return to table of content

M 4.8 – 2024 Whitehouse Station, New Jersey Earthquake

bee_rider
39 replies
1h56m

If any west-coasters are confused as to how this is news: the Northeast is sort of geologically unusual for the US in that we have almost no surprising, sudden weather thingies.

No tornados, mild thunderstorm, occasional hurricanes (but they are usually weakened a bit compared to, like, Florida by the time they get up here and they’ve spent a long time going up the coast so they tend to be well tracked by forecasters), some flooding but not much, and no earthquakes. Our bad weather events are usually blizzards, which you can see coming and which take a while to accumulate.

We’re right in the middle of the North American plate and the area is covered in gentle old hills and mountains.

So, we’re all just not used to the planet surprising us!

tzakrajs
10 replies
1h48m

What is a Nor'easter?

chimeracoder
3 replies
1h32m

What is a Nor'easter?

Literally: a cold hurricane.

Some people misuse the term to mean "a blizzard affecting New England and/or the Northeast", but it actually specifically refers to a storm that's been pushed inland by sea winds coming from the northeast, off the Atlantic Ocean. That specific pattern results in a particularly cold and brutal storm.

Nor'easters are technically cyclones, just like hurricanes, and the two are very similar in many regards. The difference is that a Nor'easter forms further north, in cold water, and it is actually strengthened by cold air, whereas hurricanes form further south and are diminished in strength as they cool off.

https://scijinks.gov/noreaster/

baq
2 replies
1h18m

Weather nerds will get very confused by ‘a cold hurricane’ since hurricanes are tropical cyclones and tropical cyclones have a warm core by definition.

…but they’ll be fine with a ‘a big cold cyclone’ I guess ;)

chimeracoder
1 replies
29m

Weather nerds will get very confused by ‘a cold hurricane’ since hurricanes are tropical cyclones and tropical cyclones have a warm core by definition.

Well, it's literally true: a hurricane is a tropical cyclone, and a nor'easter is an extratropical cyclone. A nor'easter is literally the "cold" counterpart of a hurricane!

foobarian
0 replies
8m

So like, the Nor'easter is a cryo-cyclone and the regular hurricanes are pyro-cyclones!

bee_rider
1 replies
1h23m

It’s just a hurricane in the winter, no biggie. We would enjoy the snow and check out the surf (from a safe distance). I think you aren’t officially supposed to suggest the latter though.

mrguyorama
0 replies
43m

I mean, it really isn't a huge deal, but the nor'easter that just came across us here in southern maine left about 350k people without power in a state of 1.6 million people.

That's not nothing.

renegade-otter
0 replies
1h45m

A lot of cold water and maybe snow.

hijinks
0 replies
1h35m

its a lot of warm moisture that comes up the coast from the southeast and slams into cold air from canada and can drop a lot of snow/wind. It can cause bad storms in the ocean and high seas.

manojlds
8 replies
1h28m

I am very confused with you classifying earthquakes under "weather thingies"

bee_rider
4 replies
1h7m

The thought process was: I know earthquakes aren’t really weather, so I’ll tack on “thingies” to make it clear that I’m making up some new more generalized term.

The point was to group all the… I dunno, whatever, surprising attacks by the planet into one thing. I can’t think of a real term for this, I think there might not be one, I guess I could call it something like “weather or geological surprises” but that’s just dull.

mikeocool
1 replies
48m

Sim City "Disaster" menu items

graypegg
0 replies
32m

A taxonomy my monkey brain can actually understand.

triceratops
0 replies
23m

Natural disasters

atonse
0 replies
8m

Acts of God as the insurance industry calls them!

aaronharnly
1 replies
1h13m

Natural disaster thingies

bee_rider
0 replies
1h6m

We can have natural disasters they just have to schedule beforehand.

lucky_cloud
0 replies
1m

It just illustrates how people in the NE think about natural disasters. Basically any big natural event is weather-related.

When the 2011 Virginia quake happened, I was somewhere in the Boston area sitting in my parked car, and at first I thought it was a strong wind rocking my car side-to-side. It took a few seconds for me to realize the shaking wasn't a "weather thing"

thekevan
3 replies
36m

mild thunderstorm

What!?! We have some doozies here in the summer. (Finger Lakes region of NY.)

bee_rider
2 replies
22m

We had some allright thunderstorms in MA, but I lived briefly in the Midwest and—they have these thunderstorms that are still scary even when you are inside. It is bizarre.

eej71
0 replies
10m

Agreed! Grew up in Illinois. Live in CT now. Miss those summer thunderstorms in the midwest.

chasd00
0 replies
5m

i live in dallas, about 10 years ago there was a small tornado skipping up and down about 3 miles north of me (they typically move SW to NE). I got in the car to "chase" it and made it to the end of my street. It was so ominous looking I turned around and went back home.

russellbeattie
2 replies
1h5m

I grew up in New England, but have lived in California for 30 years. A 4.7 is waaay larger than anything I've personally felt here!

Plus the Northeast is just not made for quakes. The 200 year old house I grew up in would probably have creaked pretty alarmingly.

0_____0
1 replies
20m

House I'm renovating here in the northeast had the concrete in the basement poured yesterday... Going to head over there to see if any weirdness occurred

secondcoming
0 replies
7m

Good way of removing any trapped air!

cmollis
2 replies
1h43m

we've had tornadoes in NJ..

saalweachter
0 replies
1h33m

The East Coast gets microtornadoes that deshingle roofs or tip trees over.

The Midwest gets MS Paint eraser tool tornadoes.

itishappy
0 replies
1h14m

We get about one a decade in upstate NY.

carabiner
1 replies
36m

You think the west coast has tornados and hurricanes? West coast by the pacific ocean has even milder weather than the east.

jb1991
0 replies
20m

I think you’re drawing the wrong conclusion from the post. There was no suggestion of tornadoes on the West Coast. It was a discussion of relatively isolated meteorological phenomena in the northeast corridor.

spdgg
0 replies
1h28m

Eh, there are plenty of areas of the northeast that are affected much differently by these events than where you are. For example, Vermont has had multiple catastrophic floods in memory, including last summer and Hurricane Irene. Mountainous and coastal areas magnify these systems, the lowlands and developed megalopolis region may be truer to your claims.

mtreis86
0 replies
1h36m

We're also on a shelf of hard rock, so a quake in NJ is felt by all of New England. Keys on the wall were shaking here 100mi away.

mtalantikite
0 replies
1h18m

Yeah, our reaction to this here is reminding me of what happens when Oregon or Atlanta gets an inch of snow. An earthquake (that is felt) is just not something that we experience often.

