return to table of content

I Lost Faith in Kagi

infecto
74 replies
6h22m

I still pay for Kagi for its search but this has kind of been the problem from the beginning with their org.

- Search has been a breath of fresh air, I wish they dedicated more time to it.

- Orion...is ok? I use it off and on and it is fine but would rather have better search. The premise of the browser is nice but it feels like this could probably be a whole separate company or a purely open source endeavor. It has always been kind of clunky and not something I want to pay for.

- AI tools, I get the multiple pivots and I do believe that more recent advancements in ML/AI will make search a better experience but I do wish they had a little more focus.

- The t-shirts are weird and made me lose a lot of faith in their org. The way I look at it is instead of making their products better, they flushed a bunch of money down the drain for t-shirts and its offensive to paying customers who are paying because they enjoy the product and want it to become better, they don't want a t-shirt.

- I don't care about email, I don't care about other tools, make a great search experience first. Release all of the AI enhancements that you think will make sense, focus, focus, focus.

Edit: As I was adding my comment this post flagged and marked dead. Sometimes HN is weird.

freediver
32 replies
3h33m

The t-shirts are weird and made me lose a lot of faith in their org. The way I look at it is instead of making their products better, they flushed a bunch of money down the drain for t-shirts and its offensive to paying customers who are paying because they enjoy the product and want it to become better, they don't want a t-shirt.

Kagi founder here and I want to clarify the train of thoughts around Kagi printing and giving away 20,000 t-shirts for its users.

- Kagi is not a typical VC funded startup.

- It is company I bootstrapped by going all in (meaning I put millions of dollars of my money into it).

- After all these years building it, we are lucky to have such incredibly passionate user community.

- That community is 100% responsible for Kagi's growth as a business through word of mouth (Kagi does no paid advertising).

- We are also famously taking a firm stance against ad-tech, so conventional advertising is not something I want to do.

- To do something as crazy as to start a company that builds a paid search engine and browser you obviously need to be thinking out of the box.

So combine all of this together and I thought that sending a t-shirt to all the people who supported us along the journey made a lot of sense.

The only thing I did not count on is how difficult will be to pull this off as I did not want to settle with less than premium quality for these t-shirts. As a result they will be delayed (my best guess is July/August) and I apologize for that to our users. In hindsight, we probably should have opted out for something easier to pull off (someone mentioned a billboard on 101, that would certainly be much easier).

This did not jeopardize Kagi's finances in any way at any point, nor I would do anything like that ever (as I said I am all in and have everything to lose, so I run a fiscally responsible business). In fact, Kagi has turned profitable recently.

This has also not impacted our ability to hire (we went from 10 people twelve months ago to 25+ now) and it did not impact our ability to ship a great product (check Kagi and Orion changelogs). I would venture to say that most Kagi users agree that Kagi is getting better and better every week with great speed.

So would I do it again? Well let's wait and see what we have in store for hitting 50,000 members mark :)

recursivegirth
11 replies
3h22m

I work in CX, you should listen to your customers. Your gut got you this far, but to be a profitable company you are going to need to consider the advice and concerns of your stakeholders. Based on your current description, you have two stakeholders (yourself + customers).

If the venture fails, you will ask yourself if you listened enough. Be proactive, address concerns, do not put yourself in a defensive position. Embrace change, be agile, and most importantly listen to your feedback.

Wish Kagi nothing but success, I would very much like a disruptor in this space. Best of luck to you and your team.

nottorp
3 replies
1h21m

That reminds me of the faster horses quote I'm afraid.

Or you know, that all cell phones had to have a physical keyboard. Until they suddenly didn't.

[Never tried Kagi, but let the man do his thing.]

skydhash
2 replies
43m

Maybe customers were wary of having 1 ton of steel barreling down the street. And there's no ergonomics in phones. Their prime quality is portability. Ergonomics has been sacrificed to convenience.

nottorp
1 replies
38m

Iirc it was said that speeds over 30 km/h will kill you too.

Apocryphon
0 replies
22m

A ton of steel bearing down at those speeds will do so handily.

kerkeslager
3 replies
41m

I work in CX, you should listen to your customers.

...and to be clear, Hacker News is not a representative sample of their customers.

silviot
0 replies
20m

...and to be clear, Hacker News is not a representative sample of their customers.

I am a customer and I learned about Kagi here. I assume many people are on the same boat, so I wouldn't be so sure about that.

saagarjha
0 replies
6m

Kagi has always explicitly gone after Hacker News readers as their target customer.

alwa
0 replies
12m

In fact, HN is the only place I’ve heard anything about Kagi. I’ve done my best to evangelize to non-HN friends though :)

If anything, I’m interested in what the evolution will look like as their customer base expands beyond HN types…

swatcoder
1 replies
52m

This is a forum where people respond well to practical explanations from thoughtful founders.

I don't know if the OP got what they needed from this reply, but I assume I'm not alone in being impressed by the humility and candor of the response and developed much greater affinity for Kagi from some of the specifics of what were said.

I want more companies to have communicative, principled management that invites a sustainable base of like-minded customers/partners and fewer companies that pretend they can please 7B people by radically changing their product every 3 months.

echelon
0 replies
42m

I read the email screenshots and the thread on Mastodon betwen Lori and Vlad. My takeaway is that this Lori person is trying really hard to shit on Kagi and not following reasonable social protocol. The CEO kindly tried to figure out if there were misconceptions, to which Lori responded with complete venom. There were so many better ways to handle this situation.

It's perfectly fine to publish critical and even scathing reviews, but one shouldn't expect that to happen in a complete vacuum free of response or recourse. Of course the Kagi folks are going to try to control the situation, and of course the CEO will reach out.

In a perfectly amicable outreach from Vlad, Lori dramatically escalates the situation by telling Vlad to stop harassing them and then goes on to post "evidence" of harassment. It's fair enough to ask for no contact, but to screenshot and plaster it all over social media like they have the high ground is such a gross and bitter move. Lori is the one that took a big public dump on Kagi, and they're the one acting entitled here. It's frankly egregious and disgusting behavior.

I didn't see any harassment from Vlad. Vlad is simply taking care of his company and his people. Lori is the one with no skin in the game that is acting like a jerk.

I am so sick of social media tarring and feathering, especially when it's so fake and artificial like this.

Lori is being an asshole.

I think I'm going to try Kagi now.

carlosjobim
0 replies
17m

I work in CX, you should listen to your customers.

The only way a customer speaks is with money. If people like what you sell, you'll have more customers speaking with their wallet. If they don't then they tell you so by not purchasing what you sell. Internet commenters (such as myself) do not represent all customers or even a majority. People who are happy with a product usually see no reason to give feedback – especially when it's a small purchase. Likewise, people who hate your product wouldn't purchase it in the first place.

mda
4 replies
3h18m

"Kagi does no paid advertising"

I remember Daniel King's PowerPlayChess channel recently started promoting Kagi, doesn't this count as paid advertising or is this deal something else?

freediver
3 replies
3h8m

You are right, we started doing that last week so technically we are doing marketing now.

MichaelZuo
2 replies
2h11m

It really does seem like you’re being a bit too unfocused Vlad.

Delivering high-quality search over the entire Internet, higher quality than Google, is something so complex that even if you were literally the worlds smartest person and all the other Kagi employees were number 2 to number 26, there would still likely be stumbles at least once a year on something.

Because there’s like a million gotchas hidden along the path to just reliably matching Google search quality circa 2010 in the 2024 environment. Let alone delivering a high-quality browser, AI tools, etc., on top.

swatcoder
0 replies
11m

Serving optimally performing ads to billions of global users is a radically different problem than serving optimal search results and accessory features to a self-selected 50,000 or 500,000 customers.

kerkeslager
0 replies
32m

I'm not convinced it's actually that complicated.

Google search has been bad for a long time. It's clear they serve their customers (advertisers) quite well, but as a user of their search, they're not particularly impressive.

The biggest problem is a problem of scale: being the biggest search provider means Google are targeted by SEO, so it's harder for Google to sift out the AI-generated garbage--Kagi just isn't involved in the arms race that Google is. But as a user that's not my problem; I'm not going to tolerate bad search results out of some sense of "fairness" to a corporation. And Kagi is delivering real user-centered features which are, frankly, obvious, i.e. Google should be embarrassed that they don't let you filter/prioritize domains or search within lenses like Kagi does.

kerkeslager
4 replies
45m

Please please please take Hacker News' opinions with a very large grain of salt. Many of Hacker News' users work at garbage AdTech companies and there are often people posting here who say things like "I for one enjoy targeted ads" (that's an actual quote). This place is not representative of your customer base.

I love what you're doing and will continue to support you at your Professional tier as long as you continue doing what you're doing.

shaneoh
2 replies
36m

If HN is not representative of the customer base for a paid search engine, then what is?

kerkeslager
1 replies
28m

That's a difficult question, but I think we can pretty clearly say that a user base with a high concentration of AdTech workers is probably a bit biased against a company that is pretty clearly anti-AdTech.

The number of times I've heard people extol the virtues of targeted ads on this site is absurd. I've even heard folks here say that Google ads are more helpful than the search results as if that's a good thing. And these are far more common comments here than comments in favor of actually returning good search results or aligning your income with user interests.

brewdad
0 replies
16m

I would think people in AdTech would be first in line to pay for a search engine that avoids AdTech. They understand how the sausage is made. They want the rest of us to use the AdTech products but they themselves are going to avoid them where possible.

How often do you think the CEO pf Delta Airlines flies in first class versus on a private jet? My guess is only often enough to gin up a little PR.

konschubert
0 replies
18m

For my own business (epaper calendars), HN has been a great source of feedback from potential customers. People here are both direct and kind with their feedback.

The thing you have to keep in mind is that HN is a very specific niche of the Internet. But for a slightly nerdy, not mass-market, product like mine (or Kagi) this niche is a great place to grow.

You just have to be mindful to see the feedback through the lens of the fact that you're talking to a niche audience and keep an eye on what a broader market might be looking for if that's where you're planning to go

shepherdjerred
2 replies
1h37m

Keep going! Kagi is great. Years ago nobody thought Google could be challenged and that nobody would pay for search, yet here you are.

AuthError
1 replies
38m

do they have a decent subscriber base? i thought it was still very niche

brewdad
0 replies
19m

Somewhere between 20,000 (number of t-shirts sent out) and 50,000 (their stated next target). Not too bad for a startup but a drop in the proverbial ocean of search.

RhysU
2 replies
2h39m

Kagi does no paid advertising

Because of adverse selection?

Users that are users because of marketing are somehow different?

freediver
1 replies
2h27m

I meant digital advertising, like ads in search engines and websites - stuff that has gone out of control and we are actively fighting against. I would consider a billboard or sponsoring a podcast for example.

RhysU
0 replies
1h49m

Billboards on inbound roads to major US tech hubs, beyond just SF/NYC targeting bedroom communities with families, seem worthwhile.

As does some sponsorship a la the VPN ads my kids see constantly in content heavy educational videos.

riversflow
1 replies
56m

I prefer internet ads to Billboards. Billboards are disgusting.

me_smith
0 replies
15m

I agree there should be less billboards in this world.

eddyzh
0 replies
12m

Thanks for your response!

Honestly I get the T-shirt part this way. You got to Doo crazy stuff as a start-up. I also get that you try ai stuff. As long as you keep up de search.

However what scares me is the apparent lack of knowledge about privacy, gdpr and what is PII in a product that, to me, is all about privacy. Have one person in the company be an expert in privacy and GDPR etc and use their insights, since it is critical for your right of existence.

WirelessGigabit
0 replies
2h30m

Sounds like a cool place to work. I'll check back for an opening in TypeScript / Rust backend.

Sakos
17 replies
6h11m

As a "hard-core" Kagi user:

1) I legit can't fathom going back to Google or any other search engine. I don't know what I'll do if they go under.

2) Investing in integrating AI into their search is absolutely vital and I like a lot of what they're doing there

3) Everything else, including the insanity of the t-shirts thing, is a complete waste of time and money. I don't understand what their strategy is if it isn't to set money on fire.

jonpurdy
5 replies
6h7m

I considered investing a small amount in them when they were raising a round from customers since I loved the search product so much. I too can't imagine going back to anything else, especially now that I have prioritized and blocked domains set up perfectly and added lenses, and this stuff works across desktop and mobile!

I've been mildly regretting not investing up until 5 minute ago when I read about spending 1/3 of that on the t-shirt factory.

sithadmin
4 replies
5h0m

The claim that's made in this blog - that Kagi 'owns a t-shirt factory' seems disingenuous, or lazy at best. Kagi's own blog says that instead of going with a major branded merch manufacturer/distributor, they chose to work with a small print shop instead. Nothing about blowing funds on an actual factory/print shop. "Owning a merch operation end to end" just means they're not paying some manufacturer to do production, warehousing, order fulfillment/drop shipping, etc.

baobabKoodaa
2 replies
4h26m

I do not understand this distinction. Either they "own" the merch operation "end to end", or they don't. You can't have it both ways.

EasyMark
1 replies
2h5m

You can contract facilities or output percentage. You don't have to only "own it end to end" or not.

baobabKoodaa
0 replies
1h57m

If you contract facilities then you don't "own" the merch operation "end to end".

wasmitnetzen
0 replies
4h7m

Kagi's post says further down that they

allocate[d] nearly a third of our investor-raised funds to produce and freely distribute 20,000 t-shirts

Though it sounds like they don't actually own "a t-shirt factory", but rather a t-shirt distributor.

iamacyborg
3 replies
5h34m

Everything else, including the insanity of the t-shirts thing, is a complete waste of time and money.

Presumably the tshirts are a marketing cost that they hope will lead to greater brand exposure and more subscribers.

Sakos
2 replies
5h26m

They should've spent it on a marketing agency, because I don't know how a shirt which doesn't even have the name Kagi on it is supposed to give them brand exposure.

Tempest1981
0 replies
5h10m

Or advertise on a billboard along Hwy 101 as you enter San Francisco.

OccamsMirror
0 replies
5h4m

I was giving them the benefit of the doubt up until this. Wtf? I’d be happy to wear a brand t-shirt “Kagi” and that’s it.

What an own goal. I’m sure it made sense to them but I’m worried they don’t truly understand their customer base.

datadrivenangel
1 replies
5h59m

Investing in better search is absolutely vital, and AI may be the right tool there, but I don't care about the AI. I pay Kagi to be a better search and informational retrieval tool, not to do AI.

Sakos
0 replies
5h9m

It's not like they've gone all-in on AI though. Going through their changelog https://kagi.com/changelog it looks like they regularly make improvements to their core product and there've been a lot of significant QoL improvements in recent months. Just the Wolfram change alone has cut my need for Google significantly.

The one thing I really hope they put more work into is searching for local news. That's one of the areas where I still have to turn to Google.

troyvit
0 replies
3h31m

I can't speak to the t-shirts. I was on duckduckgo before Kagi and also can't imagine returning there. I don't know what they're doing there but it's not improving. And yeah I am so with you on 2).

