return to table of content

Show HN: Radius – A Meetup.com alternative

CognitiveLens
28 replies
1d22h

I've worked in this product area before, and the big threats that we always had to watch out for were

1. Spam - once the app is large enough, you will be inundated with 'groups' that are just marketing pitches for companies and products. If you don't have a system for approving groups or figuring out how to promote high-quality over low-quality groups, you're going to struggle. Also, the whole idea of 'high-quality' vs 'low-quality' groups is dangerous in various ways.

2. All the other pitfalls of user-made content, e.g. hate speech and inappropriate content

3. People will try to use this as an online dating site - you need to decide early whether that's good or bad, but it's a huge (and potentially overwhelming) aspect of creating an app like this

4. Facebook groups will eat your lunch

5. Really great to see your early caution about building too many features and trying to be everything to everyone. All conceivable features will be requested, and you'll need to have a clear vision in order to decide what is important and what is not.

stavros
21 replies
1d21h

I run a meet-up group, I hate meetup.com but I pay for it because Facebook groups isn't as good, and meetup.com doesn't even work properly. It's such a terribly low bar.

DANmode
13 replies
1d20h

What are your top Meetup.com pain-points?

stavros
10 replies
1d20h

I always set up the same event, at the same place, etc, yet it's hard to just say "use all the values from the previous one". It doesn't have many ways to communicate with members, so I've set up a Discord server instead, which is fine. The UI is a bit confusing if you need to do anything other than set up an event. Most crucially of all, members complain that emails don't reach them, which is terrible, because then they don't know to come to the event.

A push notification system would be nice, but...

radius89
4 replies
1d19h

yet it's hard to just say "use all the values from the previous one"

Whaa- I'm kind of amazed they don't have this given how easy it would be to add.

I just added this exact feature to Radius because our event form was growing and becoming quite painful to fill out - it's just a dropdown with previous events at the top of the event form, nothing complex, but a huge time saver.

DANmode
3 replies
1d16h

Why improve the product when you can coast on your brand's previously earned credibility until you sell again?!

(/s, just in case)

dartos
2 replies
1d8h

That’s adobe’s whole biz model. It works really well

AdamN
1 replies
1d3h

Adobe has some top-tier software though and they keep improving it. It's like a senior leader at my company said - "Oracle's a terrible company but their stuff works". This was during a discussion of another company's software that was also a black box and didn't even work well.

dartos
0 replies
6h50m

Top tier software from a functionality standpoint, but not from a usability standpoint.

In my experience, oracle stuff barely works too, unless you pay for extra support that is.

akvadrako
3 replies
1d11h

You can copy events and set up repeating events. I do this all the time.

stavros
2 replies
1d11h

Maybe they added this recently, my meet-up has been on hiatus and just started up again. This definitely wasn't a thing up until a year or so ago, though.

akvadrako
1 replies
1d10h

I've been running meetups for 15 years and it's been a feature as long as I can remember.

DANmode
0 replies
1d2h

Seems like shit UI is a possible culprit here.

Unsurprising.

Edit: or maybe they were in the middle of rolling out the feature and the string of buyouts started...

paimoe
0 replies
1d15h

I do similar, but there is a "Copy event" button that I can use (and then just change the date). Is that available for you?

Don't think I have anything super premium, but am an organiser of the group

mvexel
1 replies
1d4h

After the most recent price hike ($16 to almost $30/mo for the "basic" organizer plan) I decided to quit Meetup as the host of two groups after more than a decade. It's not just the money, since you were asking about pain points:

* Notifications I get on iOS are pretty much the opposite of how I set them up; I ask for relevant notifications about people RSVP-ing and commenting on my events, instead I get notifications about their own AI / crypto virtual events. * When I do get notifications about a new comment in the 'event chat', I tap the notification, but the app just lands me on the event main screen. When I navigate to event chat (which is surprisingly hard to find) there will be an unread symbol but more often than not the actual comment is nowhere to be seen. * Meaningless functionality being added (start an event with AI!) while pain points such as the above, and the core organizer experience overall, haven't seen meaningful fixes or improvements in years. * No way to slice / analyze member data. * Related to the above, you can download the member list, which gets you a file with an .xls extension but in reality is a broken csv file. * Increased focus on having group members pay, which is hard to manage and also very hard to get any metrics on (who has paid, when, how much?)

I could go on.

Overall, from an organizer perspective, Meetup is a buggy, stagnant and increasingly expensive platform that becomes a poorer value for money with every change they make. The only reason I've stuck with it for as long as I did is that it's really the only way for me to have people organically find my group without significant effort on my part. (I am in the U.S.)

irisguy
0 replies
19h34m

I finished making a carpooling site a few weeks ago that automatches people into the optimal groups based on their location. My site might be a good use case for you: https://antride.ca/. Would appreciate if you consider using it to save people gas and carbon emissions :)

myaccountonhn
2 replies
1d20h

Meetup used to be amazing in certain cities and as someone who travels a ton it used to be my goto way to meet people.

Something happened after the pandemic though and it just turned completely garbage. All the events on there are virtual, spammy, corporate (like node js meetup stuff). Not to mention it doesn’t work half the time.

I would absolutely love an alternative.

dewey
0 replies
1d20h

That’d not a meetup.com problem but a „in person meetup“ in general issue.

All the groups I attended and the one I organized basically never restarted after the pandemic.

brainzap
0 replies
1d4h

meetup didnt pause subscriptions during pandemic so we canceled all meetups and then never started them again.

ProZsolt
1 replies
1d20h

I attend 1-3 meetups a month, the recent changes made it unusable for me. They want $10 a month just to check who will be attending. I don't say they should provide everything for free, but that pricing is ridiculous.