I remember when Atlanta got 2" and people were literally abandoning their cars on highways [1], whereas in the northeast people are out driving in blizzards.

[1] https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/01/30/268720258...

lxgr
0 replies
1h17m

NYC seems to have been taken quite by surprise by a storm last September.

green-salt
0 replies
6m

I think the term you may be seeking is 'seismic event'

filoleg
0 replies
0m

I cannot speak for California, but in PNW there is even less “surprising, sudden weather thingies.”

Rain is not pouring, unlike on east coast (speaking from my expeirences in both NYC and Atlanta), it is just drizzling at a very low rate. It doesnt thunderstorm. I’ve heard thunder iirc only 2-3 times in my 7 years living there. No tornados or tsunamis. No massive blizzards out of nowhere. I felt this earthquake in NYC today myself, and I remember having a similarly strong eathquake in Seattle only a couple of times.

I have no idea where this “west coast and its sudden weather thingies” take comes from (again, I cannot speak for California), but it runs counter to everything I’ve personally experienced.

chimeracoder
0 replies
1h33m

Also, earthquakes on the east coast travel further, and are more likely to damage structures than earthquakes of the same magnitude on the west coast[0]. That's due to underlying geological differences.

The magnitude is one immediately-available measure of the strength of an earthquake, but it's not the only measurement that's relevant to determining the size or impact of an earthquake. Depth, duration, location - there are many other measurable (and also immeasurable) factors which parameterize a seismic event.

[0] https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/east-vs-west-coast-...

spopejoy
22 replies
3h24m

I'm in Brooklyn and felt it while on a call with an NJ resident who was the first to say "are we having an earthquake??"

Do earthquakes have a propagation speed? Might she have felt it before me?

pxx
4 replies
3h23m

Yes, the speed of sound (through the earth, so faster than the speed of sound in air); yes.

In California, typically usgs has earthquakes posted before I can feel them. They didn't have this one a few minutes after I felt it, so I feel like automatic earthquake detection is off in this area of the US.

gcr
1 replies
3h1m

I received the earthquake alert about 45 minutes after it occurred.

cj
0 replies
2h8m

The Apple alert came in at 12:05pm warning of aftershocks but not the primary event.

andrewla
0 replies
3h8m

Same experience -- felt a shaking; thought maybe a heavy truck had passed by for a second, then saw that all the monitors were swaying. Checked USGS and saw nothing, so figured it was nothing, because on the west coast they have the reports up lickety split. Half hour later everyone's phone started buzzing with the automated alert.

Lance_ET_Compte
0 replies
1h58m

In the Bay Area, everyone gets an SMS message that says an earthquake is coming. I've felt/heard the shaking 10-20 seconds later.

Some industrial equipment shuts down to avoid damage.

slingnow
2 replies
2h51m

Do you think that earthquakes transmit instantaneously? Why would they not have a propagation speed like everything else in the universe?

umanwizard
0 replies
53m

I assume they meant “propagation speed that is substantially slower than light in a vacuum” since that is less than 50ms between any two points on earth.

triceratops
0 replies
21m

On the earth the speed of light as is good as instantaneous.

cossatot
2 replies
2h14m

Earthquake waves have several propagation speeds, because there are different types of waves. The fastest is called the P-wave, which is a compressional (longitudinal) wave, similar to a sound wave, with a velocity of ~5-8 km/s for typical continental bedrock. The second fastest is the S-wave, or shear wave, which is about 65% of the P-wave speed. These waves produce relatively little displacement at the surface (except for close to the epicenter of large earthquakes) but are important seismologically. Then, there are the surface waves, which are caused by the interaction of the S-waves with the surface (in a way that I don't 100% understand). These travel about 90% of the S-wave speed, but they have the biggest displacements at the surface and therefore are the main ones that you feel and that cause damage.

The surface wave displacements also get amplified in wet or loose soil, so the ground shaking and seismic damage is also much greater areas on top of sediment rather than bedrock. Areas on a river, lake or coast where the land has been extended into the water by dumping fill dirt are the worst--ground shaking is really bad and they are very prone to liquefaction.

The difference between the arrival times (at any given point on earth) of the different phases of seismic waves is a function of the distance from the earthquake itself (the hypocenter) and the observation site. It is close to linear in Euclidian distance relatively near the earthquake hypocenter, but becomes more nonlinear farther from the earthquake, because the wave speeds are faster at depth (denser rock) so the travel paths of the wave fronts (the ray paths) are nonlinear. These differences in arrival times are one of the main ways of locating the hypocenter of an earthquake given observations from seismometers at multiple sites. It's essentially triangulation, except with time differences instead of angles--this is done through solving a system of equations.

Additionally, S-waves can't pass through liquids, so there is the 'S-wave shadow zone' that occupies a large fraction of the side of the earth opposite an earthquake where there are no primary S-wave arrivals--S-waves are blocked by the liquid outer core. This is how we found out that the outer core is liquid!

neurostimulant
0 replies
2h7m

Ground liquefaction is scary. Happened in Palu, Sulawesi a while ago. You can see houses moving as if they're on wheels: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_egBKj1W08

bobthepanda
0 replies
2h10m

Early warning systems also work by detecting P and S waves as close to the epicenter as possible.

spike021
0 replies
2h28m

Yes. Last time there was a fairly large one in the SF Bay Area I happened to be on the phone with some relatives about 40 miles away and I felt an earthquake a moment before they did.

pmx
0 replies
3h23m

They travel in waves through the rock!

paxys
0 replies
3h11m

Earthquakes propagate very slowly (around 2-8 miles/sec). That's how systems like ShakeAlert can send out early warning notifications. This one, for example, happened 40+ miles from NYC proper, so residents could have had like 20 seconds notice if the service operated here. People further up or down the coast could have had multiple minutes.

ortusdux
0 replies
3h14m

The west coast states have the MyShake early warning system, which sends out automated alerts for 4.5+ quakes.

https://earthquake.ca.gov/

jedberg
0 replies
3h22m

Yes. There is an excellent XKCD on the topic:

https://xkcd.com/723/

But in summary, the speed is slower than light, so yes you can find out through telecom faster than it getting to you.

hi
0 replies
3h14m

Same thing happened to me. I was on a facetime with someone in Brooklyn, but I was a 2 hour drive north outside of NYC and it took what felt like 30 seconds to propagate over that 200km.

eggy
0 replies
2h49m

Sure given the epicenter was in NJ and closer than Brooklyn. I am from Brooklyn, but live in Nyack, NY, and I felt it here. Nyack is 40mi from epicenter, Brooklyn ~60mi. But your experience could be different based on the structure you are in, floor elevation, and existing soil and ground conditions.

atrus
0 replies
3h22m

Everything has a propagation speed :P, but yes she probably felt it before you, then her signal made it to you faster than the Earthquake did.

https://xkcd.com/723/

aragonite
0 replies
3h17m

Might she have felt it before me?

