return to table of content

Google Scholar PDF Reader

sorenjan
35 replies
1d

Does anyone have any recommendations for good local PDF readers for Windows? I've been reading a lot of various papers recently, and clicking on a citation in Acrobat reader is very frustrating. The document scrolls to show the citation in view, but doesn't clearly show it in the long list that most papers have, and then I have to scroll up to where I was since it doesn't seem to have a working back feature.

Depurator
13 replies
23h42m

Zotero's V7 reader is great, built on pdfjs (Mozillas pdf reader) and adds neat things like notations and dark mode.

wolverine876
5 replies
22h45m

IIRC, pdfjs is used by Google also, and was based on Foxit? ? Does anyone know?

Tijdreiziger
4 replies
20h59m

PDF.js came out of Mozilla, not Foxit.

wolverine876
3 replies
20h28m

Yes, but I think Mozilla may have started with code from Foxit.

thristian
2 replies
19h2m

The PDFium plugin that was part of Chrome was based on C++ code from Foxit.

PDFjs was written in JS from day one, and (as far as I know) was not based on any previous PDF reader.

wolverine876
1 replies
18h6m

Maybe that's what I was thinking of. Thanks.

BTW, I didn't mean they necessarily used the actual Foxit code, but it was a starting point maybe reimplemented in JS.

cxr
0 replies
9h33m

In no sense is PDF.js related to Foxit except that they are both PDF readers.

elektor
2 replies
22h23m

Where are you accessing Zotero V7? My understanding is that it is currently V6.[1]

[1] https://www.zotero.org/download/

elektor
0 replies
16h39m

Thanks! I'll try it out

specproc
1 replies
22h53m

I love zotero. The combination of annotation, highlights, document management and a healthy plug-in ecosystem are just killer for me.

It feels a bit dated sometimes, but I'm yet to find anything that comes close.

kristjansson
0 replies
19h31m

It looks a lot nicer after the recent design update!

random3
0 replies
23h32m

is it possible to point Zotero to a local dir with papers, or am I forced to import documents into it?

garyiskidding
0 replies
14h57m

I use Zotero and really like it, especially when working with others. This was the first thing that came into my mind on this thread.

drmaximus
4 replies
1d

Sioyek is a PDF viewer designed exactly for reading research papers and textbooks: https://github.com/ahrm/sioyek.

random3
2 replies
23h24m

Sioyek seems awesome, especially vim inspired features. Too bad u (undo) doesn't work and there doesn't seem to be a way to undo. Am I missing something or is it laking it?

jacktang
0 replies
10h53m

looks cool

SkyMarshal
3 replies
23h35m

Same question but for MacOS. There don't seem to be many good ones for it.

moritz
0 replies
23h21m

Try Skim

airstrike
0 replies
23h23m

Unfortunately, Preview has been the best reader in my experience. I say "unfortunately" not because it is inherently bad, but because it is a sad state of affairs when nobody can build something better than the barebones native tool

SkyMarshal
0 replies
21h50m

Just found this one I hadn't seen before, free version may suffice: https://highlightsapp.net/

wslh
1 replies
1d

I am interested in knowing why and how Google Chrome is not enough?

somethingsome
0 replies
23h52m

Mostly too slow for a lot of content, not every content is supported, not easy to keep it open at the right page, no comments, not easy to find the right tab, etc.

user-
0 replies
23h58m

ive always used SumatraPDF because its super fast and free

somethingsome
0 replies
23h56m

Just so you know: normally it scroll down so that the reference is on top of the page.

But most importantly.. ALT+'left arrow' allows you to go back before you clicked on the citation! It doesn't work all the time, but usually it does after some left arrows ;)

Also, in Android: you can click on the 'scrolling sign' on the right of the pdf and specify the page, or see the link to 'jump back' to before you clicked on a link!

I hope that will help

mikepo
0 replies
1d

I've been using Sumatra PDF on Windows to read papers (and as my default PDF reader) for more than a decade. Clicking on a citation takes you to the bibliography page and lands the cited paper at the top of the screen. Then Alt-leftarrow brings you back.

eitally
0 replies
23h56m

What you might consider if finding an ebook reader app and using that. I had a similar issue but on Android (for ebooks not in kindle format). I ended up with Librera but there are several. Turns out it's also equally great at academic or work PDFs.

aragonite
0 replies
22h38m

Jumping back works in SumatraPDF (backspace).

