return to table of content

Viagra improves brain blood flow and could help to prevent dementia

GlickWick
40 replies
17h57m

Wasn't this class of medication originally for cardiovascular issues, and the whole ED mitigation was a happy marketable accident?

paiute
17 replies
16h12m

It is being used off label all over the place for heart conditions. That’s why i take it. The on label use is actually pretty annoying for the first few months.

newswasboring
16 replies
13h42m

Not trying to be crass here, but does that mean you are just walking around with boners all day?

SeanAnderson
13 replies
13h33m

Not OP, but their statement read as if that effect wears off after the body develops tolerance to the medication. So, yes they did for a while (it was annoying) but no they don't now (for a few months)

jawngee
8 replies
12h24m

Or they grew accustomed to the erections and no longer found them annoying, which is how I read it.

xyproto
5 replies
5h54m

There must be a market for pants that have room for this.

xkcd-sucks
4 replies
4h6m

I've heard the erection points downwards if you slice the ligament holding it up on the top side that could make it fit down the leg better

royaltjames
1 replies
2h19m

What a terrible day to have eyes

pixl97
0 replies
1h14m

Yea, seems rather extreme when the doctor could also just prescribe phloppycoxin.

Somehow reminds me of another joke...

What do they call a testicle transplant in the US?

"Shooting someone else's children"

alfiedotwtf
0 replies
3h6m

Wtf

MrDrMcCoy
0 replies
2h27m

Hey, look at all this nope

itronitron
0 replies
6h56m

or other people found them annoying

coldtea
0 replies
3h3m

Or they found a girlfriend and can finally take full advantage of them!

Traubenfuchs
3 replies
11h51m

There is NO tolerance development, on the contrary, increasing vascular health by long term PDE5 treatment and increasing psychological confidence over time make the treatment more effective with time.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S205011611...

zolbrek
1 replies
7h11m

The first time I took sildenafil I had a bad headache and nausea, the next couple of times I didn't suffer from nausea and the headache wasn't as severe. I don't suffer from any side effects now other than my nose getting a bit stuffy every now and then, so in that sense I developed a tolerance to the medication's side effects. The boner effects still work just as reliably as day one, no tolerance development for me there.

rickydroll
0 replies
3h31m

you are lucky, in addition to the migraines and stuffy nose, sildenafil altered my vision making everything looked blue tinted. I tried a couple other drugs in that class but the migraines never went away.

The_Colonel
0 replies
11h3m

You're taking about slightly different things - you about ED, the other person about "boner all day". They are not the same thing.

Slightly off topic, but this is why I don't really trust these "no tolerance" claims. That claim is usually very specific, while people's understanding of "tolerance" is often quite a bit wider.

I take 3 medications which each make "no tolerance" claims based on scientific studies. But my subjective experience is that all of them do build tolerance in some way - the subjective effect does wear off with time and taking a break does reduce the tolerance. One possible cause is mistaking the intended effect (ED) with side-effects (boner all day).

WhackyIdeas
0 replies
5h0m

One trick I remember when I was going through puberty at school, I would make good use of tucking under my belt ha!

Traubenfuchs
0 replies
11h54m

No. You get hard easier and it takes longer to go down, but without (mental) stimulation, there is no erection. (for the vast majority of people taking sane dosages)

mikercampbell
15 replies
17h37m

I vaguely recall an anecdote about athletes using it for performance improvement, and getting a slightly different stat buff

brandall10
13 replies
17h20m

It's commonly used in bodybuilding competitions.

lukan
12 replies
16h3m

Now I cannot get that picture out of my head. A crowd full of bodybuilders in tight shorts and all on Viagra doing workouts.

Each to his own I guess..

BossingAround
4 replies
10h12m

I don't know how people imagine viagra working - it's not like you take a pill, you continue browsing the internet, reading news, and suddenly, a boner lifts your desk.

robxorb
1 replies
9h32m

That's pretty much how I imagined it working.

Was news to me to read in a sibling that it also requires mental stimulation. I thought it was purely a physical inducement by the drug, as many drugs for other purposes induce a physical response without requiring mental effort.

lukan
0 replies
5h20m

Me too. Even xkcd helped spread missinformation about the topic ..

https://xkcd.com/779/

coldtea
1 replies
3h0m

it's not like you take a pill, you continue browsing the internet, reading news, and suddenly, a boner lifts your desk.

Aside from the lifting the desk part, that's exactly how I imagine it working - and how it should work. You mean it also requires special sexual arousal? Well, even that it shouldn't be that difficult.

fostware
0 replies
2h17m

I imagine some just need a stiff breeze

idiotsecant
3 replies
14h45m

I'm pretty sure you don't just get random erections unless you're engaged in activity that you find sexually stimulating.

...so yes, probably.

rs_rs_rs_rs_rs
2 replies
13h12m

I'm pretty sure you don't just get random erections unless you're engaged in activity that you find sexually stimulating

I think that's the case for Cialis but Viagra should make you "pop" regardless of what activity you're doing.

Frost1x
1 replies
6h20m

That’s not how it works at all. As someone with recent onset of ED taking viagra regularly, it’s been fantastic but it just makes me function like I should.

It takes about an hour to take effect (usually less for me) and lasts a little over 4 hours with some lingering effects for several hours later, with diminishing effects towards the 4 and above hours.