Surface waves yes, body waves not necessarily. But surface waves are more destructive.

Glant
0 replies
2h45m

People in my town in southern NH reported feeling it about 20 minutes after it happened

jedberg
18 replies
3h16m

For those of you who didn't grow up in earthquake country, some tips:

DO NOT get into a doorway, that's a myth. It's not a terrible place to be if it's a doorless frame, but if there is a door, it's more likely you get injured from the door smacking you than the earthquake.

DO get under a strong table. That's the safest place to be in a quake if it happens when you are indoors.

If you're outside get as far away from trees and power lines as possible (and glass), but if the ground is shaking too hard to maintain balance, stay in place. Again, you're more likely to get injured falling down than from whatever may be nearby.

If you're inside and not near a table, at the very least cover your head if possible and move away from bookcases and other tall or top heavy objects.

Also, if you did feel it, please help the USGS study earthquakes by filling out a Did You Feel it survey: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ma74...

nostrademons
11 replies
3h5m

The standard advice now taught in California schools is "Duck, cover, hold." Basically everything that parent poster said, but in a pithy 3-word aphorism you're more likely to remember.

dylan604
10 replies
2h59m

Sure, but at some point, you have to be told what "duck, cover, hold" actually means. Your comment as the first comment someone hears is like a news article using acronyms throughout the article without ever expanding the acronym.

nostrademons
4 replies
2h47m

It's relatively self-explanatory. The full expansion would be "Duck under a table or other rigid object. Cover your head. Hold on."

Etheryte
2 replies
2h43m

Yeah no, unless someone has previously told you what it means there's no way of guessing that, that's just wishful thinking.

cbsks
0 replies
2h34m

I bet you’ll remember it now though :)

brewdad
0 replies
2h34m

It really isn't for anyone whose native language is American English. Unless you plan to quack, while singing a Mariah Carey song, and waiting to speak to customer service rep instead.

rprospero
0 replies
2h32m

Even more self-explanatory is "Duck into the bathroom. Cover the toilet seat with toilet paper. Hold your bladder until you're on the toilet."

I'm still not sure what I'm supposed to be holding onto. Do I briefly cover my head with my arms, then stop covering my head to hold onto the table? Do I hold onto my head while I cover it? Do I cover my loved one's head and they cover mine, sharing our last moments in a loving hold?

Now I'm beginning to wonder if I made a massive assumption that I would be covering my head with my hands. That's what I would do during a tornado, but maybe I'm supposed to be covering my head with a blanket so my hands are free for the hold on part?

Honestly, my facetious hold my bladder advice seems more apropos than anything I've managed to come up with for part three.

throwup238
2 replies
2h57m

It’s the first thing we teach new arrivals to California along with “stop, drop, and toll” and what real Mexican food tastes like.

alexb_
1 replies
2h50m

“stop, drop, and toll”

In California, even saving yourself from being on fire is taxed.

coolspot
0 replies
2h17m

Guys, calm down, it is actually an ok pun joke. “Toll”, get it?

jjulius
1 replies
2h41m

What a strange comment - I strongly doubt that schools are teaching that phrase without simultaneously expanding on what the phrase means. Introduce the phrase, explain it at the deeper level, then move forward with using the phrase once the students have been taught its deeper meaning. Why flippantly assume that that's not being done?

I grew up on the west coast and that's exactly how it was taught to us in public schools.

gorlilla
0 replies
2h31m

Midwest and we have a similar process for tornadoes.. and nuclear bombs.

duxup
3 replies
3h7m

I suppose depending on the structure and the individual's inclination strong table might be a good call.

But in my single family home situation it really doesn't take more than a few seconds and I can be out the door provided I'm not knocked off my feet entirely type situation.

nostrademons
1 replies
2h45m

Being out the door is usually riskier than being inside a wood-frame SFH. You're exposed to falling trees, branches, power lines, and roof debris, as well as unsecured cars or other loose items. Wood-framed 1-2 story SFHs almost never collapse in an earthquake; the wood can bend to absorb the shock, and there's a lot of redundancy in the studs, and not a whole lot of weight on floors above you.

duxup
0 replies
2h27m

I guess I'm fortunate / unfortunate that my outdoors ... doesn't have a lot of that.

It might be interesting to somehow determine earthquake injuries / ability to get in or outdoors and measure the real risk from actual events.

sensanaty
0 replies
2h25m

You really shouldn't run out the door during and immediately after (as in, as soon as it seems to have stopped) large earthquakes. The building, structurally, will most likely be fine (unless it's a truly massive one in an area that doesn't get massive earthquakes normally), however the facade and whatever else is on the outside of the building probably won't be. Think roof shingles, billboards, windows, planter boxes, trees, powerlines, antennae...

Plus you'd be surprised how hard it is to even stand straight during particularly strong quakes yet alone walk/run, there's no possible description I can give to explain adequately how strange it is to feel the ground underneath your feet shaking violently, especially in buildings.

aerojoe23
1 replies
2h47m

You forgot the advice of "don't run outside from a building." In the US, most buildings are going to be fine structurally; however, the facade of the building or glass, etc., may fall off.

In other parts of the world, it'll depend on the local building codes and their enforcement.

rob74
0 replies
2h36m

The scaffolding-covered sidewalks in front of many buildings in NYC are a good reminder of that actually. I wouldn't trust the scaffolding to protect me if major parts of a building were to fall off in an earthquake however...

IG_Semmelweiss
18 replies
3h40m

There's no hard line for using the right word, but it would help tremendously to put things into context if we started referring to these sort of events as tremors, not earthquakes.

EDIT - removed the article because comments were correct

EDIT 2 - why it helps : its informational.

   TREMOR - NO life or financial loss

   EARTHQUAKE - life or financial loss

JohnMakin
3 replies
3h25m

This is not the first time you've made a post like this - just because it's a weird pet peeve of yours does not mean you are right.

IG_Semmelweiss
2 replies
3h23m

its informational.

