I don’t think there are any modern startup “inventions” which bother me more than meal replacements like Soylent. It’s not that there’s something wrong with having a nutrition shake to replace a meal if you’re in a rush.
It’s more that food, cooking, and eating (alone and with other people) seem like some of the most human things you can do. And so trying to optimize them out of existence feels wrong, a crime against culture. Long after the AIs have replaced entire classes of jobs and hobbies, cooking will still be around.
As someone who hates cooking, I don't understand the argument. Why would I care about whether something is a "human thing" or not? "Crime against culture" means nothing and could be said about anything.
A lot of words have been written about the role of food in human history and culture. Here’s one from the OP’s blog:
https://jakeseliger.com/2024/02/26/food-and-friends-part-i-f...
The argument is: cooking and eating has been a fundamental human activity for millennia, one that brings people together, transmits culture, language, etc. - and to optimize it away as a problem is to disregard something very important about being a human being.
I understand the importance historically but I don't agree that it's something very important about being a human being. Someone trying to impose that on me is as unconvincing as a religious person trying to convert me. Give me practical arguments.
When I eat I want to do it alone, which is something you highlighted in your original comment, but hearing you now it's all about to the social aspects. I'm not interested in that. If I want to socialize there are far better venues for me personally. I find eating out with other people a lose-lose. The food distracts me from the conversation but the conversation distracts me from the food, and all of a sudden it's gone before I even had the chance to reflect on the taste.
A few points:
1. History and evolution are ongoing things. They aren’t “done” and in the past. Today, right now, people use food as an important part of their culture, whether that be immigrant parents teaching their kids recipes from their home culture, a brother making food for his dying sibling (as in the link), or two friends having dinner.
And that’s only on the consumption side - not to mention the entire production industrial complex that employs millions of people globally to make and prepare food - and has done so for thousands of years. “Food gatherer and preparer" probably has a claim to being the oldest profession. Food is so ingrained in human history and culture it’s basically impossible to imagine civilization without it. Which was my point about it being a human thing.
2. Your mention of religion is actually helpful too, because I think a similar attitude is prevalent when discussing religious beliefs: “That was a historical thing and it doesn’t have much effect on anything today.”
Which is very much not the case; everything in the contemporary world has been shaped by religious beliefs, from the concept of the Self, individualism, the structure of political systems, democracy, universalism, on and on. Modernity is in no way a fresh beginning or clean slate in which the past doesn’t apply. That doesn’t mean you need to believe in XYZ religion today, but to deny that it has any contemporary relevance is just incorrect.
3. On the evolutionary front, the fact is that you evolved to eat in a group - the possibility of someone sitting alone eating a meal made by others basically didn’t exist until a century ago. So it formed who you are today, whether you like it or not.
4. Personally, I like to cook alone. It requires a focused approach that prevents you from scrolling TikTok or being distracted by innumerable other things. I also like to cook foods that remind me of my origins – for example, I like making pierogi, as I'm Polish and from the region where a certain type of pierogi are from. I make them using the rolling pin that was my late Polish grandma's, which also makes it a special experience. Food culture doesn't need to a social thing at all.
I don’t want to assume what your opinion is but it seems to be something like, "None of that matters, all that matters is that it tastes good, comes in ready-to-eat packaging, and can be eaten alone."
Which seems to me like the most depressing, reductive approach possible to something with so much cultural significance and history. Do you think the same thing about art or architecture? Literature? Films?
This being HN; I’m gonna guess you’re a technical person, and so you might gain more of an appreciation for food by watching some YouTube videos on chefs working. The skill and craftsmanship can be truly impressive.
I don't watch movies and only occasionally read books. Nothing depressing about it whatsoever. In fact, I find your reasoning much more reductive. Imagine reducing life to such mundane things when it has so much more to offer.
What more does life have to offer then?
Think of all the shareholder value they must create with all that free time and lack of fuss!
If you think all food, literature, and movies are “mundane” I’m not really sure this conversation will go anywhere.
3. On the evolutionary front, the fact is that you evolved to eat in a group - the possibility of someone sitting alone eating a meal made by others basically >didn’t exist until a century ago. So it formed who you are today, whether you like it or not.
diogenes (maybe buddha also) would disagree.
It should be remembered that most aspects of culture developed because they have a purpose. In the case of cooking and eating good food, there are definitely practical benefits, largely psychological.
One part of it is about directing attention. If you cook for yourself, you pay more attention to what you're putting into your body, and in learning how different flavors come together you learn intuitions about taste and aesthetics. In directing your attention like this, cooking can also serve as a kind of meditation / mindfulness practice.
In knowing how to cook, you become able to cook for others, which is a very common way for people to connect. If a loved one is sick, making soup for them can make them feel loved and cared for, just as it can make you feel good about putting in effort to help them feel better; especially when it comes to things that you just have to wait out, like flu, something like this is an excellent way of maintaining a connection. Conversely, in knowing how much effort it takes to make a good meal you become more appreciative of meals others make for you.