If I’m sexually stimulated during that time physically and or mentally, everything works like it should (erection). If during that time even when I would normally see peak effects around the 50 min to 90 min mark I’m driving or doing taxes or whatever non-sexually stimulating activity one might do, no erection at all.

throwup238
0 replies
4h15m

You don’t get turned on by Schedule K-1 Form 1065? Nothing gets me hornier than correctly accounting for capital equipment depreciation.

rs_rs_rs_rs_rs
1 replies
13h13m

Bodybuilders at competition time have very low body fat and are very dehidrated, it's never an "issue".

Iulioh
0 replies
9h0m

And really big hormonal issues caused by the low body fat.

Bodybuilders (in the months before competing, while cutting) can't get it up even if they wanted to.

bitwize
0 replies
5h20m

Sounds like an Elton John video.

Most male bodybuilders wear loose shorts (or e.g., track pants) for workouts, the tight trunks being worn on the contest stage.

Traubenfuchs
0 replies
11h47m

Long term PDE 5 treatment lowers estrogen and increases testosterone. As a consequence of that, and its cardiovasvular effects, it makes it easier for the body to turn fat into energy by fat-browning, to grow muscles and to lose fat.

standardUser
0 replies
15h1m

We don't know how many medications actually function. We put them inside of increasingly complex animals and study the results to see what they do (and hope they don't die). Botox was intended to treat muscle spasms. Powerful anti-depressants are regularly prescribed for pain from nerve damage in people with no mental health issues. And MDMA isn't prescribed for anything because the powers that be prematurely decided to ban it based on completely fabricated claims, which I assume is part of a massive hundred-year conspiracy to make sure people... keep dying from alcohol? Not totally sure about that last one, but it's hard to deny the facts.

lebuffon
0 replies
4h46m

I know a former executive of the company that was developing this drug for cardiovascular problems. He told me that they sold it because it had this "side-effect" that they couldn't get rid of. ;-)

Marketing is the key to business success. (Talking to you, tech people)

jbandela1
0 replies
17h15m

That is true that it was originally for cardiovascular issues.

However, it seems that there was at least theoretical consideration that it could be used to treat ED

A nice overview is here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd2030

ekianjo
0 replies
16h42m

many drugs are found by accident

Phoenix5869
0 replies
17h12m

Yep. Originally developed for high blood pressure and angina, but in clinical trials was found to be more effective in treating ED than heart issues.

1oooqooq
0 replies
3h9m

this is the case with almost all drugs. for example almost every antidepressants was the result of a weight loss or something like that.

drug research is worse than training an LLM. you feed it to random people and then compare effects with initial conditions and of something looks good you try with more control.

sva_
37 replies
17h37m

The OxHARP trial was a meticulously designed double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 75 participants who had experienced a minor stroke and showed signs of mild to moderate small vessel disease. Each participant received sildenafil, a placebo, and cilostazol (a similar drug) over three-week periods in a randomised order.

I feel like dudes will know if they got Viagra or not? It doesn't seem like cilostazol has the same kind of effects on them, or does it? So is it really a placebo?

saulpw
26 replies
17h21m

Viagra doesn't "make" you hard, you still need sexual stimulus. I've taken it and then the sexual opportunity fell through, so I went back to coding or whatever, and I didn't notice anything different.

wumbo
6 replies
16h22m

Severe warning. I have no sexual problems and took a viagra once.

It definitely was automatic and persistent.

It was terrible. It wouldn’t even go away when I was done with it.

paiute
4 replies
16h1m

Pseudoephedrine

ThrowawayTestr
3 replies
15h6m

You shouldn't mix uppers and downers.

rblatz
1 replies
14h11m

The espresso martini would like to have a chat with you.

portaouflop
0 replies
11h25m

Small doses are fine

paiute
0 replies
14h25m

It’s one of the things they might give in a hospital for it.

wumbo
0 replies
2h32m

Why the downvotes? People are giving wrong and dangerous advice.

Yeah, you can say “well just don’t take it if it’s not prescribed.”

But don’t bury the truth. If you don’t have ED and you take it, the GP is wrong.

rs_rs_rs_rs_rs
4 replies
13h1m

Viagra doesn't "make" you hard, you still need sexual stimulus.

That's Cialis, Viagra should make you hard even when you're in the confession booth talking to a priest.

noduerme
1 replies
7h56m

which one makes the priest hard?

fetzu
0 replies
6h37m

Viagra was approved in the 90’s and Cialis in 2003, so I’m guessing none of them..

zolbrek
0 replies
6h59m

I have experience with both, this is not the case.

myrandomcomment
0 replies
11h26m

Viagra = standing at attention pretty much no matter what is going on. Cialis = you have to have the mind/stimulus.

dbdoug
4 replies
15h7m

I can (at the ripe old age of 78) confirm this completely. Without stimulation, nothing except facial flushing. With stimulation, and only with stimulation, a functioning erection.

adastra22
2 replies
8h28m

nothing except facial flushing

What does this mean?

rzzzt
1 replies
8h18m

Person takes pill, face gets a bit more rosy than usual. I guess it has an effect on small blood vessels everywhere.

adastra22
0 replies
33m

Thank you.

jcims
0 replies
4h26m

Without stimulation, nothing except facial flushing.

and for me, a stuffy nose and splitting headache.

chkaloon
4 replies
15h8m

But it does frequently cause nasal congestion, unrelated to sexual simulation

XajniN
3 replies
5h4m

It’s not unrelated actually, there is some tissue inside the nose cavity that is similar to the erectile tissue of the penis. That’s why the nose gets “stuffy” from sildenafil, and that’s why you sometimes sneeze when aroused.

rd07
1 replies
3h23m

A curious question, is nasal congestion has any correlation with high blood pressure?