TREMOR - NO life or financial loss

EARTHQUAKE - life or financial loss

kube-system
0 replies
3h15m

4 is big enough to cause financial loss, if nothing more than some cracked plaster, or knocking over some fragile items.
JohnMakin
0 replies
3h10m

That’s an arbitrary definition you made up, as has been pointed out before.

ziddoap
1 replies
3h31m

Not being familiar with the field, why would it be tremendously helpful to refer to it as a tremor instead of earthquake?

Tremendously helpful to the people who felt it? Or to geologists?

smlacy
0 replies
3h27m

Tremor-endlessly helpful

burkaman
1 replies
3h16m

I can't find any source that matches what you're saying. "Tremor" seems to always be defined in terms of earthquakes, either as a synonym or a "very small earthquake", which wouldn't even apply here because this was relatively large and clearly perceptible to the average person.

flobosg
0 replies
3h7m

As someone who lived for decades in a seismic country, I’d say that tremors can also be perceived. The difference lies mostly in the damage generated by the event.

ChicagoDave
1 replies
3h26m

Only if giant worms attack.

bee_rider
0 replies
2h5m

A small graboid attacked New Jersey today.

theandrewbailey
0 replies
3h28m

Episodic tremor and slip (ETS) is a seismological phenomenon observed in some subduction zones that is characterized by non-earthquake seismic rumbling, or tremor, and slow slip along the plate interface.

New Jersey is nowhere near a subduction zone, or any plate boundary.

snakeyjake
0 replies
3h23m

For laypeople, "earthquake" = "shakey shakey".

No further distinction is needed, warranted, or desired.

rconti
0 replies
3h19m

Well it seems we have to wait until Aunt Edna phones in and reports whether her ceramic collection survived unscathed.

ishtanbul
0 replies
3h32m

It says in the article that those are imperceptible to humans

flobosg
0 replies
3h13m

This distinction (temblor or terremoto) is made in Chilean Spanish lexicon as far as I know, but might be a general feature of the Spanish language.

dsiegel2275
0 replies
2h25m

It was an earthquake.

Full stop.

__float
0 replies
3h34m

What is that helping, exactly? Most people have no idea what distinction that's drawing.

The Wikipedia article says an ETS event is imperceptible to humans. This was not imperceptible.

TylerE
0 replies
2h55m

A friend of mine in Manhattan felt his whole building shake. That's over 25 miles away. This is WAAAAY more than a tremor.

scrumper
12 replies
3h8m

Felt that very strongly in southern Westchester county NY. Not like the 2011 earthquake I felt in NYC, which was kind of slow and made the building I was in sway violently; this was more like the vibrations from a huge truck passing nearby, but more intense. Loud and very unpleasant, about 15 seconds duration. Did not like that at all, am now inspecting all our services like gas and water for disruption, checking for cracks and so on.

georgeecollins
5 replies
2h1m

As a native Californian this provokes a bit of a chuckle. Try a six plus sometime!

But seriously, I hope everything is fine.

ancientworldnow
2 replies
1h22m

The geology of the east coast makes earthquakes about ten times more intense (according to usgs) so this is similar to a west coast high five.

wilg
1 replies
31m

What does "intense" mean?

nashashmi
0 replies
3m

[delayed]

__loam
1 replies
1h56m

Buildings a quite a bit older on the east coast and building codes are obviously more lax so we should probably have some empathy here haha.

gosub100
0 replies
1h40m

Plus the main aqua duct that supplies several million people is old and fragile. A simple earthquake could possibly turn into a Flint, Michigan level disaster.

reddit_clone
1 replies
51m

earthquake I felt in NYC

I am getting anxious just thinking about this. With all those sky scrappers..

mtalantikite
1 replies
3h4m

There actually was a large truck coming down my block in Brooklyn at the same time it started and it took me a second to realize that no, it actually was an earthquake.

And I definitely agree, the 2011 one was more of a sway, this felt like a rumble.

hateful
0 replies
2h47m

I'm on Long Island and there was a train passing at the same time.

cocochanel
1 replies
1h46m

it's a 4.8 lol

chrinic74929
0 replies
1h13m

it's a 4.8 lol

Equivalent in lateral motion/shakiness to a California 6.0 due to the shallow depth of the 4.8

altdataseller
11 replies
3h41m

Didn’t even feel at all? Was in Queens, NY, strangely a couple of people around me felt it though

guluarte
5 replies
3h29m

4.7 is literally nothing

chrinic74929
1 replies
3h4m

4.7 is literally nothing

4.7 quake at 1 km depth will shake more at the surface than a 6.0 at 30 km depth

zzleeper
0 replies
2h50m

4.7 at 5km depth is still nothing for anyone not immediately above the epicenter.

ziddoap
0 replies
3h23m

It is very obviously not "literally nothing", given the amount of people chiming in that they felt it.

ancientworldnow
0 replies
1h18m

East coast geology (older, harder rocks) causes earthquakes to feel about ten times stronger than a west coast earthquake. This is felt roughly the same as a 5.8 in California. That's enough to be notable, especially at a shallow depth.

eatonphil
2 replies
3h28m

I'm in Forest Hills (fifth story) and at first I thought it was the usual extreme wind we get because the windows were shaking heavily. Then it got worse and I realized what it was when I felt it through the floor.

I've felt at least one other in the last year or two here but my wife in the other room did not. This one was the strongest I've been through though.

efrank02
1 replies
3h15m

Are you in the Kennedy?

eatonphil
0 replies
3h14m

Nope.

Keegs
1 replies
3h37m

My building rattled for a good 15 seconds.

evanelias
0 replies
3h26m

Same here in northern NJ just outside Manhattan. It was extremely noticeable, my cat also freaked out briefly.

wumeow
10 replies
3h27m

Japan, Taiwan, New York, this is apparently the year of the earthquake.

kube-system
5 replies
3h22m

The hurricanes are coming soon. Oceans are warming up at record speeds this year already.

postalrat
0 replies
3h7m

Fire and brimstone!

lxgr
0 replies
3h15m

Solar eclipses, even!

bregma
0 replies
2h14m

Locusts (or at least Cicadas)!

JALTU
0 replies
3h2m

Sharknadoes

FrustratedMonky
0 replies
3h19m

Dogs and Cats Living together.

seydor
3 replies
3h24m

4.7 is not really a strong earthquake, it s routine in earthquake-prone zones

chrinic74929
2 replies
3h22m

4.7 is not really a strong earthquake, it s routine in earthquake-prone zones

NYC quake was at shallow depth.

