It will surely be the best place to watch the complete Starlink infinity grid perforate the night sky fully in all directions with a perfectly aligned quilt of dots.
Well that's kind of cool to log in and see on HN. This is right next door to where I live in Bend.
A few suggestions in that part of Oregon:
* Close to Bend, you can visit the Pine Mountain Observatory, which is open to the public in the summer. https://pmo.uoregon.edu/visiting/ - at 6000 feet, and far from anything, the views of the night sky even without telescopes are amazing. And the staff there point the scopes at interesting sights and explain what they are.
* Further out, Steens mountain and that area is incredible. It's one of the most remote parts of the US outside of Alaska.
* The Christmas Valley area has a lot of interesting things like Fort Rock, Crack-in-the-Ground, Hole-in-the-Ground and the sand dunes.
I nearly edited my comment below to add a mention of Pine Mountain but selfishly (…yes I’m sorry) wanted to keep it obscure in the hope that it’d be less crowded when I visit it myself periodically.
If I’m going be less selfish, I should probably mention that my next favorite stargazing spots are Star Valley, WY (yes, named for the celestial views); the high mountain plateaus (8,000-10,000ft+ altitude) between Bozeman, MT and Red Lodge, MT; and Central Idaho (Sawtooth or White Cloud Ranges).
I haven’t made it to Steens yet, thanks for the prompt ;)
Happy Stargazing!
The odds that not commenting on some widely known thing will 'keep it a secret' are pretty low. It's been posted here for instance: https://visitbend.com/journal/stargazing-in-bend-oregon/
Plus there's that pesky bike shop that keeps telling everyone about it
If you can't think of name for your new business in Bend, some popular choices are
* High Desert
* Pine Mountain
* Cascade
Feels like home.
I grew up in Bend. I had stayed up all night with grad students running the place… they would point their large telescopes at whatever we wanted to see. I have never seen the Milky Way like that before. You are on a mt in the desert in the middle of nowhere.
If you haven't been, the "Hopservatory" at Worthy Brewing is also really cool to check out.
I've been there a number of times, but not to the observatory thing. Roger's a cool guy and does a lot of good things here in Bend.
Love PMO, get there a day or two early on a moonless weekend and you can usually score one of the campsites.
* The Christmas Valley area has a lot of interesting things like Fort Rock, Crack-in-the-Ground, Hole-in-the-Ground and the sand dunes.
Great list, I'd also add Summer Lake Hot Springs, Freemont Point Lookout, The Lost Forest, Glass Butte, the sunstone mines near Plush, pretty much all of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Crane Hot Springs, might as well throw in Painted Hills, there's so much!
Steens mountain is one of my favorite places I've visited. I found it when I was young by just looking at maps for what seemed like the most remote area I could drive to. Unfortunately it was humid in the summer when I went and the stars weren't as notable as I expected, but the vast emptiness, the epic landscape, and the pronghorn made it worthwhile.
I didn't read all the comments so perhaps this is already answered? I'm curious why this is the largest when you've got massive land areas in the Midwest where very few people live.
As an Oregonian I'm both proud and surprised. Nice work to all involved.
The midwest can definitely get dark, but the "seeing" isn't as good as the oregon outback for a few reasons, 1) elevation, most of eastern oregon is above 1200m, steens mountain is almost 3000m. 2) climate, the midwest can be very humid and hazy, whereas the high desert is very arid and clear, 3) obscuration, eastern oregon is covered in mountain ranges with dry basins in between (hence "basin and range" name), and you only have to go over one range from any kind of town to have its light totally blocked.
This is terrific. Thanks so much.
Can you elaborate on why the elevation matters? I mean, a few thousand feet isn't going to make up the distance between the earth and the star providing the light. ;)
Less atmosphere (the closer to the ground, the denser the air), above the clouds means no difraction, etc. through water.
Dry near zero humidity desert locations also have spectactular night views.
a similar blocking effect happens in Joshua Tree. Very clear skies even though LA is not far away.
The organization that grants these titles, DarkSky International, bases them more on local policy towards light pollution rather than the absolute magnitude of darkness. It's more about whether the local municipality has committed to good lighting ordinances etc.
Indeed. For example, Cranborne Chase Dark Sky Reserve isn't that dark at all. At darkest, it's at about Bortle 4, which means that the Milky Way is visible, but not that impressive, and if you have reasonably youthful eyes you could probably walk around without carrying a light source on an overcast day.