XajniN
0 replies
2h10m

I wouldn’t know. Sildenafil lowers the blood pressure, so I would expect the negative correlation.

rjeli
0 replies
34m

See also levomethamphetamine, the mirror image of meth found commonly in drugstores in Vick’s inhalers, acting as a vasoconstrictor

mirekrusin
0 replies
15h29m

Maybe that's just java language, have you tried with other ones?

loeg
0 replies
15h36m

Viagra doesn't "make" you hard

It definitely does.

you still need sexual stimulus.

Not really, or to a much lesser extent.

gjs4786
0 replies
13h15m

Wrong python. Hehehe

bn-l
0 replies
16h52m

Dang, that is a sad tale.

spencerchubb
7 replies
17h18m

Maybe, but maybe not. If I told you I'm either giving you actual viagra or a placebo, you might get more aroused even if given placebo. Because psychologically you'll be thinking "There's at least a chance I took viagra right now"

ekianjo
6 replies
16h40m

the placebo effect does not work like that. You dont get physiological benefits just by thinking you have them.

hattmall
4 replies
15h8m

Isn't that the exact definition of the placebo effect?

ekianjo
2 replies
13h3m

you dont get antibodies against viruses just by thinking you have them.

tux3
0 replies
11h27m

Even if this is obviously true, that does nothing to support the original statement. That's a whole different claim that you had to fall back to.

Which is a motte-and-bailey type of argument.

alexey-salmin
0 replies
4h29m

And yet such thinking can in some cases increase your chances of surviving the viral infection. That's the placebo effect.

XajniN
0 replies
4h54m

A placebo has no physical or physiological effect at all, it can only affect what the test subjects think or pretend they feel.

Dylan16807
0 replies
16h25m

Being more aroused is not a physiological benefit.

To have no placebo effect, the random patients in the brain blood flow trial would need to all be unable to get erections, or something.

treprinum
1 replies
9h36m

Viagra doesn't work for everyone; it's not like you take it an get automatically erect, even with sexual stimulus. There are many reasons for ED, some of them in the brain, some of them in hormones. Viagra only helps with cardiovascular ones.

grugagag
0 replies
3h55m

I had a highly intelligent and good looking roommate with ED and it was devastating that at such a young age he couldnt’t maintian an erection even with viagra, cialis. I urged him to see a doctor and it turns out the ‘baloon’ down there that gets filled with blood also has a valve to keep the blood in. He had a misfunctioning valve and blood was leaking out and erection was soft. Sad story, as it seems to have had psychological effects on this person. Not sure it was much they could do at the time other than a manual pump fix. He did have a girlfriend though and they found other ways around it, though I heard she was cheating on him in search for a normal experience.

pcloadletter_
8 replies
16h26m

Maybe these studies are particularly hard

CydeWeys
4 replies
16h24m

They certainly are hard, because dementia is something that develops over years if not decades. Anytime it takes that long to do a single iteration of your experiment, it's hard!

jfoster
2 replies
16h11m

Does it need to be, though? You can survey healthy but senior populations about their habits, and then over the following years track what happens.

If medical records were public, the answers could even be in those for any medicines that are prescription based. You could then make statements like "A% of patients who took drug B within C years did/didn't develop disease D".

CydeWeys
1 replies
15h16m

That's not a randomized controlled trial though. You might find a correlation, but you couldn't actually establish causation, or eliminate hidden variables.

hombre_fatal
0 replies
7h35m

We have to get over this false meme where people think RCTs prove causation and the rest prove correlation.

An RCT doesn’t prove causation, it only might observe another correlation that contributes to our causal inferences based on the convergence of evidence.

We don’t have RCTs for most things that you take for granted.

lisper
0 replies
16h6m

And any time the object of your study is also a treatment for ED it gets extra hard. ;-)

henriquez
0 replies
15h26m

It’s hard science. I take viagra every day and have only become moderately demented, so obviously it’s working.

debo_
0 replies
16h10m

Don't worry, I caught your innuendo.

K0balt
0 replies
16h19m

That seems a reasonable assumption.

ezekiel68
3 replies
16h25m

Who knows what to believe.

This may be a sincere statement, but I'm not sure it's a helpful one. What data do we have? A 2:1 advantage in published studies that it does help. Since there is no such thing in science as absolute proof of anything, these are pretty good odds. Certainly more work will be done in the future to try to replicate the results and figure out the one negative outcome. But until then, we cannot say that the evidence is in any way "equal" on both sides.

zerocrates
0 replies
15h58m

The first one is just a combination of some computer modeling guessing at possibly useful existing drugs and a look at the existing patient data showing that people who were on these seemed to have Alzheimer's less. It's very clear that it's just an initial step that doesn't actually show there's a benefit.

The second is more of that same basic kind of research, but weighing in the opposite direction: it showed no association with Alzheimer's for people with a specific other condition who got these drugs vs. ones with the same condition that didn't (also they did some cell culture testing outside the body that didn't show any effect/improvement).

This new one is an actual double-blind study giving people the drug. Equally important, it's not claiming an effect on Alzheimer's, but vascular dementia, a different form of dementia that's directly related to blood flow and therefore to Viagra's known effects. Of course it's still just really a marker for future research on if this is broadly useful.

engine_y
0 replies
15h51m

Might be a 2:1 but we also have to take into account the level of evidence each study provides.

HPsquared
0 replies
7h36m

Studies aren't conducted at random, it's not really valid to sample them as though they were. Major selection bias.

j45
1 replies
15h59m

Could be different for different folks

hk1337
0 replies
15h54m

Different strokes for different folks?

throwup238
0 replies
16h32m

I’ve always been taught that “a wank a day keeps the doctor away” so I believe it.

stoorafa
0 replies
11h14m

That second study didn’t use as robust of methods as the first, and they each used observational data that benefit from advanced methods (propensity score analysis).