4.7 quake at 1 km depth will shake more at the surface than a 6.0 at 30 km depth

renewiltord
0 replies
38m

USGS shows it as 4.8 at 4.7 km

https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?currentFeatureI...

The Belden quake is 4.4 at 7.8 km, and 4.2 at 5 km.

It's a log scale so the Whitehouse quake is much larger, but the significance of the quake seems to be more than just these numbers because Belden quake is irrelevant (didn't make the news really).

Sarupathar was a 5.8 (huge comparatively) at 10 km. Hualien was 5.1 at 15.9 km and talked about more than Sarupathar. So the defining aspect appears to be how many people are within range of the epicenter rather than just raw depth and magnitude. Which makes sense, I suppose. We care about how population centers encounter the movement!

neogodless
0 replies
2h7m

In this case, it's a 4.8 mwr at 4.7 km depth.

pjsg
8 replies
3h39m

I felt it in Mass -- I was working on the second floor. My wife was on the ground floor and didn't feel it. From our internal slack channel, this seems fairly common -- people on the ground floor don't feel it here in MA, but higher floors, they do feel it.

nicwolff
0 replies
2h4m

I'm in a house up in Chelmsford, north of Boston – one person on the second floor felt it.

neilv
0 replies
2h38m

I felt it on an upper floor of a big old brick building in Cambridge.

First thought was it was an earthquake, but then no signs other than that I could feel it in legs.

klysm
0 replies
3h28m

Also in MA on the second floor. Two of my roommates were standing and didn't notice it, but I definitely felt it sitting down

ishtanbul
0 replies
3h34m

Im on ground floor and definitely felt it. In brooklyn. All the buildings around me were visibly shaking. Felt like a freight train going by 10 feet away, but eerily quiet.

ilamont
0 replies
3h24m

Felt it too outside of Boston. Thought the heat pump upstairs was having a serious malfunction.

gwbas1c
0 replies
1h42m

I'm on the Cape, and I heard some banging around that time. I thought my wife was just being loud in the shower.

astockwell
0 replies
3h28m

Felt it in Hartford, CT!

Zigurd
0 replies
1h55m

This was my second minor quake that could be felt in Mass. I was driving both times. First time I thought my steering felt suddenly rubbery. I was in a rotary. Didn't notice this one.

sunshine_reggae
7 replies
3h18m

The marketing team at Rumble.com is really innovating these days, getting people to switch over from Youtube.

tomrod
4 replies
3h7m

I hadn't heard of rumble yet. But after reviewing it, of course this exists...

tombert
3 replies
2h56m

I actually do use Rumble (there are some more controversial-but-also-left-leaning creators that got banned from YouTube that I like), but man the ads on there are insane.

COVID conspiracy theories, vaccine "alternatives", political ads for obscure Republican candidates, stuff like that. Fortunately, at least for now there's not a lot of ads (I suspect that they can't find a lot of mainstream advertisers), so generally I only got to watch one of those ads before the video starts.

sunshine_reggae
2 replies
54m

I don't know - for example, here is a video of a couple of scientists who explain in detail how they have analyzed the vaccine contents and how authorities then have reacted to their complaints:

https://rumble.com/v4n6hsn-analysis-on-covid-19-vaccines-per...

Would you still call such content a conspiracy theory?

tombert
0 replies
14m

I made it clear that these were the ads, not the direct videos.

That said, the COVID vaccines are safe and saying otherwise is kind of intellectually dishonest. Just because you can find one video where they "analyzed the vaccine contents" doesn't discount all the research and sampling data that has been taken.

If you haven't gotten the COVID vaccine, you probably should.

nielsbot
0 replies
35m

Absolutely.

The subtitles open with "so-called vaccine against COVID-19" and "with all this fraud that is which is being carried about by the WHO".

These vaccines have been seriously studied for year and now billions of people have taken them. Safe enough, ok?

tomschlick
1 replies
3h5m

Everyone should be able to appreciate a dad joke like this... even if it was a bit shaky.

cozzyd
0 replies
2h7m

It's hard to fault someone for slipping loose everyone once in a while

_sword
7 replies
3h38m

That was eerie! I felt my apartment building start to rock and sway as the walls were creaking. Not something I’m used to as a NY native, and not something I loved to experience 20+ floors above the ground.

s-kymon
1 replies
3h28m

I thought it was a train or truck going by

_sword
0 replies
3h20m

I thought wind at first because it's been stormy lately

foxyv
1 replies
2h4m

I remember being in a 4th floor office and feeling the building sway. I can't imagine how terrifying 20+ floors up would be.

13of40
0 replies
1h14m

I was in the one in Seattle around 2000 on the 5th floor of a building, and I distinctly remember walking down the hall with the building swaying like a boat in a storm, wondering when the whole thing was just going to snap and crumble into a pile of rubble. Luckily it turns out they make modern buildings not do that. I've been back to that building and they still have cracks in the stairwell from it, though.

rdedev
0 replies
3h11m

My first earthquake experience. I thought maybe I was imagining things but when the walls started to shake I got out

kungfupawnda
0 replies
34m

I was at a coffee shop in Astoria and it sounded like the subway running under. My first thought was that there is no line under this street (been living here forever). Then I thought maybe a jet liner flew over too close. But then judging by other people's reaction, I realized that this was an earthquake. I had no idea that you can hear earthquakes...

blitzkrieg3
0 replies
1h48m

On the 37th floor of my office buildin I didn't even feel it. Others said they thought it was the wind. Tuned mass dampers are no joke.

MisterTea
6 replies
3h14m

Holy shit what a ride!

Sitting at home in my office in Ozone Park NYC and I hear what I think is a low flying plane coming in to JFK. Happens when weather is bad and they come in lower they can rattle my windows. But the intensity grew suddenly and my entire house was shaking and everything was rattling.

At first I froze for a few seconds as I could not make sense of what I was experiencing - but it was clear this was not normal so I ran like hell downstairs and outside. While running I was trying to make sense of the shaking: did a truck or plane crash? no not this long - maybe the elevated A train up the block is collapsing? An explosion? some kind of cataclysm? WTF is happening! But after I reached the side door and the house was still shaking I realized this is an earthquake. Earthquake was not the first thing on my mind for sure as I have lived in NYC all my life and never felt anything like this.

Fucking nuts

swozey
4 replies
2h49m

I've never been in an earthquake it's got to be such a strange thing to experience the first time.

