

The glass is very thin though; the trade-off being that if it was regular thickness it would be very heavy and big relative to the contents - and your hands. This makes them even more likely to break!

However, the brand Bodum do nice onces made from Borosilicate Glass.

yokoprime
0 replies
1d

Is this like a prince rupert's drop? i assume this completely explodes when it breaks.

tristor
0 replies
1d3h

What annoys me about this is that due to recyclability they are going to replace the borosilicate glass formula with one made off soda-lime glass. Soda-lime glass is significantly less durable in heat/cool cycles, and part of the point of high-durability glass is it's reusability! Germany, like many parts of the world, in the name of being green has gone all-in on recycling but fail to remember the green trifecta and it's priority ordering: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle. That is, recycling is a /last resort/.

If they continued with the prior borosilicate based formula these could be high-temperature sanitized and reused when making bottles and it works better for the hot/cold cycles typical of high temperature sanitization and cool wash-downs used in commercial bar settings.

The same thing happened to the Pyrex brand. It used to be the gold standard for glass bakeware because it was made from borosilicate glass which made it much more drop resistant /and/ better for heat/cool cycles. Now Pyrex branded products have gone to being made predominantly of soda-lime based formulas and newer Pyrex dishes are known for being prone to exploding when you move a casserole prepped the night before from the fridge/freezer to the oven.

I really wish we still had seriously durable high-quality products available and we weren't regressing to lowest common denominator across our society. Soda-lime glass is not a buy-it-for-life product, regardless of what you do to the formula.

samstave
0 replies
18h41m

I love this.

While we are talking Neat! glass: Ball Aerospace is where you want to focus for a sec as well.

Ball aerospace basically is the secret tech gian few know about - specifically in their high-end lenses for all the nifty spy thingies...

But the Ball Brothers did a bunch of other nifty things - my favorite being the Mason Jar.

--

What I like about this story, is how it reignites the vision I have for a stackable Mason Jar thats unbreakable such as the German glass. - but as a core packaging line.

I have a large number of mason jars as my primary drinking vessels - but I want a service, like the milk-men of olde, and have a fully functional closed loop product, package delivery infra built on high tech mason jars, stackable, made from unbreakable-ish things, inclusive of glass foams (aerogels in the walls based on 3d printing a microfoam of glass then encasing it... and having a ceramic induction coil in the base of the glass so you can use an induction coaster (of varying size) to heat/ cook that which is in the mason jar... the jars interlock so you can stack extension tubes onto them. but all based on mason jar everything. aside from the hyper stackable.

(Also I noteced that the drop science behind that beer glass is that it provides the lip for you to rest it in your hand, and its designed to not break from the angle that a drunk person most typically drops his drink - too drunk, and has a week grip - so it just slips straight down... mostly)

https://www.ball.com/our-company/our-story/history-timeline

https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-selects-ball-aerospac...

prmoustache
0 replies
1d5h

Interesting. I resorted a year ago to using stainless steel glasses (for water, not wine or beer).

ngcc_hk
0 replies
1d2h

Usual problem - a glass that last meant a company that broke. Same for lamp. Not sure whether communism under a foreign power helps here.

madsen954
0 replies
11h24m

I remember one accident I had when I was a kid walking up the stairs, holding one of those glasses in my hand, stumbled and banged the glass loudly against the stone of the stairs. Everyone was looking at me but apart from the loud kloink noise nothing happened to the glass.

jokethrowaway
0 replies
21h38m

The best alternative is Aluminium oxynitride, a bulletproof transparent ceramic.

It's kind of expensive, though.

Would you buy a lifetime glass for 500$?

jiehong
0 replies
1d2h

You know Kintsugi, this Chinese and Japanese ceramic repair art by making the repair shine?

Maybe we could try to do that with standard glass glasses.

fuzzfactor
0 replies
4h2m

When Benjamin Franklin was still alive there was no other place to get extra-strong heat-resistant glassware suitable for chemical experimentation other than obscure locations in what is now Germany, with their secret techniques developed over a period of centuries at the least.

I would say it helps to start early.

I really do get the idea that in pre-literate times some scientific progress was continued over many generations more impressively by lifetimes of hands-on incremental advances, rather than through documentation which could only be deciphered by the few, and utilized by even fewer.

distantsounds
0 replies
1d3h

ah, you can get bongs made in the USA with similar strength.

https://tankglass.com/

RRRA
0 replies
1d5h

I'm curious who is still making something similar

BenFranklin100
0 replies
1d1h

Rule #1: Never read a Guardian article about East Germany.

4gotunameagain
0 replies
1d6h

Of course, such a durable product can never succeed under hypercapitalist environments.

Phrases like planned obsolescence and market cannibalisation come to mind.

Remember back when even a mid range HiFi amplifier came with quality service manuals, and lasted for a lifetime ?

Sure, it was more expensive relatively. But you only had to buy it once.

With the current climate uncertainty, we need to find a way to incentivise quality, reliability and repairability.

There is so much ephemeral junk being produced.

14
0 replies
11h44m

So weird when I mention something at home then few hours later see the exact thing here. The other day I broke a glass then yesterday my dad broke a glass then today my son broke a glass. We are not usually like this but just one of those fluke weeks where we all did it. I was telling my mom that there used to be a glass that was almost unbreakable and could take much more of a hit but that I didn't think they made them any more. I would love to get a set of these glasses and yes I would pay a bit more for them.