HeckFeck
0 replies
1d6h

They want $10 a month just to check who will be attending.

Looks like this has been rolled out only recently. That's frustrating to say the least, you want to know who is active and the age/profile of attendees before you'd attend certain events. Or maybe there is someone you want to avoid.

Also yet another app looking a $10 per month subscription for basic features. Outrageous.

2color
1 replies
1d6h

Have you looked at Luma?

stavros
0 replies
1d5h

I did, it can only email 500 people on the free tier (my meet-up has hundreds of people subscribed but only ~20 come to each event) and the paid tier costs $700/yr, which is way too much for a free meet-up.

jeltz
3 replies
1d21h

I am skeptical about 4. There is a reason Meetup ate Facebook for many things despite it requiring a new account, Facebook groups are terrible and Meetup shows that you can compete.

CognitiveLens
1 replies
1d21h

That is a good sign, for sure. Maybe revise to 'Facebook will eat 20% of your lunch - your business model will need to account for that'. Products like this don't have a big moat other than their network.

DANmode
0 replies
1d20h

Products that truly intend to sow community will be okay with losing 20% of the crowd which are indeed a group who will put forth lower effort, higher noise than signal contributions, and severely change your offering's requirements.

Think HN or lobste.rs vs....well, Facebook!

ilikehurdles
0 replies
1d4h

Event organizers shouldn’t centralize on Facebook.

A substantial number of people I know under 40, myself included, have deleted Facebook or logged off indefinitely (my spouse still has it so that’s how I found out.) The meetup I regularly attend that advertises on both platforms sees significant new attendees from meetup.com. It’s a shame the platform itself is falling into such disarray post-pandemic.

olegp
0 replies
1d2h

I run the Helsinki JavaScript meetup (https://meetabit.com/communities/helsinkijs) and we also built our own Rails based Meetup.com alternative called Meetabit, so let me comment on your points. I hope this is useful to the original poster as well.

1. Agreed, this has been a huge problem. We partially solved it by adding a captcha, forcing email address verification and adding nofollow to outbound links. Even so we get some spam communities created on occasion which we clean up semi-automatically.

2. Not been a problem for us, but we don't have any social networking features.

3. Has not been a problem for the site for the reason above. However, this has been a bit of an issue at the actual meetups. We've recently introduced an anti-harassment policy to address this problem and I'm thinking of adding functionality related to that to Meetabit.

4. We have a Facebook group as well which was quite active before the pandemic. Now it is completely dead. Whenever I promote events I get the most engagement on LinkedIn of all places. Email is still the best way to get the word out though.

5. Agree about not trying to be everything to everyone. I also think there's a big difference between professional and non-professional meetups, so we've focused on the former with an additional focus on tech. This has allowed us to grow to about 8K users so far with no marketing spend. The features that we have that Meetup.com does not are: talk proposals and archive as well as sponsorship profiles and offers.

As an aside, in case anyone here is considering starting a tech meetup, I've written a few short blog posts on how to run one, which you may find interesting: https://www.toughbyte.com/blog/what-is-a-meetup-and-why-shou...

nox101
0 replies
1d20h

I came here to make this comment, though without having worked in the product area. I've seen all of these issues.

1. Spam - there's a question of definition. I've seen lots of bars post their happy hour etc. Is that an event or just an ad for the bar? Lots of meet ups that are really just an hour long pitch for some service/software/consulting. I've seen a groups post the same event under different names 10-15 times. I've also seen groups somehow claim 300 people are coming to their event even though the venue only holds 80 people. I don't know what kind of backdoor they found since this "300+ people" was the number reported by the service itself, not just something in the description.

5. I don't know what "too many features" is but I did enjoy posting images to meet ups. Sure that can be done via some other service but that requires all the people at the event to coordinate separately from the fact that they already signed up for the event. OTOH I'm sure hosting images brings up all kinds of problems. Similarly, the "chat" feature has been invaluable for coordination. Show up to a picnic, need to find out where they ended up, check the chat on the event page.

Then there's the fact that their search experience is just terrible.

Agreed - but you don't have search yet or if you do it wasn't clear. I assume that's on your TODO list.

That brings up issue 2, user made content. Maybe AI can categorize events from descriptions but on many sites with user content, people will tag themselves with whatever they think will get search results, even if their event is entirely unrelated. Which then ruins the results and makes the experience bad.

In any case, I which you luck. I'd love for there to be better solutions in this area.

rickcarlino
9 replies
1d22h

I run a meet up group of about 1000 members for a makerspace in the Chicago suburbs. I’m glad to see alternatives coming about, but I’m also somewhat skeptical this can actually solve our dissatisfaction with Meetup. As an event organizer, I don’t really need that many fancy features. I need a product that is moderately priced and will actually get people to walk in the door when I schedule an event. Focus on building network effects because that is what group organizers are ultimately paying for. I think this is solved by gaining large amounts of capital to support a promotional strategy to compete. I don’t think a lot of energy needs to be spent on building every feature that an attendee would want because ultimately they will never pay for anything and will continue to use the service as long as interesting groups stay put. Put differently, I don’t think you need to make features your differentiating factor to win. Event organizers, a.k.a. the people who ultimately pay for the service, have serious problems with the pricing strategy they are being offered by Meetup but have no viable alternative. I’d be happy to hop on a call with you and give you free opinions on our experiences over the last eight years. I’m very easy to find. Reach out anytime.