With an RCT, the evidence is substantially increased.

I’d conclude sildenafil reduces risk of age-associated cognitive decline

peutetre
0 replies
16h0m

All I know for certain is there's no dementia in my pants.

makeitdouble
0 replies
16h16m

Who knows what to believe.

Honest question: do we need to believe one or the other ?

Or can we get away with "it depends" or "it works on some subjects and not on others"

hk1337
0 replies
15h55m

Maybe they forgot what they said before?

deepfriedchokes
0 replies
16h19m

This is like the supposed health benefits of drinking red wine. I don’t know if it’s true or not but it’s fun to find out.

silenced_trope
19 replies
18h18m

I take 4.5mg cialis (tadalafil) every day.

I think a lot of people do. Viagra is slightly different of course.

Both "hims" and "blue chew" now offer a daily mint "multivitamin" of tadalafil.

jjallen
18 replies
18h12m

You take it for this purpose or why?

QuantumGood
12 replies
17h59m

It is prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; an enlarged prostate) which include difficulty urinating—not just for ED

abraae
4 replies
16h58m

Just hijacking to add a public health warning about BPH. Like many men as they get older, I was getting up several times a night to pee. Thought I would just put up with it until it got worse.

I went on a yacht for the weekend, drank quite a few beers and crashed to sleep.

I awoke to find out I couldn't pee at all. I can't describe how painful things were by the time I staggered into the emergency department that evening. Definitely the worst experience of my life. A few weeks later a guy was winched off a boat by helicopter with the same condition - one of his mates had been tasked with catheterising him using the rubber fuel hose from the boat's engine, but was unsuccessful.

If you are having trouble urinating, seek medical attention - don't ignore it.

justinc8687
1 replies
16h28m

Is there some correlation to boats or just happenstance?

abraae
0 replies
16h24m

Just coincidence, situations where one might drink too much and be isolated from medical care.

barrenko
0 replies
11h46m

Ignoring prostate issues for 6 months got me to the edge of sanity - I was 26 then and was told there was no way I have prostate issues.

2-3-7-43-1807
0 replies
8h6m

why on a yacht, though? i have a similar problem. shy bladder plus tense pelvic base. maybe even somewhat increased prostate (i don't know). so peeing is always something i need a little privacy for. but everytime i'm scuba diving plus out with a boat it's like my prostate is locking up completely. extremely weird and uncomfortable feeling. on those small boats there is never a toilet but there are sneaky options that in theory should work but don't. so i'm wondering if the wavy motion might have something to do with this problem.

astrange
1 replies
11h54m

If you want to pretend to be old, Strattera gives you the effects of this as a side effect.

hombre_fatal
0 replies
7h14m

Another weird effect was that my ejaculation and orgasm were seconds apart. Don’t remember which came first (pun). Hated that drug.

petereddy
0 replies
16h48m

I take it on doctor’s orders to recover from prostate cancer. Improving the circulation in that area should help rebuilding tissue.

pasquinelli
0 replies
17h45m

now you have my attention.

paiute
0 replies
15h55m

There are many off label uses. Pulmonary Hypertension for one.

koolala
0 replies
17h49m

ouch thank you for explaining your usecase

QuantumGood
0 replies
3h21m

BPH smptoms I started having in my '60s turned out to go away when I stopped taking antihistamines for seasonal allergies.

tomcam
3 replies
17h59m

Looks like 5mg viagra is 10%-20% of the minimum recommended dose for viagra's original purpose

saulpw
0 replies
17h20m

10mg works really well in my experience.

loeg
0 replies
15h30m

GP is talking about cialis (tadalafil), a completely different drug. It is dosed differently from viagra (sildenafil).

Scoundreller
0 replies
16h17m

5mg of tadalafil would be 50% of the typical “as needed” dose for its original purpose

snakeyjake
0 replies
17h4m

I do the same because 20 years ago a roadside bomb blew up next to the vehicle I was riding in and caused it to roll over and down an embankment and the repeated impacts compressed my lumbar discs which after about 10 years manifested as degenerative disc disease at L5-S1 and a series of disc bulges and scar tissue build-up up and down my lumbar region that compressed the nerves leading to my genitals and ultimately led to a spinal fusion of that area...

...and a low dose makes it so my penis functions normally.

It's fantastic, really.

elzbardico
11 replies
16h40m

Well. too sad I can't take it. It gives me terrible heartburn (an acute stomach pain, not a heart related condition) that only partially responds to anti-acids such as Alka Seltzer.

Also, extremelly stuffy nose, to the point where basically I need to breath by the mouth. And the red eyes, eyes as red as if had just smoke the biggest and strongest joint ever.

Yes, I tried to use it recreationally a few times. It is not worth the pain for me.

And then the dosage in the study: 50mg 3X times a day? I am not sure I could even survive the first day.

Did I mention the headaches too?

EDIT: Before someone asks... At least the on-label effect works really well in a recreational setting for me. But it is kind of funny to have persistent carbon-steel erections when you're feeling miserable with stomach pain and can't breath well. Doing oral sex with a stuffy nose is... interesting.

talldatethrow
1 replies
16h13m

Were you taking authentic or internet genetics from China/India?

Ive gone through a decent amount of generics over the years, from several sources, and even though the label is the same, they almost all act differently on me. Some give me a flushed red face. Some cause a dull headache. Some don't cause anything negative thank God. They all work though.