STDU Viewer might also be worth looking into. Default shortcut for jumping back is ctrl+z.

airstrike
0 replies
23h24m

SumatraPDF if you want speed above all else

DrawboardPDF if you want something more full featured and like to annotate, highlight, bookmark and whatnot, particularly if there's any chance you'll also use a stylus

abhayhegde
0 replies
23h56m

Irrespective of the OS, I recommend Zotero (https://www.zotero.org/).

Tomte
0 replies
22h56m

Okular. You don’t need the rest of KDE. It has a Windows installer and I think it‘s also in the Windows Store.

Configure0251
0 replies
16h47m

Zotero!

jinay
16 replies
19h52m

Does anyone have a research paper reading tool they're happy with? Zotero is what meets most of my needs but I wish I could organize the papers faster and I wish the annotation tools were better. AI-assisted reading is a plus too.

felipefar
4 replies
17h21m

I was also unhappy with how reference managers handle annotations. So I rolled my own app (https://getcahier.com), with highlight management integrated in the application. This enables me to extract highlights according to topics, organize them in notes using document elements (like collapsible notes and outlines) and use them to plan more complex arguments. This makes it much easier to read actively.

On the paper organization side, I would also like to find out a better way of doing it. What helps me a lot, from a more methodological perspective, is to categorize books according to time period, school of thoughts, or perspective.

ukuina
1 replies
12h31m

Cahier looks great! Any plans to add backup/sync?

Also, is the data store encrypted at rest even when the app is actively being used?

felipefar
0 replies
7h2m

Thanks! I'm considering that. We might first implement P2P or external services (dropbox, iCloud) sync, but we'll see.

The data is all local, so there's no need for encryption yet. But when we implement sync it'll be end to end encrypted.

oldandtired
1 replies
12h12m

Doesn't support Linux though or any of the unixes. Looks good though.

felipefar
0 replies
7h0m

Thank you for your interest! I've received that request more than I thought I would. It's high on the priority list now, and will arrive soon.

gillesjacobs
2 replies
18h15m

Mendeley beat Zotero for me with automatic pdf renaming, organising and its highlight and note taking tools in the reader.

The Elsevier account integration is disgusting though, and I hate the idea of using all Elsevier product.

malshe
0 replies
16h3m

I use zotfile extension to automatically rename files in Zotero

felipefar
0 replies
17h18m

What do you like about organization in Mendeley?

mixedmath
1 replies
19h44m

What does AI assisted reading mean to you?

jinay
0 replies
14h47m

Those "chat with a PDF" apps get me halfway there, but I'm more imagining something that can explain certain terms in the context of the paper, or automatically dive into the citations and pull explanations from them too.

hahajk
1 replies
8h49m

Readwise Reader has a nice pdf reader with highlighting, notes, and an AI reader tool. I organize sources using tags. It's very new and in active development. Academic research is not it's main focus, though, so it probably won't add mindblowing academic tools. (like citation support/ backlinks. although it does have internet backlinks that tell you want articles link to the one you're reading)

1123581321
0 replies
3h59m

Readwise Reader is a poor PDF reader, unfortunately. Where it shines is making readable text documents out of PDFs, so it depends on the type that you’re reading.

pks016
0 replies
14h28m

I use Zotero with a bunch of useful Addons. Currently, scite is best available tool for research papers (at least in my field).

jdeaton
0 replies
17h43m

Paperpile is fantastic and you can make a shared folder with your lab/team.

Helmut10001
0 replies
13h40m

I use a combination of Zotero, Locally Linked PDFs/Folder Structure, and SumatraPDFs (Comments etc.):

