I find it quite concerning just how much propaganda the US seems to get from Israel. Where I live there are big billboards around, I regularly see ads on YouTube.
I know propaganda is a thing, but it feels like we are getting more about a foreign government than our own.
I feel like before what is going on now I was aware of some of the groups responsible for this being a thing, but was not fully aware just how much money there was in it those organizations until recently.
Some of the practices are concerning, like I found out recently apparently the Boston police regularly go over to Israel for training?
Regardless of what is going on right now, I don't understand how this much power over the US was ever deemed acceptable?
The best part is when it comes from our own "newspaper of record" i.e. with the extraordinarily dubious "mass rape" article the NYT published. They finally dismissed the one Israel-connected reporter who had liked tweets calling for a brutal response against Gaza, but that of course has seen about one billionth the attention that her original claims continue to receive.
You also get stuff like the POTUS repeating lies like "40 beheaded babies" and "a mother and child had kerosene poured on them" with none of the usual media freakout you usually see over "misinformation."
The NYTimes also reported about an alleged Israeli strike on a hospital killing hundreds despite it ended up being a Hamas failed rocket.
It seems to me the the NYTimes is trying to be somewhat objective but just gets stuff wrong occasionally.
"Getting stuff wrong" by not corroborating facts using reliable sources is not acceptable for a news organization.
You're right, but just want to dispute the claim that NYTimes is somehow Israeli propaganda - I think it's clearly not.
The claim has some merit: https://theintercept.com/2024/04/15/nyt-israel-gaza-genocide...
They were told to not used those words because they are disputed and not consider facts, pretty sure they can and still use those words in opinion pieces.
This line of propaganda is kind of infuriating. Separate from this incident, Israel bombed afaik every hospital in Gaza. They claimed Hamas was operating inside them or under them and produced absolutely zero credible evidence of it. They killed a lot of doctors and patients. But if they start out polluting minds with the claim that one time at the Al Ahli parking lot, there was an Islamic Jihad rocket once, they then by extension use that to imply that Hamas is somehow responsible for all the deaths in hospitals that happen by Israeli hands on every other day.
You are changing the subject, I'm just disputing that NYtimes is Israel propaganda, I'm not claiming anything about the righteousness of Israeli actions.
My personal opinion of NYT is that their record is mixed on the subject.
If you'll allow me to change the subject to one that is less presently divisive to provide an instructive example, NYT's conduct in the lead-up to the Iraq war is a great example of where they acted as a pro-war propaganda mouth piece, and maybe the institution doesn't deserve our total trust.
"Somewhat" is doing some heavy lifting here. The NY Times internal pro-Israeli editorial guidelines were leaked. NY Times is a pro-Israel biased source:
https://theintercept.com/2024/04/15/nyt-israel-gaza-genocide...
CNN even sends all stories to Israel to be approved/disapproved and/or edited to ensure pro-Israel bias, so I guess NY Times is at least better than CNN:
https://theintercept.com/2024/01/04/cnn-israel-gaza-idf-repo...
It is pretty disgusting. All major US corporate media is biased in favor of Israel:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_coverage_of_the_Arab%E2%...
Israel also has put fear of god into US government officials through their lobby group, AIPAC (the only foreign lobby group of its kind that is not required by the U.S. to register as a foreign agent). While no fan of former president Reagan, he called the Israeli attacks on Lebanon a "holocaust" and stopped Israeli atrocities against Lebanon by threatening cutting off US aide. Now all our representatives line up behind Israel in their perpetration of genocide-- especial Biden.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIPAC
https://www.amazon.com/Foreign-Agents-Committee-Fulbright-Es...
https://www.wrmea.org/north-america/aipac-election-role-rais...
I have struggled to even look at my News app anymore.
Next to articles about the protests or other things, there are the articles about the hostages or something else that just feels like a propaganda piece aimed at one thing.
And that is just the headlines.
Do you find it concerning that no presidential candidate can even pass the primary without first kissing the ring of AIPAC? That Zionist lobby openly attacks insufficiently pro-Zionist candidates and then openly brags when they lose elections? With Zionist lobby trying to outlaw any criticism of Israel in direct violation of 1st amendment? Etc, etc. IDK about others, but I think this is insane.