I think the Indian/Chinese ones are laced with garbage and what I feel depends on what else was in there.

exodust
0 replies
11h39m

The one time I used it over a few weeks was a generic brand. The on-label effect worked, but I had one disturbing side effect: terrible nightmares.

Unscientific conclusion, but the nights I took it when with my new gf at the time, nightmares followed. Binned the remaining pills, nightmares vanished. Possibly the generic additives factor, or maybe the drug itself. Who knows, never tried it again after that.

flatline
1 replies
15h54m

Viagra is prn, you should not take it 3x/day. Cialis is a daily dose.

elzbardico
0 replies
15h47m

I was talking about the regime used in the study. If you read the article you'll find that

SOLAR_FIELDS
1 replies
15h16m

It sounds like you have at least a small allergy to something in the drug. The stuffy nose is something I get when I take trazodone.

at_a_remove
0 replies
5h27m

Nope. You know that erectile tissue? Well, it's not just in the penis, it's also in the nose as well. Hence the stuffy nose. It's not allergies, it's the same sort of tissue having the same response.

That "pump" in your nose you may feel just prior to a good sneeze? That's those tissues swelling with blood.

01100011
1 replies
15h14m

Yeah I occasionally take it or tadalafil for BPH/prostatitis because they have less side effects than alpha blockers. I've got GERD and a hiatal hernia and, man, it really fires it up. Chewing gum sort of helps. I also only take half of a 25mg. I'll sometimes get the stuffy nose and rarely a headache but the stomach issues almost prevent me from using it. I've sort of grown used to tolerating extreme stomach pain though, so I still use it if I really need it.

elzbardico
0 replies
3h11m

Man. Based on personal experience at my family. I bet you're carefully keeping tabs on your stomach with a doctor, but if not, don't grow used to tolerate extreme stomach pain. I've seen stomach cancer in my family, and I would like to encourage you do whatever you can to minimize the risk for you.

vidarh
0 replies
11h51m

Having tried it recreationally and also getting the stuffy nose, NSAIDs counter that effectively for me. Of course if you also get acute heartburn you want to be careful with combining it with something that can be tough on the stomach...

Talk to your doctor about whether you can combine with a proton pump inhibitor like Omeprazole. There's are downsides (in particular, sustained use can mask other things, including serious issues) but I've not had a single episode of heartburn since I was out on it.

WesolyKubeczek
0 replies
10h24m

Also, extremelly stuffy nose, to the point where basically I need to breath by the mouth. And the red eyes, eyes as red as if had just smoke the biggest and strongest joint ever.

Looks like an allergic reaction; it could be not so much in sildenafil itself, but what they use as filler for the pills.

Scoundreller
0 replies
16h25m

Sildenafil is fairly short acting, so that’s probably the reason for 3x/day (but a better choice if you don’t need a whole day of effects because of its side effects like sinus congestion).

Tadalafil (Cialis) would probably be a better choice, and is used at daily (but reduced) dosing for prostrate issues.

mpenick
10 replies
17h21m

Saunas, hot baths, and excercise improve blood flow.

demondemidi
8 replies
17h12m

This is America: we demand a low-effort, overpriced solution, preferably in pill form.

senordevnyc
3 replies
16h44m

Not everyone on HN is from the US, and the study in question is from the UK...

demondemidi
2 replies
16h20m

Do you have jokes where you live?

jrflowers
1 replies
15h23m

Do you

hattmall
0 replies
14h42m

GOT EM!!

Frost1x
1 replies
5h17m

It’s more of a testament to a potential beneficial side effect of an already widely used drug for something entirely different.

I (in America) actually exercise 5-6 days a week with regular sauna use afterwards averaging about 2-2.5 hours per total session (20 minutes from sauna). I coincidentally even happen to take long hot baths frequently (3-4 times a week for an hour) as a form of stress relief, relaxation, and it further helps with muscle recovery.

Absolutely none of that helps me to a notable degree with what the specific pill in question does which I also use regularly. In addition, viagra adds an additional say 4 hours per day per pill to my normal weekly routine of increased blood flow that may help reduce risk of dementia when I’m older. That’s a big win in my book if it’s true as it’s something I already do and is additive.

demondemidi
0 replies
3h12m

Or maybe guys that are embarrassed about it need some other cover story?

houseplant
0 replies
12h33m

think about the main consumer base for viagra, and then think about who makes the majority of economic/financial decisions in this country.

Dylan16807
0 replies
16h20m

Saunas and hot baths are low-effort too, but they get pretty expensive time-wise.

And these pills are pretty cheap.

larsrc
0 replies
8h55m

Cognitive Long COVID sufferer here. All the of those help indeed, but why not this, too? With a shot.

doubloon
10 replies
16h51m

you know what else would?

walkable cities

more time off from work

more third spaces

less air pollution

less inequality

of course none of that "increases productivity or GDP" so the ruling class won't consider it. of course when they start dying like Japan with low birth rates, their 'solution' is to have a government funded dating app instead of doing the obvious.

kredd
4 replies
16h12m

Given the opportunity, people will do anything else than have more than 2 children, which is the requirement to increase the population. There’s just better stuff to do than spend multiple years taking care of the baby. Any argument other than “for the greater good” won’t sound reasonable to educated population. Talking to my friends, especially women who already have a child, they keep mentioning the opportunity loss when you go through pregnancy and birth (career, vacations, personal growth and etc.). You can call it selfish, but it’s the reality and nobody wants to fall behind. Everything you mentioned is great, and I support it, but I doubt it’ll convince young people to sacrifice at the very minimum 6 years of their life (pregnancy + first year).

hattmall
1 replies
14h47m

Are people really saying they missed out on "personal growth" when they had kids?