    folders:
        - for every literature search, create a folder with date and name
            - e.g. 2024-03-21_Quantum_Entanglement
            - use CTRL-SHIFT-DRAG to drop files into Zotero as Links, see [#77](https://github.com/zotero/zotero/issues/77)
            - You _can_ organize in Zotero, but you don't have to. Files can be linked
            to multiple Zotero folders (simply copy library entries in Zotero)
            - sync literature folder and zotero database with nextcloud to somewhere, for backup
    zotero:
        - disable sync
        - set “Base directory” (Preferences > Advanced > Files and Folders) to local literature folder
        - set PDF View to “System default” (Preferences > General > “Open PDFs using..”)
        - Enable recursive quick search in folders: go to Preferences > Advanced > Config Editor, search for `recursiveCollections`, double click (set to True)
        - use CTRL-Shift-C to copy bibliography to clipboard
        - Dark Theme:
            - https://github.com/Rosmaninho/Zotero-Dark-Theme
            - Go to `%AppData%\Zotero\Zotero\Profiles\` (`XXXXXXXX.default`)
            - Create `chrome` folder
            - Place the `userChrome.css`
            - Start Zotero
        - Add-Ons:
            - zotero-pdfkit
                - https://github.com/sharpevo/zotero-pdfkit/
                - allows to modify/select a “default” PDF attachment to be opened
            - ZoteroDuplicatesMerger
                - https://github.com/frangoud/ZoteroDuplicatesMerger
                - easier merging of duplicates
            - zotero-folder-import
                - https://github.com/retorquere/zotero-folder-import
                - bulk import PDFs from a folder
            - zotero-tag
                - https://github.com/windingwind/zotero-tag
                - allows to add stars to items (Num Key `1`, `2`, `3` etc.)
    - PDF Tools:
        - qpdf
            - removing passwords, unlocking PDFs, conversion
            - install in WSL with `apt-get install qpdf`
            - remove password with `qpdf --decrypt --password="" input.pdf output.pdf`
        - `SumatraPDF`
            - _Really_ fast Viewing of PDFs and adding annotations (highlight, comment etc.)
            - Highlight Text: `A`, Save to file: `CTRL+SHIFT+S`
            - it is much faster than Adobe Acrobat
        - [pdfplumber](https://github.com/jsvine/pdfplumber)
            - Awesome python package to extract tables from PDFs into data pipelines. Use with Jupyter Lab.
        - [PDF X-Change viewer](https://www.tracker-software.com/product/pdf-xchange-editor), `choco install pdfxchangeviewer`
            - for manual OCR of pages/PDFs

superkuh
11 replies
1d

That's nice and all, but google scholar recently removed all the 'cited by' 'related articles' and other links from the HTML pages of google scholar. It was like this for about two months before they restored the functionality. It likely they will remove it again soon. Google scholar is getting worse, not better. The google devs have no idea what a typical academic's computer is like around the world. They dev for their lived experience and it's just not applicable. A javascript (slow, computationally expensive) pdf reader is just another aspect of this ignorance.

google234123
3 replies
20h53m

Are you sure this actually happened? I never noticed this. can anyone else collaborate? Maybe you installed some extension that messed with the html

superkuh
2 replies
20h13m

Yes, I confirmed it with 3 other people on IRC a couple months ago. I didn't know google scholar had restored it until I checked right before I wrote the above post. I thought the links were still gone. They had been the last time I'd used google scholar about 3 weeks ago. Back then I also confirmed it myself first using 3 different computers, 4 browsers (with JS disabled), coming from 3 different IP addresses, both logged in to google and logged out. I probably wouldn't have started writing the post at all if I didn't think they were still gone.

I figure in addition to the feedback they received from me (and presumably others) at the time they saw a drop in usage and restored the functional version. But they'll try again.

google234123
1 replies
19h43m

I think you are wrong - I don't recall seeing this. Screenshots of scholar on twitter from feb, jan, dec all show those links

superkuh
0 replies
15h24m

Check at 2024 Feb 08 09:54:00 (am) CST. I definitely didn't confabulate the memory because the initial conversation about it (with others) is in my IRC logs. Sorry I don't have any screenshots of my own. Perhaps it was A/B testing or something.

xnacly
1 replies
1d

I couldn’t agree more, I dont want you displaying the pdf, let me download the file and view it with zathura

adr1an
0 replies
1d

Or Sioyek (vim keybindings!), Okular, Xournalpp, Zotero, ...

lukeinator42
1 replies
20h54m

Alongside this, I have found that Google Scholar's search has become noticeably worse in the last year or so. I can search for an author's name and a few keywords from a paper title and it won't show up, even if the paper has like 5000 citations.