The Midwest is smoothly populated with regular towns and farms. If you look at darkskymap.com, the darkest areas in Midwest are darker but not the darkest. It is only leave Corn Belt that get dark spots. But taxes going to the western deserts to get really dark.
A few years back I camped out on the Alvord Playa in this part of Oregon on a clear, moonless, summer night: it was spectacular!
I've been to quite a few remote dark sky sites, but this place was something else.
Later that night a storm rolled in and I had to get off the Playa due to the strong winds and blowing sand and dust.
I ended up sleeping in my Jeep next to a power substation since I only had a half tank of gas and that wasn't enough to get me to the nearest open gas station. At this time in Oregon even the rural gas stations were full service only so I had to wait until morning when the store at Fields Station opened up and I could gas up and get back home.
It was a memorable trip.
Ahhh I was about to post the same. I had never been in a landscape like that. It’s really mind-bending being out on the playa at night.
Oregon is such a beautiful state.
Most people think of Oregon as the western third from the Cascades to the coast. The eastern two thirds is basin and range desert and equally beautiful in a different way.
There is a camp ground just across the CA border on Goose Lake north of Alturas. Quiet, hookups, small town near by and not much light pollution.
Was Alvord hot springs not open? I know they've been hit or miss over the years. It's pretty primitive, basically a hole dynamited into the ground but the water is amazing and it's usually never busy. They also have a great access road to the playa.
Yeah, it was open but I didn't take the time for a soak. This was during the week in late summer and there was no one around at the time.
I've been looking forward to going out there this summer. The guy who sold me my subie told me about camping out there with the subie and a full spare gas can to get back to a gas station
Yes, I've been out there.
I absolutely agree it's amazing.
curious how or why australia doesn’t feature in this given their extensive unpopulated outback seems relevant.
Sanctuary means protected by law or regulation
and are there laws in the USA?
That's literally what the article is about.
so it is "... Dark Sky Sanctuary in the USA"
Read the article please. The organization behind this is DarkSky International.
But has it been passed by the State congress as a law/regulation? Curious to learn more. The article does not tell more than this snippet
The designation was given by DarkSky International, an organization dedicated to protecting the nighttime environment and preserving dark skies through environmentally responsible outdoor lighting. The project is the work of the Oregon Dark Sky Network, an ad-hoc group of state, local and federal officials, private individuals, business owners and tourism agencies.
If only a nonprofit is claiming it, unless they purchased the land, this isn't legally enforceable without a heavy-handed backing of state government. Such protections have to get cemented by some legislation as the next step.
To fully experience the night sky there is no substitute for getting up to altitude. Most of the atmosphere that really interferes with the view is way down low. Try a moonless night at 8000 to 11000 feet elevation in the eastern Sierra or Yosemite high country to really blow your mind. Boss level is a summit bivy during a new moon meteor shower with a close friend or lover.
Steens Mountain summit is at 9,738′ and is pretty much smack dab in the middle of the darkest region. It's pretty awesome up there.
See my post elsewhere here about Pine Mountain Observatory. It's not quite that high, but they have telescopes and knowledgeable staff to explain what you're looking at.
Unless I am missing the distinction, Oregon outback us being protected as a sanctuary whereas Central Australia, Kazakhstan plains, Hokkaido in Japan etc. are larger but without any guarantees of dark sky protection (?). Please correct me if this understanding is wrong, because I saw some other HNers raising this point.
Also the 70% of Earth that is ocean.
Nice job representing HN's large dolphin and whale audience.
Just curious, how does one get to the middle of the Dark Sky Sanctuary to do some astronomy stuff without driving a car and ruining everyone's astronomy with the headlights?
Doing it before night fall and setting up camp :)
This seems very obvious in retrospect but I literally didn't think of that.
What about the (happy) isles of Oceania? The night skies there are nigh unreal. I've never seen the milky way like that before.
Kiwi here; we try not to advertise it too much because tourism will ruin things
Gotta be careful it doesn't become a force of hobbit.
I would recommend anyone who has the means to, to go to Raja Ampat near Papua, specifically by boat. You're in the middle of open water in Indonesian seas with nothing around you for quite a while, and the amount of stars you can see in the night sky is simply mindblowing. We didn't even need lights turned on to navigate around the ship/islands, it was crazy to witness
My dad said the stars in Raja Ampat were incredible — he was on a dive trip there, and was really out in the middle of nowhere at night on a boat.