It seems like (again, t-shirts aside) Kagi is throwing a bunch of stuff at the wall to see what sticks. I hope they're having fun because I sure am.

ravenstine
0 replies
2h29m

I agree, but not necessarily that AI will make results better. Search engines already rely heavily on heuristics, and I really doubt that LLMs or vector databases are going to improve results in any combination. At best, they will overfit results to the lowest common denominator.

What I want is a search engine that supports full-text queries with exact matches. This quite literally no longer exists anywhere, and maybe that's because it just doesn't scale. Nevertheless, I would find a lot more value in a search engine that returns exact matches. Someone will probably reply saying that Kagi, DDG, or The Google do exact matches with quotes, but this is not true. When it works, you've just gotten lucky. At best, it will filter out inexact matches, but that doesn't mean it will actually return every exact match in the index.

infecto
0 replies
6h6m

Totally agree on all points. I don't believe I have the technical capability for it but both the fear of losing great search and the lack of direction has made me think about what it would take to replicate the search experience.

daft_pink
0 replies
5h3m

I agree with a lot of your sentiments, but we’re just in peak ai I think.

EasyMark
0 replies
2h6m

I agree pretty much verbatim. I don't see how anyone could criticize them for getting into the AI game as well or at least using a 3rd party AI software for some results. That would just be silly these days. I like Orion browser but to be honest firefox does what I need.

Zambyte
7 replies
5h19m

I wish they dedicated more time to it.

What changes you have in mind to search functionality? I feel like the core search is rock solid as is, but they address search quality reports on their feedback forums all the time.

To me, the AI features (and specifically how they are only used when you opt in per query) are enhancing search, and the time they have been allocating to those features has continuously improved Kagis utility to me.

Note: I subscribe to Kagi Ultimate, so I use some AI features that are not available in the base plans.

dustincoates
2 replies
4h18m

I love Kagi, I'm an early paying subscriber, but I think the quality of their results is overstated. Anytime you get past result #5 or so, the results just get _weird_. If you have to do deep research on something, you'll often get pages that seemingly have nothing to do with the query, or these class of pages that seem to be poor answers to common queries aggregated together.

lttlrck
0 replies
31m

DDG is like that. If it can't find any more matches it seems to spam random results.

I tried Kagi and really enjoyed it but the pricing tier doesn't sit right with me, it's not that much better than DDG for my purposes. All these monthly subs start to add up. I'd be happier if there was a lifetime tier.

Zambyte
0 replies
1h52m

I hope not to sound like I'm blaming you, but do you actually use the features that are unique to Kagi? Over time my manually configured block/lower/raise/pin list has continuously grown, quickly leading to higher and higher quality search results. I also have integrated custom lenses and bangs into my workflow more and more over time. I often end up searching seemingly very generic things and getting exactly what I'm looking for in the first or second result. Maybe my results after the first couple are weird too, but it doesn't really matter to me because I don't actually get very deep into results most of the time.

hiddencost
1 replies
4h27m

Search quality requires maintenance and continual tuning. It's not a one and done "add more functionality" kind of product.

Zambyte
0 replies
1h48m

Fair. I was trying to make the point that they are already dedicating time to continuously tuning based on feedback on their forums.

infecto
0 replies
3h46m

- Localized search is not a great experience

- Business listing search via maps is not a great experience. Maps and searching on maps are a more important endeavor than browser and email when thinking about the ecosystem.

- AI is definitely important but so far none of those features (afaik) have trickled down to non-ultimate users. From what I have seen, features have been removed from the regular plans.

- Remove reliance on using bing/google searches.

- Search is not a one and done operation.

Closi
0 replies
4h26m

I mean they could focus on actually building out their own search engine as an example? (i.e. moving further away from using Google and Bing APIs)

It's just a matter of focus with a team of that size.

Dayshine
6 replies
5h24m

Re the t-shirts: last time I checked the were private equity not VC and priced their product for profitability not growth.

Would you be upset if they had just donated that excess to charity?

infecto
3 replies
5h17m

So if I understand your comment, you are suggesting that they went and raised money to make t-shirts?

Not upset in the slightest, I love Kagi search and want to see it continue. Merch is a solved problem and there was no reason to bring it in-house and make such a big announcement around it.

Dayshine
1 replies
5h4m

I'm suggesting that self owned companies are allowed to and often do spend absurd amounts of their spare money on pointless things like marketing or internal transformations.

The difference they don't tell you about their internal accounting so you don't join the dots.

Start ups burn money on silly things like offices way too nice for what they need all the time. That's much closer to unethical than a company with no real duty to outsiders throwing away money.

bee_rider
0 replies
32m

I don’t see any claims that they are unethical. “Losing faith” seems to be being used more like losing hope or something. People are worried that they are doing things that seem a bit wasteful because they don’t want them to fail.

fireflash38
0 replies
5h13m

Maybe they wanted to make T shirts. Who knows. I don't get why people are up in arms about it.

jacekm
1 replies
3h59m

Would you be upset if they had just donated that excess to charity?

Yes.

Dayshine
0 replies
2h27m

Would you be upset if they just paid themselves a higher salary?

Do you think they charge too much?

Do they charge more than you think it's worth?

laborcontract
1 replies
5h14m

Kagi’s killer feature is somehow managing to get literally every post about them featured on the front page of HN.

If they fail with all of the free marketing they’ve been gifted by this community I can only shake my head.

edgyquant
0 replies
5h10m

A lot of us either use them or have used them in the recent past

neurostimulant
0 replies
3h12m

I'm actually looking forward for the t-shirt...

keyle
0 replies
5h16m

Orion is my daily driver and I hope they don't crush that. It has bugs, but it works.

erickhill
0 replies
56m

I can't stand the randomness of how posts seem to be getting flagged more and more on HN. Seems like if a post is flagged and killed a reason should be given somewhere on the page by the flagger. Educate us on why our discussions should be off-limits, please. It would also be interesting to see if certain topics are always flagged by the same individuals and patterns emerge.

claytongulick
0 replies
36m

I'm a deep technical nerd, but I approach Kagi from a basic user perspective.

Things I love and can't live without:

- When I search for something, I don't have to deal with weeks of whatever I searched for coming up in ads on every web page I visit.

- I don't feel like "the man" is snooping on me in some sort of weird dark social credit score thing. (I literally got a call from Google once offering me a job based on what I'd been searching for. Flattering, but totally freaked me out)

- The quality is good for non-local things

- I'm the customer, not the product

- That makes things like blocking or enhancing sites possible

What I'd like to see improve:

- I don't want AI. I don't want summaries, I don't want hallucinations, I don't want assistants. I don't want it.

- Local results and map integration. When I click on a local result, actually having the map go to the result I clicked on. Currently this doesn't work well.

- Hours for local businesses.

I find myself still going to google for these things, and while it doesn't seem like a lot, aside from work stuff those kinds of searches are probably 80% of what I need. Where can we go for dinner tonight that's near by and still open? Who has all-you-can-eat deals near by? Where can I find some floating shelves to put in my office near by?

Those are all examples of things that Google does really well, and I don't have much luck with on Kagi.

I agree with the author that I'd rather see the quality there improve before AI features.

WarOnPrivacy
0 replies
5h0m

Edit: As I was adding my comment this post flagged and marked dead. Sometimes HN is weird.

I'm a full Kagi shill. But I also want the stuff I like to remain stuff I like and reasonable criticism is the path there.

Raed667
0 replies
5h42m

orion is the only browser i use on ios as it supports uBlockOrigin and a bunch of other extensions.

i’m glad they spent the time and effort on it.

smcleod
27 replies
6h13m

Sounds like Vlad did a pretty sane, human thing reaching out and offering to discuss.

The authors replies seem pretty rude (or at least somewhat aggressive / dismissive). Kagi is Vlads baby and I could imagine he would care and try to explain when he thinks someone has the wrong idea. However to the author - it’s just another service he doesn’t use anymore.

nebulous1
16 replies
6h0m

You can make that argument for initial approach, but it falls flat on its face after the author told Vlad that they didn't want to communicate with them and Vlad responded with a lecture.

Vlad comes off as fairly unhinged here.

magistr4te
4 replies
5h35m

Tldr: you can't just spread a very negative opinion about someones hard work and then plug your ears shut for any kind of non-symathetic interaction.

In my eyes this rationale would make sense if there was no backstory to this. If there was no preceeding blogpost, I'd consider Vlads messages pure spam.

But the context here is different: The author wrote a very critical, and clearly opinionated blogpost. There was clear intention in engaging with this subject.

Now the author seems to want to avoid responsibility, while Vlads attempt to react to a public hit piece with a respectful conversation was honestly the best way to handle this.

rsynnott
0 replies
5h25m

You can criticise something without obligating yourself to have a conversation with the subject. In fact, that is generally how most critical writing has worked, for centuries. If you're unhappy with the review of your restaurant in the paper, you _might_ be able to convince them to publish a short owner response, once, but they're certainly not going to engage in a dialogue about it.

mekoka
0 replies
4h41m

There's probably some backstory between Vlad and Lori there.

But beyond that, there's some irony in that exchange. If Vlad had simply stopped engaging when Lori asked, it would indeed make Lori seem like more of an asshole for rejecting an appeal to have a simple conversation. But then Vlad transgressed that wish, making Lori's case about not wanting to engage.

mbStavola
0 replies
5h12m

You are right... up until maybe the second reply.

Vlad saw something critical of his hard work and wanted to put in the effort to clarify his stances and mend a relationship. I can absolutely understand that, your work is a reflection of yourself and nobody wants to be judged on misunderstanding. He might've even felt like he let someone who cared about Kagi down and wanted to make it right. Again, all understandable!

However, twice, the blog post author said they did not want to engage. At this point, regardless of how you feel about what was said, you should probably move on; they said their piece, you tried to engage, they rebuffed, oh well, do something else! To continue on is both incredibly annoying and a bit unhinged.

If Vlad absolutely felt like he needed to respond to this, he should've digested the main points of the original blogpost, reflected on them, and written his own blog post to a more general audience. Not necessarily in _response_ to the author, but understanding that more people probably feel this way as well and want to hear clear answers. Perfect examples of this would be an "Our stance on privacy" or "How we're ensuring Kagi's future," again factoring in the criticism from the author.

I write all of this as someone who pays for and likes Kagi. I think it's a good product, if a bit scattered at times. But the blog post does hit on some concerns that I have (privacy being the biggest) and seeing the follow up leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

catapart
0 replies
5h22m

There was clear intention in engaging with this subject.

Yes, and then that engagement - which very much took place - did not give the author any confidence that FURTHER ENGAGEMENT (via email) would change the situation.

If I talk to you back and forth about an issue I have and feel like I'm talking to a brick wall, so I then write a critical review based on those issues, why should I be forced to not be a brick wall, in return? If Vlad wants someone to listen to him, he should probably take some time to engage with (not just 'listen to') what is being said on it's fundamental merits (not whatever surface level bit he wants to latch on to).

Recontextualizing an issue is not addressing it. Explaining an issue is not addressing it. Describing a paradigm that contextualizes an issue is not addressing it.

fireflash38
3 replies
5h6m

One thing I absolutely love about online discourse: shit all over someone, then block them. It is something that you don't see with in-person communications - because you really can't just "close off" the discussion to one way.

Anyway, I just think that people do things in online discussions that they wouldn't do to someone's face. And that tends to be a bad thing for reasonable discourse.

sph
1 replies
4h38m

Another thing you don't quite seen in real life: strangers that record a serendipitous conversation, to later post it for the whole world to see, to point and laugh.

The Internet has turned us into sociopaths.

gandalfgreybeer
0 replies
1h4m

Another thing you don't quite seen in real life: strangers that record a serendipitous conversation, to later post it for the whole world to see, to point and laugh.

In the thread linked above, I think his reasoning for posting the email is reasonable. I find this similar to what the Apollo dev did when discussing with Reddit people. If he didn't record the conversation or make it public, his words could have been twisted.

mac-attack
0 replies
10m

One thing I absolutely love about online discourse: shit all over someone, then block them. It is something that you don't see with in-person communications

Ummm dating and breakups?

t8sr
2 replies
5h1m

The author's response is perfectly calibrated to drive someone up the wall. Sling some mud and then hide behind "help, I'm being cornered."

Imagine doing this in the offline world. How well would this kind of behavior go over with people at the grocery store, do you think? Why is it acceptable online to behave like this?

thorum
1 replies
36m

As alternative perspective in terms of power dynamics: The Kagi CEO is a somewhat powerful figure as the CEO of a well-known tech company. The blog author is a random person from outside the tech startup culture.

The internet levels the playing field so the random person has the power to post criticism of the more powerful person and be heard. It doesn’t make sense to compare with the offline world because this wouldn’t be able to happen outside the internet.

In response the CEO is attempting to force them into a different context where he once again has power. The author recognizes this and therefore refuses.

t8sr
0 replies
24m

But you’re not talking about Tim Cook, this is a guy running a company of ~10 people. Someone on the internet, with a following and an audience, has written an essay about how Vlad is a bad person, and now is implying the latter is abusive for trying to have a conversation.

This is psychotic behavior.

There’s a huge spectrum between NY Times writing a sourced article about a powerful business magnate and someone disparaging an SMB owner on their blog. If I took the posts and emails of someone I knew in my life and posted them online, I would probably get a call from the police.

ACow_Adonis
1 replies
5h20m

Perhaps we live in different worlds, but there's a world of distanced between unhinged and roughly 3 emails to someone who wrote a peice targeted specifically at your business.

If anything the replies in that Mastadon thread make the author and others appear petty, combative and immature imo, and I do not say that as someone who agrees with all Vlad's perspectives.

davidcbc
0 replies
5h12m

If someone tells you to stop emailing them after 1 email don't send 2 more. It's that easy

dotnet00
0 replies
4m

This feels very similar to the trope on X, where someone makes an inflammatory or stupid comment, people angrily respond calling them stupid, and the original person then claims they're being harassed/were just joking, and ultimately neither side actually communicates. The people who like the original poster continue on believing that they were being harassed, and people who thought they were being stupid continue on believing they're being stupid.

I feel that Vlad is justified, even if I personally would've just considered it to be a lost cause and just kept receipts in case it became necessary to publicly respond, similar to how the Apollo dev released receipts when Reddit tried to make him out to be in the wrong.

Semaphor
0 replies
5h27m

So does the author. But then I also don’t care about the author and don’t pay them for my search engine :/

WA
6 replies
6h7m

Vlad is not discussing, he is lecturing. The author of the blog post seems right. Vlad defends his position "lol email is not PII" repeatedly, despite being obviously and completely wrong. He has no understanding that it doesn't matter that a user could enter fake information.

His business collects email addresses, which is a process. Under GDPR, this process must be documented, users must be given their data on request (even if it just contains an email address, but usually it also contains the signup date for example as a proof for their data processing consent) and users must be informed about their rights to correct or delete such data.

He comes off totally as the "trust me bro" guy with zero respect for a different perspective and doesn't seem to be interested in changing his (objectively wrong) opinion. It is almost laughable, because "is email PII" has been discussed a million times since the introduction of the GDPR that you must've lived under a rock to dismiss it like Vlad did.

eviks
5 replies
5h49m

he explicitly said in his email that "Personal emails are PII.", so how is that a defence of his previous position?