malshe
0 replies
15h56m

Wow so I am not going mad! I had the same experience and it almost feels like Google is trying to recommend me papers based on my past searches. I hope they revert to their earlier algorithm

smeeth
0 replies
18h13m

Check out https://openalex.org

I'm pretty optimistic that by the time google scholar really goes to shit they'll be good enough to pick up the slack.

newzisforsukas
0 replies
22h26m

What are the base hardware requirements for a JavaScript PDF reader where it isn't "slow"?

adolph
0 replies
23h52m

A js pdf reader they control has monetization possibilities. Slip in an interstitial page for Naturally Fun Arkansas with an article from Nature. You don't want scholar going the way of reader do you?

jwr
10 replies
9h45m

Already counting the days until this inevitably gets killed. I've been burned too many times to rely on Google for anything, except tracking me and pushing ads, which they indeed do better every day.

LightBug1
4 replies
8h33m

This was promising, but they announced the sunset of this yesterday. The news hasn't propagated yet.

coeus77
3 replies
3h34m

Where did you see the announcement they sunset it?

ddalex
2 replies
3h20m

In an effort to accelerate the development life-cycle, Google will now release sunset announcements before the product release.

blagie
1 replies
2h14m

I saw that announcement, but I thought they changed their mind about a week before it was announced?

halfmatthalfcat
0 replies
1h28m

They're sunsetting the sunset?

occamrazor
3 replies
4h17m

Scholar is heavily used internally, it’s unlikely to be discontinued even if it has never brought any money to Google.

biofox
1 replies
2h49m

Google Reader and RSS feeds were also heavily used internally :(

tibbydudeza
0 replies
2h0m

What replaced it - Google Wave ???.

kadoban
0 replies
3h38m

This is about a PDF reader though, not Google Scholar itself.

cityhall
0 replies
36m

I wonder if their real intent is to gather training data on which parts of papers are considered important by readers, and which topics are related to each other.

cygnion
8 replies
21h16m

Capturing and visualizing research knowledge is personally an exciting space. I feel that deep reading and absorbing content continues to be challenging, due to the ever-increasing amount of published research, rudimentary reading apps (Google PDF reader finally addressing issue with easily looking up references), and due to somewhat disconnected tools for reading and note-taking. Similar to the readers piggy-backing on the PDFjs library, I've developed an app that helps me capture and organize personal research knowledge [1]. Additionally, visualizations and customizable contexts for notes help to recall and link information.

[1] https://www.knowledgegarden.io/

chipdart
7 replies
11h42m

Zotero does a good job at it, doesn't it?

KingMob
6 replies
4h53m

As a daily Zotero user, not really. The nicest thing I can say about it is, it has plugins and is FOSS. Maybe the new 7.0 release will blow me away, but I've been waiting for it to get out of beta forever.

More fundamentally, we need to stop disseminating scholarly work as PDFs, a format primarily designed for print. Plain HTML would be an improvement. Even better than HTML would be an extended variant with scholarly-specific semantic markup and universal, animated, explorable figures. Embedded notebooks would be cool, too, but disseminating data would still be a major challenge. (And I don't just mean storage/transfer; a lot of researchers are reluctant to share source data to the world.)

Unlisted6446
4 replies
4h10m

So I'm a researcher that almost always uses pdfs... Does HTML have the reproducibility that PDF promises? My feeling is that if I store a PDF, it'll look the same in a decade. But is HTML the same way? It seems like it relies on the web browser and many other things... How would one manage things like images and gifs? Is there a way to keep everything into one HTML file that's easily shareable and feels secure?

theGnuMe
0 replies
40m

I'd like to see PDFs move to Computational Notebooks. One can dream.

telegtron
0 replies
2h13m

The potential to freeze an HTML page in time with minimal changes at render time is already there. [0] Such an ability can even be baked directly into the rendered HTML page so the viewer would be able to download a copy of the page as it is seen at a given time. Other archiving facilities, such as archive.org, take static snapshots of accessible pages if allowed by the publisher of the page and requested by anyone who wants to make that snapshot.

My point is that it is possible to achieve in principle and in practice, albeit that might be practiced as often as one would like to see.