DevX101
4 replies
1d22h

Real life meetup platform doesn't really need network effects. The most engaging "meetups" I go to are small events, friendly attendees with similar interests, and no more than 20 people. In these settings I get to have meaningful face to face dialogue.

yowayb
0 replies
1d21h

Yes! I went to a professional meetup with 80 people. Every single person I met was interesting, but they keep moving, so I had to pull aside the person I was talking to at the moment just to continue a conversation.

rickcarlino
0 replies
1d21h

Our meetups generally have about 20 people. The problem is that without generating network effects, you can't generate awareness that the event is happening at all. We've had a brick-and-mortar location in a Chicago suburb for over 8 years. In the early days, Meetup's network effects were the only way to get people in the door, until much later when word-of-mouth spread.

langsoul-com
0 replies
1d3h

But how do people know about said event? Print and post adverts on telephone poles?

CognitiveLens
0 replies
1d22h

Meeting up in real life is all about network effects - people make friends through networks, organize events through networks, and discover new opportunities through networks. If you're talking about small events that you found out about through sites like Meetup, those are typically successful when you have a large-enough network of people who _might_ be interested.

radius89
1 replies
1d20h

Thanks for the feedback and the kind offer, Rick - I'll definitely take you up on that and reach out!

syedkarim
0 replies
1d14h

I scheduled a call with rickcarlino awhile back--I didn't know him before doing so. He is very sharp and very genuine. You should definitely take him up on his offer.

rickcarlino
0 replies
1d22h

I’d also be happy to host you virtually for our entrepreneurship group if you want to be a presenter and talk to our Meetup members.

drillsteps5
0 replies
1d3h

Would you be willing to share the name of the makerspace/event? I'm in NW suburbs and have been looking for something similar, but can't seem to find anything good on meetup... Thank you in advance!

jacobgkau
6 replies
1d23h

I've been using Meetup heavily for years, and I've met most of my friends in my current city at Meetups. I also used to host one in my previous city.

However, the Meetup website and app are garbage (especially with things being slow or straight-up failing to load) and have only been getting worse (other than the recently-added Connections feature, which is nice in theory but basically nobody uses). So naturally, a competitor would be of interest to me.

That said:

Meetup excludes too many groups by not offering a free tier for smaller/non-profit groups which make up for a huge number of small communities. So many groups just end up dying because one person has to pay the fees.

While true, a side effect of this is that groups that aren't active anymore eventually get deisted, because nobody wants to pay Meetup's prices to keep a dead group online. Once you get discovery up and running, I'd be curious to see how cluttered the website gets with inactive groups, especially over time.

FWIW, I also think they have a marketing issue with the name Meetup.

Genuinely curious what you think the marketing issue here is. If anything, I think they've cornered a term pretty well.

radius89
5 replies
1d22h

While true, a side effect of this is that groups that aren't active anymore eventually get deisted, because nobody wants to pay Meetup's prices to keep a dead group online. Once you get discovery up and running, I'd be curious to see how cluttered the website gets with inactive groups, especially over time.

Yeah, that would be interesting to see! If a free option was always available then I'd assume the amount of groups dying would be fewer.

Genuinely curious what you think the marketing issue here is. If anything, I think they've cornered a term pretty well.

Yep, I think the term is great for what the platform is! But sorry, what I meant was that it limits the scope of events that people associate with them (which I guess is fine if that's all they want to focus on). I associate it with clubs and actual meetups (tech and the like) - I wouldn't expect to find a page for a weekend vegetable market there for example. When I'm looking for things to do, I want to see every type of event/activity rather than just clubs etc.

Funnily enough, my mother (having never used Meetup) thought Meetup was a dating site. Perhaps that was their problem all along, haha.

nprateem
2 replies
1d13h

I saw a YT video once where the founder said they started charging mainly to cut spam.

shiroiushi
0 replies
1d12h

Perhaps, but it seems they just succeeded into turning it mainly into a platform for profiteers and scammers to advertise their bars' happy hours, their dating events, their MLM seminars, etc.

radius89
0 replies
1h38m

I haven't implemented anything for this yet, only thought about it - but I think the OpenAI API would be able to handle moderation/approval if done correctly. I'd assume major platforms are already doing this but there are probably pitfalls which I haven't thought about yet.

cryptonector
1 replies
1d1h

Re: dead groups, activity level / recency of activity needs to be a search parameter.

radius89
0 replies
1h42m

Awesome suggestion, thanks!

s17n
4 replies
1d23h

Meetup has steadily gone to shit, and it's not hard to see why: you can't make money with a user-friendly platform for hosting community groups. Do you have a plan to avoid their fate?

apsurd
1 replies
1d23h

Why can't you make money with a user-friendly platform for hosting community groups?

People are used to paying nominal transaction fees for commerce transactions. Pro versions of group facilitation, messaging, and ticketing is also a thing.

The problem is just cost. These post IPO companies grew massively with sales and support teams. It's very likely much easier to get to scale nowadays. Remove the sales teams and find ways to grow on the cheap. "can't make money" isn't right, it's managing costs to turn a profit inline with the current state of things.

dheera
0 replies
1d22h

Why can't you make money

Once people have formed their community, they can just split any costs in-person and not go through your platform.

I'm not paying $20 in yearly "dues" to maintain a friend group that could be maintained for $0 as a group on any social media messenger.

radius89
0 replies
1d22h

you can't make money with a user-friendly platform for hosting community groups

Well, hopefully, you're wrong!

The gist of my plan is to focus on a broader range of groups/communities, with the larger groups who want/need premium organiser features (or paid promotions in listings, etc) footing the bill for smaller, free groups.

Smaller communities/groups that don't collect fees from their members are likely what make up the bulk of groups that exist - so I don't think it makes sense to exclude them by not having a free option. They're what will bring more value to the discovery side of the platform, IMO.

morgante
0 replies
1d21h

You certainly can make money from a user-friendly group platform.