WA
2 replies
5h30m

I re-read again. You are right, he says "personal emails are PII" in this email. In the original post however he dismisses the whole GDPR data request process as "we don't need this, because you can provide fake data".

Point is: if the business requests an email address, many people will provide their real email adress and your business needs to document this process under GDPR. I just checked. The signup form doesn't say "please give a FAKE email address", it just says "email address".

If a user provides a real email address, Kagi must respond to GDPR Art. 15 requests by providing...that same email adress. Might sound silly, but usually, there is other data associated with this. Usually, at least the timestamp of the signup. If a business is really GDPR compliant, it will offer a download option for stuff like user settings and so on.

Or, if the user signed up and later deleted the account, his email should explicitly NOT show up when asking for personal data.

See, it is about documenting the process, whether the outcome is "here is your email address you just asked for" or "we don't have any data on you". And Vlad says that this process is irrelevant for Kagi, while it is not.

shadowgovt
0 replies
55m

It's ultimately not up to Vlad. If the law declares email addresses are PII, they're PII.

If he's positioning his company to challenge that law when he runs afoul of it, that's a choice they can make but it's a business risk (and IANAL, but... Probably one they'll lose).

iamacyborg
0 replies
5h14m

If a business is really GDPR compliant, it will offer a download option for stuff like user settings and so on.

I've made a bunch of SAR's, including pre-GDPR and I've never received one that contained my user settings, so that seems pretty normal.

The whole PII convo seems incredibly asinine though, "PII" is not a thing in the GDPR. Personal data is[1], but that's not the same thing.

If Kagi keep a record of searches performed by a user, that's something that a SAR should be used for, but the whole convo just misses the mark entirely.

[^1]: See article 4.1 https://gdpr-info.eu/art-4-gdpr/

thisisjasononhn
1 replies
4h7m

Lori is a she, not a he.

eviks
0 replies
2h4m

Vlad is Vlad, not Lori.

danpalmer
0 replies
5h32m

This post suggests the author has tried this already, has had these discussions and has reached the natural end of that process.

I've also had a similar discussion with Vlad on comments here, he definitely doesn't try to view things from other people's perspectives.

ImPostingOnHN
0 replies
5h16m

Vlad's message to "discuss" reads more like a sealion-ey 'let me explain to you why you are wrong, you just don't understand why you are wrong, I am very smart and not wrong' than an honest admission that Vlad was wrong and is interested in being humble and learning from someone else.

HeatrayEnjoyer
0 replies
6h7m

I don't care if it's someone's baby. I'm the paying customer paying in both money and sensitive information I expected to be well protected.

sph
5 replies
4h59m

Jesus I agree with some of the post, but the author seems to be an insufferable human. This has all the characteristics of terminally-online people that spend way too much time being angry on social media, and needing the world know how angry they are.

Like, these days you do not know when you email someone if they reply to you, or if they will post screenshots of your entire conversation to social media showing how utterly disgusted they are because you dared talk to them.

Have these people forgot about how strangers in real life behave and communicate?

t8sr
1 replies
4h39m

At the risk of sounding grumpy, a big difference between the tech community today and in the Usenet days is that the Usenet crowd's interpersonal skills weren't two standard deviations to the left of the mean at your local Target.

sph
0 replies
4h34m

We reminisce about Usenet as this cesspool of human interaction, while everybody today is a pre-offended sociopath with an audience.

I miss talking with the average idiot from the 2000s internet.

green_dragon
0 replies
10m

Have these people forgot about how strangers in real life behave and communicate?

It's possible they have. These are the kinds of people who savored the COVID fear mongering as it became easier and more acceptable to become a shut-in.

This is not a bad thing. They're terminally online, not out in the real world touching grass. This makes live more pleasant for the rest of us who aren't terminally online.

drcongo
0 replies
4h44m

Yeah, I flagged this as the post feels completely unhinged to me, like the kind of ranting I used to get in emails from a schizophrenic friend.

acheron
0 replies
4h25m

I agree with some of the post, but the author seems to be an insufferable human. This has all the characteristics of terminally-online people that spend way too much time being angry on social media, and needing the world know how angry they are.

Yes, my impression as well. (I have never used Kagi but have considered trying it.)

Among the other things, the blog author approvingly put up a screenshot with someone insisting on seeing the entire world through their own political views and demanding others do so as well. ("Actually, the word 'politics' means 'everything', and also I'm right and everyone else is wrong.") As the meme goes, they need to touch grass.

fn-mote
1 replies
6h11m

^ The parent link leads to an email chain between the CEO and the blogger in which the blogger says "go away I do not want to talk to you" several times and receives a chain of emails back. Text version:

https://d-shoot.net/files/kagiemails.txt

Read them yourself, but to me they look like the emails of a persistent salesman. They were remarkable only in that they provide more excuses than concrete responses.

fridek
0 replies
5h31m

I find this quote funny and on some another level of disconnect about what they are competing with:

Not even Google ever printed 20k tshirts to give away for free.

For a couple of my university years I had nothing but free Google t-shirts. They were throwing so much of this crap around that my closet was halfway to 20k. I only lamented they never gave away Google trousers or briefs.

They have a fair shot at competing with Google on quality of search and they should focus on that. If they think they can complete on AI, email or swag - good luck, and I hope you have a good money printer.

vaughnegut
0 replies
6h11m

Honestly what he says makes sense in his "rebuttal", except for the part where he continues emailing after being told to stop.

I actually stumbled across the AI stuff being turned off by default yesterday when I got curious and was poking around the feature request forum. It was explicitly because a lot of people hate it for moral/ethical reasons. A lot of the comments in the replies are specifically about the AI stuff in spite of it being disabled by default.

Most of this seems fine for a startup?

ufmace
0 replies
3h44m

Thanks for that. After reading both, I'm fine with Kagi and somewhat more annoyed by the author.

Perhaps Vlad is a little excessively enthusiastic and protective of his baby. But then you don't do something frankly crazy like start a new search engine from scratch in 2023 without being a little bit off. If we actually want a viable alternative to the advertising-funded search monopolies, we've got to be tolerant of some personality quirks.

And perhaps the T-shirt gambit is a poor use of limited resources. But have any of the startups that ended up making it big not make a few poor investments on the way up? I'll forgive it.

Meanwhile, Vlad's response does spell out several ways in which this lori exaggerated or misinterpreted things. Which of course are not acknowledged or responded to at all, despite lori's self-important tone. If you want to take your ball and go home because somebody doesn't take your concerns seriously, well you can, but don't expect me to follow you.

IMO, Vlad would have been better-off making his response his own blog post somewhere rather than an e-mail exchange. But eh, at least it's out there.

magistr4te
0 replies
5h47m

While I do not agree on Vlads interpretation of PII and GDPR at all, that whole conversation was so incredibly mishandled by the author of this blog post.

I understand not wanting to engage in a conversation about a product you don't care about, but after collecting so much information and writing a lengthy blog post about it, that is a different story. In my eyes, the author wrote a hit piece largely based on personal grudges, and then wanted to avoid any kind of responsibility.

And from my point of view, a lot of the financial stuff "makes sense". This is a small startup, probably with little business experience, and it shows. But why make it look like they are doing evil because of small, negligible mistakes?

llm_trw
0 replies
6h9m

Why even reply to an email when you intent to ignore it?

Yes, hello so called prince of Nigeria. I have no interest in a discussion about the intricate court politics of Nigeria or its Byzantine inheritance rules. As you can see from my blog post it is entirely unlikely you would ever gain the throne even with my $2,000 wire transfer.

The only thing I take away from that is I'm very happy I don't know either of them and am never likely to.

catapart
0 replies
5h56m

This definitely needs more eyeballs. What a gross person Vlad is being.

astura
0 replies
5h32m

Wow, strong Tommy Tallarico vibes there.

alephxyz
0 replies
3h48m

Yikes. The lack of emotional and social maturity in the tech industry will never cease to impress me. Vlad is coming off as a big narcissist and the OP as disingenuous. If you don't want someone to email you, just block or ignore them and move on. Don't publish your private conversations for the terminally online peanut gallery.

_gabe_
0 replies
5h17m

I don’t have a horse in this race, but the author of this post sounds insufferable based on their email responses and fediverse thread. They post a public email on their public website (I assume for people to reach out to them) and then gets mad when someone does so?

I may not have spelled this out explicitly in my previous reply but I will do so here: I am not interested in getting more replies from you on this subject. Declining a call does not mean I want you to argue with me about Kagi in email either. I do not trust you, personally, either and do not want to have a conversation about that. And for the record, I read that blog page already. If you had read my own blog post, you would notice that I link to it.

If they don’t want to talk, just don’t respond.

The author also cross posted their blog to multiple social media platforms, which I assume means they wanted it to get attention. But then when the CEO does see it and offers some explanations they get mad that the CEO “vomited out” a reply that they didn’t want? I’m sorry, but the CEO of Kagi definitely sounds like the reasonable one here, thanks for linking this thread.

SiempreViernes
0 replies
5h42m

If someone mails you

I may not have spelled this out explicitly in my previous reply but I will do so here: I am not interested in getting more replies from you on this subject. Declining a call does not mean I want you to argue with me about Kagi in email either. I do not trust you, personally, either and do not want to have a conversation about that. And for the record, I read that blog page already. If you had read my own blog post, you would notice that I link to it.

replying with a 1100 word long email is a mood.

yreg
25 replies
6h7m

I've read the first third of the article and I didn't get what's the author's problem with Kagi. What do they care how many employees Kagi has or how much they spend on t-shirts.

Then I scrolled through the rest of it and read the very last screenshot. That one looks pretty bad.

people who really need anonymity are very rare. probably less than a 100 in the entire world. definitely not typical Kagi users

unless they are criminals, in which case we don't care they don't have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

- Kagi CEO

tomoyoirl
7 replies
5h45m

What do they care how many employees Kagi has or how much they spend on t-shirts.

Spending a third of your round on t-shirt manufacturing equipment is possibly not the best sign of the focused leadership that will bring your company success in a difficult market.

yreg
6 replies
5h35m

True, but what do I as a customer care? It's not like I'm building some business on their APIs or anything.

If they go down, I will switch to another search engine… no need to do so preemptively from my PoV.

mbStavola
3 replies
5h27m

Because "going down" doesn't necessarily mean _shutting_ down-- it could be a sale as well. Considering the stated attitude towards privacy, that should worry you if privacy is your concern.

JohnFen
2 replies
3h59m

All search engines are problematic in terms of privacy.

mbStavola
1 replies
3h44m

One of the main selling points of Kagi is privacy. It's featured on the main landing page, they have a page dedicated to it, and it's mentioned in pretty much every sales pitch they will make. Kagi's audience is also comprised of people who have that value as paying for a search engine means divesting from adtech surveillance.

So, it does not matter that "all search engines are problematic in terms of privacy"-- this one is marketed to not be. That's why people have concerns about how serious they're taking that committment and why people would hold them to a higher standard. It's also why a sale to a company which does not respect privacy is potentially a major issue, especially if current customer data isn't being handled in the manner they had expected.

JohnFen
0 replies
2h59m

Sure, I get that. I'm one of the more privacy-sensitive people you're likely to meet.

The complaint is about the marketing for sure. But that's not so different from the other "privacy-oriented" engines I'm aware of.

I'm not saying Kagi is (or is not, I don't know) being a good actor here. I'm just saying that if you want to use a search engine at all, you're effectively having to choose the lesser of evils.

Kagi may not be a saint, but since there aren't better options, I'm willing to settle with a search engine that actually gives me useful search results and isn't totally egregious on privacy issues.

laborcontract
1 replies
5h16m

It you want to know when Evernote went downhill, it’s precisely the moment they started selling backpacks.

HWR_14
0 replies
3h56m

Every tech company I've ever seen has had free t-shirts to give out at some point. While I don't think it was a smart use of limited funds, it's certainly not a major pivot to physical products like Evernote.

nunez
2 replies
4h37m

He's right though (or at least I agree with him).

Full anonymity is hard to achieve.

Kagi is aiming for more privacy, I.e. a search engine and browser that doesn't track your habits or sell them to data brokers to identify you. Kagi does that very well.

Closi
0 replies
4h15m

Eh, a founder that effectively says 'we don't care if we give away the identity of our users if they are criminals' is not totally in line with my definition of an organization focused on privacy.

At least not a definition of privacy I really care about.

It's very Mark Zuckerberg 2004.

34679
0 replies
4h1m

Anonymity should be the default. I don't have any right to come peeking into your windows, or to tap your phone, even if there's a market for whatever I discover. The same should be true for online activity.

And his comment about needing privacy? Name one person that needs privacy while taking a shit. Just because your desire for privacy doesn't rise to the level of need, that doesn't make it any less valid.

freediver
2 replies
2h52m

Kagi CEO here.

I'd concede that it was a bad choice of words but also the screenshot was taken out of context. What I meant to say is that anonymity and privacy are two different things and that most people really need just their privacy respected, not be truly anonymous in life.

I also had a narrow view back then of what people considered by anonymity (for example considering VPNs as something giving them anonymity online).

number6
0 replies
1h26m

Your grasp of personal information management under GDPR seems to be lacking, particularly regarding the roles and responsibilities of data controllers and what personal information are under GDPR. If you're operating within this jurisdiction, I would strongly recommend consulting with a GDPR expert. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines. Additionally, if this user were located in Europe, and he already sounds salty, were to report this to a privacy watchdog, there's a high likelihood it could result in a penalty. It might be beneficial to revisit GDPR guidelines to ensure compliance and avoid such risks.

lamontcg
0 replies
58m

I really don't want to use a VPN and a fake e-mail address with Kagi to get the kind of anonymity that DDG at least claims to offer.

[It would also be selling point to offer at least GDPR levels of privacy to everyone -- embrace it and do it right for the EU and don't fuck over people in the rest of the world just because you aren't required to do it here]

kklimonda
1 replies
5h49m

For me, and probably a lot of other people who moved from other search engines, long-term viability of Kagi is important - heck, that's the reason I've decided it's worth paying some money for search. Given that, I'd expect them to be very frugal with their spendings. Burning money on T-shirts, on another Browser, AI "improvements", Kagi Email (wtf? first time I've heard of it) show that they have incredibly startupy mindset, and will end up like every other company that takes VC money - bloated, money focused and deaf to their community.

Terretta
0 replies
4h40m

Every entrepreneur obsesses about some competitor or some business model.

You can see various baubles glint in Vlad's eye.

If you are a collection of 10x devs, you can afford to make multiple bets and test for traction. You can sample the Brave waters, or try to head off Proton claiming ownership of privacy first, or get in front of perplexity and phind. Arguably, only products you've shipped can tell you the truth about product market fit.

Which is to say, I don't think these "let 1000 flowers bloom" experiments are a bad thing... so long as the core product has no appearance of inattention and never goes backwards in usability or quality while "net promotion" is still part of the growth plan.

beretguy
1 replies
5h42m

Definition of “criminal” can change depending on perspective. A journalist is a criminal from a perspective of an authoritarian government.

mr_machine
0 replies
5h17m

It can also change after an election, and the impact can be retroactive.