-------

[0] See SingleFile by gildas at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/single-file/: “Save an entire web page—including images and styling—as a single HTML file.”

nickpsecurity
0 replies
1h3m

Machines and humans can both easily use HTML/XML. Extracting information from PDF’s is so much harder that there’s deep learning products dedicated to doing it. They still make mistakes, too.

I’d much rather have something akin to the CHM files where everything I need is in one file, easy to analyze, and has good readers.

cygnion
0 replies
1h35m

I explored tools to export/interchange PDF to HTML in the KnowledgeGarden app, but the results were not optimal, suffering from non-standard layout and poor typesetting of equations. Publishers of scholarly articles generate web pages of papers, but they're not replicas of PDF files.

Re. self-contained HTML (and slightly off-topic), look at TiddlyWiki, which contains data/code/layout all in one interactive, local or hosted HTML. Extensibility, plugins, and community of contributors are some key highlights, among others.

[1] https://www.tiddlywiki.com

chipdart
0 replies
1h57m

As a daily Zotero user, not really. The nicest thing I can say about it is, it has plugins and is FOSS. Maybe the new 7.0 release will blow me away, but I've been waiting for it to get out of beta forever.

Can you elaborate where you think Zotero drops the ball?

smburdick
7 replies
16h11m

For me, reading papers requires deep focus. I have to have it physically printed out if I'm going to really read the whole thing.

ildon
6 replies
12h16m

I suggest you try new devices to read papers. Often the perception that paper is a better support is due to a lack of more convenient devices. Paper is better than a 15'' screen for sure, for many reasons including size and posture while reading. But have you tried larger screens (> 27''), large tablets (>= A4) or as large as possible E-Ink readers? Depending on your preferences, you might find that some of these work actually better than paper also for you :-)

ykonstant
4 replies
8h50m

There is no way I can perceive reading on an expensive device as more comfortable than paper. Paper is fairly cheap, lightweight and resilient; I can carry it around, fold it, toss it aside, sit on it by accident while thinking, annotate it with scribbles, and pour coffee on it with aplomb and finesse. I can flip it, half-tear it in anger, drool on it when I reach my brain capacity. I can take it hiking with me without fear of breaking or losing it. In other words, paper is a tool that gets out of my way.

I did try all the devices you listed above, even had my department pay serious money, and ended up barely using them for all those reasons. I am a mathematician, I am clumsy and I want to focus on my problem-solving; I want to think, and babysitting devices and tools is not what I want to spend my brainspace on.

serial_dev
3 replies
8h8m

"But did you think about the environment? Why don't you by a new device every 2 years with Lithium battery and full of non recyclable plastic in it"

... is what I get told all the time.

AlotOfReading
1 replies
4h26m

With the typical reading volume of an academic and the amount of plastic in my toner cartridges, I'm not sure paper comes out ahead in that comparison.

Eisenstein
0 replies
38m

A high yield toner cartridge can print between 3000 and 8000 pages of text [1]. Average number of pages in a scientific manuscript is 10 [2]. This means that it would take 300 to 800 printed scientific papers to deplete one cartridge. I would have to assume that a single toner cart is not the same amount of waste as a reading device just due to the recyclability of toner carts, but it is up to you how to count them. If I was going to pull a number out of my ass, I would say 10 carts would be equal to one reading device with battery. Let's go low-end and pick 300 papers, which means you would need to print 3000 full scientific manuscripts to equal the waste of one reading device. How many do you read in two years?

[1] https://www.brother-usa.com/supplies/ink-and-toner#sort=rele...

[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987331/

temporarara
0 replies
18m

In my experience those people don't even talk about ink, it's all about paper. They must think that you get just a few sheets of paper for a single tree or something like that, when in reality you get like 10 000 sheets of paper for one averagish tree. And those trees are not rare or anything like that, and the process of making paper is nowhere near as bad as electronics industry. Using paper is as ecological as it gets.

benrapscallion
0 replies
11h8m

Remarkable 2 tablet is very good for reading papers.

antimora
7 replies
20h54m

Can someone recommend an app for ipad that can read PDFs? I want to be able to bookmark using my browser but read it on my ipad. Sort of like "Save to pocket" extension.

walterbell
0 replies
17h54m

> bookmark using my browser but read it on my ipad

MacOS and iPad: DevonThink paid app with sync via P2P, WebDAV or cloud services.