It's just not enough money to sustain a VC-backed model or a large sales/support staff.

If OP is careful about managing expenses and doesn't set outlandish expectations for profit (or raise VC), a profitable niche is doable.

gnicholas
4 replies
2d

Plenty of folks are sick of Meetup, so there should be a fertile audience. One question I would have before migrating an existing group is what your plans are for making this sustainable. People don't want to jump to a new platform that is great, only to find it migrate in the direction of the platform they've just left. On the other hand, people don't want to migrate to a platform that is going to go under because it's not financially sustainable.

If you can be transparent about what your goals are and what it will take you to get there, you'll probably find a lot more people willing to make the leap. I think of Garry Tan's Posthaven as a good model. [1]

1: https://posthaven.com/pledge

rixed
2 replies
1d23h

Such a simple thing as a meetup clone does not cost much to host, and is therefore immediately economically sustainable. The real concern is, as usual: is it easy to move from meetup to there, will my friends do it, etc, which depends on:

- how simple it is to register an account

- how certain are we this is not going to take the same path to profit than meetup

An example I often consider is that of bewelcome.org, that become huge after Covid when couchsurfing decided to preserve its margins by raising prices. The service is simple, non-profit, its management is open, and it's free. It mostly replaced couchsurfing, at least in the cities in europe where I used it.

Can the same be done with meetup? Maybe, I'm not sure people are frustrated by meetup as much as they were from couchsurfing, but I strongly believe that ruby-on-rail is not the distinguishing feature that will win the argument.

macintux
1 replies
1d7h

It may not cost much to host, but does it cost much to moderate?

rixed
0 replies
1d1h

Maybe it's easy to self-moderate because there are few opportunities for spamming in a site like bewelcome, because most communications are one to one (forums are, in my experience, not very active). Might be harder for a meetup clone, I don't know.

radius89
0 replies
1d20h

I think of Garry Tan's Posthaven as a good model. [1]

This is an awesome suggestion - definitely stealing that idea. Thanks!

blakeburch
4 replies
1d23h

I actively run both a professional and personal on Meetup for the past 1.5 years. I love seeing new options show up in the space, because I do believe the tools are ripe for disruption right now and the sites where people post their events are very fragmented. Kudos to you for taking a stab at it.

There's two things I'd love to know how you're thinking about:

1. Right now, the benefit of Meetup is natural discoverability. I can set and forget an event with no advertising and people will find it and show up. That's not true of any of the other event websites. This may be specific to the Austin community though.

For example, I've tried to post the professional data happy hour on LinkedIn events, Eventbrite, and Meetup. Meetup always drove >60% of the ~50 attendees.

I've been increasingly interested in Luma because they have the idea of a "Calendar" you can subscribe to which doesn't require the origin of the event to be on Luma itself. This allows it act as an event aggregator while still encouraging events to originate on Luma with notifications and reminders built in. See an example here: https://lu.ma/austin-tech-scene

How are you thinking about becoming a go-to resource for discoverability?

2. It's my understanding that despite the high cost to run Meetups, the company itself has never been in a good financial position. They've been bought and sold multiple times.

How do you plan to make money? Without a visible monetization model, my main concern switching to your platform would be the longevity of the platform and the risk of building up an audience there.

mncolinlee
1 replies
1d21h

It's my understanding that despite the high cost to run Meetups, the company itself has never been in a good financial position. They've been bought and sold multiple times.

Former Meetup employee here. A company being bought and sold multiple times is not a sign of being in a poor financial position.

2017: Meetup was first bought by WeWork for $156M.

2020: Meetup was then sold for a fire sale price to AlleyCorp as WeWork was trying to avoid bankruptcy from their unsustainable office rent deals. Watch any of the streaming shows like WeCrashed if you want to know what happened to WeWork.

2024: Meetup was then sold for a very nice multiple of their 2020 price to Bending Spoons after being profitable for several years. However, it had been profitable over those years by keeping it all together with only a small team. Bending Spoons moved operations to Italy, where most developers are cheaper.

blakeburch
0 replies
1d19h

Thanks for the extra context! I was operating off of (faulty) memory with that statement.

You're 100% right that it's not necessarily a sign of being in a poor financial position and that's my bad for assuming as much.

From an outsider's perspective, it makes it seem as if the local events space is not necessarily a lucrative business to be in. If it was, it would likely stand on it's own independently. Instead, we see more tools integrate events as a feature of an existing community platform. I think that's where there's an opportunity, especially for smaller shops or solopreneurs.

radius89
0 replies
2h4m

How do you plan to make money? Without a visible monetization model, my main concern switching to your platform would be the longevity of the platform and the risk of building up an audience there.

Maybe this is something the community here can pitch in on because it makes me feel a little uneasy - but I've had a few suggestions of having a Patreon to help with early-stage development of the product, whilst publishing financial data "open startup" style to show hosting costs etc - along with a "Pledge" page that another commenter mentioned to address always having free groups, longevity of the platform etc. It's all bootstrapped at the moment with the plan of having income via premium features in the future.

I've only got a small sample size for the Patreon suggestion though so I'm not entirely convinced people would support the project, but there does seem to be enough demand for it here at least.

radius89
0 replies
1d20h

1. Right now, the benefit of Meetup is natural discoverability. I can set and forget an event with no advertising and people will find it and show up. That's not true of any of the other event websites. This may be specific to the Austin community though.

Yep, it has that going for it, for sure. I'm currently focused on the organiser side of things before working on discoverability - but planning on focusing on smaller geographic areas initially and expanding out from there.

I like what Luma have done with pages for cities - not sure how they include events in their listings which are outside the zones they've decided to make pages for (just major cities for now).

