Seems so idiotic that you're not allowed to receive maritime traffic in Germany (item #49).
Don't transmit any, if you don't want people to receive it.
Seems so idiotic that you're not allowed to receive maritime traffic in Germany (item #49).
Don't transmit any, if you don't want people to receive it.
I set up one to pull readings from my utility meters. Now I've got the exact figures the power company uses to calculate my bill, and can track it throughout the month, entirely offline
Do you happen to have a write-up of this? I'd be interested in building the same capability, although I doubt we have the same provider.
I'll get one written up post haste
I've been batting around a few blog posts on various home automation projects and will probably sit down and write this one this afternoon
I'll reply with an link when it's up
Thanks! After I asked this I googled around and found on GitHub bemasher/rtlamr, but discovered it doesn't work on my meter's network (FlexNet/Icon/Census). Hopefully someone figures out FlexNet, I'd like to add my meters to my home data collection!
Here's my writeup:
https://pdx.su/blog/2024-03-17-reading-my-electric-meter-wit...
It's based on rtlamr, which might still be a non-starter for you, but it should point you in the right direction.
Most of what I did was just turn-key assembly of existing code, but you might be able to make something work by digging through how rtlamr works
Well, it is truly amazing what you can do with a cheap RTLsdr dongle and some time and energy. I used GNU Radio to build a receiver flowgraph that decodes and displays the signal from a nearby VOR aircraft navigation transmitter. It was cool to drive around it, and see the pointer update in real time.
The sensitivity of these things is on the order of a normal receiver, (0.1 microVolts) which surprised me, knowing the samples are 8 bits.
ADC sensitivity is influenced by quite a few things, some of them pretty unintuitive (e.g., some interference from unwanted signals in the RF passband can be a good thing if it provides a source of dithering that allows weaker signals to cross bit boundaries).
Bit depth is surprisingly far down the list in overall importance. To understand why, look up "FFT processing gain." Consider that sigma-delta converters are 1-bit ADCs, yet the S-D topology is used for many applications that require wide dynamic range.
The interface between analog and digital signals is weird science
SDR is great. I'm using an RTL-SDR dongle together with the rtlamr software to read my gas meter. It provides measurements about every 30 seconds, and my gas company doesn't give any real-time data. Quite handy.
(and I run an adsb receiver, which incidentally provides free access to FlightAware and other services if you share with them.)
What frequency is your gas meter transmitting at?
The 900Mhz ISM band, specifically: (dump from rtlamr output)
07:12:02.921590 decode.go:45: CenterFreq: 912380000
07:12:02.921659 decode.go:46: SampleRate: 2359296
07:12:02.921663 decode.go:47: DataRate: 32768
07:12:02.921666 decode.go:48: ChipLength: 72
07:12:02.921669 decode.go:49: PreambleSymbols: 32
07:12:02.921672 decode.go:50: PreambleLength: 4608
07:12:02.921674 decode.go:51: PacketSymbols: 736
07:12:02.921677 decode.go:52: PacketLength: 105984
07:12:02.921681 decode.go:59: Protocols: scm,scm+,idm,r900
Is there a very low bandwith equivalent of Internet via SDR? Like BBS via radio packet thingy?
In this case what is a good SDR device that does TX? The one in the article does only RX
In this case what is a good SDR device that does TX?
The hackRF is a popular one. If you want to do anything at range, note that you'll need an RF amplifier and an antenna.
Also note that TX is heavily regulated, and you should get licenced before you start blasting.
Is there a very low bandwith equivalent of Internet via SDR?
There's open source software to build your own LTE tower using an SDR. That's not really low bandwidth, though...
Most of the SDRs are receive-only. The ones that do transmit have really low power. The LimeSDR is 10mW and most are in that range. That means need amplifier or two to make it usable.