I hope you two realize that it’s exactly this kind of rhetoric that has led to Israel putting so much money, time, and effort into defending their reputation
Antisemitism is a very very old problem
Trying to shut down a conversation with "Antisemitism" does not help your case.
Being critical of their actions does not equal antisemitism.
I fully understand why they are doing what they are doing, they would be stupid not too. That doesn't mean its ok and we should accept it.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/17/pro-israel-m...
How do you propose we determine the fine line between the antisemitic "The Jews run the World" and "being critical of their actions"? What would e.g. be the piece of evidence that convinces you that we're dealing with antisemitism and not legitimate criticism?
We shouldn't shut down conversations about Israel with antisemitism but we also shouldn't shut down conversations about antisemitism with "being critical of their actions".
There are many other groups lobbying for various causes in the US, e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_lobby_in_the_United_State...
"According to ProPublica, 4 of the top 10 governments lobbying in Washington are Arab, in terms of spending. The United Arab Emirates places first, having spent $10,914,002 in 2007 and 2008. Iraq, Morocco and Saudi Arabia also each spent over $3 million, and the non-Arab, Middle Eastern nation of Turkey also spent over $3 million."
Why the focus on Israel here?
That is the what the article is about and there is something going in involving Israel.
I can't find the article I read a while ago with a graph showing their massive increase in spending, but according to a few articles AIPAC plans to spend $100Million this year.
As far as how to distinguish between them. I really don't think this should be complicated.
Criticizing a government is not criticizing a religion or people.
If I start to attack a religion or to attack a group of people based on those beliefs, then yeah that is antisemitism. Actually having and voicing a problem with jewish people.
A government is not that. We criticize our own government all the time and we are not anti-American (ok, admittedly some do try to make those claims but that's a different story).
yes I will also admit that this got complicated with the protests.
Because the original post is about Israel using fake social media accounts to get US representatives to support genocide in Gaza. We’ve literally just passed some laws to _sanction the ICC_ for their daring to say anything negative about Bibi Netanyahu. Does the Arab lobby also have this kind of power? I mean, are you going to seriously argue that this is normal: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/03/aipac-israel-spendi... ?
You are shutting down the conversation by doing the thing you are accusing me of.
Defending your position with false arguments that have been disproven repeatedly is unquestionably antisemtic.
Please wake up.
100% yes.
TBH when I said "propaganda" I was grouping a lot of that under that when I should have been more specific.
But that and similar things is what I was referring to with "I don't understand how this much power over the US was ever deemed acceptable".
I remember seeing the articles about them funding the campaign of someone opposing someone else who had been critical if Israel. I don't remember which state or what position, but it wasn't just a one off either.
What the actual fuck
AIPAC is one such group. Here's an article about their spending in 2022: https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/11/american-israel-pub...
and also a story from earlier this year: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/03/aipac-israel-spendi...
The MO is basically to try and defeat democrats in primaries who aren't giving carte blanche in terms of spending or support. If their candidate wins the primary, it doesn't matter much who wins the general election, since they have support of R's.
Free speech sometimes applies to things you don’t like. There’s pro and anti propaganda for just about any foreign interest. Some of it’s just more subtle such as recommendations on TikTok.
Ukraine had really obvious pro Ukraine requests for military aid and images of destruction, but quite a bit of pro Russia propaganda was more subtle aiming for people to stay out of it.
With Israel you see some really blatant pro Israel propaganda, but both sides also have a lot of more subtle stuff.
...and in the United States we've defined down "free speech" to include "monetary donations."
somebody needs to pay for the billboard, or rent a hall to give a speech, or printing the flyers for your lost cat. How is money not essential to speech? Your proposal is that to support a cause, one should only be allowed to go outside and yell, because that's purer than the corrupting influence of money?
Once money gets involved, you inherently have a commercial interest. What's the ROI?
I personally think people misunderstand to whom "freedom" is granted and defended in the US, it is demonstrably not freedom of the individual, but of the powerful.
One person, one vote.