I've been increasingly interested in Luma because they have the idea of a "Calendar" you can subscribe to which doesn't require the origin of the event to be on Luma itself. This allows it act as an event aggregator while still encouraging events to originate on Luma with notifications and reminders built in. See an example here: https://lu.ma/austin-tech-scene

So, initially, I had planned to have an aggregator for the discovery side but then decided to stay away from that for legal reasons. I know Meetup have something in their terms against using their API for any service that can be deemed a competitor so I assume Luma is scraping that data.

From what I've read, scraping like this seems like a legal grey area but maybe I'm being over cautious? Being able to aggregate would solve one of my largest problems.

How do you plan to make money? Without a visible monetization model, my main concern switching to your platform would be the longevity of the platform and the risk of building up an audience there.

Premium organiser/group features for larger groups or groups that want them. Longevity is an understandable concern - I probably have a few features added already that could be deemed "premium" but have a few more to add before I can consider opening that up as an option.

AnonHP
4 replies
2d

From the FAQ:

Are there any restrictions on the types of events I can create?

Radius is open to a wide range of events, from small community gatherings to large-scale conferences. However, we do have guidelines to ensure all events meet our community standards and are appropriate for our audience.

The guidelines are neither linked from this answer nor are present in the Terms page. I’m not sure how a potential user would decide if their content is acceptable or brig group will suddenly vanish due to these unseen guidelines.

I couldn’t see anything about content moderation and related policies either.

radius89
3 replies
2d

Thanks for pointing that out! I'll need to update that - guidelines aren't something I've thought about in a great amount of detail, but I'd imagine there are some existing policies out there I can take inspiration from. Open to suggestions if anyone has any. Perhaps there's an open-source set of guidelines somewhere.

And yup - definitely need to define a process for that rather than removing groups with zero warning.

nprateem
2 replies
2d

TBH that's polish. I'd worry more about how you plan to monetise it/keep it sustainable, and solve the empty shop problem. The problem with hyperlocal is you basically need to launch in every locality to gain critical mass for people to actually use it.

radius89
1 replies
2d

Agreed! Thanks for the feedback.

Initially, I was focusing on feature development on the discovery/search side, but after speaking with some initial groups - none of them cared about discovery (although being found easily would obviously be great for them too) - they just wanted a place to be able to gather RSVPs for events, and a page to post events on easily.

So, the plan is to focus on the organiser side for now and open up discovery if/when I see there's enough demand for groups to actually use it, and we have a good amount of events.

As for launching in every locality - I had planned to focus on one geographic area at a time but that's something I'll need to think about more. I've seen a few different approaches to search, like having pages dedicated to cities/countries rather than just a single search page - that seems like a good intermediate step to have before going all out on a single search page.

RE: monetizing - the rough plan for now is just to have some premium organiser features, which would be aimed at larger groups.

sanitycheck
0 replies
1d8h

I ctrl-F'd "critical mass" and it turns out the point has already been made!

I had a similar idea years ago (and never got around to doing anything) and concluded I'd do the same as you, focus heavily on getting enough people using it in one place at a time...

The other thing I'd say is that "event" could have a broader meaning than the meetup/facebook definition. Sale at a local shop? Someone's giving away a piano? Yoga on the beach every Tuesday? I'd be happy to get notifications of everything like that within walking distance of my house, and the best part is if you focus on a single city initially you can scrape & ingest all that stuff from existing big & local websites to make Radius immediately useful without waiting for event organisers to sign up.

That's what I would have done if I wasn't so lazy, anyhow.

victor9000
3 replies
2d

Sign up to search is a blocker for me

radius89
2 replies
2d

I probably need to clarify that so thanks for mentioning this - search isn't an active feature at the moment - I'm focusing on the organiser side for now before opening that side up, as there aren't enough events currently for it to be useful.

Definitely won't be sign up to search once search is live.

mikepurvis
1 replies
2d

That'll work as long as your organizers are willing to push their attendees to use a new thing, but if you want this to truly become a discovery platform and avoid xkcd 927, it would really be ideal to somehow aggregate/scrape public event info from other sources.

Cause yeah, from the consumer side, I'd love to have a single place that could let me search and link me out to events listed on Facebook, Eventbrite, Ticketmaster, Meetup, Fever, etc., and also provide reasonable tools for cutting through what is sure to be a deluge, through some combination of search tools and machine curation/recommendation.

jacobgkau
0 replies
1d23h

If they were going to aggregate, having corresponding events tagged (e.g. the same event posted on Meetup, Facebook, and Instagram all showing up linked under the same page) would be helpful, or even necessary.

pietervdvn
3 replies
1d22h

To be a bit blunt: I don't feel the need to have yet another centralized meetup tool. I'd rather have federated tools such as Gancio (https://gancio.org/) or Mobilizon (https://mobilizon.org/en/), which both can push scheduled events into Mastodon and can exchange events among them. This way, one is insulated against enshittification and abuse of network effects.

uh_uh
1 replies
1d22h

Normies won't use these. UX needs to be simple.

rakoo
0 replies
1d21h

That doesn't mean a brand new project needs to be started from scratch though

aloisdg
0 replies
1d2h

Mobilizon use ActivityPub. Some stuff are missing (like recurring event) but it works well

devdao
3 replies
1d15h

Where is the code repo?

If this is another closed source platform, what reason would we have to trust it?

collyw
2 replies
1d8h

Do you really not use any closed source platforms? Al la Stallman?

devdao
0 replies
12h16m

Freedom matters. Principles matter.

But in this case, it's a continuity thing.

Pouring my efforts into something that can, and likely will, evaporate without a trace, leaving me and my community high and dry - I'm not thirsty for that kind of opportunity.