Vlad needs to walk that "criminal" comment WAY the hell back.

alchemist1e9
1 replies
5h17m

unless they are criminals, in which case we don't care they don't have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

Christians can be labeled criminals in China. Young women try to get a 1st trimester abortion in Texas.

What the hell is he talking about? Anyone with even a basic understanding of human liberty and dignity knows anonymity and free speech are bedrocks. Especially disturbing coming from someone trying to run a search engine which can collect very detailed and targeted information from users via their search history!

Terretta
0 replies
4h55m

I have been a proponent of kagi from near inception, and have interacted with Vlad by email as well as Discord, including getting change/feature made. The core search product was (for the longest time*) a breath of fresh air, as were these interactions**.

That "criminals" comment flipped my advocacy off like a light switch, for all the reasons described here in this thread. Perhaps it will get walked back.

* Lately, the results seem more Bing-like, and I've even had to !g things for the first time in a year to find a non-spam result. The core product has to be 10x for people to advocate and people to switch, not just more of the same or slightly better.

** Although, I couldn't convince him to make a team plan that would effectively let me pay full price (pro or ultimate) per employee for everyone registering from a domain. I cannot fathom why he wouldn't let a company pay him for double or triple digit employees, it's free money. Plus, those employees that use it for free at the office, will get frustrated at home, and buy the family option and tell their friends... Refusing to let me cover my employee base is a weird flex for someone still counting subscribers trying to get to 25,000.

TimTheTinker
1 replies
5h12m

Those who have "nothing to hide" still close their curtains at night and shut the door to the bathroom when on the toilet.

Granting and fiercely protecting privacy is a simple matter of respect for your fellow human beings. Doing so also has the side effect of slowing descents into various forms of totalitarianism.

bookofjoe
0 replies
4h22m

Whenever there’s a conflict, the logic of security will trump the right to privacy.

— Eric Schmidt, 2013

tokai
0 replies
4h36m

Ouch. I have been on the fence about paying for Kagi for some time now. Will definitely not touch any project presided over by someone with such a viewpoint.

newzisforsukas
0 replies
5h52m

he should run his discord posts through a LLM for an unbiased summary of who he is as a person.

34679
0 replies
4h9m

unless they are criminals, in which case we don't care they don't have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

People helping other people escape slavery were criminals.

lijok
14 replies
5h40m

Lori seems (from the blog post and the subsequent email chain with the CEO) to be unnecessarily combative and most definitely too emotionally invested in Kagi.

You're paying, what, 10, 25 USD - are you getting a good service for it? If not, unsubscribe, if yes, what's the problem? Sounds like they're profitable now, so little risk of the service dissapearing.

Unnecessary drama by people who live for drama. My only advice for Vlad would be to not get caught up in it.

ImPostingOnHN
10 replies
5h25m

For a second there, I thought you were talking about Vlad!

Based on the exchanges, Vlad is both extremely combative and unwilling to accept the possibility that he is wrong (which he is here).

Being aggressively wrong is no way to go through life. Vlad should be more humble, and open to being wrong, rather than being unnecessarily belligerent.

lolinder
8 replies
5h20m

I don't get the sense that Vlad is combative, just (over)confident. There are no personal attacks, no aggression, no flaming or flamebait. He just is very confident in his approach and doesn't slow down to listen to criticism. Not the best approach as a founder, but not combative.

davidcbc
4 replies
5h16m

If someone says "please don't email me about this anymore" and you continue to email them you are being combative

piafraus
1 replies
18m

If your intention to stop communication - you can block someone.

Or if that's the words that would've been chosen - I would agree to you.

But if you mix those words with extra message, then no. A reply to this new message is warranted.

E.g. if you add a reason and that reason is unreasonable - it's warranted to address that and reply to you. Either do a request without attached strings, or block. Don't write extra conditions/reasoning and then complain that someone doesn't agree with you on those and kept messaging.

jlund-molfese
0 replies
1m

Sure, or if you're being polite, or even short in a reasonable way "I'd rather not discuss this privately."

Lori's emails are deliberately designed to goad Vlad into replying, just to act indignant when he does.

drunkan
0 replies
50m

If someone say "please don't email me about this anymore" after writing a hit piece on someone and there company without giving them an opportunity to respond they are being provocative, goading and a troll.

catapart
0 replies
2h42m

This comment, taken as a response to the parent or just as general advice about life, is so entirely bereft of anything objectionable, and is so intrinsically reasonable that its status as 'downvoted' (assumed from the grey text color) is a blemish on HN's commentariat.

Put more simply: it takes a weird, broken logic to find fault in the idea that a person who won't stop emailing you, after being told to, isn't "combative".

ImPostingOnHN
2 replies
5h10m

Combative in this case means treating the exchange as combat: a fight to win; rather than an opportunity to be humble and listen to others and learn.

The exchanges all read like Vlad derives a lot of self-esteem from being right, which isn't as good as deriving it from ability to learn when wrong.

alemanek
1 replies
3h51m

Wouldn’t the same apply to Lori in that exchange. They just put the company on blast and aren’t willing to even hear the other side of things. That email exchange made me lose a ton of respect for them.

But, Vlad definitely should have stopped when Lori responded that they didn’t want to have a conversation at all. If for no other reason than they were a lost cause.

ImPostingOnHN
0 replies
3h8m

The one who "needs to hear the other side of things" is rarely the customer, and this is a good case study in why: no matter how much this customer "hears", they are right and Vlad is wrong with regards to the GDPR. By insisting that the customer needed to "hear the other (wrong) side of things" he looked worse than if he had just listened to the customer.

The customer isn't always right, but often is, like in this case. If you're a CEO, best to just pipe down, be humble, and listen to customers. Being open to being wrong is a nice plus, but either way, people will like you more if you appear to listen instead of argue. Even when you're right!

tl;dr: this isn't an internet argument between two otherwise-equal random strangers, this is a CEO talking down to a customer while being objectively wrong, which is 2x bad.

drunkan
0 replies
51m

If someone say "please don't email me about this anymore" after writing a hit piece on someone and there company without giving them an opportunity to respond they are being provocative, goading and a troll.

HWR_14
2 replies
4h0m

People pay $0 to Google/Meta/Twitter/TikTok for their base level offerings, and their privacy policy is valid to discuss and criticize. Does it somehow become less important just because they are also getting paid money?

People discuss Apple's commitment to privacy and if it is real or adequate.

barbazoo
1 replies
44m

People pay $0 to Google/Meta/Twitter/TikTok for their base level offerings

There are costs other than direct monetary. We're still "paying" for it, just via ads, sponsored results, etc.

mac-attack
0 replies
16m

And I think that the inability to explicitly confirm relationships w/ Stripe et al are ways that users cannot determine whether they are paying w/ their data on top of their monthly costs.

arghwhat
11 replies
6h24m

Vlad's interpretation of GDPR is both horribly wrong and very concerning.

Personally Identifiable Information includes anything that can be used to uncover a person's identity. An email address is PII, as it can be used to identify which person their data relates to - and they do have data, at the very least a user account and settings but likely also logs.

Full names, phone numbers or IP addresses are also PII - if you have a server log with source addresses, that's PII under both GDPR and CCPA. Why you have it, and whether I can take steps to hide my identity is no excuse - you need to follow the legal process for PII under GDPR and CCPA, need have data controllers in place and ways for any individual (registered or not!) to make the appropriate data requests and removal requests as applicable.

carlosjobim
9 replies
5h49m

An e-mail by itself is not PII, it has to be connected to other personal data. When companies use Stripe for payments, those other personal data are cared for by Stripe.

There are people who argue that just the name of a person is PII and they are wrong.

ceejayoz
3 replies
5h16m

There are people who argue that just the name of a person is PII and they are wrong.

It's very easy for a name to be PII. I'm quite certain mine is unique, due to hyphenating when I got married.

carlosjobim
1 replies
4h46m

Your name by itself and not connected to anything else, is not PII. But there are many people who argue that.

ceejayoz
0 replies
4h32m

Your name by itself and not connected to anything else...

It's in your database. That's inherently a connection to something else.

mwrd
0 replies
4h49m

There is no test under GDPR for personal data that can identify an individual to have to identify a single unique individual to be in scope of the legislation, just that the personal data can be used to identify _an_ individual. Two people living at the same address with the same name sharing the same telephone doesn't suddenly make all that personal data fall out of scope.

Whilst the response from OP is so obviously wrong and confusing that it's likely to be a troll and not worth engaging with, it's worth clarifying to anyone reading this thread that email addresses most certainly do qualify as personal data under GDPR. GDPR very clearly states what personal data is (see https://gdpr.eu/eu-gdpr-personal-data/ and https://gdpr-info.eu/issues/personal-data/) and that storing or processing of this data necessitates the need to comply with the requirements of the GDPR (particularly the rights detailed under https://gdpr-info.eu/chapter-3/).

For the purposes of this conversation, an email address is personal data, operating in the EU (and additionally, by way of carried-over legislation, the UK) means complying with the GDPR, and therefore Kagi need to provide mechanisms by which people covered by the legislation can enforce the rights afforded them within it.

(GDPR also doesn't use the term "PII", merely just "personal data" and goes on to detail what this means in terms of identification, which might add to the confusion in OPs original message).

Kuinox
3 replies
4h49m

There are people who argue that just the name of a person is PII and they are wrong.

‘personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, [...]

https://gdpr.eu/article-4-definitions/

A name is PII, as stated by the definitions in the GDPR.

carlosjobim
2 replies
4h42m

You're misunderstanding. The name by itself is not personal data, but data connected to a name is.

ceejayoz
1 replies
4h15m

"in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name"

What is there to misunderstand?

carlosjobim
0 replies
59m

If I write a name on a piece of paper here on my desk, I have not violated GDPR. If the radio commentator speaks the name of the soccer player who made a pass, he has not violated GDPR. But there are people who argue that names by themselves (without reference to anything else) are protected personal identification data. Which they clearly are not.

arghwhat
0 replies
4h38m

This is wrong on all points. GDPR quotes that directly contradict this below.

Quoting GDPR Article 4, point 1 (https://gdpr.eu/article-4-definitions/):

‘Personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person.

And Recital 30 (https://gdpr.eu/recital-30-online-identifiers-for-profiling-...), which gives some more examples of identifiable information such as IP addresses:

Natural persons may be associated with online identifiers provided by their devices, applications, tools and protocols, such as internet protocol addresses, cookie identifiers or other identifiers such as radio frequency identification tags. This may leave traces which, in particular when combined with unique identifiers and other information received by the servers, may be used to create profiles of the natural persons and identify them.

There is also the quote from the Danish Datatilsyn (https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english/fundamental-concepts-/wh...) also makes some more examples and explicitly highlight that is is PII even when it must first be combined with other data:

Personal data may, for example, include information on name, address, e-mail address, personal identification number, registration number, photo, fingerprints, diagnostics, biological material, when it is possible to identify a person from the data or in combination with other data. It is said that the information is “personally identifiable”.

---

An email address is obvious PII because it is a globally unique identifier representing a way of contacting a specific person. You can find the name of the owner separately and correlate it with your stored data, thus identifying the person.

Even if you store nothing else, the email reveals that you have an association with the user, but you most likely also have data that ties activity to the email such as the user logging in and using your service in any way or form.

There are people who argue that just the name of a person is PII and they are wrong.

A person's name is the most obvious case of personally identifiable information.

danieldk
0 replies
6h13m

IANAL, but even UUIDs and hashes of user names can fall under the EU, when there is a future possibility of linking it to a user (e.g. through behavior). See e.g. https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/86570/in-gdpr-terms-...

To determine whether a natural person is identifiable, account should be taken of all the means reasonably likely to be used, such as singling out, either by the controller or by another person to identify the natural person directly or indirectly.

https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-26/

figassis
9 replies
4h26m

I noticed Orion is very very buggy, and I found it odd from a revenue oriented company. I was desperately looking for a way out of the chromium world and also avoiding Firefox, so when I found Orion I thought this is where I'd settle and maybe help development. But the bugs are so counter productive, that you can't even manage bookmarks. Something was off with that browser's team.

freediver
8 replies
4h15m

It is very hard to build a browser from scratch. Yes Orion is still in beta and buggy, but there are hundreds of people who paid $150 for a lifetime license for this browser, which makes me hopeful that there is a space for a browser we pay for and is built with users' best interest in mind. That is incredibly important for Kagi's mission.

figassis
4 replies
4h11m

It is important, and I thought it'd be amazing. So then take it seriously. If you need more funding then find a better pricing model. But it is a shame that a project so attractive feels like it's abandoned.

freediver
3 replies
3h54m

But it is a shame that a project so attractive feels like it's abandoned.

Can you clarify what makes you say that?

Orion development is very active. Here is Orion's changelog in case you missed it:

https://kagi.com/orion/updates/orion-release-notes.html

figassis
2 replies
3h38m

I installed it sometime (end of last year/ beginning of this year, can't recall). Was setting it up and imported bookmarks. Then tried to edit them and found out that renaming bookmarks and/or changing links messes up the bookmarks, they don't save/get reset. Some very odd behaviors and I have a hard time believing that they were not picked up by the team or other users. I think setting bookmarks with icon only was also not working. There were other issues and I just did not have the energy to navigate those and my work. So I decided to give it another few years. Using Safari now. But Orion being solid would make me come back.

I also don't want to be overly critical, and I am a paying Kagi user, love it and will eventually try to use the family plan, but maybe I'm just not at the point where I have time to deal with glitchy software anymore.

freediver
1 replies
3h16m

Is it fair to say that building a browser from scratch is very hard, multi year process, and that one interaction with it half a year ago and encountering some bugs does not mean the project is abandoned?

I use it as a daily driver and many other people do and while there are many issues still (we have over 2000 open issues on oriofeedback.org) Orion has never been better and I encourage you try it again.

figassis
0 replies
1h55m

I intend to, thanks.

Closi
2 replies
4h11m

Yes - but why do it is the main point?

Why not focus on doing one thing properly?

Although you seem to obviously be attracting enough money so it's up to you how to spend/burn it :)

freediver
1 replies
2h43m

Because I think you can not succeed as a search company without a browser. And I think that both and Orion and Kagi have proper focus. There are bugs yes, but they are not there due to lack of focus, otherwise every product out there has lack of focus.

Spivak
0 replies
11m

I think this comment is the one that finally made Orion click for me from a business perspective. Without it you're sharecropping on land owned by your direct competitors who fund their browsers through money coming in from search. If you ever encroach on their revenue even a little bit they'll fight you tooth and nail.

I think it's a crazy ambitious bet but I can see why you're making it.

emushack
7 replies
4h2m

I really don't understand why people are so upset about the T-shirts. Like in the grand scheme of things, who cares? If I invested money (I didn't) in Kagi, I would expect some of that money to be spent on marketing. Marketers often do experiments, some of which go well, and others that don't. Only time tells.

This take feels more like being upset about one individual's (Vlad) personal opinions about privacy and politics. But in my opinion, it fails to realize that assigning one person's views to an entire organization is a fallacy. Even if they are the leader.