And finally, in cooking with someone else you learn about them and about yourself, about subtle differences that you might not have encountered otherwise. In solving a relatively easy, low-stakes problem together, you gain a sense of closeness without much risk or cost.
Overall, cooking is a practice centered on ideas that are underappreciated by people too engrossed in "hustle culture" etc, so it's important to have it as a tool in today's world. Of course, everything that it provides can be found elsewhere, but these are the reasons it's so deeply ingrained in human culture. I think you would also struggle to find other things that give you all of the above, and more that I didn't go into, for so little investment. It's not that cooking makes you human or something, but cooking does help you to connect with a lot of the deeper parts of yourself that do.
You don't understand that the preparation of food is important to being a human being? Both physiologically and socially? Across every culture on the planet?
Nobody is imposing anything on you. Nobody cares to convince you. Go ahead and eat your meals alone.
Chew carefully. Eat slowly. Sip water. Your digestive system will thank you for it.
What one values, or does not value, in life is a fundamentally impractical subject. IMO you're asking for the impossible.
You don't have to enjoy cooking to enjoy a well-made meal. That's why restaurants exist, after all. Lots of people are perfectly happy to let someone else do the hard work in the kitchen.
If you actually don't enjoy good food, then considering how important culinary arts have been to humans for all of recorded history, I'd say there's something wrong with you.
That last sentence feels like a personal attack. I'm not sure why this is so important to you. You write about recorded history, but there is a vast majority of humans who has never written or at least not about food, so I don't know, maybe food hasn't always been important for everyone, we don't really know.
Nowadays, we also have the stress of a capitalist system to deal with, plus processed food we eat since our childhood, which for a lot of people "break" food for them, since they get used to the sugar rush, and normal food tasted "boring" or "bland".
What I mean is, I know plenty of well adjusted people who don't enjoy "good food", and that's OK.
I probably didn't word it that well; I meant that if you don't enjoy eating food that you like the taste of, there's something wrong with you. It's a normal human thing to like to eat, and to eat things you think are tasty. Unfortunately, modern low-quality unhealthy foods are engineered to be tasty, but this doesn't mean there's something seriously wrong with people who like them. I didn't mean "good food" as only high-quality, nutritious food, just something you like to eat and enjoy eating, even if it isn't that healthy.
The people who really have something wrong with them here are those who actually don't enjoy eating any food, and see it strictly as a biologically-necessary chore. Those are the people who seem to be attracted to Soylent. Yes, I really do think there's something wrong with these people.
Maybe if you're only eating Soylent but the vast majority are simply people who don't want to cook for one reason or another. I eat Huel a few times a week and I really like it. I also think it's pretty tasty but most of all it's convenient.
Yeah, I'm not talking about people who just want something convenient and nutritious when they're in a hurry, I'm talking about extremists who genuinely don't like eating anything ever and treat it like needing to use a toilet.
It’s died down a bit now, but 5-10 years ago there was a very vocal group of people that insisted on only having shakes and that food/cooking was outdated.
I enjoy good food but that's it. I don't assign a higher purpose to it. A lot of things that were important historically are now gone.
If you enjoy eating "good food" (whatever you define that as, since it depends on your taste), that's normal for a human. You don't have to attach a "higher purpose" to it, but it's something that's been important to humans since forever. We have taste buds for a reason, and eating tasty food isn't going to fall out of favor ever, unless humans somehow change into something non-human.
You are also a "human thing." As such, it is wise to attend what is of importance to other such, whether or not you would natively concern yourself with those aspects of life, at least if you care to have your life involve other humans in a significant and enduring way.
I lived on a DIY total meal replacement shake for about a year:
Pros:
- Feel fucking amazing. Not just digestive, but mind, energy, mood, all over feel great.
- Perfect poops. I'd poop the same ideal poop everyday at the same time. Two wipes and done.
- Cheap-ish. DIY made it much cheaper than commercial products. Allowed fine tuning too. Was something like $7/day.
- Never hungry. I had three shakes a day and was very satiating. I would go months without experiencing the feeling of hunger.
- Lots of water. Each shake had ~500ml of water in it, which made it much easier to stay hydrated.
- Maximized exercise gains. Was tailored for working out, so I didn't leave anything on the table due to nutritional deficits.
Cons:
- The taste and texture. Bad and worse. Wasn't excruciating to get down, but fell into the "It's not good but I'll still have it" camp.
- No variety. Basically the same thing all the time.
- Weak jaw. Your jaw muscles weaken quickly when not being used all the time. It's surprising to eat regular food and find your jaw aching and tired after half a sandwich.
- Planning. Kind of minor but I would need to plan a bit more to make sure I had shakes ready to go. They tasted best if they could sit for an hour or so after mixing, and where chilled.