Software freedom satisfies.

aloisdg
0 replies
1d2h

As few as possible.

michaelmior
2 replies
2d

I would be happy to see a good meetup alternative. You might want to consider hiding the numbers of groups and events until you have numbers that are likely to impress anyone viewing them. No shame at all in starting small (there's really no other way to start). But you might turn away potential users who think you're likely to disappear.

djbusby
1 replies
2d

But small numbers are a signal to the visitors they are early. Some segment likes that. I think when you are new, embrace the newness.

michaelmior
0 replies
1d21h

That's a reasonable take as well. I think there are positives and negatives to both.

justincarter
2 replies
1d19h

Hey I think this is a great idea! In fact I am working on putting together something similar! The apps in the meetup space are so bad there is a lot of potential here for new platforms.

It is interesting that both you and the comments are focused on event discovery. I am looking at it from a different angle. I am looking for a platform that can keep a calendar of events and rsvps for already-established small nonprofits and community groups - like book clubs, board meetings, local political groups, etc. In my opinion there are lot of social networks that are doing a decent job of event discovery out there (as much as you can in our very fragmented world). The problem is organizing who is going to what without using Outlook, Google Calendar, etc. - also with better options for recurring events and notifications/reminders, and something non-tech-savvy people can use.

com
1 replies
1d5h

Consider something like Mobilizon[0] - it's ActivityPub based, like Mastodon, but apart from the federation capability, might have the feature set you're looking for?

[0] https://joinmobilizon.org/en/

aloisdg
0 replies
1d2h

Cam here to talk about mobilizon. The project is quite easy to work on and it is made in Elixir. :)

cbeach
2 replies
1d4h

I created an account, saw there were no meetups visible at all, and I probably won't return to the site.

I think the announcement on HN was a little premature, but I wish you the best of luck.

thruway516
1 replies
1d3h

Chicken and egg problem. Look at all the attention and new sign-ups they've gotten with the HN announcement. How do you get up to the stage where it is not premature to announce without announcing? Lol

cbeach
0 replies
17h57m

They launched it on HN with discovery features missing or disabled.

So it comes across like a Google Forms website at this point, accepting data and revealing nothing in response.

I don't wish to be negative about the creators of the site. I wish them the best of luck.

langsoul-com
0 replies
14h57m

Partiful is different from hosting public events. One thing is there's no way to search existing events in x city. Which also means there's no natural advertising of the event.

It's more for friends or mutual friends trying to organise an event together.

dvt
0 replies
1d23h

It seems like everyone (gen-z/millenials) uses this these days. Pretty cool app and features, makes organizing and attending events super fun.

Nephx
2 replies
2d

Great choice of name, fitting for a meetup platform!

It'd be nice knowing right of the bat if the email I sign up with (https://www.radius.to/users/sign_up) will be shared with other users or not.

Best of luck, just like u/skrebbel mentioned below I do wish this takes off.

radius89
0 replies
1d20h

It'd be nice knowing right of the bat if the email I sign up with (https://www.radius.to/users/sign_up) will be shared with other users or not.

Great suggestion - I'll add that to the sign-up form!

Best of luck, just like u/skrebbel mentioned below I do wish this takes off.

Thanks!

skrebbel
1 replies
2d

I upvoted just because of how awful Meetup has become. Hope this takes off!

whirlwin
0 replies
2d

Can you elaborate a bit?

franciscassel
1 replies
1d22h

Have you considered a land-and-expand rollout, where you focus on getting an active community going in one or two cities before you expand? Otherwise, folks from underserved cities (which will be most of them) will be disappointed when they try to find interesting meetups near them using your site. Just a thought!

radius89
0 replies
1d22h

land-and-expand rollout

Hey, thanks! That's exactly what I'd planned - didn't realise there was a term for it heh!

Still very much focusing on feedback and iterating so group locations are a bit all over the place just now (one of the first groups to sign up was a Ruby meetup in Kathmandu haha) - but yeah, I do plan on coordinating it a bit more when the time comes!

ceva
1 replies
1d21h

There is nothing free on the Internet anymore :)

aloisdg
0 replies
1d2h

Most FOSS solutions are free

Tepix
1 replies
1d4h

Interesting. The number of users should not be a limiting factor for the free offering. There are many free events with many people attending (and even more no-shows!) that cannot afford these fees.

zupa-hu
0 replies
1d3h

Do you have a better idea?

ChrisMarshallNY
1 replies
1d5h

This sounds great. I will mention to some folks I know, that might be able to use it.

Meetup.com was a good idea, but I found them to be useless.

Here's my experience:

I was interested in hosting local meetups for techhies. I wanted to do it around Swift, so I knew there wouldn't be many of us.

Meetup had two "paid" tiers. One, was up to about 20 people per meetup, and the other (more money), was for an unlimited number.

Since I knew the meetups would be small, I opted for the cheaper one. I didn't expect more than five or six people at any meetup.

Once I started posting meetups, though, I started getting a lot of bogus signups. They were clearly bogus, as many had nothing to do with tech, or were unreasonably far away (like New Jersey or Upstate). I suspect most, if not all, were fake profiles.

These signups filled the meetups, so I would get like, one real person showing up. All the rest were no-shows.

Coincidentally (I'm sure), I started getting a lot of upselling contacts, recommending that I get the unlimited plan, as my meetups were so popular.

After a couple of these, I figured out which way the wind was blowing (straight across the cow manure), and dumped Meetup.com.

portpecos
0 replies
35m

I would get like, one real person showing up. All the rest were no-shows.

