Autoimmune diseases, of which lupus is but one of many, are essentially black boxes. It’s proven extraordinarily difficult to develop therapies in this area. As such, this is great news. Hopefully this research will encourage pharmaceutical and biotech companies to invest more resources into translating research findings into effective therapies.
I haven’t read the paper yet, so I can’t comment on how this discovery might generalize to other autoimmune diseases, but one interesting bit about autoimmune diseases is that they tend to run in packs. This is suggestive there may be underlying mechanisms that are shared across autoimmune diseases.
I have a good feeling we're going to make a fairly big impact on cancer in our lifetimes with mRNA and other new discoveries in our lifetime. Autoimmune issues I'm feeling much less confident about. It seems like so many of the therapies are "turn down the immune system". I wish there was wider study into autoimmune derived mental health complications too. Maybe I'm totally wrong on this (and I'm very OK to be proven wrong) but maybe there's something to find here.
There is evidence that inflammation is among the causes of depression:
https://wapo.st/3xHLze1
Is this why something like vitamin C can help with depression?
What the mechanism?
„Vitamin C supplementation attenuates the oxidative stress (lipid peroxidation) and inflammatory response (IL-6) to a single bout of exercise.“[1]
Vitamin C is essential and gets consumed by the body and needs to be replenished. For example during sickness the Vitamin C consumption is higher which could lead quickly to low levels.
1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32162041/
I don’t believe there is any evidence that vitamin C reduces inflammation or helps with depression. Vitamin C is an antioxidant, not an anti-inflammatory agent.
There is evidence that things that reduce systemic inflammation help with depression. Fish oil, or more generally a balanced omega-3/omega-6 intake is one example. Curcumin is another. However the effects are modest, which is probably to be expected with a condition as diverse as depression.
However the causality is not clear. Inflammatory agents cause depression. And most depressed people have higher pro-inflammatory markers. It could also be the case that the inflammation is a result of something completely different.
I am here to restore your confidence about autoimmune issues.
Recently (and still in many cases) "turn down the immune system" was the treatment for most cancers. Of course, the purpose of anti-cancer drugs isn't to turn down the immune system. It just happens that the side effect of drugs that target cancer cells also target other rapidly-dividing cells like hair, endothelial, and immune cells.
In fact, chemotherapy drugs like Methotrexate are prescribed - at lower doses than for cancer patients - to people with Lupus and other autoimmune diseases.
There are similar challenges with cancer and autoimmune diseases, so progress in one might help progress in the other.
From the article: "They are now working to find ways to deliver these molecules safely and effectively to people." This is a challenge for many potentially effective cancer treatments as well.
And some autoimmune treatments started out as failed attempts at developing cancer treatments, too. Happy accidents!
I <3 all the happy accidents that allow us to live much healthier and longer lives than the generations before us
Killing quickly dividing cells as a way of modulating immune system is ‘turn down the immune system’
Just as antivirals are actually ‘stop cell division’
Neither of which inspire any confidence
It should inspire confidence that we have moved beyond that for many types of cancer. And if it can be done with cancer treatment, we are closer to doing it with autoimmune and anti-virus treatments.
The immune system has many branches, and you can effectively deplete one branch of the immune system while preserving the other branches to fight infection. For example with MS a very effective treatment is CD20+ B cell suppression, as rituximab does. For many people diagnosed with MS this has been effectively a "cure," in the sense that while they need to continually deplete their CD20+ B cells, their disease doesn't progress in any meaningful way, and their immune systems remain largely able to fight infection.
So we don't need to wholesale "turn down" the entire immune system for many autoimmune diseases. Rather, we need to surgically target specific parts of it and either suppress those parts or modify their behavior. Given the success we've seen with ritixumab and MS I'm more optimistic about our prospects for finding effective treatments for autoimmune conditions.
And all of this is controlled by your microbiome which is always ignored. I really wish more money was put towards researching that. It's literally our body's bioreactor.
Is it really controlled by the microbiome or is it just a factor among many others?
Ah yes, the "gut" meme.
No, the immune system is not controlled by our microbiome. The microbiome interacts with, and modulates the immune system in various ways, but it's hardly "controlling" it. There are germ-free animal models with sterile guts, which demonstrate that you can live without a microbiome - of course not 100% healthy, but they can still live and reproduce.
The immune system is modulated by a lot of things: circadian rhythm, environmental stress, nutrients, etc. Yes, the gut microbiome is one of them. But let's be a bit more nuanced than Joe Rogan or The Liver King.
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which is key to this discovery, appears to be super relevant to psoriasis, another autoimmune disease.
AhR has been known for a long time, but it seems it's been somewhat mysterious until a series of recent breakthroughs. In 2022, an AhR inhibitor called tapinarof, sold as VTAMA, was launched, and has shown itself to be one of the most effective treatments for psoriasis to date. It's also unique in that it appears to have the ability to bring lasting remission. In the main clinical trial, patients who used VTAMA for one year and then stopped had a mean remission duration of 4 months until their psoriasis returned. That is unheard of for any topical medication used on psoriasis.