Hearing tornado sirens for the first time was wild, especially as a Silent Hill fan.

On the other hand my friend moved to Brooklyn from Haiti after their terrible quake so he's in a mood right now.

HeyLaughingBoy
1 replies
1h45m

My only earthquake experience was also in NYC. In the 80's I was awakened by what can only be described as feeling as if someone had picked up the entire apartment building a couple inches and dropped it. Sudden and severe and over in a second or two.

nobody9999
0 replies
1h0m

Early morning on a weekday in 1985?

Yeah, I slept through that.

pixl97
0 replies
2h22m

A number of decades ago I took a trip out to California for the first time and we had reached our friends house pretty late. After driving for 12+ hours straight I passed out on the floor.

In the middle of the night I was awoken by what I thought was a large truck out front, like a garbage truck or something. But it kept getting closer and more intense and everything started shuffling around in the house with a shik-shik-shik-shik noise and the blinds started rapping off each side of the window sill. When you experience something new like this where your brain kind of spins around in circles not knowing what to do, then it came back with the answer of Earthquake! which I involuntarily yelled out loud. My next thought was "Is this going to get worse, and what do I do if it does". I was in a new place that I had barely even looked at before falling asleep. Thankfully it subsided after 20 seconds or so without any major incident. Was hard to fall back to sleep that night.

HeyLaughingBoy
0 replies
1h45m

My only earthquake experience was also in NYC. In the 80's I was awakened by what can only be described as feeling as if someone had picked up the entire apartment building a couple inches and dropped it. Sudden and severe and over in a second or two.

noman-land
0 replies
3h1m

Thanks for the exciting first person account.

neogodless
5 replies
2h52m

Curious about the 4.7 vs 4.8. Official source here says 4.8 but title says 4.7.

APNews did something similar showing 4.8 in the headline but 4.7 in the text.

Coincidentally the depth is 4.7 km. Wonder if there's just a transpose error and a lot of copy/paste.

jedberg
2 replies
2h50m

Earthquake magnitude usually changes a bunch in the first hour or two as new data comes in.

For example some of the data comes from stations on the other side of the planet, and it takes a while for the wave to propagate that far.

neogodless
1 replies
2h46m

That's one possible explanation, though I've been on usgs.gov a lot from the first I heard of this, and I've only ever seen 4.8 on it. Odd, also that the OP sharing this shared a link to 4.8 but put 4.7 in the title. But the text on that page might trick your eye, between "M 4.8 - 7 km N" and "Magnitude 4.8 mwr Depth 4.7 km".

asveikau
0 replies
1h57m

Those of us in California are used to this. We feel the shake and look it up, and see one number. News articles get written with one of those numbers. After a while it changes, possibly a few times, to some number close to the initial report.

ccurrens
1 replies
2h41m

I've been watching USGS since I felt it. It was originally 4.8, then it was 4.7 for a little bit, and they brought it back up to 4.8.

neogodless
0 replies
2h35m

That helps. I must've just missed it when it said 4.7. Most articles just state 4.7 (or 4.8) though a few are now saying "preliminary magnitude of 4.7." By the time I saw it, it said M 4.8 mwr with uncertainty ± 0.0.

Also interesting is the list of two "catalogs" with mostly similar data but very different depth reports: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ma74...

moomoo11
5 replies
3h35m

How common is East coast earthquak

klysm
1 replies
3h31m

I've lived on the east coast for 25 years and experienced 2 that were noticeable.

asveikau
0 replies
1h46m

I lived there for the first 23 years of life and experienced zero. I felt left out when I missed the 2011 one.

xkcd-sucks
0 replies
3h28m

Pretty common, but small and rarely noticed [0]. Probably lots of construction and geotechnical engineering wouldn't have survived anything significant at least in the Northeast

    [0]  https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?extent=38.03944,-79.33228&extent=45.75219,-63.86353&range=search&showUSFaults=true&baseLayer=terrain&timeZone=utc&search=%7B%22name%22:%22Search%20Results%22,%22params%22:%7B%22starttime%22:%221900-01-01%2000:00:00%22,%22maxlatitude%22:42.816,%22minlatitude%22:41.2,%22maxlongitude%22:-69.593,%22minlongitude%22:-73.592,%22minmagnitude%22:0,%22orderby%22:%22time%22%7D%7D

ssijak
0 replies
3h34m

very rare

sylens
4 replies
3h38m

Sorry guys, that was me doing a git rebase

moomoo11
0 replies
3h36m

Spit out my tea thanks lmao

kibwen
0 replies
3h26m

    $ git config --global alias.subduct rebase

jmkni
0 replies
3h8m

skill issue

hk1337
0 replies
3h26m

Found the google engineer!

blueflow
4 replies
3h38m

Which fault caused it?

moate
1 replies
3h25m

Likely Ramapo, but what do I know.

bobo_legos
0 replies
3h4m

I didn't stay at a holiday in last night, but I can read maps and it does seem like this one landed on the Ramapo fault line.

kevin_thibedeau
0 replies
3h34m

Northeastern US quakes are typically the result of post-glacial uplift. The land is still rising and stress builds up over time.

nickjj
3 replies
1h43m

I felt it on Long Island over 100 miles away. I had headphones on and thought a really heavy truck was shaking the ground. It was enough to make my desk and monitors shake but nothing too crazy.

fullstop
2 replies
1h39m

I live about 20 miles from the epicenter and my neighbors said that their mirrors were shaking and monitors were wobbling. I felt nothing, at all, and my cats didn't move an inch.

I'm pretty observant with that sort of thing, so I'm a bit surprised.

Is it even possible for someone a few houses away to experience drastically different seismic activity?

Edit: I was on the ground floor, which is likely why I did not feel it.

nickjj
1 replies
1h17m

If my eyes were closed I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference between it and a washing machine running on a floor below you. I really only noticed it because my monitors were wobbling a decent amount.

Is it even possible for someone a few houses away to experience drastically different seismic activity?

I'm not sure but there's probably variables around how sturdy things are (the foundation, floor, walls, desk, monitors, etc.). If I tap the side of my desk with the force of a golf clap the monitor wobble factor it about equal to the earthquake. I know in the US it's funny to measure things with weird units but that's the best I can do to associate the amount of force.

fullstop
0 replies
1h13m

I was at a desk which also has a bunch of my wife's art supplies on it. That stuff definitely would have moved.

cute_boi
3 replies
3h12m

I got alert after 10 mins of earthquake .....:(

mmmmmbop
2 replies
2h52m

Yeah I found that pretty strange. I felt the earthquake, and searched Google for "earthquake nyc" results in the last hour - found nothing.