As a service, I like Kagi. Both in principle, and in practice. I find the "summarize this page" feature to be very useful. I also like the idea of paying for value, rather than being forced to feed the advertising beast. So I pay for value. If it stops being valuable, I will stop paying. I care about privacy, but I also realize that we live in a world where there are serious limits on the amount of privacy that can be expected. So I have to just do the best I can with what is available. Kagi is at least an improvement on the standard "eyeballs are the product" business model.

karaterobot
2 replies
3h55m

I mean, the main value proposition for Kagi is privacy. They need to be really focused on maintaining trust when privacy is their brand. I won't condemn the company based on some out of context quotes from the founder, but those screenshots weren't reassuring either. Not paying taxes and focusing on adding AI to your search doesn't make me more confident that they're protecting my data. It makes me more likely to think "someday they will need a little cash infusion to keep the lights on; at that point they'll begin to consider collecting my data and selling it".

eloisius
1 replies
2h29m

I don’t think privacy was ever Kagi’s value prop. That’s Brave. Kagi’s value prop is that it’s search that actually works.

karaterobot
0 replies
1h40m

It's both. Their marketing copy states it as "search which is aligned with what's best for you", which they say includes both personalized search, no advertisements, and being "100% privacy-respecting". Privacy is definitely spoken of every time they talk about the product.

danpalmer
2 replies
3h58m

Sending t-shirts to existing users is unlikely to be an effective marketing strategy to grow/maintain the business. The way they did it was also inefficient and high-risk. It may reduce churn, but with 20k users there's a very low cap on how good a churn reduction can be vs bringing in new users.

lolinder
1 replies
3h1m

As a counterpoint, nearly all of Kagi's growth so far can be directly attributed to word-of-mouth marketing from those 20k early adopters. I can see a rational case to be made that making those vocal early adopters feel appreciated will pay off in the long run as they continue to advocate for Kagi in places like HN.

danpalmer
0 replies
2h54m

That's fair, but many of them may also prefer to see the money spent on the service (or other marketing). If I was paying $20 a month for a service on the basis of creating a sustainable paid search business, I think being sent a "free" t-shirt would call into question the sustainability and make it harder to justify the cost – can I pay $15 for a service that doesn't send t-shirts?

More generally though, word of mouth is a good place to start but it maxes out quickly, especially for niche products. There will need to be some support from other channels. Even just putting the name of the company on the t-shirt would have supported it a bit.

andrewmutz
0 replies
0m

This take feels more like being upset about one individual's (Vlad) personal opinions about privacy and politics. But in my opinion, it fails to realize that assigning one person's views to an entire organization is a fallacy. Even if they are the leader.

And Vlad didn't even say anything that crazy from a political perspective. "News should not only be about politics" is super reasonable, and I found myself agreeing with him much more than the person he was talking to.

koutsie
6 replies
6h36m

They lost my faith when they partnered with brave

stuartjohnson12
2 replies
5h50m

What's wrong with Brave?

tail_exchange
1 replies
4h30m

The founder, Brandon Eich, made donations in favour of banning same-sex marriage.

I also refuse to use anything from Brave for this reason.

bigstrat2003
0 replies
41m

Brendan Eich also created JavaScript. So you're going to have to pretty much stop using the Internet entirely if you're going to act like his work has anything to do with his political opinions. Personally, I separate a person's work from their political opinions and I think you should too.

promiseofbeans
0 replies
5h56m

Nah the Brave thing got spun up a bit. Kagi just wanted the extra search index data, which isn't even originally from Brave - they acquired it from Cliqz.

keyboardJones
0 replies
5h17m

I’d rather them lean on Brave than Google or Bing

AndroTux
0 replies
5h36m

What a stupid statement. You do realize that they partnered with Microsoft Bing for their search results from the very beginning, right? In what world is Brave worse than Microsoft?

keiferski
6 replies
5h33m

I am increasingly convinced that the successor/replacement to Google will not be a more clever, AI-powered search engine, but a hyper-curated collection of links, selected by people who understand what good content is. Sort of like Yahoo in the pre-Google days.

I think this is only going to become more apparent once AI-generated content takes over the web.

internetter
3 replies
4h57m

I’m working on a pinboard competitor (that is, essentially, just reviving development of it)

One thing I want to look into is ranking algorithms based on individual engagement. So, if you save lots of stories from a site, it ranks higher. If lots of people save stories from a site, it also ranks higher, ect

nottorp
2 replies
4h32m

And... when the bots come and "engage", what will you do?

internetter
1 replies
3h58m

1. Voting rings are one of the easiest types of spam to detect. Of course, the bigger the service the better the bots, but that problem specifically is a later issue

2. Zero tolerance to bots

3. The service is not free

4. Individuals have very little impact on the rankings of other users, so you need to pay for a lot of bots

I believe that the true problem with bots on, say, twitter, is that they have perverse incentives to 'boost engagement' and whatever by allowing the bots to run rampant.

nottorp
0 replies
1h51m

The service is not free

That may fix things on its own ;)

Now would I pay to see what other people 'engage' with? I'd probably associate it with the likes of facebook/twitter/other social networking crap and I'd just move along...

sph
0 replies
15m

I agree but we need to wait the next AI Winter, right now everybody is on the LLM hype train.

gandalfgreybeer
0 replies
1h2m

Very tangential but your description is exactly why I've dropped most streaming services except for the Criterion Channel.

bruxis
6 replies
6h30m

The era of having startup founders both immediately accessible on social platforms (X/Twitter, Discord, etc.) and overly willing to share their opinions is a messy one.

It's hard enough in a small startup to prevent CEO "commentary-driven-development" , let alone have their random thoughts driving investment insight and user acquisition/attrition.

jsheard
4 replies
6h19m

Even without seeing Vlads comments it was already disheartening to see them investing in AI features of questionable utility rather than focusing on the core search product. Trying to make a new search engine is already a difficult enough task without spreading themselves even thinner, and diluting the value of the subscription for those who just want search because they only offer unlimited searches in conjunction with unlimited access to the AI tools.

infecto
1 replies
6h15m

To me the Orion endeavor was much more concerning. I don't understand how you can sustain a company of a handful of people and work on search, ai, ai+search, orion and making tshirts.

BadHumans
0 replies
5h51m

Orion came before Kagi Search. If anything, I'm sure Orion users found this Kagi endeavor much more concerning.

Dayshine
1 replies
1h46m

What do you mean? The unlimited tier didn't come with AI last time I checked. That's the ultimate tier which costs 2.5x as much to pay for the ai?

jsheard
0 replies
35m

The $10 unlimited tier gives you unlimited access to FastGPT and the summarizer. The 2.5x more expensive plan above that gives you more AI features, but it sounds like you're paying for early beta access, and they will filter down to the cheaper plan eventually.

dartos
0 replies
6h26m

Messy, but valuable imo.

It’s good interacting with the real people that make software.

IMO, The fact that it’s so detached from the customer is part of why MBAs fit in to leadership so nicely.

None of the customers see it coming, because they don’t interact with employees.

marcinzm
5 replies
6h19m

I wonder if the t-shirts were basically a way to siphon some investor money directly into their own pockets. Or if someone just thought they can do it cheaper and then ran into sunk cost fallacy.

carlosjobim
2 replies
4h50m

Yes, of course they created a consumer product that outperforms the main product of the third largest company in the world just as a measure to cheat investors out of a couple of hundred thousand. That's why I won't buy Apple products either, because I'm sure all these iPhones and Macbooks are just a tricky plan to build up investor confidence so that they can cheat them out of money in the future.

Useless snark aside, if the Kagi team wanted more "money directly into their own pockets" they could just raise their salaries. If their product is comparable to Google their salaries could be as well.

marcinzm
1 replies
3h40m

Useless snark aside, if the Kagi team wanted more "money directly into their own pockets" they could just raise their salaries. If their product is comparable to Google their salaries could be as well.

And they'd get the money for those massive salaries from what magic money tree? They're at best barely profitable, revenue is probably around $2m, and they only raised $670k in funding. This isn't a particularly money making enterprise.

carlosjobim
0 replies
1h1m

What I'm saying is that they could take all the investor money as salaries for themselves if they wanted, and easily motivate it by comparing to industry compensation for similar work. They don't need to invent any Yugoslavian scheme to put "money directly into their own pockets."

rsynnott
0 replies
5h23m

I mean, Occam's razor says they were just naive and didn't realise what a huge pain doing stuff like that is. There's a reason that pretty much everyone uses a third party for this.

bravetraveler
0 replies
5h44m

Interesting to think about/play with

"why pay for shirts or advertising when we can own it?"

Anyway, that's how I felt it happened. Build over buy. Siphoning is an interesting thought

It's mind blowing. The earliest internet ventures were selling shirts that somebody else made for huge margins.

Why take on the costs in-house, lol. Either way: by making it yourself or dealing with problematic suppliers, it's not worth the hassle.

Shirts aren't their business and for those still in it, the margins are razor thin. Madness.

paradite
4 replies
5h52m

The real lesson here is that as a founder, don't spend too much time discussing with your users on discord.

Gathering feedback good. But getting involved in philosophical discussion or how to run the company looks like a bad idea.

freediver
3 replies
4h28m

Kagi founder here. I am probably 'guilty' of reading and responding to every comment on discord, our feedback forum and I still respond to support tickets.

This does invite trouble but interacting with users of the product I am building is also the only way I know how to do it and is keeping me sane. Not to mention it helps build a great product, as users probably 'built' half of it with feedback.

I never thought that talking too much with the customers can be bad but it also may be true that full openness approach becomes a burden at some point and that it would be healthier to separate from it a bit.

theothermelissa
0 replies
3h59m

I think it's a matter of scale. The principles and instincts that guide us in small-group conversations don't always translate well in large groups -- especially in conversations with an imbalance of emotional investment in the conversation. As the founder, you have a lot more riding on every exchange than any user does (even ardent, investing users). And as your user base grows, both the number of those interactions and their visibility and potential impact on your company is growing. So they're increasing in both number and stakes.

davidgerard
0 replies
3h20m

also not repeatedly emailing when they've already asked you to stop might be worth considering maybe

iowahansen
4 replies
6h7m

Happy Kagi user here. I'm gladly paying $25 per month because of all their AI features, which work well for me overall. Yes, I could set up API keys on OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Mistral and get a similar experience for less, but I prefer the convenience of their interface and have clean search results bundled into the experience. I will continue to recommend them and hope that T-Shirt becomes available soon.

thisisjasononhn
2 replies
4h6m

Or you could spend $25 a month on a dedicated server and run SearxNG or Yacy? Good lord what an excessive amount of money that is to search the web...

theshrike79
0 replies
2h22m

If either of those was even close to the quality of Kagi searches, ever would start a new search engine startup

talldayo
0 replies
1h23m

My thoughts exactly. It's stomach-churning to hear people talk about improving search and privacy for all, before putting it behind a prohibitively expensive (and probably inordinately profitable) subscription.

I'll just say the quiet part out-loud: expecting people to pay $10+/month for a search engine is a pipe-dream that rules out 95-98% of the world population. People buy food with that money, they pay rent, they live lives that aren't tethered to a search engine in a meaningful way. Google "wins" their traffic because they don't care, and every bit of friction in-between them and their content is extra work. Kagi's payment-upfront mentality is unrealistic for everyone except the most well-paid Bay Area engineers.

That's not to say I don't understand the "avoid ads at all costs" concept. I do oppose to using anti-advertising sentiments as a populist rallying cry so people will line up at your Search SaaS kiosk and pay you whatever you ask for. At this point you really might as well just invest in your own Searx instance, it's plenty cheaper. And you can't even "dropbox comment" me since there have been third-parties providing search for free since before HN was a website.

mediumsmart
0 replies
5h13m

Me too and I also happily support Orion and using the RC as a default browser.

Kagi is for a subset of the internet and specifically for the part that has content. The good parts of cyberspace if you like. OP seems to be looking for something bigger like someone they can trust to replace Google and save the internet as well. For that search I say good luck sailor

(see, that is the good thing in Kagi too - you can downvote ;)

edude03
4 replies
5h20m

(this articles formatting was super hard to read, I love the web 1.0 "just get it out there" vibe but man I wish CSS had a good "reasonable default" for lots of text)

I'm a huge fan of kagi and have been paying for it for as long as paying for it has been possible - that said, I think the author is spot on about the long term viability of the project considering their limited funding, limited employees, very wide (yet unproven) interests AND a leader who's maybe not so receptive to feedback.

For example I was part of the Orion beta and I left feedback in the discord that it took ~30 seconds on the then top of the line iPhone (13 Pro Max?) to load the interface which made it hard to use and I thought it was unreasonably slow and he said something like "that's not slow it's totally reasonable" and since then I decided it wasn't worth leaving any more feedback and have since left the community.

catapart
3 replies
5h5m

FWIW, my assumption here is that people who publish like this page are expecting users to use a "reader view" and they're trying not to introduce any styles at all, so as not to conflict with the styles that the reader view will apply.

Otherwise, ' "reasonable default" for lots of text ' is something that browsers provide, using the "system" fonts. Applying a font-family to the entire html or body tags will do the job, because system fonts don't need to download or load into the browser. And since you can even specify the specific system font you want to use, you have a few options like serif or sans-serif.

All of that aside, if I applied a system font and your screen reader applies a different one, what was the point of the extra css? So that's my guess as to why people do this because, like you, I find it very hard to read.

If you're curious, though, Firefox has a built-in reader mode and I think Safari does, too. Last I checked, Chrome's was behind a flag. And then, of course, there are extensions (but extensions to read plain HTML docs seems exactly backwards, so...)

drcongo
1 replies
4h49m

Using reader view would discard all CSS anyway though right?

catapart
0 replies
3h55m

Depends on the reader view, especially for fonts (some people have a visual-related reason to enforce specific fonts).

shadowgovt
0 replies
59m

But the default is objectively awful, at least in Chrome.

Seriously: no margins on the images and the images all different widths. No human being would lay out a mixed-media document like this on purpose if they expected other human beings to consume it easily.

(This reflects not so much on the author as on how fascinatingly bad the UX of unstyled HTML is. I remember when things looked like this and we were just used to it because there wasn't anything else on the web).

lolinder
3 replies
5h37m

The T-shirt thing is dumb and a waste of funds, but TFA describing it as "owning" a T-shirt factory is an exaggeration that makes me question most of the framing of the rest of the article. They partnered with an existing entity in Serbia, what they did set up was the means to distribute them. Still not a great look and definitely still a waste of funds, but if every criticism takes this same form—take a legitimate criticism and blow it out of proportion with exaggerated language—then it's important to take the article with plenty of salt.

My own experience has been that what I get month to month is worth what I pay. If the project is sustainable, then I'll get to enjoy it into the future. If not, I'll get to enjoy it while I can.

A search engine isn't like an email provider or even a web browser, there's basically no lock in that makes transitioning later difficult if something changes for the worse.

mfiro
1 replies
5h10m

If not, I'll get to enjoy it while I can.