Taking care of kids is not that hard or much of a sacrifice really. It would be super easy if things were even more communal. There's just really not that much great stuff that you are missing out on after like 35/40+. In truth most of the stuff geared to people in that age range is designed for people with kids. I think a lot of people would prefer to have more than 2 kids. The major issue is that SO much stuff is designed for the family of four. Yeah there's 3rd row seating, but it's annoying. Furniture that comes in 2 packs, theme parks, restaurant tables, vacation accommodations, etc. Because of modern life and the things we are accustomed to the logistical management burden of more than two children is very significant.

kredd
0 replies
4h41m

Not 35+, think of mid/late 20s as it used to be about 20 years ago. Peak health, some disposable income, educated, but also good age to bear a child. If you start having children at 35-40, it’ll be harder for you to have 3+ children, but now for health reasons.

Up here in Canada, according to statistics, only 20% of couples want to have 3+ children. If I recall it correctly, it’s not that they have it, but plan to, which might not even happen due to socioeconomic reasons.

I don’t think majority of young people want to have 3 children though, as you mentioned. Even if I do an extremely unscientific look around in my circles, the number of couples who want that is 0. I obviously might be in a bubble, but it’s a fairly common sentiment especially for my age group.

Engineering-MD
1 replies
10h5m

For me having kids has been massive personal growth. In some ways having kids is synergistic with many of life’s goals and personal growth. Career, less so, but I can a more capable human for being a parent.

kredd
0 replies
4h37m

You’re most likely right, but people achieve the same result with having one or two children as well. It’s having minimum of 3 children that is needed to have a population growth, and that’s sometimes a bad life choice for a young woman nowadays. Again, back to opportunity loss.

It’s way easier for me to babble, because if I was a father I wouldn’t have to go through pregnancy period. Statistically it also shows men want more children than women, and that’s fair because it affects our physical health way less.

astrange
1 replies
16h45m

Less air pollution does increase productivity (air pollution is actually really bad for your mental performance, it's a surprisingly strong effect) and it seems to me "the ruling class" does consider it seeing as the Clean Air Act exists.

Btw, Japan has walkable cities of course but also has low inequality (but not so high wealth). Approximately nothing is known to increase birth rates except for being highly religious though; it seems they mostly collapse when people have anything else to do for fun besides have sex. So basically it's caused by being on your phone too much.

arcimpulse
0 replies
16h31m

"Japan doesn't have walkable cities" is not a logical conclusion one can draw from the grandparent.

hattmall
0 replies
14h39m

Are there lower rates of dementia in places that have those things?

ezekiel68
0 replies
16h21m

Nah, man.

I'll take the Capitalism and the pills.

123yawaworht456
0 replies
13h1m

"walkable cities" is the solution to virtually everything these days, apparently.

I keep seeing this /r/antiwork crap in the most unexpected places around here.

the_arun
8 replies
18h14m

It needs prescription, correct?

cactusplant7374
1 replies
17h52m

It's possible to order it from Indian pharmacies or one can pick it up while on vacation in the third world.

Scoundreller
0 replies
16h20m

Which is why every package I get from India (to Canada) goes through heavy inspection, to the point that most/all Indian pharmacies just won’t ship here anymore.

bananamerica
1 replies
17h18m

Over the counter in Brazil.

dbdoug
0 replies
14h58m

And a month's supply of generic tadafila 5mg in Brasil costs less than USD$7.00

sva_
0 replies
17h35m

In the UK you can get it over the counter since a couple years back afaik.

loeg
0 replies
15h32m

In the US, yeah, but arguably it shouldn't be. Probably the only good reason for controlling it is risk of priapism from people using it stupidly, which is an extremely bad "go to the ER now" condition.

koolala
0 replies
17h47m

ummmmmm... no offense if you have dementia and i have no easy way to ask about it, sorry this question is personal and you could easily just be asking for a friend

ethagnawl
0 replies
16h40m

In the US, it does but the bar is laughably low. For example, you can get a prescription on blewchew.com which gets "reviewed" by their "consulting physicians" and have it in hand in a day or two.

bouncycastle
5 replies
17h56m

All you need is regular exercise to improve blood flow

mpenick
2 replies
17h23m

Simple solutions to hard problems seem to be falling out of favor.

larsrc
0 replies
8h48m

Have done regular exercise to improve my Long COVID state for 6 months now. It has helped, but it has its limits too. If I overdo it, I get worse, but I can't always tell until later. And other health issues are limiting what forms of exercise I can do.

Hard problems rarely have one simple solution, or they wouldn't be hard, would they?

Spod_Gaju
0 replies
16h47m

Actually, exercise lowers cGMP (and low cGMP is what Viagra reverses) so your "simple solution" is actually totally wrong.

rsynnott
1 replies
8h40m

The OxHARP trial was a meticulously designed double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving 75 participants who had experienced a minor stroke and showed signs of mild to moderate small vessel disease.

I mean, I think if going for a walk were a magic bullet for stroke rehabilitation, someone would have noticed by now.