10 or 20 minutes later my phone starts buzzing informing me that there had been an earthquake. Seems rather pointless.

dzdt
0 replies
2h15m

Phone alert came here 1hr40min after the quake. [shrug] yes pretty useless

devb
0 replies
2h31m

I think the alert is to try to get people to stop calling the police to ask/inform them about what they felt.

aragonite
3 replies
3h23m

I distinctly remember the first time I created a Twitter account (& probably became aware of Twitter being a thing) was the day when a similar earthquake was felt in NYC back in 2011...

ModernMech
1 replies
3h21m

Yes! It was in the fall. The epicenter of that one was near Virginia though I think.

Edit: Here it is. It was the end of August which I consider the Fall cause that's when the Fall semester starts for me ^^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Virginia_earthquake

gabeio
0 replies
3h8m

I remember this earth quake! I missed it lol. I happened to be driving and we got out of the car to see a tv telling us how we got hit with an earth quake and my friend and I looking at one another like "what did we miss". This time I happened to be on the second floor of a small office building. I was about to run out of the building if it started to get worse I wasn't sure it wasn't the building having an issue.

SamPatt
0 replies
1h27m

I worked in northern Virginia at the time, fairly close to the epicenter.

Our office building shook violently. A poor woman I worked with was quite panicked, dove under her desk... and admonished me afterward for staying calm?

ChrisMarshallNY
3 replies
3h8m

I felt that (I live on Long Island).

I thought it was construction vehicles. We've had a lot of heavy construction around here.

What made it clear it was different, was my cat didn't like it, and he ignores the construction.

floxy
2 replies
2h59m

Speaking of cats and earthquakes, I just watched:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJ-p9qOhBv4

...again. This is a Cat Cafe in Japan, and you can clearly see the cats get alerted to something ~10 seconds before the shaking starts. Do we have an idea of what they are reacting to?

ChrisMarshallNY
0 replies
2h44m

Huh. You do hear about animals reacting before earthquakes. My cat did alert before the quake, but didn't really scoot, until the shaking started.

He was sitting on my lap, at the time. I'm glad he didn't extend his claws.

I suspect some kind of subsonics that come before the shaking really gets going. It can take a bit of time to get a rhythm going, so the earthquake may actually be under way for a bit, before we really feel it.

megous
2 replies
2h23m

40 such earthquakes happen daily in the world. So?

theandrewbailey
0 replies
25m

Earthquakes are not evenly distributed, and quite rare in New England.

bee_rider
0 replies
2h7m

We don’t get this kind of stuff in the Northeast and it is a relatively population-dense area of the US. Also it is sort of the news center of the country.

meepmorp
2 replies
3h41m

It's now 7 km NNE of Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, according to the linked page

theandrewbailey
0 replies
3h35m

Thanks, I edited while I still could.

jameshart
0 replies
3h1m

This makes it sound like the earthquake is ongoing and moving.

For all our sakes, I hope that’s not the case.

whycome
1 replies
2h36m

What if this is just another foreshock?

joecool1029
0 replies
49m

Considering the aftershocks are way less intense, probably not. I've felt 2 now, last one was just a few minutes ago, parents confirmed (they are about same distance from epicenter but I'm northwest, they are southeast of it)

EDIT: waiting for usgs to update with latest but here's all the ones associated with event https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/?currentFeatureI...

bickeringyokel
2 replies
1h48m

Reading this on the toilet now wondering what my priorities would be if there was a quake in the next couple minutes.

fictorial
0 replies
1h40m

Finishing up!

bertil
0 replies
1h19m

That one is easy: You won’t shock anyone if you show up at the hospital with dirty underwear. You don’t want a trauma surgeon to say that they have to page the neuro-chir. Get under a doorframe, and put your pants up when your head is safe.

1970-01-01
2 replies
3h27m

Show us your failed 3D prints!

dotnet00
1 replies
1h41m

Well tuned 3d printers are somewhat surprisingly mostly unaffected by earthquakes. People have even done stuff like hanging a printer and printing without any significant issue. It'd just show as a slight imperfection on that specific line.

jjk166
0 replies
5m

Makes sense, as long as the force creating the vibration is acting on both the extruder and the bed so they don't move relative to one another it shouldn't really matter.

usernamed7
1 replies
3h23m

I was laying in bed and thought I'd sleep a little bit more. the earthquake wasn't violent, but certainly noticeable. It was similar to someone walking on my roof, without the banging.

melling
0 replies
3h19m

I thought a tree fell on the house. It was loud. We occasionally get branches that make a bang on the roof.

I’m about 15 miles from the epicenter.

sethammons
1 replies
3h24m

A number of years ago, in SoCal (where earthquakes are nothing too special), we had a similar sized quake (maybe a tad bigger). One guy from Denver was out and his eyes went big and wasn't sure what to do -- everyone else just kept talking and moved away from the big glass windows haha.

gwbas1c
0 replies
58m

For my first quake in CA, I was peeing. (I'm a man and I pee standing up.) The shower doors next to me started to rattle, so I thought the people above me were jumping around. I didn't realize it was a quake! (The stream kept going where it was supposed to go.)

I came out of the bathroom and my roommate was terrified.

It was even funnier when my mom called me in a panic and I told her what happened.

rohan_
1 replies
3h29m

My apartment in williamsburg was violently shaking for like 2 minutes

christkv
0 replies
2h9m

I think i remember someone telling me when i was living in nyc that your area foundations are a lot of clay. That would probably amplify the sensation of a quake.

recck
1 replies
2h39m

Felt it in Southwest CT for a solid 15-20 seconds. Definitely thought it was a very large truck going by, but also felt like our solar panels were falling off the roof.

busyant
0 replies
2h12m

Didn't feel it at all in central CT. My brother in northern NJ said he was briefly evacuated from his building.

nobody9999
1 replies
1h2m

I'm in Manhattan (UWS) and live on the fourth floor of a five story walk-up. I felt the quake, but didn't realize that's what it was (I was a little confused as to why my building was vibrating -- for 40 seconds or so, as big trucks can do that but not for that long) until I received an emergency alert on my phone ~45 minutes later.