Optional local mirror/sync of web pages and PDFs, with full text search.

mtone
0 replies
14h46m

I use Readdle Documents to sync PDF folders with my server PC via FTP. Free version supports PDF highlighting & simple annotations, basic file management, and automatically syncs back everything.

kristjansson
0 replies
19h32m

Zotero w/ their first-party storage is the best I've found.

hedora
0 replies
19h10m

Square icon with up arrow sticking out of it -> Save to books.

It seems to work in MacOS and iOS; an iCloud account is probably required.

dunham
0 replies
19h16m

Primarily I've been using Zotero and Notability. They each have "save to" on mobile. Zotero has a chrome plugin that requires the desktop app to be running. They both optionally support a dark mode for reading in the dark.

I like the experience of reading in Muse.app on the iPad. It's a nested whiteboarding thing, but also can act as a PDF reader. (It'll let you pull out chunks of the PDF and put it on your canvas with a link back into your document, if that fits your flow.) I often read on my phone, so this is not an option for me.

Apple Notes and Muse slow down with a lot of ink. For taking a page full of notes I'm using Notability.

I've heard good things about GoodReader, but haven't played with it in years.

buildbot
0 replies
20h49m

In theory the built in files app will work for this. However, I like goodnotes, which has good highlighting snd library support. I’ve used it since grad school for reading papers.

lxgr
3 replies
22h20m

Looks great, but can you imagine Google pulling the rug under an academic's document/citation database?

I don't even want to imagine having to migrate all annotations and citations to something else when they inevitably pull the plug on it some years down the road.

resolutebat
2 replies
22h3m

Huh? This tool just parses PDFs, it doesn't require academics to actually do anything.

lxgr
1 replies
21h58m

Hm, I got the impression they store notes and annotations to your Google account, but maybe I'm mistaken.

glial
0 replies
21h16m

The Chrome Web Store page doesn't say anything about annotations.

gnicholas
3 replies
19h14m

I've never seen so many light/dark modes before. There's Device Mode, Light Mode, Dark Mode, and Night Mode. AFAICT Device Mode follows the browser/device's current setting, Dark Mode makes the sidebar dark but doesn't change the PDF, and Night Mode darkens both the sidebar and the PDF. I wonder how they decided to have so many modes?

gcr
1 replies
7h48m

I’ve seen other apps that have Systen, Light, Dark, and “Very Datk” for OLED devices, so it isn’t out of the question

chankstein38
0 replies
1h39m

Did you put "Very Datk" in quotes because it was spelled like that where you saw it? Or is it just "Very Dark" and it's quotes because it doesn't fully imply what you get?

Kwpolska
0 replies
6h57m

Automatically applying dark mode to documents tends to have poor results, especially when images are involved, but some people are masochists and/or can't be bothered to turn on the light, so they made a separate setting for them. Although I think a toggle would be better instead of dark mode/night mode.

nprateem
2 replies
11h37m

Ha ha lol. Is that really the best they can think of in an age of AI? Instead of turning PDFs into web pages how about some actually useful tools:

* Summarisation

* Succinctly placing the research in context of the broader field

* Highlighting limitations or flaws in research methods, etc.

* An outline view to summarise each paragraph/section and then drill down into the ones you actually want to read in more detail

* Rephrasing into plain English. A lot of academics enjoy sounding clever and usling long words so it'd be nice to be able to switch off "ego mode" and just read stuff in plain English instead of having to wade through their word-soup.

With more effort maybe Google could create a PDF reader that is actually innovative.

vasco
1 replies
11h33m

The friends I have in academia say that their PhD professors tell them to use "ego mode" or papers won't pass review and be accepted. I'm with you though. And it's not about specific jargon of a field, it's just wankery. Most lawyers do the same thing and you need to get extremely good ones to write good contracts in clear language.

"Sounding smarter through obscurity"

nprateem
0 replies
9h53m

Yeah I'm sure that's true. It'd be nice to be able to opt out though while you're in the first pass research phase.

meekaaku
2 replies
22h55m

Does anyone know of a library (or reading material) that can render a pdf (mostly architectural drawings) on to webgl canvas as actual vectors not image?

me_jumper
0 replies
21h16m

Not sure if that's what you are looking for but mupdf can render to SVG.

gcr
0 replies
7h41m

WebGL is inherently a vector-to-raster technology, it’s always backed by a pixel buffer. One might argue that even PDFjs works this way with its calls to the canvas API.