Sure, but what happens with your information after that is also very important. What's for me very concerning after reading the article is not a T-Shirt factory or burning budget, but the their attitude towards privacy.

lolinder
0 replies
4h45m

For my part, I trust that they aren't logging my searches and I don't put any sensitive information into the fields that are persistent. If someone eventually buys Kagi then they'll be able to learn that I block Pinterest and boost MDN, which is way less information than Google collects and stores about me, and it's information I'm happy to divulge to get the service I want.

barbazoo
0 replies
45m

It's so silly. Google/Bing are wasting money too but the difference is you don't see it. And yes, we're "paying" to use those services too, just not with our own money.

andy99
3 replies
6h1m

I stopped reading once I realized it was just a rant about their business. Why would I care? Their search is better, it's worth what I pay, if it stops being worth the money I'll stop paying. I could care less how their business is run. If I was investing I might look closer, until then, the maximum I have at risk is the $100 or so it costs a year, which I'm comfortable with. Did I miss something more damning later in the article?

someone7x
1 replies
5h49m

Did I miss something more damning later in the article?

Yes. The part where the CEO claims that of all the people seeking anonymity that less than 100 of them aren’t criminals o_O

Check out the last discord screenshot.

andy99
0 replies
5h7m

The comment is weird but I think it's out of context. I don't want to defend it but also don't think it particularly affects me as a Kagi user.

jjice
0 replies
5h48m

I completely agree. I use products because they're useful, not because I'm invested (financially or emotionally) in the business creating said product.

PaulHoule
3 replies
6h20m

(1) I helped somebody start a hobby shop years ago, he was having trouble getting the bank loans to start it and I asked him if he’d consider raising equity, the next day he asked if I was serious, I told him I would put something in if he found some other investors and that was what happened.

He was successful about building a community around the store but not successful at the paperwork so it turned out we had not paid the sales tax for a few years which led the state to put up signs in front of the store, thankfully he was able to scrape up the money. Boy it was a near death experience.

(2) If you are working on search in 2024 and you are serious you’re going to be using A.I.

MrVandemar
2 replies
5h56m

(2) If you are working on search in 2024 and you are serious you’re going to be using A.I.

Pretty sure Marginalia doesn't use AI and to the best of my knowledge Viktor hasn't written about plans to do so. But maybe he's not serious because it sure seems like he's having fun!

maleldil
1 replies
5h41m

Isn't Marginalia playing a completely different game from Kagi? AFAIK, Marginalia isn't trying to be a general-purpose search engine.

PS: Lovely username =)

PaulHoule
0 replies
5h16m

(1) Marginalia can get away with it because it is searching a smaller collection over which it is easier to manage spam. On the other hand, Matt Cutts became a hero at Google not because he built models for filtering unwanted content but because he figured out how to motivate people to make the labels to train that sort of model.

(2) One of the most depressing experiences of my life was reading through the first ten years or so of TREC conferences looking for something useful to improve the search engines I was building. Eventually I found a volume that revealed the handful of useful results that they got in the first ten years (here https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262220736/trec/)

Advances in search quality are rare and come along about once a decade; BM25 was such an advance, on paper. Even though BM25 is in Elasticsearch and a lot of other products very few people are taking advantage of it because they don't want to do the parametric tuning it requires to get superior results.

https://sbert.net/

is a similar once-in-decade advance that actually works out of the box with relatively little tuning. It doesn't address all the issues of search and should be integrated with more traditional search, but if you are building a search engine in 2024 you can expect to wait another 10 years for another advance like that.

(3) Marginalia particularly interests me because it is a small collection and the problems of search over a small collection are very different from those over a large collection. Gerald Salton started IR research with a deck of punch cards and he thought 80 documents was a lot and with 80 documents you are going to be very concerned about missing relevant documents because you didn't pick the right word. If you have 80,000,000,000 documents you have a very different problem. My take is SBERT and related techniques are particularly effective against small collection problems.

Bnichs
3 replies
6h25m

I think a lot of this can be ascribed to "startups don't always do the right thing" and you have to learn a lot over time.

That's said, I've been a customer for a while and the t-shirt debacle is one of the dumbest things I've seen a small company do. Even if you try and call it marketing cost (no name on the shirt makes that hard), there's no way it was the most efficient use of money for marketing.

And setting up infrastructure for it wreaks of "I'm bored with search let's do t-shirts." it completes goes against "do one thing really well" and just seems like a waste. If I were one of those investors and my money got spent on that I'd be really upset.

foobarian
2 replies
5h42m

On the other hand, I see it as evidence that adtech is not in control of the company. Public companies or companies beholden to ad money would never be able to get away with a stunt like that. Can you imagine Meta sending each of their users a T-shirt? At > $40 RPU they could afford it.

jsnell
0 replies
3h43m

The (publicly listed) bank I'm a customer of sent me a pair of oven mitts during the 2008 financial crisis, with an accompanying note that I'd paraphrase as "there have been rumors about our financial stability, and to show how untrue they are we're sending a gift to our customers".

It remains the worst customer retention pitch I've ever seen.

ceejayoz
0 replies
5h21m

Can you imagine Meta sending each of their users a T-shirt?

If they thought it'd help, absolutely. Facebook has a long history of doling out swag; I've got a free Oculus sitting downstairs.

BadHumans
3 replies
5h52m

Oh and they own a t-shirt factory.

Maybe I'm being pedantic but Kagi doesn't own a T-shirt factory and presenting it as such is a bad faith argument that does make me question the author. They very clearly point out that they worked with a print shop in Serbia to make the shirts.

reducesuffering
1 replies
5h43m

Idk about "bad faith argument," because even if Kagi doesn't technically own the thing, they literally said "we basically ended up owning a merch production operation end-to-end."

BadHumans
0 replies
5h15m

I know I'm being pedantic but there is a difference between a factory and a fulfillment service. When I read "they own a T-shirt factory" I interpret it as a place where T-shirts are made which is a much bigger cost than renting a warehouse for fulfillment.

JustFinishedBSG
0 replies
5h36m

That makes a whole lot more sense considering Vlad is from former Yugoslavia

wkat4242
2 replies
1h7m

I don't know why this is flagged into oblivion. I'm sure most HN users won't agree because Kagi is very popular here but I don't think the arguments are bad or overblown.

Personally I don't use Kagi for 2 reasons: It's not significantly better than what I already have (SearXNG private instance) and I don't really subscribe to the "everything must be paid on the internet". I'm much more comfortable running some dockers and putting a privacy barrier between myself and google, as I do for my searches, for my phones, computers etc. Of course this kind of tech solution is not an option for everyone, but I don't care about everyone :) $10 is a lot of money for me and I rather spend that on something I control like 2 VPSes.

Also I think that once things go commercial eventually they will reach a scale where they will want our data too. After all, data is like free money. A business will never say no to free money. By due diligence law they're not even allowed to. Kagi has that luxury now, but once they become big and own half a northern californian town for their campus they no longer will. That's the idea of enshittification.

rixthefox
1 replies
33m

My only reason for not using SearXNG is it seems like the complete opposite of what you want for a search engine replacement. The one shining point of using Kagi, Google, Bing or DDG is that only ONE search engine is getting my search query. With SearXNG you've now taken your search query and sent it all over the place which I don't personally believe is better. My goal is to get my searches OUT of other companies hands, not thrust it directly to all of them all the time.

Additionally, by running a private instance you have effectively given all these companies a spotlight onto YOU. Only your searches are going to come from that instance and these companies already have enough information they can figure out WHO is making that search pretty much right after you click through the first result.

Just from the available public instances you can quickly see that other search engines may block your requests for one reason or another but your server will be constantly retrying to query them from time to time. Last thing I want is to find my IP addresses on some sort of "naughty list" because I wasn't honoring some 403 error my server was getting every time I searched something.

There is nothing that says other search engines won't wise up and figure out how to stop searx from "abusing" their search functions so it almost feels like the only sure way to ensure search privacy is to run your own crawler, for better or worse.

wkat4242
0 replies
27m

Yeah my goal in using SearXNG is really getting better results, not privacy, that's more secondary for me. It's pretty good at filtering out the clickbait crap. I guess every engine promotes its own clickbait.

And of course I block cookies and ads heavily, bypass paywalls, the works. I'm sure I'm pretty trackable anyway with so many addons. Also I'm probably one out of 10 that uses my specific OS/browser combo. So with fingerprinting they have got me anyway.

I run it on a VPS so I don't really care, that one is not used for exit traffic of any other kind except an IRC bouncer. And if I really need to I can just switch to another IP :P

mrweasel
2 replies
4h12m

Maybe a little off topic, but regarding Orion: Can someone explain to me why every search engine feel like they need to build their own browser, and by build I mean jiggle the handles on Chromium a bit?

It seems pointless. I can sort of see why Microsoft would do it, but that's Microsoft wanting a modern browser for their operating system, not DuckDuckGo, Kagi or Ecosia wanting a browser for their search box.

Why this is pretty much just a weird rant about Kagi, I do agree with the questioning of the investment in maintaining a browser.

JopV
1 replies
1h27m

Orion is based on WebKit, not on Chromium. The Mac version of DuckDuckGo's browser is based on WebKit too.

mrweasel
0 replies
35m

You're right, it doesn't negate the question though.

malnourish
2 replies
6h7m

I use Kagi and will continue to do so until it no longer suits my needs. Frankly, it's still the best search engine. I temporarily subscribed to the AI tier and found the expert assistant genuinely useful.

The t-shirt thing is inexplicable.

promiseofbeans
1 replies
5h54m

Yeah, the AI is good (too expensive IMO) - it's really nice being able to choose between the best models from all the providers.

JustFinishedBSG
0 replies
5h31m

too expensive IMO

Except it's less expensive than just going for the providers. Which is puzzling to say the least.

go88faxme
2 replies
5h39m

That is why I pay duckduckgo which include vpn. I also run my own searxng. I used to subscribe Kagi last year. But after researching I came to the same conclusion as Tomte. Nothing unusual. Just business. DDG already is Kagi with solid business and proven privacy (almost anyway, I know about their Microsoft connection). DDG interface need improvement though.

Tomte
0 replies
5h14m

Just a small correction: I'm not the article's author, I don't really have a conclusion, and I don't see the mail exchange as quite so damning as most commenters here. Although you should really stop mailing when someone asks you to.

I was posting this mostly to get a sense what others think about this, since I have only heard good things about Kagi so far, and thought about subscribing last month (but didn't, yet).

Terretta
0 replies
4h10m

DDG was certainly privacy oriented, but for various reasons in recent years I was not able to maintain conviction on the alignment of revenue sources / financial incentives with that mission. (It's still the one I set any time I help someone with their machine, unless they're willing to pay, then it's been kagi.)

The latest all-in-one privacy subscription may be a course correction to have more revenue directly from those who care about their own privacy, to better align the incentives.

cube2222
2 replies
49m

From my own experience, the AI built-in to Kagi is excellent. I frequently suffix my query with a question mark to trigger their AI responder (it responds based on the content of a few top results, with citations), and the results are almost always great, and spare me the need to open each of the sites individually and look through them.

I don't care about Orion and Email, but what I'm getting right now in terms of search experience is definitely worth the cost.

barbazoo
1 replies
46m

I frequently suffix my query with a question mark to trigger their AI responder

Didn't even know that existed, thanks for sharing.

sph
1 replies
5h9m

As a paying user since day 1, I do not give a rat's arse about AI. In fact, I have moved away from Google because they have focused so much on AI their search got worse to the point of being useless.

I paid for a good search engine that respects my queries and does not try to outsmart me. The more Kagi focuses on AI, and making an """intelligent""" search engine, basically replicating Google's missteps, is the day I stop giving them money. I've already been noticing some of my keywords are being ignored or reinterpreted. Please stop that.

I don't care about email either. I am paying Fastmail for it, and I certainly know better than to attach my search history to my email account, especially when it's from an AI company. Is the goal here to copy Google?

To all startup owners: there is more to software quality and user experience than trying to fit the AI buzzword in anything you do. Stop following the hype and focus on building a damn good product.

mostlysimilar
0 replies
1h31m

100% agreed. I was disappointed when Kagi launched their AI thing but I had hoped it was just a small side project or something. If it's truly a major focus for them I'll be ditching my subscription. Also not jazzed about their browser and email etc.

segasaturn
1 replies
41m

VERY ironic to me that a web search company has its community platform hosted on Discord, which is un-indexable. Honestly, companies having their community platform on Discord is a huge red flag for me.

klabb3
0 replies
34m

I also have my reservations and in particular the lack of indexability is a big problem. However, a red flag is an overstatement. You have to pick your battles.

Discord is an excellent place to collaborate. It’s easy to use for non-techies. The level of community is consistently high, better than old Reddit imo. Being realtime it’s conducive to ad hoc chatter.

rsynnott
1 replies
5h28m

For example, he has stated before that he thinks 3 star reviews on products are "by definition" unbiased, because they must include good and bad points.

... What?

Has this person ever visited a review site? I mean, it varies fairly dramatically, and there are some niches where 3/5, 5/10 etc has a fairly defined meaning (for instance, for TV reviewers it means "meh", for gadget reviewers it means "this will catch fire as soon as you plug it in"), but really, I mean, what?

jlund-molfese
0 replies
21m

The author seems to deliberately misunderstand the language that a non-native English speaker is using, for the purposes of maximizing outrage. There isn't any citation, but I doubt Vlad said anything like that. If I had to guess, I'd assume it was a more nuanced take like "3-star reviews are less likely to be biased than 5-star reviews."

For example, Kagi very clearly does not own a t-shirt factory, and this worst-faith take makes me distrust the entire post.

resfirestar
1 replies
6h7m

I don't find anything outlined in the post particularly bad, but what does bother me is that it seems like Kagi's founder cares a lot about what people think on Discord. Like the author said, most people never touch it and don't know or care what is said on there. If you want to engage with people, why not do it in a more open space? The closed nature of Discord chats means the only way to reference them is through screenshots, and that breeds drama as we're seeing here.

promiseofbeans
0 replies
6h1m

They do also have a feedback forum that Vlad is very active on: https://kagifeedback.org

mr_machine
1 replies
5h28m

I'm a subscriber simply because their search is far better than any available alternative. That's the primary thing I want from them and so far they're delivering it at a cost I consider fair.

Their other projects are not interesting or useful to me, but so far I can simply ignore them. Yes, on some level I wish they'd focus and quit wasting money and energy on things I don't care about, but that's really not my affair.

The one growing reservation I have is with regard to Vlad's/Kagi's actual, boots-on-the-ground approach to privacy. Kagi necessarily has the ability to know more about me than almost any other company. I want to see them demonstrate strong and unwavering commitment to respecting and protecting my privacy - through policy, technology, and careful and continuous vetting of partners. Expressed disinterest in collecting or capitalizing on my data is not enough, and seeing Vlad's communications in which he casually shrugs or responsibility-shifts to a third-party heightens my concern.

For now, I remain a customer - but a wary one. I've stopped actively recommending Kagi personally and professionally because as a privacy advocate, it increasingly feels irresponsible to do so.

garciansmith
0 replies
7m

I've been curious about Kagi but the idea of running all my searches through one company while logged in worries me. Yes, I realize most people do that with Google and could care less, but I do. For me to try Kagi I'd need a much firmer commitment to user privacy, not the wishy-washy hand-waving portrayed here.

kodarna
1 replies
3h16m

Kagi Ultimate user here.