SamPatt
0 replies
6h23m

I'm not knowledgeable about stroke rehabilitation specifically, but the benefits of walking are extremely robust. Especially if you're talking about the difference between a totally sedentary lifestyle and one which includes a substantial amount of walking.

bionhoward
5 replies
11h11m

Just a word to the wise, viagra can cause tinnitus by putting too much blood through tiny vessels in your ears. Be careful of high doses while hydrated and exercising

noduerme
2 replies
7h58m

isn't, er, vigorous exercise part of what people expect when they take viagra?

sushid
0 replies
46m

It's common to have a 1 hour running or a lifting session 3-4 times a week but kudos to you and/or my condolences to your partner if your vigorous exercise lasts that long every time.

galdosdi
0 replies
2h2m

Depends. The kind of exercise you're thinking can be done vigorously and for a long period -- or, for some people, it could be a quick 5-10 minute thing that feels vigorous but really doesn't involve that much muscular effort.

alfiedotwtf
1 replies
3h17m

Off-topic but related… I started Vyvanse about 3 months ago and the only negative side effect so far is tinnitus. It’s bloody loud :(

hooverd
0 replies
35m

It can also be caused by SSRIs and NDRIs and benzos! Great side effect if you're already feeling depressed. Although benzos can also help, depending. I think 80% of cases are a brain thing and not an ear thing, but because ENTs and audiologists have exactly one hammer (hearing aids), we get fuck all for research.

ablyveiled
5 replies
17h44m

Viagra increases the effect of nitric oxide, which is bad stuff when it gets into cytochrome complex iv in the mitochondria (IIRC). I would personally suspect based on that, that its effects on brain health would be negative in spite of blood flow.

francisofascii
2 replies
17h21m

Nitric oxide bad for you? Pretty sure it is good for you ,otherwise super foods like beets and leafy greens would be bad for you.

astrange
0 replies
16h44m

Leafy greens can be bad if you're sensitive to oxalates. Depends how you cook them though.

Spod_Gaju
0 replies
16h51m

Too little NO is bad for you, too much NO is bad for you.

fnordpiglet
0 replies
17h13m

Nitric oxide is a crucial part of the biology of life, especially animals. Viagra does not specifically impact the amount of nitric oxide in the body or the nitric oxide cycle mediated by arginine. It instead enhances the effect of NO in the smooth muscle. I would not worry about nitric oxide in general as it’s crucial for the basic functioning of your body.

Dylan16807
0 replies
16h15m

1. "Bad stuff" meaning what?

2. There's no such thing as increasing "the effect" of such a nonspecific chemical as nitrogen oxide. There's tons of effects, and it increases some of them. Also, can the active ingredient get into mitochondria?

xgkickt
4 replies
17h15m

I’d like to see how this effect from Sildenafil compares to increased NO levels from eating beets.

paiute
0 replies
15h58m

This is how i figured out NO would help my heart. Eating cereal colored with beet powder. If i understand the magic happens when it combines with saliva. So chewing beets might help.

debo_
0 replies
16h4m

looks at pants I see you've been beeting off

... Sorry

CoastalCoder
0 replies
16h38m

If nothing else, you're making me imagine some new scenes involving Dwight Schrute :)

01100011
0 replies
15h12m

Also arginine and/or citrulline.

spencerchubb
4 replies
17h25m

Boss: You look... particularly excited to be working today

Me: I'm just trying this new technique to boost productivity

luxuryballs
1 replies
17h10m

you seem to be working hard today

xtracto
0 replies
16h47m

Oh man...

anigbrowl
1 replies
17h1m

Username checks out

spencerchubb
0 replies
13h43m

My username is my legal first and last name lmao

boguscoder
4 replies
18h3m

Hmm I thought viagra improves blood flow in opposite place but 2 for price of 1 is great too

sva_
1 replies
17h49m

I think it just causes vasodilation anywhere in the body?

andrewstuart
0 replies
17h47m

Its all the same.

Izikiel43
0 replies
17h27m

Different head

treprinum
2 replies
10h2m

It also seems to cause melanoma, so... Pomergranate/beetroot/garlic seem safer. Arginine/citrulline perhaps as well (all of them increase NO in the blood).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4178948/

https://www.drugwatch.com/viagra/melanoma/

"In 2014, a study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found that the use of sildenafil, more commonly known by its brand name Viagra, within 3 months prior to the study’s start increased the likelihood of developing melanoma by as much as 84 percent.'

loeg
1 replies
9h50m

It is associated with increased risk of melanoma, but not known to cause it. The third variable is expected to be lifestyle / socioeconomic. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2338254

Men taking PDE5 inhibitors had a higher educational level and annual income, factors that were also significantly associated with melanoma risk.
treprinum
0 replies
9h48m

Still, it's a food for thought. I know correlation is not causation but there might be some link that hits some folks unexpectedly hard. I was taking sildenafil to improve brain hypoperfusion from long covid and one day a fast growing mole appeared on my arm that reached 2cm diameter in a few days - the suspicion was on nodular melanoma or pyogenic granuloma and it turned out to be the latter. I stopped taking sildenafil immediately. I am in the socioeconomic group they mentioned.

pram
2 replies
17h20m

I’ve read about people using tadalafil as a nootropic in the past. Is there even a difference?

It’s so easy to get a prescription these days might be worth a shot.

simple10
0 replies
16h59m

Tadalafil (Cialis) can be useful for dealing with depressive symptoms. It's commonly used in nootropic circles.