Packet radio is done with amateur radio. There is both VHF/UHF ones that use normal radios, and 2.4GHz ones which usually use Wifi with dishes. There aren't BBSes because there isn't much point with Internet, and there isn't much point to Internet access when have mobile. Plus, it isn't allowed to provide non-amateur Internet access.
Here’s more stuff to add I did before:
- Scan for drones that are using RC link
- Scan nearby cell operators and their metrics.
- Scan and pentest cellular networks
- Create your own LTE/5G tower.
- Transmitting FM/AM radio
- Communicate with other pilots by tuning on airband
Among others, for this you need a full duplex SDR, so rtl or hackrf won’t do, limeSDR or bladRF would.
For the author: I did have a realtime voice over SDRangel, it allows you to have the sdr in a physical location away from you, if I got some time I will write how to do it.
Have any links or sources for tutorials on getting into those several are intersting
Images still very slow, but:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240316173921/https://blinry.or...
(there are also two snapshots from today (2024-03-17), but yesterday's is the one I didn't give up on waiting to load)
or
Saving with SinglePage, it's around 125 MB (original a bit less, archived copy a bit more).
On hunting weather baloons:
And he was right: Someone had been faster than us! The status was changed. So in the end, I didn’t find the sonde. But something that might be even better – a friend!
Other than all the other fun packed into SDR this story just put me in a good mood today.
ACARS is pretty cool https://www.rtl-sdr.com/rtl-sdr-radio-scanner-tutorial-recei...
Off-topic, web performance: compress your images, use caching headers, and/or serve them via a CDN (ideally one that supports HTTP/2). The current server is not powerful enough to handle the current set of images on this post in a reasonable time.
Item #17 - 865-868 MHz - Could that possibly be LoRa-based communication?
I have a soft spot for SDR. I've only done a bit of it, but the mathematical techniques I learned from it helped kick start my career. While I worked in a different field, having made friends with frequency and phase analysis was hugely powerful.
I just wanted to post that I can't find anything about it being forbidden, but there is actually a link in the post[1]. So basically the situation is:
Mit einer Funkanlage dürfen nur solche Nachrichten abgehört oder in vergleichbarer Weise zur Kenntnis genommen werden, die für den Betreiber der Funkanlage, für Funkamateure im Sinne des § 2 Nummer 1 des Amateurfunkgesetzes, für die Allgemeinheit oder für einen unbestimmten Personenkreis bestimmt sind.
Which in English would read something like this:
With radio equipment you are only allowed to listen to, or take note of in some other way, those messages that are addressed to the operator of the equipment, those messages that are addressed to ham radio operators in general, those messages that are addressed to the general public or for an undefined group of people.
This is of course absolutely unenforceable, untraceable and generally ridicoulus, but it is what it is. Imagine your neighbours having very loud arguments (or very loud 'horizontal discussions') in a clairaudient flat, and then telling you that you cannot listen to it. And being correct legally ;)
[1] https://www.buzer.de/5_TTDSG.htm
:^)
You all may appreciate (a short browse away from TFA): Antragsformular für den Passierschein A38
https://blinry.org/passierschein-a38/
I recall Finland had a rule that you can listen (how else would you hear the next message meant for you on maritime VHF), but you can't repeat things publicly or act on knowledge gained from that. Now, why would that be? Well, it's mostly to minimize sensationalist news reporting of people's accidents, misfortunes and such, whether maritime or over old school police radio (before it was encrypted). Discourage ambulance chasing, that sort of thing. It's just another part of the European attitude toward privacy.
I think a number of countries have this sort of thing. It's more, as you say, not banning the listening but if it can be shown you acted on it then that's the no-no. This was probably more relevant in the times of unencrypted analogue cordless telephones and cellphones. The sensationalist news thing is a good thought too.
There are also FCC regulations in the US that relate to receiving signals under certain circumstances: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/interception-and-divulg...
Reminds me of Germany in WW2 where citizens would get locked up or worse for listening to the BBC to get non-government approved news.