I think that is arguably the absolute single greatest problem that all meetups experience. It's frustrating for the Hosts and the Attendees. If a Meetup-like site could solve that drop-off/no-show rate, that would be the ultimate win.

zulban
0 replies
1d6h

Neat. Here's a feature idea you may not have encountered before: the host sees an estimate on how many by people will show up. Initially this can just be a super trivial to implement 50% for free events and a label just above attendee count. Later it can be fancier with ML predictions based on event info and users. That ML could actually be very simple and still effective.

Even just the simple 50% notice could be really helpful to people hosting their first event for the first time. Or "7 sign ups, you can expect 0-3 attendees".

treyd
0 replies
1d21h

These things have to have good iCal integration. Meetup's worked for a while but one of its issues was that each calendar was per-group and only showed future events. Refresh your calendar 5 mins after the event started to make sure you're in the right place? Too bad, it's gone. It'd be nice to have a user-level calendar that shows all the groups I'm a member of. But Meetup requires auth for that now and DAVx5 doesn't work with it anymore.

sarmadgulzar
0 replies
1d8h

Love the name. Fits well.

radius89
0 replies
1d21h

Just had a notification from Heroku to say they're upgrading my database and it'll be in read-only mode for the next 15 minutes. Great timing.. :) - sorry to anyone who tried to sign up just now if you had an error.

olives
0 replies
1d9h

I would really like to have one social networking application that has 3 features:

1. Groups, Events, and Discovery/Search; something that Radius is working toward and Facebook has (but one can argue that Facebook Groups / Events are clunky)

2. Sharing media, and the ability to control who sees what; I think Instagram does this quite well.

3. Seeing friends' location, and location media discovery for public accounts; Snapchat has this feature.

Unfortunately no app does all three together, and my friends are fragmented across fb/ig/sc.

nprateem
0 replies
1d13h

I worked on a similar app. Did several iterations before binning it.

If I were to do it again I'd focus solely on business model & value proposition canvases and research. You need to find a USP that both sides of your market really value (ideally leading to viral growth) and that meetup can't replicate.

This is absolutely not a technical problem despite how shit meetup is.

There are several informative videos on YT from the founder from several years ago. They probably tried most of what you're thinking of doing. You can learn from them.

Good luck!

PS I have actually found a new take that I think solves a lot of the issues I had (revenue, cheap scalable marketing, growth). I'm keeping it close to my chest, but at some point I may give it a go. There are novel approaches out there. Be creative and original.

nlnn
0 replies
1d5h

I'm not sure there's much hope of this based on the product's name, but something which has always frustrated me about meetup is that distance to events is calculated by radius.

I live near London, so tons of events come up in meetup searches that are close as the crow flies, but can take over an hour to reach by public transport (or sometimes are in places inaccessible except by car).

I'd love something which took into account different transport modes/routes, so I could look for e.g. events within walking/cycling distance, events with under 30 minutes of train travel time, etc. (ideally taking into account public transport timetables, but that's maybe a bit too much to expect).

mos_6502
0 replies
1d18h

Hey!

I run a large Meetup group for software developers in the Tampa Bay Area [0]

We’re multi-platform, and essentially a technology vendor for other Meetup groups in Tampa ([1]). While our overall community spans ~4,000 distinct people, only ~2,300 of those are Meetup members [1],[2]

I’ve built a ton of unique integrations around Meetup, and have built a ton of custom integrations with Meetup’s API (such as [3],[4])

If you’d like to get in touch, please do send an email to the address on our GitHub org [5]. Would love to see more competition in this space!

[0] https://tampadevs.com

[1] https://tampa.dev

[2] https://go.tampa.dev/meetup

[3] https://github.com/tampadevs/events.api.tampa.dev

[4] https://go.tampa.dev/unityops

[5] https://github.com/tampadevs

moralestapia
0 replies
1d23h

So nice, something like this is truly needed.

Also nice to see there's some activity in Toronto already.

langsoul-com
0 replies
1d9h

Meetup and social media in general are difficult to compete with due to their moat.

Yes, the features of meetup aren't crazy to implement, a way to create, list and see events. But will people use a different site when meetup is good enough.

Even then, meetup itself is only good for large cities. So they haven't solved the discoverability problem.

Facebook groups, and others do exist, but generally are a very poor experience for public events. Cannot deny they have users though and that's what matters the most.

If I post a tech event and no techie will see the event then what's the point? Getting a critical mass of users is not easy, perhaps start with a specific region or group. Japan has doorkeeper for japanese tech events, very popular and since its limited to the tech crowd (for now) it's a good host - > attendees cycle.

One thing would be nice is to hide events or types of events. If I'm not interested in night club events, why is it always showing. Or if there's a bad event Ive attended, thus don't want to see any more, I want to hide it from view.

keiferski
0 replies
1d11h

I have thought a lot about the events space (especially considering recent anti-social media backlash) and my conclusion is that something like this will only work if the company itself has a mechanism for organizing the events. If you are relying on users/third-party people to handle events, it'll eventually devolve into what Facebook Events/Meetup/etc. is today.

johnnymellor
0 replies
1d19h

Many communities would like to have a page/ical that lists all the events going on in that community. But event organisers are often busy, and by the time they've posted on WhatsApp and Facebook and Meetup they won't necessarily bother to post here too, especially when there are multiple organisers within a community, and due to the chicken and egg problem of it only being worth posting here if all of the community's other events are also listed here.