I gave in eventually because regular food is just so enjoyable and because GNC stopped making the micro nutrient powder that was essential too it.
Your anecdote is interesting, but it seems biased towards, "everything was better and healthier, but I didn't get the joy of food".
I'm skeptical that you were getting optimal nutrition from some powder produced in a factory in Mexico. If everything about this was "better", I assume your original diet was terrible.
It's implied, otherwise what's the point of his post?
What is someone trying to achieve by drinking entire meals in a shake, if not optimal nutrition? What other benefits are there?
Time savings
Having done the Huel thing, it's incredibly low-effort. If you don't value the time spent converting ingredients into a meal, or in expending decision energy either on what to buy or what to prepare, it's a pretty big win.
It's more likely that my body is just overly sensitive to foods (which is very common). I eat clean now but still not feeling like I did back then. Maybe 80%.
Diet and how you feel is highly variable and highly individual dependent. So the shake is excellent for creating a baseline since it is about as plain as you can get food to be.
You said "DIY". Did you publish the formula or blog about your experience? I am sure HN would love to discuss it.
It was a popular recipe from a forum about a decade ago. I don't remember the name and I maybe can recall the list of ingredients sort of the amounts.
But generally it was carbs (corn flour), protein (whey isolate), fats (oil blend), micronutrient powder, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium. No sugar, gluten, dairy or soy.
This is a silly take IMO. I love eating and cooking good food. I also sometimes need something healthy on the road or in between classes etc. Vanishingly few people replace all food with Soylent. It’s fine as a fill-in between meals.
As I wrote, it’s not that having a fill-in meal is an issue. It’s the attitude that food and cooking are some kind of unfortunate requirement that should be optimized out of existence - which is the mentality that companies like Soylent put out there, and what their fans want.
I think it’s largely a consequence of not having a respect for food, and that mentality is not welcome in places like Japan, France, Italy, etc. where there is a deep cultural respect for food.
I think this is catastrophizing some cheeky marketing hyperbole. You can have deep respect for food and occasionally drink a Soylent.
I agree, but 5-10 years ago "Soylent replaces eating" was very much a trendy cultural thing to believe.
but really? I was living in SF and drinking soylent in grad school then, and aside from a few maximalists online, nobody I knew ever really thought or wanted that. To me it seemed like dopamine fasting or other silly trends that news outlets will breathlessly write about but everyone else takes in stride as a kinda minor thing they might do occasionally.
Oh boy. Hope you never run into a CalorieMate or a jelly squeeze packet. Or the stoveless apartments.
Those are intended for quick meal replacements, not replacements for eating entirely.
And stove less apartments are usually for people that eat out, not people that are trying to replace meals with shakes.
Fortunately this mindset is limited to a vanishingly small number of rootless young men who are lost in the scam of "hustle culture" - they are overrepresented on HN, but they are also mostly alone and childless, so unlikely to pass the mindset to the next generation
How do you feel about most humans no longer farming, hunting, digging or searching for water, fishing, etc.?
I think people would have a better connection to nature if they did these things more often.
But cooking and eating is sort of an umbrella activity for all of those - everyone in the village/tribe/etc. has to eat, and usually they’d come together in one place to do so. Farming or searching for water don’t have the same centralizing social effect.
Thanks, yeah, that's what I was hoping to tease out -- the fact that there's also a social element to it.
I think that everyone should do most, if not all, of those things at some point in their lives. It doesn't have to be an everyday thing. But I think that a lot of people in modern societies are completely unaware of how lucky they are to not have to do those things any more, and would greatly benefit from the perspective.
I understand your point but I believe McDonalds and the likes are worse. Sure some people hang out there together, in fact I even have fond memories of getting a Happy Meal with a shitty toys with my little sister but the food has little nutritional value, there is no "love" and the whole "feel good" situation was planned by some corporate guys in an office...
Similar but different issue. McDonald’s is fake industrialized non-nutritional food wearing the mask of classic Americana burger culture. Soylent is saying that culture doesn’t matter, only nutrients do. A bit like Brave New World vs. the goop in The Matrix.
I’m not sure which is worse…
Humans spent essentially the same number of millennia hunting animals as they did cooking and eating, and it was profoundly integrated into culture.
Cooking is a huge waste of time. Think about the hours wasted toiling in a kitchen, doing dishes, moving little items up and down and setting them here, now there, now wipe up the mess. All for what, so I can sit still for 10 minutes and taste a good thing, then get up and clean up that mess? If I could swap out my stomach for a Lithium Ion battery I would.
I enjoy cooking for a few reasons. I tell people it's because it's so different from what I do at work. There's some truth to that. The main reason is because I like doing things that make people happy. There's something very satisfying about cooking a good meal and enjoying it with others.
You can enjoy Soylent? By yourself or with others? Just because the meal is done in 5 minutes does not mean it’s not enjoyable.