What are you trying to do? Why is webgl the key here?

woctordho
1 replies
8h16m

When can we have a PDF reader where we can hover over a symbol and see its definition?

lordswork
0 replies
5h45m

What kind of symbol?

modeless
1 replies
11h52m

Hmm, nice to have direct links to references. But the PDF rendering itself seems not as good as the native renderer.

lordswork
0 replies
5h44m

Just tried it and didn't notice any significant differences in PDF rendering myself. Do you have any concrete examples?

kennydude
1 replies
20h26m

I just wish Google Scholar would be a bit more open in terms of debugging why a site isn't picked up by the platform

mixedmath
0 replies
19h41m

I would also be interested to know how they decide to pick up a site. I was very surprised to learn that a technical note posted only to my website was picked up somehow. (I am a mathematician and so there are other things on my site, but it’s some custom static site generator thing and I’m still astounded).

benrapscallion
1 replies
11h9m

Can someone recommend lightweight alternatives to Paperpile or EndNote that have two essential features: 1. Rename a PDF file to a consistent (Author Year Journal) format. 2. Online sync (Mac, iOS and web access) - including via say iCloud or Dropbox.

Maybe this just needs a script? I just paid $100 for EndNote 21 yesterday and don’t think these needs justify that cost.

zoizoi
0 replies
10h57m

Maybe try Zotero[1]. There are many addons which can do what you need.

[1]https://www.zotero.org/

SamBam
1 replies
21h32m

Has anyone tried installing this? It says "PDFs on all sites will have a new look in Chrome."

This makes me nervous. I'm often looking at PDFs that are embedded in a page (either grad school software for commenting on PDFs, or publishers' sites). Is it going to play nicely with those? Is this only for navigating directly to a PDF?

gnicholas
0 replies
19h28m

My guess (as someone whose company makes a PDF extension for Chrome) is that it may intercept embedded PDFs as well. Sometimes sites use iframes or the like, and those get intercepted. But if the PDF is displayed through some sort of third party tool then it would be unaffected. Just my 2¢!

ur-whale
0 replies
16h23m

Scholar PDF Reader is available as a Chrome browser extension

So it's a closed ecosystem for now ... pass.

ttul
0 replies
1d

Now all they need is a way to grab documents from SciHub..

pyromaker
0 replies
15h25m

I use a tool called Scholars

https://www.scholars.io

Let you import and read PDF directly, annotate, comment and share with people.

orsenthil
0 replies
2m

I use an extension called histre, https://histre.com/ for annotation and keeping up with _notes_ / _thoughts_ inline. I found that using tools like Fermat's Library, which provides side bar annotation, histre for inline highlight, annotation and multi-references, and ChatGPT to understand complex terms, all helped with understand recent papers. Even a medical journal paper, https://senthil.learntosolveit.com/posts/2023/10/21/medical-... for me, in one instance.

notsahil
0 replies
5h49m

Zotero is the one I use but found this one useful too: https://synthical.com/

nothrowaways
0 replies
12h22m

"..have long loved PDFs" not.

jccalhoun
0 replies
4h3m

It is really nice to see google scholar get some attention. It is essential for a lot of academics and it would be horrible if google "sunset"ed it.

eviks
0 replies
12h47m

You can focus on absorbing the scholarship – the format is simple and clean.

Unless you need to scroll left and right on your phone instead of absorbing

chombier
0 replies
8h31m

So I guess this a way for Google to gather (more/fine-grain) data on paper skimming/research interest?

alecco
0 replies
22h48m

Most important papers can be read with highlighting at https://www.semanticscholar.org/ (PDF Semantic Reader, skimming assist)

abhayhegde
0 replies
23h57m

This looks great! Since they link it all to one's Gmail account, I wonder if they implement saving annotations to these PDFs and have them live on your Drive or elsewhere.

Edit: Also, Chrome now defaults to this extension for rendering any PDFs you load.

RandomWorker
0 replies
5h52m

Alt+<- brings you back to where you were after clicking on a reference. You can skip around pretty easily to see the referenced object and this overlay does seem kinda interesting it’s not something crucial.