What would help is if engaged community members can collaboratively list events that event organisers have posted elsewhere, so that community members can find all the community's events in one place (here) even if the event organisers don't bother to post them here themselves. This raises a few auth complications, e.g. if the event organiser wants to post their event ideally they'd be able to take ownership of the placeholder event uploaded by the community member. But if you can solve those, seeing all their events in one place might be a compelling reason for communities to organically switch over to your platform (at which point event organisers might well also follow).

john01dav
0 replies
1d22h

This looks great. I have a small local non-profit purely social event/group, and I'd like to be able to advertise it better. I did not use meetup because they have no way to post an event for free! Given that my use case is not about making money, I don't want to be spending money either. Meetup seemed to only have high budget events, many of which needed money to join. It would be very nice to have a place where you can just have non-money-related events (free to post, free to attend). Perhaps making everything that does not (generally) charge money to attend free would be a good choice for you.

Also, there should be a map so I can see as pins on a map which upcoming events are physically close to me. I recommend openstreetmap for this to keep costs down. You don't need the higher detail information that Google has for this.

irisguy
0 replies
19h36m

Looks great! I finished making a carpooling site a few weeks ago that automatches people into the optimal groups based on their location. Your site would work really well with mines: https://antride.ca/. Would appreciate if you could share my site to group organizers.

rough video demo here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToVn8tVQ0cc

huimang
0 replies
1d19h

I wish this project well but the main problem here is the network effect. Pretty much everyone I know is on meetup, and if they're not, they're on facebook. The experience isn't great but good luck getting anyone to sign up to a new random site. It's also very risky for people hosting events to switch over.

So I would focus on that more than any technical features other than group/event discovery.

hugocast
0 replies
1d22h

Looks great!Thanks for putting this together.

For some reason, EDT is not available on the dropdown menu. But my browser displays EDT once I publish the event.

So in the meetup event I can set it to be 7:00pm - 9:30pm EST, but it displays as 8pm - 10:30pm EDT.

I switched it to be 6pm-8:30pm EST so it displays the time that I want, 7pm-9:30pm EDT.

Any chance you could add EDT on the dropdown menu? Thank you.

https://radius.to/groups/latinos-in-tech-orlando-meetup/even...

harry-wood
0 replies
1d7h

I've ended up keeping a bit of list of events listing websites here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_Weekend_Howto#In... So I've added radius.to to that.

This is for running community events for OpenStreetMap, and so one quirky requirement is that ideally we show OpenStreetMap rather google maps (perhaps as an option). We also like to see open source options, of which there are a couple listed on there (more suggestions welcome!)

But all of these considerations are less important than the big one: Discoverability. meetup.com wins by having a list of events which is not just searchable and taggable etc, but also massive. So people just browse on there and find your event via their interests. That's a tough thing for any newcomer to compete with obviously.

gamerDude
0 replies
1d23h

I signed up because meetup failed me too. I used to be a host of events, but after things got so much about making money, the group just sucked.

However, I signed up for yours but there is no way to see other groups etc. so, I don't think what you have is meetup yet, just private event hosting. I hope you decide to make some groups have a public option so the events can find people outside their network to come.

crespire
0 replies
13h53m

Toronto Ruby co-organizer here, love Radius!

bn-l
0 replies
1d4h

I don’t have any specific feedback just want to say thanks for building this. This is something I also want and need badly.

b3ing
0 replies
1d20h

Meetup has very good SEO for most cities, you have to do the same

atulvi
0 replies
1d20h

Good luck trying to disrupt meetup.com. I really want this to happen, but they have market momentum. meetup.com is the most bloated app I've ever seen.

anon115
0 replies
1d22h

put up a google auth por favor i hate having to sign up manually >:(

alvincodes
0 replies
1d5h

https://guild.host/ is also doing some great work in this space.

adamredwoods
0 replies
1d20h

Great idea, 100% agree this space is ripe for innovation. But that website is cold and stark, the opposite of what a human-interaction should be. Find some (quality) stock photos of actual people to add to the landing page.

SkyMarshal
0 replies
1d23h

A little feedback: When I click "Notify me" on the front page, it takes me a sign-in form. I enter my email and a random password (since I don't have account yet), and then it tells me I don't have an account yet. I click "Sign Up" at the top and am taken to an account creation page. I then remember that all I wanted to do was sign up for the announcements email list, not create an account yet. why am I jumping through all these hoops? I quit and move on to the next HN article.

"Notify me" implies to the user they just need to give their email address and you'll email them with updates and announcements. They may not be ready to create an account yet, verify their email, all that rigamarole, so don't force them through that workflow just yet. When someone wants to give you their email address, for free, and get email updates from you, make it as simple and frictionless as possible for them to do that.

PcChip
0 replies
1d19h

I can’t seem to figure out how to see groups near me

Mystery-Machine
0 replies
1d20h

Please open-source it if the project dies. Thanks!

I'd say that the biggest threat is not getting enough traction/funding. Marketing could help to increase the user base.

KingOfCoders
0 replies
1d14h

For me Meetup was always about the marketing reach (created the eBay Tech Talk Germany event series with Meetup), not about features etc. (with 50% no-show-ups for free events in Berlin).

DevX101
0 replies
1d22h

I think the biggest unsolved issues that a platform could provide are:

- securing a meeting venue, especially for newer hosts

- how to encourage repeat attendendance. You can only build deeper relationships when you repeatedly 'bump' into someone with shared interests

- curating attendees (lu.ma does this, same with posh.vip for parties). I think there's still room for innovation here though.

Meetup discovery can actually be a net negative, without curation. You end up with perpetual networkers at technical/business events. Also with social media, many prospective hosts already have a channel to invite their people. That said, meetup search would be useful if attendees can be curated for the right experience/vibe.

Cordiali
0 replies
4h12m

    A wild COMPETITOR appeared!
Hello from Australia! I've been working on a related concept for about a year now, to solve a slightly different but related problem. I haven't produced anything yet, lots of research and planning, but this might light a fire under me!