This article comes across so unhinged it almost works as an advertisement, except for the founder dismissing privacy issues...

I'm happy to hear Kagi are creating an e-mail service though, I've been looking to get away from Microsoft 365 since I'm not really using the meat of it. I hope they allow multiple aliases per users and perhaps add a masking service as well.

green_dragon
0 replies
13m

It absolutely does work as an advertisement. I hadn't heard of it and immediately signed up for it.

resolutebat
0 replies
4h23m

Vlad does not appear to be aware of the first rule of holes: if you're in one, stop digging.

I'm a happy, paid Kagi subscriber and have been one for a long time, but I've been uneasy for a while about their lack of focus (the T-shirt fiasco being only the latest example) and the post demonstrates clearly that the issue is systemic. You're trying to compete in search against Google and Microsoft with 12 people! Stop doing irrelevant bullshit that's no going to improve your bottom line!

jchw
1 replies
5h36m

Good write-up, I am taking it somewhat with a grain of salt since I am not really invested in this enough to try to verify it for myself, but unfortunately it doesn't really feel like a huge shock either.

Kagi Search is at the very least intriguing, though I honestly didn't find the results very impressive; they seemed alright, but nothing spectacular. The thing that is frustrating is, Google has a massive index, but searching it is an exercise in frustration because it feels like it is basically rewriting your query. Even using "" and + no longer seems to be good at ensuring certain things appear in the results, and so I sometimes try, in desperation, to simply repeat the term I want to emphasize multiple times in the query, which finally sometimes allows me to find things I already know exists. God forbid you wanted to find something you didn't know existed, because in that case, you might never realize Google is fucking up what you're looking for; it has the answer, but it's hidden in a sea of Google-funded blogspam. What a mess.

Will there ever again be a profitable search engine that works as well as Google used to? The answer might be no, and this bums me out.

And he is very, very much the type that believes "not everything is political"

Well, at least we agree on one thing, I have always felt the "everything is political" angle was one of those semantic technicalities, kind of like saying "actually, the glass is always full, just sometimes it's full of air". The lack of a well-defined boundary between "political" issues and non-political issues should not be used as an excuse to drive politics and politically-charged discussion into otherwise rather mundane and apolitical things. I suppose it's not really that important, but this is one of those Internet-era brainrot issues I dislike most. Of course, maybe this is actually trying to make a more nuanced point, but it being phrased like this activated my "uhm, actually" response impulse.

dinkleberg
0 replies
5h7m

Yeah the everything is politics take is nonsense. Certainly anything can be made to be about politics, but it doesn’t have to be (and shouldn’t be).

Also, anyone who can say with a straight face that their preferred political party is aligned with the truth, while the opposition is aligned with lies loses credibility. People lie about anything whenever it suits them, and in politics and the news that is rather often.

It just so happens that they like what the one side is saying and not what the others are saying. So the one side must be good and telling the truth, and the other is bad and full of liars.

darrmit
1 replies
5h31m

I did pay briefly for Kagi, but ultimately just didn't see the benefit over DDG. Google seems to be too far gone to be useful, but DDG still consistently finds what I need. Other than that, the main issue I have with Kagi from a business perspective is it will always be extremely niche. Even among "tech" people, the idea of paying for a search engine will always be a single digit percentage of the overall market.

I view Fastmail in a similar manner, but the difference with them is they have a real business market for those wanting an alternative to Google or Microsoft.

coldpie
0 replies
5h16m

Yeah, I signed up for the free Kagi trial because of all the praise on here, and I think I've used it... twice? It felt exactly like DDG and Google. I think I just don't use search engines very often.

carlosjobim
1 replies
5h36m

What I sense here is the same phenomena as when a famous artist gets a fan that turns into a hater that maybe turns into a stalker, but this time it is a small company that gets this kind of attention and zeal.

There's some kind of psychological instinct that makes some people think that they are owed something and have some kind of personal relation to somebody famous or in this case a company, a kind of familiarity that is just one way. The author of course wouldn't direct this kind of attention towards Google or any other huge company, because they understand that there is no relationship between him and them. But now when it's a small company, there is a short circuit. Just like stalkers usually direct their attention to female performers, and not to gangster rappers or a rock band.

Of course there will be nothing that Kagi as a company, or the people behind Kagi could do to please the author. When in "hater mode", exactly everything the other part does or says will be turned and twisted into something bad. Just read the e-mail exchange that was posted.

With that said, Kagi is still the best search engine around and if they someday won't be, it's as easy as unsubscribing.

danpalmer
0 replies
5h24m

Did you read the post? I know this sort of fan/hater type, and this post comes across to me as very much not that.

I think Kagi have a lot of things to answer for, in particular, a large tax bill, possible GDPR violations, and potentially a future inability to pay their hosting bill in t-shirts.

arghwhat
1 replies
6h15m

Aaand, trying to delete your account you get:

    Error: Server Error
    The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request.
    
    Please try again in 30 seconds.

catapart
0 replies
6h0m

Yikes.

EricAski
1 replies
4h15m

I am surprised that nobody mentioned Kagi Maps so far. To me this is the largest waste of energy possible, building an Apple/Google Maps competitor is a project too ambitious and time consuming for a 12 person company which is also developing a search engine (and a browser, and AI assistants, etc.). Kagi should nail their search engine first and only then start side projects like that.

Kbelicius
0 replies
3h22m

I am surprised that nobody mentioned Kagi Maps so far. To me this is the largest waste of energy possible, building an Apple/Google Maps competitor

Kagi maps seems to just be Apple maps otherwise I don't see why they would put Apple maps logo in the bottom left corner.

Crontab
1 replies
3h52m

Is Kagi actually running their own search engine or are they just representing the outputs of other company's search engines?

I ask because I am considering a subscription.

Kbelicius
0 replies
3h21m

I think they do have their own index but they are also heavily reliant on other search engines.

zirtec
0 replies
5h4m

Kagi does not collect any personal information

Our payment processor does, and you can ask Stripe for that

- Kagi CEO

The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller (...) access to the personal data (...)

- Art 15 GDPR

Controllers are responsible for complying with SARs, not processors.

- ICO https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-re...

Kagi = controller / Stripe = processor

So no Vlad, that is not how the GDPR works.

yieldcrv
0 replies
4h5m

There is absolutely no reason to trust Vlad on GDPR when they didn’t even pay sales taxes

troyvit
0 replies
3h29m

I got a little more than halfway through the post before I gave up. I honestly don't know of any other tech endeavor that is doing so much good only 16 people. You can diss their CEO all you want, but their product is heads above the rest.

And it's not just recycled google results. It's google's API, which means that it brings back into the light what google was best at before they decided to monetize it with echo chamber algos and toxic ads. I can find it in my heart hate Alphabet and yet pay to mainline their best product with a sprinkle of other vitamins and minerals like Wolfram.

tombert
0 replies
4h34m

I don't know that I agree with all these complaints.

Making a bunch of free shirts is something DuckDuckGo did too, I have one. Is it a bit weird they incorporated their own factory for it? Yeah, but I guess I just figured that that was part of their marketing budget. How many cool products have we seen die just because their marketing was crappier than their competitors?

I do think that building their own browser is a waste of resources, but I think that the AI tools also are kind of marketing. People utilizing the universal summarizer gets the name out there, and allows people to see the Kagi branding more frequently. Are they spreading themselves too thin? Maybe, but simultaneously I do feel like the second that someone has to reach for Google to do anything, that's going to whittle away at their potential market share. I think the fear is that people are going to say "if I have to do X using Google anyway, why should I stick with Kagi, especially since Google is free?"

It's tough to say, I've been a paying Kagi user for about a year, I like it, it's a product that I actually think is better than vanilla Google. I really want them to succeed, so maybe I'm viewing what they are doing with rose-colored glasses, but most of the complaints in this blog post didn't seem completely horrible to me.

throwup238
0 replies
5h42m

The whole tshirt thing is straight out of an episode of Silicon Valley or the WUPH episode of The Office.

If they go down that direction they should at least make some Kagi branded condoms like Ryan did.

> > Not even Google ever printed 20k tshirts to give away for free.

This guy is a total Ryan Howard.

stzsch
0 replies
4h53m

My perspective as a subscriber for ~6 months:

Search just works, 90%+ of my searches are on kagi. Much better than google, bing, ddg, etc. Worth the $10.

I do use fastgpt and the summarizer sometimes. As with any of these AI tools, you have to get a feel for what suits it and when to use it.

The unbiased review idea _sounds like_ it would be ultimately fruitless as the requirements get philosophical, but it may very well lead to more useful tools in the process.

The GDPR perspective is unfortunate. I'm willing to wait and see if they eventually accept it.

Overall, I like their focus on user experience, customization, fast and light websites, and search quality. Sure it might not as objective as it's portrayed, but it is giving me great tools _today_.

strogonoff
0 replies
4h58m

I’m using Orion and I pay for Kagi. Orion works great (despite a few glitches I had run into over year or two, miles ahead of competition).

Like others, I think that they had to raise money is a worrying signal they are not sustaining themselves. However, that’s only a signal.

I may not think the CEO is a particularly nice guy (though he was not too pleasant when responding to tickets, which yes he apparently does himself (unless it’s a shared account?), he was not rude either), but realistically can I demand that from him? Push comes to shove, can’t really claim I’m extremely nice either, and I have achieved less.

Regarding the use of ML or Kagi being originally an AI company, I don’t think it necessarily condemns the project.

Kagi Email drama seems ridiculous, but is very new to me.

Unless there are some further bad revelations about the company or the CEO, I will reserve my judgement for now…

starsep
0 replies
1h33m

I am Kagi subscriber because I think their search is great. I would like them to focus on it.

I don't care about closed-sourced browser nor their AI offering

slackfan
0 replies
4h1m

Kagi is not a product I'd use, nor do I get the hype around it.

The company has apparently made a significant amount of bad business decisions.

The author is a politically-obsessed weirdo who gets upset when people deny their delusions.

reducesuffering
0 replies
6h7m

Holy ****, how much drugs does it take for a search startup of 8 people trying to compete with Google to do this:

Kagi: "The process from here involves setting up a business entity in Germany, so we can import the t-shirts, store them in a warehouse, connect inventory logistics and ship them all over the world. This includes building a website and connecting it to a back-end database. So, we basically ended up owning a merch production operation end-to-end, just so that we could ensure premium quality of these t-shirts!

Now, you may ask, why did we go through all this trouble and allocate nearly a third of our investor-raised funds to produce and freely distribute 20,000 t-shirts?

    We would not be here without our early adopters (you!) and we deemed it important to pause, reflect and show gratitude.
    We acknowledge that our journey is a marathon, not a sprint. With a long road ahead, supporting our member community is both rewarding and meaningful.
    Simply put, wearing the Doggo t-shirt is an incredibly awesome experience."
That's a classic stimulant-fueled side quest bender

recursive
0 replies
43m

I'm a kagi subscriber, and this is the first I'm hearing of the t-shirt thing. I'll be happy as long as the search is good.

rebeccaskinner
0 replies
24m

I've been using Kagi since the early in the beta, and I've been happy with it. I think most of this article is maybe a bit overblown, but there are a few things that give me pause.

On the positive side, I still think Kagi's search results are, practically speaking, better than other search engine's results. I don't make heavy use of filters, but used sparingly they've had a really positive impact on my experience. Same with the AI integrations- I don't use them much, but sometimes I do and I'm glad I have the option.

The investment in AI seems totally sensible to me. I'm not "all in" on AI, but it seems obvious to me that AI both clearly compliments document retrieval for a search engine, and integrating AI services fits well with the idea of putting together a service backed by things like Google or OpenAI's APIs (and maybe slowly replacing those dependencies as you grow).

I'm not a mac user, and Orion on iOS was super buggy so I stopped using it, but I guess I can see an argument that it's a worthwhile investment if it's an effective funnel to get people into Kagi. Apple users seem more likely than other groups to pay for things (like a kagi subscription), and if there aren't other ways of getting Kagi added as a default search engine in Safari or Chrome then it seems like a plausible investment I suppose. Maybe not the choice I'd have made, but not something that really makes me question the company either.

Email seems to fit the same narrative as Orion to me. If I were in charge I'm not sure I'd prioritize it, but Google has normalized bundling of email and search for a lot of users, and I can definitely see a plausible argument that people who are already logging into google to use their gmail account would be more likely to churn than people who stay in the Kagi ecosystem.

I had no idea the tshirt thing happened, and sure, it seems like a weird choice but whatever, I don't think it's worth getting up in arms about either.

All that said, the privacy angle does concern me a fair bit. I'm going to give Vlad a bit of the benefit of the doubt here on email. As a fairly privacy conscious person I still pay Google to host my email. Why? Because email is really only as private as the counterparty you are emailing with. The vast majority of people I correspond with are already using Google for email, so keeping my side of the conversation private has a lower ROI than a lot of other things I could spend effort on.

I do worry a lot about other areas of privacy with Kagi though, especially in light of the "let's not get political" comments. We're only getting one side of the conversation, but it had very "right leaning dogwhistle" type vibes to me. Of course with only a few screen shots of a discord conversation it's very hard to know how accurate those vibes might be. I suppose for the moment I'd just say that it gives me pause, and makes me think about how I could recommend Kagi to people who might not be technically savvy enough to understand the potential consequences of their online behavior. Without a much stronger idea of privacy, I would very much worry about anyone using Kagi to search for information related to, e.g. pregnancy if even something as innocuous as searching for pregnancy tests could be used as evidence in a criminal trial against someone accused of a felony for having an abortion- as is the direction many US states are headed. Similarly, I would wonder if I could, in good conscience, recommend people use Kagi to search for any LGBT related material today because they are significant concerns that such searches could be used to persecute people today in many countries, including some US states today and possibly many more US states in the near future.

I'm not likely to cancel my subscription or stop using Kagi over this today. I'm still getting value out of the product, and I think the basic idea that we should have an option for things like search where users are the customer and not the product is a fundamentally sound and important one. The very fact that a lot of people commenting in this thread about privacy concerns are customers and not the product is a great opportunity to demonstrate why it's an important idea.

rdl
0 replies
4h5m

I use them and none of this stuff really matters; they basically have deep pockets available to them and in the current operating model can continue indefinitely.

I'd love to see more focus on their own search engine/results, as well as technical means of ensuring anonymity/unlinkability within their infrastructure, but they're well worth the $250/yr for a pro subscription today.

rchaud
0 replies
3h58m

Like most search now Kagi has chosen to include Instant Answers that are AI generated, which means they're often wrong, as well as a "Universal Summarizer" tool, that again is more of the same old AI bullshit.

I started turning away from Google when they implemented this a few years ago, because the "answers" they selected always came from bullshit sites. Looking up Excel formulas for example, you're more likely to see a lightly disguised sales pitch page from an Excel barnacle company like AbleBits or ExtendOffice than the many forum posts and tutorial blogs that would actually answer my question.

rc_mob
0 replies
4h20m

Kagi uses Google products under the hood for everything. So you are not really avoiding Google/Alphabet when you use Kagi. The pay Google a lot on money for various services and index data and such.

prh8
0 replies
4h3m

From this and other things, Vlad has seemed to have a heavy Elon Musk vibe, which is unfortunate.