Nothing broken or dislodged, just wondering why my building was vibrating fairly gently.

steadfastbeef
0 replies
55m

It's laughable I got 3 emergency notifications +1h, +1h20m, +1h30m after the earthquake. Some use that is...

radres
0 replies
2h57m

well, potential regions do not include east coast US at all.

habibur
1 replies
1h58m

5 km depth. That's of concern. Will shake a small region more violently than what a normal mag 4+ quake would have.

bertil
0 replies
1h18m

Is that deeper or shallower than usual?

aenopix
1 replies
31m

4.7 an earthquake? Here in Chile thats more like a simple tremor, we dont even feel those.

Simon_ORourke
1 replies
2h14m

I felt that one too in upstate NY, more of a rumbling that anything more violent. Doesn't even come close to the one I experienced in Peru one time, where everything felt like a ship on rough seas... never want to live through that kind of quake again!

hhshhhhjjjd
0 replies
2h3m

I prefer living through an earthquake than not!

ModernMech
1 replies
3h21m

This is the second quake I've felt in Pennsylvania. The first was in 2011. I was born here and lived here for my whole life except for 4 years when I lived in CA, where I didn't feel any earthquakes.

jvolkman
0 replies
3h13m

Yeah, since I moved to Seattle in 2011 there have been two largeish quakes in the northeast. I have yet to feel one in Seattle.

Of course now I've jinxed myself.

JohnTHaller
1 replies
3h3m

In NYC. This was much stronger than in terms of local shaking than the others of the last 25 years. Living on the 4th floor of a 90+ year old building. My fridge was trying to walk across the floor.

eggy
0 replies
2h52m

Were you always on the 4th floor for the others?

You would feel it more the higher up you are as the building resonates.

ylee
0 replies
3h2m

My father is a very light sleeper. During my childhood in NYC, more than once an earthquake woke him up.

trashface
0 replies
2h51m

Felt it in western philly suburbs near valley forge. My roof was shaking but it was weird, thought it was a helicopter overhead. Didn't even realize it was a quake. Over in seconds.

tombert
0 replies
2h55m

Felt this all the way in Brooklyn. My wife and I thought it was just some heavy sustained road construction nearby; it was a bit shakier than usual for that, but the last thing we thought it was was an actual earthquake.

Fortunately, at least in our area, there doesn't appear to be any kind of damage.

throwaway743
0 replies
2h56m

I legit slept through this?? Had to take an ambien last night because of my insomnia. Who knew insomnia could potentially be fatal?

thakobyan
0 replies
2h19m

I was in jersey city and our building literally shaked. It was very scary to say the least.

ribs
0 replies
3h36m

I felt in here on Long Island, where I grew up, and am visiting from California, where I’ve lived for decades

Right now in Huntington

renegade-otter
0 replies
1h42m

I ran out because I thought the boiler was going to go kaboom.

poidos
0 replies
3h8m

TIL that part of the world is seismically active. No idea why I thought it wasn't. Funny gap in knowledge there! Hope folks are ok.

philip1209
0 replies
3h28m

I experienced a 4.8 earthquake about a month ago in Tokyo, and noticed the shaking significantly. In Manhattan this morning, I didn't notice the 4.7 earthquake at all.

markbnj
0 replies
3h1m

We're almost exactly 10 miles north of the epicenter near Oldwick, NJ. We experienced several sharp jolts that sent some items tumbling off shelves and shook my ember full of coffee off its charging coaster (or I spilled it in reacting to the jolt, idk really), followed by a gentle shaking that lasted 30 seconds or more. This is the first one I can recall feeling since we moved here in 1995.

joecool1029
0 replies
55m

So since I live near epicenter, there's one thing that changed geographically very recently. Nearby round valley reservoir was being worked on for years, last fall they got the authorization to pump it back to full and it was told it might take years. Rainy asf winter though so it's pumped back almost full from already 66% to 92% now. I'm wondering if billions of gallons of water getting added nearby affected pressure on the fault. Here's today's operations data (we just had 3.5in of rain past couple days too): https://www.njwsa.org/uploads/1/0/8/0/108064771/data.pdf

EDIT: just had another aftershock right after posting this. Felt the 2.0 a couple hours ago too

EDIT2: yup usgs finally added it https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000ma95...

jmspring
0 replies
2h56m

Earthquakes are apparently rare on the East coast. We had a 4.8/4.9 here near the census designated place of Belden in Plumas County CA yesterday evening. Others farther away felt it. I didn’t. Cats didn’t react either. Unless it’s a sharp quake, or in the mid 5s, I mostly don’t notice them.

geophile
0 replies
2h58m

Lots of “was that an earthquake”? discussion in r/somerville (MA)

flakes
0 replies
2h8m

Both me and my girlfriend were working from home today. Randomly our dog started crying and a few seconds later we felt the quake. Was pretty wild. Lots of rattling of furniture and plates in the cabinets. I guess my dog must have noticed the more subtle rumbles beforehand.

davidjhall
0 replies
3h21m

In Connecticut - rattled the windows and shook books off the bookcase.

cushychicken
0 replies
2h35m

Felt it and I’m in MA. Boston area.

chasd00
0 replies
7m

a couple of east coast people on my team (NYC) felt it this morning. they were pretty excited about it haha

caretak3r
0 replies
3h26m

Was on a call with my boss reluctantly explaining how kubernetes works. I felt the rumble, thinking it was just my discomfort with the state of affairs in my company. Might as well have been a fart in the wind.

bitwize
0 replies
2h38m

I once experienced an earthquake in Connecticut.

The weird thing was, just before it happened I heard/felt a very peculiar thrumming in my ear, like the air was exerting vibrating pressure.

They say that animals can detect earthquakes before they happen. I think I might have an idea as to how.

benraz123
0 replies
2h36m

Felt a slight shake. House was unaffected however.

ajdude
0 replies
3h22m

I felt it in Delaware!

Scubabear68
0 replies
3h5m

Live 25 miles South West of epicenter.

It went on for I guess 30 seconds or so. Everyone in the house completely confused as we had never been in a quake before. Very low level vibrations, very very loud sound. Very foreign to New Jersey folks!

MarCylinder
0 replies
2h42m

That was fun. My folks place is essentially a 5 minute drive from the epicenter. I'm about an hours drive. Our experience was pretty similar.

Looks like reported depth was 5km, making this a very shallow earthquake

HarHarVeryFunny
0 replies
3h10m

Yep - felt it here in northern NJ, as did friends in NY and CT.

Working from home - all windows rattling/etc - first thought something was happening inside house, then looked outside expecting something massive driving by perhaps!

Kids at high school did classroom emergency shelter-in-place.