You yourself saying something even on a billboard or convincing other people to say something is different from paying someone to troll forums to spread a message. At that point it’s no longer your message being sent but rather how the person writing the post on your behalf interpreted your message.
It might seem silly to separate a billionaire sitting down and writing a TV commercial from one paying a firm to come up with a bunch of slogans, but the second is inherently inauthentic. Which causes knock on effects.
Speaking of free speech, can you name another foreign interest that has managed to make it illegal in the US to boycott it's companies?
To add some context in case people aren't aware: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20181218-texas-teacher-fir...
I believe the issue here is how much sway Israel has on the US and how rabid many US politicians are about Israel (to the point where many straight up accuse you of anti semitism if you just criticize the country or their policies)
Also issues like where you are not allowed to refuse to work with Israel if you are an arms manufacturer in the US (but you can refuse to work with the US military). I know that part of that is due to Israel being part of the FMS list but they are also the largest recipient on it...
On the other side of town where I live, billboards appeared with slogans like "Be pro-Semitic." This happened almost immediately after the latest conflict involving Israel began. So I can't just be against anti-Semites, but I have to be pro Jewish ethnicity? Interesting. There was also one stating that anti-zionism is anti-Semitic; I guess my Jewish friends and family who are not Zionists didn't get the memo.
I can't prove that these are somehow connected to funding from Israel, but it seemed like these billboards were ready to go at a moment's notice.
As far as why we deem foreign propaganda as acceptable, I like to think that we play dumb about it in part so we can strategically point it out when it is in the favor of politicians and/or elites. Remember how Russian propaganda supposedly got Trump elected even though it was going on during prior years when the establishment insisted on the integrity of the elections? On the other hand, maybe we are just dumb.
Right, that is what we got in Boston. The timing is just too convenient.
Whether or not it is from Israel themselves or funding here for Israel is kinda a moot point when both have the same purpose: Propaganda for a foreign government.
Whether or not it is from Israel themselves or funding here for Israel is kinda a moot point
It's not at all a moot point and you're coming pretty close to a generic 'dual loyalties' trope.
Imagine if it were Russia or China
Well it can’t be China because China don’t kill their muslim popula… oooh…
A message being on a billboard or in an advertisement on YouTube doesn't make it "propaganda", though. In fact there a very large constituency[1] for pro-Israel policymaking right here in the United States, and they want you to know what they think and why, and are willing to spend money to do it.
Now, you clearly don't agree with them. I don't either, in at least some aspects[2]. But our beef with the AIPAC and the Israel lobby isn't with a "propaganda" organization run by the Israeli government. It's a POLITICAL fight with our fellow americans, and we shouldn't conflate the two.
[1] Likely larger than in Israel proper, in fact, both in headcount and budget.
[2] Though I stop way, way short of the eliminationist sloganeering that has taken over a lot of the left. Handing the region From the River to the Sea over to a Palestinian-controlled army would be far more horrifying than anything happening in Gaza today, and I really don't think that people understand how intractably violent the situation in the Levand really is.
I struggle with not calling this propaganda:
https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/18skzb0/ah_behold_o...
https://www.boston25news.com/news/local/new-billboards-along...
US politicians can direct funds to Israel and Israel can support them or attack their rivals.
Weirdest thing about their propaganda is that it seems squarely aimed at older wealthier Americans and politicians. The amount of content produced targeted at anyone under the age of 40 is much smaller and less sophisticated. There's this narrative that Israel is "losing the propaganda war" but I think they're just targeting it towards major stakeholders. We're not the intended audience of the billboard - it's the editorial writer, the business leader, the member of congress (and their staff).
The Israel / Palestine conflict is one of those low-valence issues with the general public where a politician rarely gets punished for voting one way or another with the notable exception of cash lobbying and super PACs for/against a given candidate.
Wait until you read up on NUMEC and Rafael Eitan.
like I found out recently apparently the Boston police regularly go over to Israel for training?
That's really common for most countries on earth though[0]. Gaining exposure and experience from other countries is very valuable for police forces.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Law_Enforcement_...
It's crazy that AIPAC is not registered as a foreign agent. They funnel orders directly from Netanyahu to our politicians.
How do you know how much we get from Israel relative to others?