My girlfriend and I had a similar experience at Volcanoes National Park in Hawaii. We went to see some of the active lava flows a couple years ago. The park is open 24/7, so one night around midnight we took a walk on the side of the caldera where all you can see is the lava glow (and had no people) and the view of the sky was absolutely spectacular. The Milky Way just smacks you in the face. There’s a reason why they built telescopes on Mouna Kea!
What does the Sanctuary part mean? Are there increased light restrictions, or is it mostly a "put a name on what's already happening"-type thing?
As far as I understand reading the article (and some Wiki pages around it), it seems to be a consortium of people trying to protect the dark night sky. However, this article hasn't made it clear if the 'sanctuary' implies it has got NPS or State's protection in reaching that objective.
The sanctuary is a term which was introduced in the last decade, and with loose subjective definition
Sanctuaries are the most remote (and often darkest) places in the world whose conservation state is most fragile.
In 2015, the IDA introduced the term "Dark Sky Sanctuary" and designated the Elqui Valley of northern Chile as the world's first International Dark Sky Sanctuary.
There are legally protected zones like mentioned in [1], but seem to cover smaller patches of area. But how is a sanctuary protected by legal enforceable measures isn't described in the same spirit. Probably this is something area experts & conservationists know better.
The verbiage is at best a tad confusing IMHO. While places like Central Australia or South NZ is remote, Oregon outback is much more accessible. I'd wager Star valley is on similar league of being pristine and yet more remote being in WY.
I drove across the Simpson Desert in Central Australia. 600km of absolutely nothing. No buildings, no water, just two sandy tire tracks through the desert [1]. The stars were utterly breathtaking, the milky way was so bright it kept me awake at night in my swag (ground tent). I took this photo as a single 8s exposure on just a sony A7iii [2].
Then a few months later I drove the Canning Stock Route, the world's most remote road [3]. In 1,050 miles over 10 days I never saw another vehicle or person on the track. I went into one aboriginal community to buy gas, it was the only "lightbulb" I saw in ten days. I have not really looked it up, but I suspect I was about as far from a lightbulb as you can drive to on planet earth, and the stars every night were utterly incredible. I stayed up way later than I should have night after night trying to take it all in. The Canning is in Western Australia, a state that is approaching twice as big as Alaska.[4]
Dark skies are awesome!
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmJKXDdrvcI
[2] https://www.instagram.com/p/CersLuLBfCz/
Incredible picture!
What about North Korea?
I've been there once. It's hard to move around at night without lights (unless there's a power outage)
Oregon is beautiful. For the Canadian “east is least” crowd there’s the Torrance barrens dark sky park 2 hours north of Toronto with impressive night skies. But, like every attraction around the GTA it gets very crowded and many don’t respect the code of darkness which has lead to same nasty verbal fights.
A plug here for the Oregon Star Party if you want to experience what these dark skies are about. You are at about 5,000 feet in the Ochoco National Forest. It keeps getting pushed earlier in the summer trying to get in before the western North America fire season is in full swing. which is sub-optimal for long nights, but the high desert flowers make up for allot.
Only affiliation is I been going for a couple of decades.
The progress Dark Sky International (and friends) has made is very encouraging.
I have been extremely pessimistic about the dark sky movement making progress at all given how desperately fearful of any darkness the areas around me seem to be (daylight-bright streetlights, storefront signs to rival Vegas, etc.)
Truly dark skies are magical. I'm so glad they'll be around at least a bit longer.
Kielder Forest in the north of England is another spot that’s got Dark Sky status[1].
We stayed in a place with an A frame roof that opens into a V shape so you can lie in bed and watch the stars, which was pretty great[2].
If you’re wondering where this is, here’s a website with map (also PDF version): https://www.southernoregon.org/dark-skies/oregon-outback-dar...
I went hiking in Yosemite/John Muir for a week. The night sky was something I hadn’t experienced before.
I didn’t bring a tent so I slept under the night sky.
I remember waking up and thinking “aha, that’s why it’s called the Milky Way”.
Having been to the boundary waters a few times - I can saw the sky is absolutely amazing at night.
I wouldn’t give up artificial light for a second, but everyone should experience the night sky as our ancestors saw it
The skies there are brilliant! But that also means it is one of the most remote areas of the US. There is very little but high desert and ramshackle cattle ranches in all directions. There is a reason that they named this county “Malheur” (it’s the French word for ‘misfortune’). I drive through a part of this area every couple of months and it’s agonizing, but on the rare occasion that I’m solo and driving it at night I always make time to stop, turn the lights off, and look up.