Blocking AhR has also shown promise in treating MS [1].
I haven't read the lupus paper, but often with papers like these, the "cause" turns out not to be the actual origin, but some cytokine or other protein that is more disease-specific than current drug targets. This lupus discovery appears to identify an imbalance that may be compensated for, but we still don't know what triggers the imbalance in the first place.
In some cases diseases turn out to be a genetic fault, but my money is on pathogens acting as the initial triggering event, which then spins the immune system into a vicious cycle of autoimmunity. In psoriasis we see this with strep bacteria, for example, but the exact mechanisms are not well understood. However, the mechanism that makes psoriasis chronic has been identified, a type of T-cell called a tissue-resident memory (TRM) T-cell. This type of cell acts as a kind of biological memory for infections.
[1] https://newsroom.uvahealth.com/2023/02/15/multiple-sclerosis...
Good post. One small correction: Tapinarof isn't an AhR inhibitor, it's an AhR activator, an agonist.
Interestingly, tapinarof is a natural product -- a sort of bacterially-modified stilbene, a chemical cousin of resveratrol and pterostilbene -- and several other natural products also activate AhR. (Though perhaps not exactly in the same way.) The most potent and readily available of these is probably 3,3'-diindolylmethane.
Ah, thanks. I assumed tapinarof was an inhibitor, as the papers on its mechanism describe it as downregulating cytokines. It appears the exact mechanism isn't quite clear. Bissonette et al 2021 [1]:
It looks like tapinarof modulates the signaling behaviour of AhR, but so far the precise mechanisms are educated guesses.The story of tapinarof's discovery is fascinating. It's produced by a bioluminescent (!) bacillus P. luminescens that (quoting from the paper) "lives symbiotically within parasitic, soil-living entomopathogenic nematodes." It was observed in the 1950s that "the nematode did not putrefy once dead, in contrast to the rapid decay seen in the absence of the nematode," leading to the idea that the bacillus' metabolites had antimicrobial activity — which turned out to include what is now synthesized as tapinarof.
Coal tar is another semi-natural substance that is thought to act on AhR.
[1] https://www.jaad.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0190-9622%2820%2932...
This open-access paper is pretty interesting with respect to mechanisms of action and how tapinarof differs from other stilbenes and AhR agonists: https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(17)31543-9/full...
And, yeah, good point re coal tar. AhR was once thought to be a toxin or junk receptor that activated liver enzymes for clearance of environmental waste and other chemical byproducts. The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) were, at one time, thought to be very similar. That might still be the case with respect to PXR and CAR, but I'm thinking that the way to bet is that there's more to them than was once thought...
I don’t have any particular point to this post, just tossing out that resveratrol itself seems to be an antagonist of AhR, as it seems to compete with and block agonists.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2019/5847040
Also of note for those curious since I haven’t seen it mentioned yet, Dioxins are potent agonists of AhR.
My own interest in AhR is that it seems to play a role in metabolism. Lower levels of exposure to AhR activators seems to kick off a complicated series of effects that seem to ultimately lower metabolism, potentially being a factor in obesity. Higher levels of exposure to dioxins however results in wasting. AhR is poster child for hideously complicated biochemical relationships, so do be careful of simple summaries of exposure/response relationships.
I would be cautious of AhR agonists though, I recall coming across a number of potential negative associations in regards to cardiovascular health.
This is a great response. I tapped out something longer about not being as particularly impressed with the paper and the headline here on HN, but as an rheumatologist just wanted to say your last two paragraphs well said.
Hi @zeagle, sorry to hijack the thread (didn’t see a way to DM you)
I'm a PhD student working on a new lupus diagnostic blood test approach [1]. Hoping to steer the project towards true clinical needs.
I'd love to ask for your feedback as a technologist + rheumatologist on a few lupus + RA diagnostic directions we're considering. Would they actually be useful in your practice?
Would you be open to a quick chat? My email is maximz@stanford.edu.
Many thanks!
[1] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.26.489314v5
Great info. Looks like the field has advanced tremendously.
AhR also appears to be significant in (mouse models of) rosacea, which is another chronic inflammatory disease: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35926563/
Thanks for posting this. My doc just prescribed vtama for me a month ago and my psoriasis was gone in less than a week. I didn’t even finish the sample tube he gave me. Far more effective than the steroid topical cream I was using before. I had no idea what vtama was until reading your post.
If this approach touches Psoriasis and MS, there's a chance it'll be effective for IBDs too. That would be huge.
Great comment, thanks. I’m looking forward to reading the paper.
Hardly. Treatments are down to the kinase level these days, which is just one step away from the gene transcription factors.
In fact it is pretty amazing how well understood the complex mechanism of autoimmune diseases are.
Yes, for Hashimoto's thyroiditis there seem to be some approaches: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38621508/ Let's see how this plays out.