My partner works in mental healthcare. There are absolutely more than 100 people who need anonymity. Far more than 100 people who have patients show up at their residence with bad intentions. I think men are also more predisposed to think that "most people" don't have anything to worry about with their personal safety.

All I want is a search engine that

1. ignores junk 2. allows me to up/down/pin rank certain sites 3. efficiently gets me to what I'm looking for

Kagi was that, and still mostly is, but all the AI stuff is pretty distracting, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to be willing to support a company with a good piece of tech but bad human leadership.

plutokras
0 replies
5h38m

First of all, as a project, Kagi stretches itself way too thin. "Kagi" isn't just Kagi Search, it's also a whole slew of AI tools, a Mac-only web browser called Orion, and right now they are planning on launching an email service as well.

Like most search now Kagi has chosen to include Instant Answers that are AI generated, which means they're often wrong, as well as a "Universal Summarizer" tool, that again is more of the same old AI bullshit.

I agree that Kagi should focus their efforts on delivering the best possible search experience (the image search is horrendously slow at times). But as for the above-mentioned AI tools, I love and use daily. For a short question style query, most of the time, the quick answer is all I need. Universal Summarizer is excellent at summarizing the uncountable YouTube videos that my friends send to me.

At one point someone suggested the idea that searching for suicide-related terms should bring up a helpline, and he rejected that idea because it would be "biased" (I guess towards not wanting people to kill themselves).

Why is the so hard to accept for some people that not everything should push a message? If I want to know about a controversial topic, I need results about it, not a lecture. Their responsibility is to serve me good results.

nunez
0 replies
4h45m

I use Kagi heavily. I don't make time to follow their Discord but have submitted some bugs to their feedback forum. I also paid for Kagi+ because Orion is a cool project and I want very badly for it to replace Safari as my main line browser.

Honestly, this gave me the impression that Kagi is a move fast and break shit kind of company, with Vlad as a benevolent dictator type. Finances are often (I think) a disaster at these kinds of companies that gets fixed later. The t-shirt thing is sus but those shirts look really cool and I might buy one. Vlad being flippant about getting sold is better than lying about "nothing will change; we will find a buyer that agrees with our values" while looking for the highest bidder, values be damned. The email thing makes sense technically (they're basically trying to be a Google alternative) and seems like too much, but, hey, it's Vlad's money (I believe he bootstrapped this? If so, the investments they got were probably more donations than investments) and if the devs want to do it, more power to them!

Vlad is "my way or the highway" unless you convince him that the highway is actually better. I've seen this happen with many feature requests, like them improving WebAuthN support or integrating support for Apple's iCloud Keychain extension, both in the Orion browser.

Also, while Kagi seems to have pivoted from an AI answering service to search, it seems like a really logical pivot and comments like this:

1 AI should be used to the extent that it enhances our humanity, not diminish it (AI should be used to support users, not replace them)

give me the impression that they're at least trying to be responsible with this tech.

Everything in this article is mildly concerning, but the alternative (going back to Google Search and embracing a mono-browser future) is so much worse. I don't regret supporting their mission at this time.

mst
0 replies
5h18m

the only real killer feature it has to me is the ability to block domains from your results, which I can currently only do in other search engines via a user script that doesn't help me on mobile

User scripts are doable on Firefox for Android.

For iOS, somewhat ironically, I think you'd need Orion.

mrmetanoia
0 replies
12m

Kagi just works for me. I pay a monthly bill and I get a good search engine. Until they do something that disrupts that relationship or signals a disruption to that relationship, the things in this post don't strike me as that, I don't have much patience for posts like these. It's like a child making a "dead game" post for a game that made a change they didn't like.

mediumsmart
0 replies
5h29m

That’s ok. Faith is what you need for Google.

luuurker
0 replies
1h15m

I don't know if I'll ever use Kagi, if their founder fully understand privacy laws, if I agree with him clarifying anything when clearly this person doesn't want to discuss it, etc... but after reading the post and some stuff on Mastodon, I'm glad I don't have to deal directly with customers. I'd hate to have people like this using my service.

logro
0 replies
5h49m

I don't use Kagi, but this post reads much more like a PR smear campaign than anything else.

knoebber
0 replies
44m

Fair criticisms, but at the end of the day, Kagi offers a better search experience then all the alternatives for a fair price, so I pay for it. I don't really need to have 'faith' in it, though I do hope it sticks around.

Also, can't wait to get my tshirt! (closed beta user here)

joshstrange
0 replies
5h40m

I didn’t know about the T-shirt thing and I didn’t know about Brave either. The email stuff is also new to me and I have zero interest in it.

At the end of the day, Kagi was a way for me to filter out certain sites and raise/lower others. To be honest I’ve considered turning off the ranking modifications, I often have to scroll to find the business I’m searching for’s website because I’ve up-ranked SO/GitHub/HN and the like. It’s more frustrating than useful. I wish there was a way to up-rank the “definitive website for a brand” when I search.

Furthermore, the lack of local results is painful. I just have to go to Google to find the restaurant/business in my town since Kagi seems unable/unwilling to do that. And in that vein, all my !bangs seems to have disappeared which is frustrating, even more so since on mobile it won’t save new ones (last time I tried) and manually going to Google gets redirected to Kagi due to the way their extension (has to?) works.

I’ve been paying for a while now and while the AI doesn’t bother me (I don’t use it) the Brave stuff turns me off massively. I don’t know how I’ll decide but I found this post (and the emails the founder sent) very informative.

jmull
0 replies
4h31m

This is a great argument against the kind of blog where you just drop your stream of consciousness into a publicly available document, which may be archived and searchable. Uptake on a site like HN may seem like a win now, but it also means there will be no hiding from it.

This is the kind of thing that comes up when you're trying to form new relationships (whether personal or career/business) so you may not want to put your worst side forward.

(I have no opinion on Kagi, BTW, since I know virtually nothing about it.)

jlarocco
0 replies
13m

So he's mad they bought promotional t-shirts after a hitting a subscription goal?

If it's deeper than that, I'd recommend adding a summary. It's a big ask to expect strangers to read a ranting wall of text.

iLoveOncall
0 replies
54m

Kagi is really given a LOT of space on HackerNews for something that doesn't even have 25,000 users.

graemep
0 replies
4h27m

A lot of this seems to be "I do not like Vlad".

The only issue that has been brought up here that concerns me is privacy, and the important thing there is that whether search history data is stored and can be linked to and account. Some things like personalisation features require it, but what about the rest? It does concern me that I have to take their word for it.

drunkan
0 replies
1h0m

Honestly after reading this guys follow up rant about the CEO contacting him directly for an opportunity to address any of the points made in this post, this comes off as nothing more than a hit piece. Just saying ive said my piece and I have no interest in hearing any follow up or rebuttals is just classic modern day social media journalism. Suprised the CEO stayed so cool in his follow ups with this guys attempt to goad the CEO into loosing his cool in a private email so he could plaster it all over the web - he comes accross as nothing more than a drama troll.

drizze
0 replies
5h50m

I was a Kagi subscriber for about 5 months. I had noticed a slight improvement for random software development related content vs my previous search engine (bing). After cancelling 6 months ago I don't miss Kagi at all.

The thing that made me cancel my subscription was one specific interaction.

One day I was trying to buy tickets to a podcast tour, the sales for tickets was set to open at a specific time and I was searching for the purchase page at the moment of opening. I frantically searched "$SHOW_NAME $CITY tickets", the first search failed to bring relevant results. I tried "$SHOW_NAME $CITY tickets $YEAR", nothing.

I tried many searches for about a minute along these lines and thought maybe their site just wasn't public and I needed a specific link. Then I typed my original "$SHOW_NAME $CITY tickets" query into bing and got the exact correct webpage on the first try.

Bought the tickets I wanted and immediately cancelled my subscription to Kagi.

dooglius
0 replies
5h51m

To any of this, so what? As long as Kagi makes a good product, and they do, I'll keep paying. As for privacy, my main goal is to protect myself from advertising, which Kagi does excellently.

davikr
0 replies
4h17m

they 100% don't own a T-shirt factory. this feels like finding a reason to seethe over them using genai&llm.

dantondwa
0 replies
6h3m

I personally haven’t lost faith, because search is still the best out there. I’m really happy with it, no complaints and I’m not planning on cancelling.

Speaking about their whole business, I think three things left me a negative impression:

- the tshirts were really unnecessary. I didn’t understand that. I am not sure the world needed more trash being produced and for sure it was not a good use of their money.

- I think AI as a tool has a place in their offering (Quick Answer, Summarizer). I don’t think the Assistant stuff makes sense for a search engine.

- the apparent lack of care for privacy that appears in the quotes in the blog posts are not good and I hope Vlad changes his mind and addresses that properly. Everyone needs privacy. Moreover, GDPR is no joke and it should be followed properly.

danpalmer
0 replies
5h36m

Jesus this approach to privacy is just awful. "it's not data collection if the user volunteers it" I mean wtf. "emails aren't PII because you can use a burner".

GDPR was designed to protect consumers from companies like this.

daft_pink
0 replies
5h4m

I really love using Kagi Search. It’s awesome. I think Arc is becoming very similar with all their AI features that are kind of boring, but that their team is obviously focusing on.

It is quite strange that they are doing all these other things that I basically don’t use at all though. Classic entrepreneur chase shiny objects and get bored with the core idea. In their defense though, people do believe that search is going towards an ai future.

But I do want to say that Kagi Search is really awesome and I hope it works and I won’t go back.

catapart
0 replies
6h5m

Yikes. I'm happy to stay away from Kagi, now. I find that platform strategy and that founder's attitude to be hideous, so I appreciate you bringing that to light.

boesboes
0 replies
5h42m

Bad faith arguments and personal attacks. 0/10 woulnd't read again

binarymax
0 replies
5h28m

I don’t have the full story on the t-shirts, but isn’t this a typical “we want to give tshirts to our supporters” without realizing that it’s crazy expensive and complicated? They probably didn’t intend to spend 1/3 of their round on tshirts, but this is pretty much a microfunding cliche at this point. Kickstarters often reel at their tshirt promise after the fact, and I believe there’s even a YC company or two that started just to solve the problem of sending supporters their promised swag.

ajkjk
0 replies
26m

Yeah every time they mention AI I am more sure that I do not care about them.

acureau
0 replies
5h5m

I did not know all of this about the org. The t-shirt situation is just unfathomably stupid, that last line about anonymity might convince me to cancel.

I still do like the product they offer, though. It'll be difficult to give up their bullshit result filtering. I also cancelled my ChatGPT plan because I could use GPT4 through Kagi. They also provide access to Gemeni, Mistral, and Claude. Probably actually an unsustainable value.

RGamma
0 replies
5h57m

This is disheartening to hear... Especially wrt. AI I was hoping for them to use it to classify the web and not aiming for yet another GPT frontend. Or in general developing tools that are a match for the state of the information space that exists today.

And whatever the heck is going on with all the other stuff. There's no way one should stretch oneself this thin.

Mockapapella
0 replies
5h2m

and they have fully bought into AI being the future of search

Good, because as far as I can tell it is. I use their "Quick Answer" feature very often in my searches, to the point where it's the first thing I click when searching. It's fantastic on mobile so I don't have to go trawling through ad-ridden websites. I am a happy customer because of this feature.

But the developers of Kagi fully believe that this is what search engines should be, a bunch of AI tools so that you don't even need to read primary sources anymore

At least with "Quick Answer" it links to their sources used. This is a non-issue.

There was some demo where you could put someone's Twitter handle in and it would give you a summary of who that person was (nightmare shit)

Really? Providing a summary of someone who willingly posts publicly is the stuff of nightmares? This is not a serious person and their opinion should not be taken seriously.

And he is very, very much the type that believes "not everything is political" and "we don't get into politics"

Because not everything is political. I have never met a stable or amicable person who has thought that everything is political. Every time they have had a coarse personality that has a warped perception of reality. If I had a discord channel for my product and people were going into it mucking it up by trying to make everything political, they would get a swift ban. Keep that shit on Twitter.

I see a lot of their extra features as just that, extra. I don't buy Amazon Prime because I want to use "Twitch Prime" and "Amazon Music" as well, I buy it because I want faster shipping times. The rest is just extra and is of no concern to me.

A third of their investment on free t-shirts aside (which ain't good AFAICT), most of what Vlad is talking about comes off as reasonable. The only thing I do take concern with is his stance on <100 people on earth who really need anonymity. That does not inspire confidence.

JohnFen
0 replies
4h10m

I get where he's coming from, but I don't really find those arguments to be a huge problem. Probably because my "ideal" search engine doesn't exist. I have to choose out of the offerings on the market, and Kagi is the least objectionable of them for me.

In terms of letting me find what I'm looking for, Kagi is the best search engine I've tried. At worst, it's no less "private" than the alternatives.

The AI stuff is irrelevant to me until it starts degrading the search results I get. I just ignore their AI-related features. No big deal, and certainly no worse than others.

All the other criticisms (t-shirts, etc.) don't matter at all to me. What matters is search quality.

GrumpySloth
0 replies
24m

I’ve been suspicious of and disconcerted by the amount of AI-related news coming out of Kagi. I unapologetically hate the current AI craze and am turned off whenever I see it appear in one of the products I use.

I’ve also already stopped using Kagi on mobile, because they made the experience of editing the search field terrible with some JS. In particular moving the text cursor in the search field in Kagi on mobile Safari is an exercise in frustration that’s not replicated by any other text field in any other search engine, website or anything at all on iOS.

This confirmation about their core focus being LLM stuff seals the deal for me and I’m cancelling my subscription. I fully agree with this sentiment from TFA:

> They just don't want to admit to being an AI company anymore. Frankly, it's not something I want to pay them to keep developing. It's something I want less of out in the world.

AlexandrB
0 replies
3h59m

And he is very, very much the type that believes "not everything is political" and "we don't get into politics".

Seems like a feature, not a bug. The only politics I care about from my tech products is whether they will collect/sell my personal data or not. Too many tech companies use a veneer of support for various political causes to take attention away from their own misdeeds. At this point it's a red flag when a company talks more about their politics than about their product.

Thus the quotes at the end are quite bad:

people who really need anonymity are very rare. probably less than a 100 in the entire world. definitely not typical hKagi users (edited)

unless they are criminals, in which case we don't care they don't have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

Women seeking abortions in the US weren't criminals two years ago and now, in some places, they are. I don't think he's thought about this position very carefully.

19h
0 replies
6h1m

Maybe they needed a German company to receive money from the BND for their user data without the US knowing :-D

But in all seriousness, I’ve been a subscriber ever since they started and I’m an ultimate subscriber still, and I’d be sad if they went bankrupt due to mismanagement of the funds.

01HNNWZ0MV43FF
0 replies
4h42m

Did I mention that the t-shirts don't even have the Kagi name on them? Just the Kagi dog mascot, who is at this point the only thing I like about Kagi

I don't even like the dog mascot.