I think those are called dark-sky preserves? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark-sky_preserve
A 2.5 million-acre swath of southern Oregon has been named the largest Dark Sky Sanctuary in the world.
It's smaller than the inner 70 km radius of the Murchison Quiet Zone which is 15,394 sq km or 3.8 million acres. The Radio Quiet Zone, centred on Inyarrimanha Ilgari Bundara, the CSIRO Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory, comprises:
* A 70km radius Inner Zone; other radiocommunications services within the Inner Zone are taken to be secondary services in relation to radio astronomy; and* An Outer Zone from a 70km to 150km radius; and
* Coordination zones from 70km up to 260km radius (depending on frequency).
https://www.atnf.csiro.au/projects/askap/ARQZWA.html
Given the absence of townsites and infrastructure (aside from unmanned radio telescopes and cosmic microwave detectors, etc) it is pretty "dark" at night (aside from the overwhelming glare of the milky way in the southern hemisphere) - it's just not an "official Dark Sky Sanctuary".
For those interested: a global Light Pollution Map
Related tangent: last summer I got the chance to spend a week at Medawisla -- the Appalachian Mountain Club -managed lodge and cabin and dark sky park in Maine, on the edge of 100-Mile Wilderness. Highest possible recommendation.
I can't imagine what the stars used to look like. It must have been amazing.
I’m lucky enough to live somewhere that gives me regular, clear and dark views of the cosmos. I think it changes you as a human.
When is this expected to happen?
Probably never because every generation of Starlink satellite has been dimmer than the last. Despite being significantly bigger, the v2 minis are only 19% as bright as the original satellites.
Honestly, I can see why astronomers are pissed (they need to use software to delete satellite streaks from long exposures), but they really aren’t particularly visible except at dusk and dawn. They reflect the sun as they rise/set on the horizon, but that’s about it.
I live in an area where we can just barely still see the milky way, but light pollution is encroaching steadily.
The main problem is all the empty office buildings decided they need to leave their lights on 24/7. (Check out a light pollution map of Silicon Valley to see which megacorps are the worst offenders).
LED lights are probably a bigger problem though. They’re free to run, so people leave them on all night. Global light pollution has been growing exponentially in the last decade (faster than the population).
Yeah white lights can't be filtered out whereas sodium vapor lamps' narrow emission spectrum can be easily blocked by special filters.
That's part of it. Part of it is that sodium bulbs are power hungry, so they tend to be provisioned to be dimmer.
Also, many LEDs have reflectors on top that prevent them from shooting light into the sky. These aren't required by building codes from what I've seen. Similarly, I don't think buildings are designed with this in mind.
Office buildings with massive glass atriums / skylights tend to be particularly bad offenders, since indoor lighting is often designed to bounce light off the ceiling.
Why isn’t there some group of people who make it their mission to get into empty office buildings and turn off all the lights?
They're not abandoned; just unused in the middle of the night.
I'd love to watch a satire where eco-terrorists in cat suits attempt to do what you're suggesting though.
I still think that's a test of how much we're willing to tolerate. Since there is no uproar (outside of niche communities like amateur astronomy) I imagine they'll keep pushing the envelope.
Don't be surprised when in a few years we'll have ads plastered across the sky (day and night) via drones or novel projection technologies; it's not like you're gonna see the stars beyond the Starlink junk field anyway...
FWIW, SpaceX has been actively working to make the Starlink satellites darker --- painting them black, adding a sun visor, working with the International Astronomical Union, etc --- so it is a bit disingenuous to suggest that they are "pushing the envelope" in the other direction.
Naturally, I do wish that they were even darker and less obtrusive but oh well.
[1] https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-starlink-internet-sat...
Correction: they tried colouring satellites darker, but that caused heat radiation difficulties, so they've gone back to reflective satellites. Doesn't sound like they tried very hard. Plus the satellites have gotten larger (= still more reflectivity.)
The new satellites are 18% as reflective as the original ones despite being bigger.
Such a huge percentage of people these days live in urban sprawl with so much light pollution they can barely see any stars at all, so it makes sense there isn’t much backlash.
Taking people who’ve spent their entire lives in populated areas into the backcountry and spending a couple of hours with them just staring up at the sky as their eyes adjust and the shapes and colors of the Milky Way appear is kind of a mystical experience.
Hoping for Kessler syndrome :)
If I understand correctly, generally not from Starlink. Its orbit is too low; the satellites and their debris tend to end up pushed into the atmosphere eventually.
a guy can dream
Yeah, it's going to look pretty neat.