With both viagra and tadalafil, they can negatively effect sleep. So it's hit or miss for a lot of people depending on depressive or anxiety symptoms.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306377/

anigbrowl
0 replies
16h57m

It's thought to improve neuronal density in the hippocampus and also (higher p) to increase bone density. A lot of bodybuilders and athletes use it for increased blood flow benefits, partly because it seems to have fewer side effects then sidenafil (which can cause mild retinal damage leading to a blue tint in the vision; probably why Pfizer used a blue tint in all their advertising). I have no personal experience with it but the theory seems sound.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7321982/

largbae
2 replies
15h35m

I always wonder if there is a circular logic flaw in survey studies of recreation and dementia: could it be that the folks who are chasing Viagra or running marathons don't get dementia, because the ones with dementia don't pursue these activities?

loeg
0 replies
15h28m

This isn't a survey; it's an RCT.

acchow
0 replies
15h32m

This is known as a confounding bias. A quality study should try to eliminate the obvious ones, but of course there may still he an infinite number of hidden confounding variables.

koolala
2 replies
17h52m

deleted?

koolala
1 replies
17h51m

wait i read the whole headline now sorry

koolala
0 replies
17h50m

wait "prevent?" whats going on? ill read the comments, oh wait

Arthanos
2 replies
17h14m

50mg 3x a day, according to the study: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.124.32432...

Seems high to me, but I've never taken the drug. I assume most people take it just a few times a week for it's intended use? Is anyone aware of research that shows positive benefits to health at recreational doses?

Aurornis
1 replies
16h48m

That’s a standard dose. 3X per day is because it has a short half life.

Is anyone aware of research that shows positive benefits to health at recreational doses?

Recreational doses? What does that mean? Excessive vasodilation isn’t going to be fun. You actually need some vasoconstriction to balance your blood pressure. Too much and you’re just going to get headaches and lightheaded. Excessive vasodilation would be expected to worsen cognition.

ezekiel68
0 replies
16h22m

Recreational doses? What does that mean?

I mean, we don't need to act obtuse here in the name of pedantry. Commenter was clearly referring to occasional use for on-label indication.

standardUser
1 replies
14h27m

The 3x daily dosage is surprising to me because the one notable warning that comes with the prescription is to never take it more than once in a day. In fact, I would go as far to say that if you've been prescribed Viagra the only things you know about it are: it will help you get boners, you should talk to a doctor if you have a heart condition, and you should never use it more than once a day. The warning seemed extra ominous because it was basically the only warning, so I adhered to it fairly strictly at first.

About a year later I talked to some gay male friends and they all said that was ridiculous, that they freely take it multiple times per day, and I that should too. So now I do (as needed) and it's worked very well. Plus, the subscription I get through Hims sends me a giant bottle of 20mg pills (at an unreasonably high cost) so I am able to easily dose myself instead of being given a one-size-fits-all dosage, like we get with most medications. My low dose is 3 pills and my high dose is 5 pills.

Now there are many options beyond Viagra including a ton of intriguing combination drugs that use multiple erection drugs and/or other drugs with tangential effects. But I like that I know how Viagra works for me personally based on experience. I think we all underestimate how much drugs very from person to person. Plus, now that I think about the lack of warnings that come with Viagra, it actually seems like an unusually benign drug.

UberFly
0 replies
13h38m

A typical dose of Viagra is 25,50 or 100 mg, so your 3-5 doses of 20 mg isn't even atypical. Also, there are plenty of warnings that come with Viagra usage. You may have not taken the time to read them.

ofrzeta
0 replies
12h15m

One trial with 62 patients and then "Since we did not meet our sample size due to the loss of funding and could not confirm our primary hypothesis, larger studies of longer duration, likely multi-center, are needed to confirm the findings from this study. "

cpill
1 replies
10h10m

I wonder if it would help with the brain fog of long Covid...?

bell-cot
1 replies
18h9m

Expect a new tsunami of Viagra spam in 3...2...1...

jagged-chisel
0 replies
17h53m

I bet you were at least sixty seconds late

a_wild_dandan
1 replies
17h49m

“…involving 75 participants who had experienced a minor stroke and showed signs of mild to moderate small vessel disease.”

mikercampbell
0 replies
17h36m

I had my hopes up, but there is the kicker

seydor
0 replies
9h14m

between this and cialis helping with prostate cancer, i wonder if the erection is just a side effect

pylua
0 replies
7h18m

Maybe now viagra opens up to older women, not just men ? It will double their market ?

pbj1968
0 replies
17h10m

I used to buy it over the counter in Mexico for recreational purposes, now I have some ancient prescription I don’t need that’s renewed annually for free. A stiff breeze will work, it’s actually remarkable. It will totally make your skin flush and make you feel light headed, not surprised by any of this.

nothrowaways
0 replies
14h19m

What a coincidence

madmask
0 replies
12h4m

Try some citrulline

kabes
0 replies
12h33m

It also increases blood flow to the scalp, which helps against hair loss.

jgalt212
0 replies
2h56m

There's a joke / counterpoint in here about men with erections thinking less clearly than men without erections.

hkt
0 replies
16h44m

Ah, finally, Rupert Murodch's secret!

dkekenflxlf
0 replies
4h30m

@ALL:

Guys (esp!), for real-pros, Viagra is a toy - instead, they use Taladafil/etc.

(Source: Boner all day _actually_ hurts ;-)

bitwize
0 replies
5h22m

So it works as well for the big head as it does for the little head. Interesting, but somehow I feel I should have figured this was the case.

adolph
0 replies
16h23m

canned ham health benefits still elude science

Spod_Gaju
0 replies
16h55m

If this is true they altered zinc metabolism might play a role in dementia since zinc is the cofactor for PDE5, or that people who do not make enough cGMP are prone to dementia (which also means they might be low in GTP and GTP regulates glucose-insulin secretion so...)

So I think they can do better then "here is a pill give me more money".

Havoc
0 replies
17h47m

Presumably it would need to be pretty continuous though? So uhm like micro dosing ?